Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Processes
- Part II Processes and applications of geomorphology to risk assessment and management
- 17 GIS for the assessment of risk from geomorphological hazards
- 18 Hazard assessment for risk analysis and risk management
- 19 Vulnerability analysis in geomorphic risk assessment
- 20 Geomorphological hazards and global climate change
- 21 Geomorphic hazards and sustainable development
- 22 Geomorphology and disaster prevention
- 23 Geomorphology and the international agenda: concluding remarks
- Index
- References
19 - Vulnerability analysis in geomorphic risk assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Processes
- Part II Processes and applications of geomorphology to risk assessment and management
- 17 GIS for the assessment of risk from geomorphological hazards
- 18 Hazard assessment for risk analysis and risk management
- 19 Vulnerability analysis in geomorphic risk assessment
- 20 Geomorphological hazards and global climate change
- 21 Geomorphic hazards and sustainable development
- 22 Geomorphology and disaster prevention
- 23 Geomorphology and the international agenda: concluding remarks
- Index
- References
Summary
Rationale
The application of vulnerability concepts within the discipline of geomorphology is relatively new. Due to the lack of a theory of its own, the usage of these concepts for geomorphic risk assessments is not without pitfalls. A first step towards avoiding these pitfalls is to recognise and appreciate the theoretical backgrounds and meanings in other fields of research. Consequently, it is fundamental to review these concepts carefully and to link them – where possible – to our own discipline of geomorphology. Indeed, some of the reviewed concepts are distant to geomorphic applications. However, it is important to acknowledge their meanings in order to distinguish different aspects linked to various scientific roots. The major aim of this contribution is to review these scientific roots and their vulnerability concepts, to provide ideas for applying these concepts within geomorphology and to give some examples to illustrate advances, but also pitfalls.
The first part of this chapter outlines the series of key developments in vulnerability research, and then builds the (historical) framework for vulnerability analysis in geomorphic risk reduction strategies. The common approach and methodology of vulnerability analysis from a geomorphic (i.e. natural science) perspective is reviewed and discussed in the context presented.
Different vulnerability approaches towards risk reduction
Research in the fields of natural hazard and risk research has diversified substantially during its relatively short history. A series of key developments can be identified:
the notion of risk changed from expressing the likelihood of geophysical processes occurring, such as a landslide, to a concept that includes the possible overall adverse effects on people and their (built) environment;
[…]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Geomorphological Hazards and Disaster Prevention , pp. 233 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, and (2007). Vulnerability assessment in a volcanic risk evaluation in Central Mexico through a multi-criteria-GIS approach. Natural Hazards, 40(2), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Vulnerability to landslides. In , and (eds.), Landslide Hazard and Risk. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 175–198.Google Scholar
(2003). Vulnerability reduction and the community-based approach. In (ed.), Natural Disasters and Development in a Globalizing World. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 170–184.Google Scholar
and (2006). Purpose-driven public sector reform: the need for within-government capacity build for the management of slope stability in communities in the Caribbean. Environmental Management, 37(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Risk Management Guidelines, AS/NZS 4360:2004. Sydney, Wellington: Standards Australia International Ltd. and Standards New Zealand.Google Scholar
(2004). The historical geography of disaster: ‘vulnerability’ and ‘local knowledge’. In , and (eds.), Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People. London: Earthscan, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
(2006). Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: theoretical bases and requirements. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
, , and (1994a). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, and (1994). Climate-change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 4(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Community-based disaster risk index: pilot implementation in Indonesia. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University, pp. 271–289.Google Scholar
, and (2005). Erosion hazard vulnerability of U.S. coastal counties. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(5), 932–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995). Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Development, 23(9), 1615–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Methodological and Practical Considerations for Constructing Socioeconomic Indicators to Evaluate Disaster Risk. IDB/IDEA Program of indicators for disaster risk management, National University of Colombia: Manizales.Google Scholar
and (1974). Ecological dimensions of environmental hazards. In II (ed.), Human Ecology. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 253–283.Google Scholar
, and (1968). The Human Ecology of Extreme Geophysical Events, Toronto: Department of Geography, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
(2004). Curriculum adaptation and disaster prevention in Colombia. In , and (eds.), International Perspectives on Natural Disasters: Occurrence, Mitigation, and Consequences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 397–408.Google Scholar
(2005). Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management. Program for Latin America and the Caribbean, Summary Report. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), Sustainable Development Department.Google Scholar
(2006). A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press: pp. 189–209.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Paper presented at the Department for International Development's Natural Resources Advisers Conference: London.
(1983). The Sahelian drought: social sciences and the political economy of underdevelopment. In (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc., pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2005). Quantitative assessment of the residual risk in a rockfall protected area. Landslides, 2, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Landslide hazard and risk: issues, concepts, and approach. In , and (eds.), Landslide Hazard and Risk. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
(1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering Geology, 64(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). An Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Centre, Stanford University, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
and (2001). Comparing the hurricane disaster risk of U.S. coastal counties. Natural Hazards Review, 2(3), 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998). Evaluation and Use of the Earthquake Disaster Risk Index. Understanding Urban Seismic Risk Around the World Project, Stanford University, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
(2004). Inuit adaptive strategies and environmental conditions. Nunavut Research Institute conference, 26 July 2004.
