Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T19:43:27.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inbreeding and the incidence of recessive disorders in the populations of Karnataka, South India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

A. H. Bittles
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Human Biology, King's College, London, U.K.
A. Radha Rama Devi
Affiliation:
Health Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
N. Appaji Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

While it is generally accepted that inbreeding in humans can lead to increased incidences of genetically-determined abnormalities, due to the expression of rare, deleterious, recessive genes in the homozygous state, consanguineous marriages are common in many communities, for example, the four southern states of India, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu (Kumar et al, 1967; Rao & Inbaraj, 1977a; Rami Reddy & Chandrasekhar Reddy, 1979; Radha Rama Devi et al, 1981). Although infectious diseases and nutritional disorders are still common in India, their incidences have declined markedly during the last twenty years. Therefore it seems probable that among the populations of South India (Fig. 1), which in the 1981 Census totalled over 164 millions, a transition from an almost exclusively environmental to an increasingly genetic pattern of disease is currently under way, similar to that earlier observed in countries such as Great Britain (Roberts et al, 1970). However the emerging situation in the South Indian states almost certainly will be of greater complexity than in Western countries because of the long inbreeding tradition. Indeed, it has been suggested that the high levels of inbreeding practised by the Dravidian peoples for at least 2,000 years (Centerwall et al, 1969) would have led to the gradual elimination of deleterious lethals and sublethals from the gene pool by segregation (Sanghvi, 1966). This theory has been questioned (Chakraborty & Chakravarti, 1977; Bittles, 1980) but supporting evidence was claimed in large-scale prospective and retrospective studies conducted in Tamil Nadu (Rao & Inbaraj, 1977b, 1979a,b, 1980).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×