International, ASTM D4060 (2010). Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by the Taber Abraser.Google Scholar

Taber Rotary Abraser 5135/5155 (2008), edited by Taber Industries.Google Scholar

Zhou, Q., Wang, K., and Loo, L. S. (2009). Abrasion studies of nylon 6/montmorillonite nanocomposites using scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 113(5), 3286–3293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, S.-P., Hwang, S.-S., Yeh, J.-M., and Hung, C.-C. (2011). Mechanical properties of polyamide-6/montmorillonite nanocomposites – prepared by the twin-screw extruder mixed technique. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 38(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srinath, G. and Gnanamoorthy, R. (2006). Two-body abrasive wear characteristics of nylon clay nanocomposites: Effect of grit size, load, and sliding velocity. Materials Science and Engineering: Part A 435–436, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mu, B., Wang, Q., Wang, T., Wang, H., and Jian, L. (2008). The Friction and Wear Properties of Clay Filled PA66. Polymer Engineering & Science 48 (1), 203–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International, ASTM (2009). The Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Scratch Resistance of Polymeric Coatings and Plastics Using an Instrumented Scratch Machine.Google Scholar

Carrión, F. J., Espejo, C., Sanes, J., and Bermúdez, M. D. (2010). Single-walled carbon nanotubes modified by ionic liquid as antiwear additives of thermoplastics. Composites Science and Technology 70(15), 2160–2167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermúdez, M. D., Carrión, F. J., Espejo, C., Martínez-López, E., and Sanes, J. (2011). Abrasive wear under multiscratching of polystyrene + single-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites: Effect of sliding direction and modification by ionic liquid. Applied Surface Science 257(21), 9073–9081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giraldo, L. F., Brostow, W., Devaux, E., Lopez, B. L., and Perez, L. D. (2008). Scratch and wear resistance of polyamide 6 reinforced with multiwall carbon nanotubes. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 8(6), 3176–3183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kandanur, S. S., Rafiee, M. A., Yavari, F., Schrameyer, M., Yu, Z.-Z., et al. (2012). Suppression of wear in graphene polymer composites. Carbon 50(9), 3178–3183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulo Davim, J. (Ed.) (2013). Tribology of Nanocomposites. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, M., Biswas, S., and Bhowmick, A. K. (2011). Permeation characteristics and modeling of barrier properties of multifunctional rubber nanocomposites. Polymer 52, 1562–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, Q., Zhu, W., Zhang, C., Liang, Z., and Wang, B. (2010). Study of fire retardant behavior of carbon nanotube membranes and carbon nanofiber paper in carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Carbon 48, 1799–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czichos, H., Saito, T., and Smith, L. E. (Eds.) (2006). Mechanical Properties. In Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods. New York: Springer, pp. 283–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karkhanechi, H., Kazemian, H., Nazockdast, H., Mozdianfard, M. R., and Bidoki, S. M. (2012). Fabrication of homogenous polymer-zeolite nanocomposites as mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Chemical Engineering & Technology 35(5), 885–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinto, A. M., Cabral, J., Pacheco Tanaka, D. A., Mendes, A. M., and Magalhaes, F. D. (2013). Effect of incorporation of graphene oxide and graphene nanoplatelets on mechanical and gas permeability properties of poly(lactic acid) films. Polymer International 62, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, J. H., An, Y. K., and Sur, G. S. (2003). Poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites with various organoclays. I. Thermomechanical properties, morphology, and gas permeability. Journal of Polymer Science Part B 41(1), 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poreba, R., Spirkova, M., Brozova, L., Lazic, N., Pavlicevic, J., and Strachota, A. (2013). Aliphatic polycarbonate-based polyurethane elastomers and nanocomposites. II. Mechanical, thermal, and gas transport properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 127(1), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Rooyen, L. J., Karger-Kocsis, J., Vorster, O. C., and Kock, L. D. (2013). Helium gas permeability reduction of epoxy composite coatings by incorporation of glass flakes. Journal of Membrane Science 430, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prusty, G. and Swain, S. K. (2013). Dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in polyacrylonitrile-co-starch copolymer matrix for enhancement of electrical, thermal, and gas barrier properties. Polymer Composites 34(3), 330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castarlenas, S., Gorgojo, P., Casado-Coterillo, C., Masheshwari, S., Tsapatsis, M., et al. (2013). Melt compounding of swollen titanosilicate JDF-L1 with polysulfone to obtain mixed matrix membranes for H₂/CH₄ separation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52(5), 1901–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valix, M., Mineyama, H., Chen, C., Cheung, W. H., Shi, J., and Bustamante, H. (2011). Effect of film thickness and filler properties on sulphuric acid permeation in various commercially available epoxy mortar coatings. Water Science & Technology 64(9), 1864–1869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kong, X. and Ohadi, M. (2010). Applications of Micro and Nano Technologies in the Oil and Gas Industry – Overview of the Recent Progress. Paper presented at Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 1-4 November. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-138241-MS. doi: 10.2118/138241-MS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singh, S. K., Ahmed, R. M., and Growcock, F. (2010). Vital Role of Nanopolymers in Drilling and Stimulations Fluid Applications. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 20-22 Sept. ISBN: 978-1-55563-300-4.Google Scholar