and (2005). Damage potential and losses resulting from snow avalanches in settlements of the canton of Grisons, Switzerland. Natural Hazards, 34(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2007). Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Natural Hazard and Earth System Science, 7, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Indices of Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: A Comparative Evaluation. University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
(2003). Vulnerability assessment in landslide risk analysis. Die Erde, 134(2), 121–138.Google Scholar
(2004). From vulnerability to empowerment. In , and (eds.), Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People. London: Earthscan, pp. 114–127.Google Scholar
(1983). The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
(1997). Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.Google Scholar
and (1971). The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events. Research Publication 6. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Reconsidering the risk assessment concept: standardizing the impact description as a building block for vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazard and Earth System Science, 5, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2002). Modellierung der Vulnerability von Schadensobjekten gegenueber Naturgefahrenprozessen. Zürich: ETHZ.Google Scholar
, and (2005). Evolution of natural risk: research framework and perspectives. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). Quantitative assessment for slopes and landslides: The state of the art. In and (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Landslide Risk Assessment, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 19–21 February 1997. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2007). Conceptual challenges. In , and (eds.), Sustainability Indicators. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
(1970). Natural Hazard in Human Ecological Perspective: Hypotheses and Models. Working Paper 14. Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
(1985). The interaction of climate and society. In , and (eds.), Climate Impact Assessment. New York: Wiley, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
, and (1996). Vulnerability assessment of elements exposed to mass-movement: working toward a better risk perception. In (ed.), Landslides. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema, pp. 263–270.Google Scholar
and (2003). A method for assessing regional debris flow risk: an application in Zhaotong of Yunnan province (SW China). Geomorphology, 52(3–4), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Empirical assessment of debris flow risk on a regional scale in Yunnan province, southwestern China. Environmental Management, 30(2), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2007). Vulnerability assessment of rainfall-induced debris flows in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, 43(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2003). Regional landslide risk to the Cairns community. Natural Hazards, 30, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005). Quantitative landslide risk assessment of Cairns, Australia. In , and (eds.), Landslide Hazard and Risk. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 621–642.Google Scholar
(1990). Human dimensions of environmental hazards. In (ed.), Nothing to Fear. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, pp. 131–175.Google Scholar
and (2007). Challenges to sustainability indicators. In , and (eds.), Sustainability Indicators. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
(2005). Von ‘Naturkatastrophen’ zu ‘Complex Emergencies’: Die Entwicklung integrativer Forschungsansaetze im Dialog mit der Praxis. In and (eds.), Moeglichkeiten und Grenzen integrativer Forschungsansaetze in Physischer Geographie und Humangeographie. Forum IFL, Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut fuer Laenderkunde e.V., pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
, and (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260, 566–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003). Paradigms of risk. In (ed.), Natural Disasters and Development in a Globalizing World. London: Routledge, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
(2006). A human security index. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 246–267.Google Scholar
(1997). Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters, 21(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Urban vulnerability to disasters in developing countries: managing risks. In , and (eds.), Building Safer Cities; The Future of Disaster Risk. Disaster Risk Management Series. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp. 211–232.Google Scholar
and (2006). User needs: why we need indicators. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University, pp. 103–114.Google Scholar
and (2000). Landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment. In , and (eds.), Landslides in Research, Theory and Practice. Cardiff: Thomas Telford, pp.1257–1262.Google Scholar
, , , and (2005). Human impact on geomorphic processes and hazards in mountain areas in northern Spain. Geomorphology, 66(1–4), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975). African Environment: Problems and Perspectives. London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
and (2003). From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduction. In , and (eds.), Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climate Change, 45, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004). Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
and (2000). Urban landslide hazards: incidence and causative factors in Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Applied Geography, 20(2), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. (2007). Frameworks for environmental assessment and indicators at the EEA. In , and (eds.), Sustainability Indicators. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, pp. 127–144.Google Scholar
(1981). Vulnerability, Resilience and the Collapse of Society: A Review of Models and Possible Climatic Applications. Environmental Monograph 1. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
and (1997). Natural Hazards: Explanation and Integration. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development. A Global Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
(1982). Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis. Geneva: United Nations Disaster Relief Organisation.Google Scholar
(1972). The Role of Science and Technology in Reducing the Impacts of Natural Disasters on Mankind. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
, , and (2002). Multi-hazard risk assessment using GIS in urban areas: a case study for the city of Turrialba, Costa Rica. In Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Best Practices in Disaster Mitigation, Bali, pp. 120–136.Google Scholar
, and (2005). Geo-information for urban risk assessment in developing countries: the SLARIM project. In , and (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Geo-information for Disaster Management, 21–23 March 2005, Delft, the Netherlands. Berlin: Springer, pp. 379–392.Google Scholar
(2006). Vulnerability assessment: the sectoral approach. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 300–315.Google Scholar
and (2008). Development of a multihazard and multirisk concept. In and (eds.), 11th Congress INTERPRAEVENT, Dornbirn, Vorarlberg, Austria. International Research Society INTERPRAEVENT, pp. 422–423.Google Scholar
(1983). Coping with frosts, governments and disaster experts: some reflections based on New Guinea experience and a perusal of the relevant literature. In (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc., pp. 33–43.Google Scholar
(1983). Drought in the US Great Plains: shifting social consequences? In (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity From the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc., pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
and (1993). The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography, 17(1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1945). Human Adjustments to Floods. Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Geography Research Paper 29.Google Scholar
(1973). Natural hazards research. In (ed.), Directions in Geography. London: Methuen & Co Ltd., pp. 193–216.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1974). Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1975). Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Environmental Studies Series.Google Scholar
, , et al. (1958). Changes in Urban Occupance of Flood Plains in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Department of Geography Research Paper 57.Google Scholar
(1993). Disaster vulnerability: scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal, 30(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Self-assessment of coping capacity: participatory, proactive and qualitative engagement of communities in their own risk management. In (ed.), Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 316–328.Google Scholar
, , and (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by