Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T09:56:36.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Four conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Paul Griffiths
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Karola Stotz
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

The identities of the gene

The gene today has several identities which have accumulated as the molecular biosciences have developed and diversified. The gene is still an instrumental unit for genetic analysis – the Mendelian allele. The gene is also a material unit of heredity, a reasonably clearly defined structural unit used in annotating genomes – the nominal gene. The gene is also a unit of Crick information, a volume in the ‘library of specificities’ (Nanney 1958). But the relationship between this identity of the gene and its identity as a structural unit has become increasingly vexed in recent years. So the gene as a unit of Crick information has taken on a separate identity – the postgenomic gene. The gene also has less prominent identities: we saw that some ‘genes’ are no more than hypothesised anchors for the parameters of developmental models – ‘abstract developmental genes’. Each of these identities plays a productive role in some forms of biological research. Scientists are adept at thinking about genes in whichever way best suits their work, and at switching between these different representations of the gene as the nature of their work changes. The concept of the gene is therefore best thought of as a set of contextually activated representations.

In Chapter 2 we described how the gene of classical, Mendelian genetics had two identities, as an instrumental unit for genetic analysis and as a hypothetical material unit of heredity. In Chapter 3 we described the elucidation of the basic structure and function of DNA. This represented the successful conclusion of the search for the gene as a material unit of heredity. However, the causal role of the gene as it had been envisaged in classical genetics was very substantially revised in order to fit what had been discovered about the material basis of heredity. Moreover, the original role of the Mendelian gene continues to define the gene whenever biological research uses genetic analysis. As we showed in Chapter 3, it can be necessary to think of genes as both Mendelian alleles and molecular genes, even when those two identities do not converge on the same pieces of DNA.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genetics and Philosophy
An Introduction
, pp. 221 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Four conclusions
  • Paul Griffiths, University of Sydney, Karola Stotz, University of Sydney
  • Book: Genetics and Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511744082.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Four conclusions
  • Paul Griffiths, University of Sydney, Karola Stotz, University of Sydney
  • Book: Genetics and Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511744082.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Four conclusions
  • Paul Griffiths, University of Sydney, Karola Stotz, University of Sydney
  • Book: Genetics and Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 April 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511744082.009
Available formats
×