Pourafshary, P., Azimipour, S. S., Motamedi, P., Samet, M., Taheri, S. A., et al. (2009). Priority Assessment of Investment in Development of Nanotechnology in Upstream Petroleum Industry. Paper presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 9-11 May. SPIE No. 126101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nabhani, N., Emami, M., and Taghavi Moghadam, A. B. (2011). Application of nanotechnology and nanomaterials in oil and gas industry. AIP Conference Proceedings 1415(1), 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cai, J., Chenevert, M. E., Sharma, M. M., and Friedheim, J. E. (2012). Decreasing water invasion into atoka shale using nanomodified silica nanoparticles. Society of Petroleum Engineers 27(1), 103–112.Google Scholar

Savino, V., Fallatah, G. M., and Mehdi, M. S. (2010). Applications of nanocomposite materials in the oil and gas industry. Advanced Materials Research 83–86, 771–776.Google Scholar

Clark, M. (2009). Minimizing Environmental Footprint by Utilizing Prevention Technology. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, 26-29 Sept. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 90242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, M., Noguchi, T., Ueki, H., Takeuchi, K., and Endo, M. (2011). Carbon nanotube enables quantum leap in oil recovery. Materials Research Bulletin 46(9), 1480–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endo, M., Noguchi, T., Ito, M., Takeuchi, K., Hayashi, T., et al. (2008). Extreme-performance rubber nanocomposites for probing and excavating deep oil resources using multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials 18(21), 3403–3409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, Z., Agrawal, G., and Salinas, B. J. (2011). Smart Nanostructured Materials Deliver High Reliability Completion Tools for Gas Shale Fracturing. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, 30 Oct-2 Nov. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 146586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

One colossal discovery: Materials science breakthrough creates nanostructured material of immense proportions. (2011). Connexus 2(2), 8–13.Google Scholar

Dasari, A., Lim, S., Yu, Z., and Mai, Y. (2007). Toughening, thermal stability, flame retardancy, and scratch–wear resistance of polymer–clay nanocomposites. Australian Journal of Chemistry 60(7), 496–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dasari, A., Yu, Z.-Z., and Mai, Y.-W. (2009). Fundamental aspects and recent progress on wear/scratch damage in polymer nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 63(2), 31–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koo, J. H. (2006). Polymer Nanocomposites: Processing, Characterization, and Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Sinha, S. K., Song, T., Wan, X., and Tong, Y. (2009). Scratch and normal hardness characteristics of polyamide 6/nano-clay composite. Wear 266(7–8), 814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verdejo, R., Mar Bernal, M., Romasanta, L. J., and Lopez-Manchado, M. A. (2011). Graphene filled polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Chemistry 21(10), 3301–3310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar