Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:13:26.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation: Which rules for GATS in times of crisis?

from PART 6 - Unfinished business: Safeguard and subsidy disciplines for services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

Marion Panizzon
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Nicole Pohl
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Pierre Sauvé
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

With the suspension of the multilateral trade negotiations in July 2006, discussions about the scope of future rules in the WTO framework may seem futile. Although formally the suspension concerns only the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) and WTO Members can always revive the negotiations, it is unlikely that new rules will be agreed upon in the near future. Instead of reducing scholarly interest in the scope and content of future rules, the current situation should stimulate reflection and discussion. In fact, without the straitjacket of ongoing negotiations and the necessity of commenting on existing negotiation proposals, academics should seize the opportunity to reconsider some aspects of the conventional wisdom of the WTO system and engage in a critical and radically different discourse about the future of the trading system.

This chapter aims to contribute to such an exercise with regard to a limited area of WTO law. It concerns the content and scope of future General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) rules, in particular whether and to what extent GATS should incorporate provisions on recognition, standardisation or harmonisation. Recognition, standardisation and harmonisation are advanced instruments of trade liberalisation which can already be found in some WTO agreements, notably the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). The aim of these instruments is to reduce the trade-distorting effect of diverging domestic regulations in the territories of different WTO Members.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacchus, James, ‘The Bicycle Club: Affirming the American Interest in the Future of the World Trade Organization’, Address to the Washington International Trade Association, 12 November 2002, www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/bacchusbicycle.pdf.
Beviglia Zampetti, Amerigo, ‘Market Access through Mutual Regulation: The Promise and Limits of General Agreement on Trade in Services Article VII’, in: Sauvé, Pierre and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000 – New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization, 2000, p. 283.Google Scholar
Bronckers, Marco and Larouche, Pierre, ‘Telecommunications Services and the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade 31 (1997), p. 5.Google Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘The World Trade Organization, Democracy and Development: A View From the South’, Journal of World Trade 40 (2006), p. 5.Google Scholar
Desmedt, Axel, ‘Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law’, Journal of International Economic Law 4(2001), p. 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Heinz, ‘Domestic Policy Foundation and Domestic Policy Functions of International Trade Rules’, Aussenwirtschaft 41 (1986), p. 171.Google Scholar
Jackson, John, ‘The World Trade Organization “constitution” and proposed reforms: seven “mantras” revisited’, JIEL 4 (2001), p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Perspectives of World Trade Organization Law’, Journal of World Trade 35(1) (2001), p. 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services – The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (General Agreement on Trade in Services) on National Regulatory Autonomy (London: Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar
Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel, ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade 36 (2002), p. 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Jan and Türk, Elisabeth, ‘Necessity Revisited – Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea – Beef, EC –Asbestos and EC – Sardines’, Journal of World Trade 37 (2003), p. 199.Google Scholar
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso, Mutual Recognition of Regulatory Regimes: Some Lessons and Prospects, Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/1997, available at http://jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/97/97–07.html.
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso ‘Non-Discriminatory Mutual Recognition: An Oxymoron in the New World Trade Organization Lexicon?’, in Cottier, Thomas and Mavroidis, Petros (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 267–301.Google Scholar
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso and Trachtman, Joel, ‘From Policed Regulation to Managed Recognition in General Agreement on Trade in Services’, in Sauvé, Pierre and Stern, Robert M. (eds.), General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization (Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000), p. 242.Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, (eds.), The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004).
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation from Market Access in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and General Agreement on Trade in Services’, World Trade Review (2005), pp. 131–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law (University of Fribourg Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Polaski, Sandra, Winners and Losers – Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment, 2006).Google Scholar
Steiner, Josephine, Woods, Lorna, and Stigg-Flessner, Christian, EU Law, 9th edn (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Schorkopf, Frank, World Trade Organization-World Economic Order, World Trade Law (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O., ‘Comparative Advantage and the Normative Economics of International Trade Policy’, Journal of International Economic Law 1 (1998), p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, Joel, ‘Lessons for the General Agreement on Trade in Services from Existing World Trade Organization Rules on Domestic Regulation’, in Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington: World Bank, 2003) p. 57.Google Scholar
Trolliet, Claude and Hegarty, John, ‘Regulatory Reform and Trade Liberalisation in Accountancy Services’, in: Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalization (Washington: World Bank, 2003), p. 147.Google Scholar
Tumlir, Jan, ‘International Economic Order and Democratic Constitutionalism’, ORDO 34 (1983), p. 71.Google Scholar
Bossche, Peter, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×