Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:49:53.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

By
Eva Ogiermann  and
Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Edited by
Eva Ogiermann  and
Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Eva Ogiermann
Affiliation:
King's College London
Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Get access

Summary

This volume is dedicated to Maria Sifianou, whose diverse contributions to the study of politeness over the last 30 years have had a significant impact on the development of the field. Her numerous publications have not only helped refine and deepen our understanding of a wide range of politeness phenomena, but have also provided alternative interpretations, enabling us to view politeness through a cultural lens. The volume reflects the remarkable breadth of her scholarship by providing a coherent treatment of politeness as well as a broad multilinguistic perspective, with its 12 chapters examining a wide range of languages and language varieties.

Keywords

Maria Sifianou
Type
Chapter
Information
From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives
 , pp. 1 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arundale, R. B. (2006). Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and politeness: new (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35(10), 1453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Harris, S. (2006). Politeness at work: issues and challenges. Journal of Politeness Research 2(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bella, S. (2011). Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6), 1718–40.Google Scholar
Bella, S. and Sifianou, M. (2012). Greek student e-mail requests to faculty members. In Ruiz de Zarobe, L. and Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., eds, Speech Acts and Politeness across Languages and Cultures. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 89–113.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11(2), 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds, Politeness in Language: Studies in History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 255–80.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S, House, J., and Kasper, G., eds (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: a case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 73, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987[1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a socio-cultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashman, H. R. (2006). Impoliteness in children’s interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2), 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. and Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: the case of apology. Language Learning 31(1), 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. and Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly 27(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3), 349–67.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 35–72.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009). The metalanguage of impoliteness: Using Sketch Engine to explore the Oxford English Corpus. In Baker, P., ed., Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum, pp. 64–86.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., and Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11), 1545–79.Google Scholar
Drew, P. and Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds (2014). Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dynel, M. and Chovanec, J., eds (2015) Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M. and Bodman, J. (1993). Expressing gratitude in American English. In Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., eds, Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. and Liu, C. (2013). Learning pragmatics through computer-mediated communication in Taiwan. Iranian Journal of Society, Culture and Language 1(1), 52–73.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2(1), 46–94.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2013). Face, identity, and im/politeness: looking backwards, moving forward – from Goffman to Practice Theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N., and Bou-Franch, P. (2010). A genre approach to impoliteness in a Spanish television talk show: evidence from corpus-based analysis, questionnaires and focus groups. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4), 689–723.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18(3), 213–31.Google Scholar
Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: a comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24(1), 90–121.Google Scholar
Graham, S. L. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4), 742–59.Google Scholar
Grainger,  K. (2011). ‘First order’ and ‘second order’ politeness: institutional and intercultural contexts. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group, eds, Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 167–88.Google Scholar
Grainger, K. and Mills, S. (2016). Directness and Indirectness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J., eds, Syntax and Semantics. Vol, 3. Speech Acts. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2), 237–57.Google Scholar
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: from user discussions to theoretical concepts. Journal of Politeness Research 6(2), 215–42.Google Scholar
Harris, S. (2001). Being politically impolite: extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society 12(4), 451–72.Google Scholar
Hartford, B. S. and Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Experimental and observational data in the study of interlanguage pragmatics. In Bouton, L. F. and Kachru, Y., eds, Pragmatics and Language Learning 3. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2007). The discursive challenge to politeness research: an interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2013). Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Pragmática Sociocultural 1(1), 46–73.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015). Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,Google Scholar
Haugh,  M. and Bargiela-Chiappini,  F. (2010). Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2073–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. and Watanabe, Y. (2009). Analysing Japanese ‘face-in-interaction’: insights from intercultural business meetings. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Haugh, M., eds, Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 78–95.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. and Watanabe, Y. (2017). (Im)politeness theory. In Vine, B., ed., Handbook of Language in the Workplace. Routledge: London, pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., Marra, M., and Vine, B. (2011). Leadership, Discourse, and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2008). Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2), 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3), 223–48.Google Scholar
Ide, S., Hill, B., Carnes, Y. M., Ogino, T., and Kawasaki, A. (1992). The concept of politeness: an empirical study of American English and Japanese. In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds, Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 255–80.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., eds (1993). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M. (1997). Varieties of rudeness: types and functions of impolite utterances. Functions of Language 4(2), 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Corum, C., Smith-Stark, T. C., and Weiser, A., eds, Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 1973. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292–305.Google Scholar
Langlotz, A. and Locher, M. A. (2012). Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 44(12), 1591–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Wong, S. M. (1999). Politeness and Face in Chinese Culture. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2006). Polite behaviour within relational work: the discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25(3), 249–67.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2008). Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In Antos, G. and Ventola, E., ed., Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 509–40.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., ed. (2010). Special issue: politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1).Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behavior. In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. A., eds, Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2008). Real disorder in the court: an investigation of conflict talk in US television courtroom shows. Media, Culture and Society 30(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N. and Bou-Franch, P. (2013). A cross-cultural investigation of email communication in Peninsular Spanish and British English: the role of (in)formality and (in)directness. Pragmatics and Society 4(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, C. and García-Gómez, A. (2013). ‘You look terrific!’ Social evaluation and relationships in online compliments. Discourse Studies 16(6), 735–60.Google Scholar
Mao, L. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5), 451–86.Google Scholar
Márquez Reiter, R. and Bou-Franch, P. (2017). (Im)politeness in service encounters. In Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 661–87.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2009). Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5), 1047–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullany, L. J. (2009). Applying politeness research to health care communication. Journal of Politeness Research 5(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Nwoye, O. G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics 18(4), 309–28.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E. (2009). On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E. and Suszczyńska, M. (2011). On im/politeness behind the Iron Curtain. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Politeness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 194–215.Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Aria. (2005). Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2), 193–217.Google Scholar
Placencia, M. E. and Lower, A. (2013). Your kids are so stinkin’ cute! :-): complimenting behavior on Facebook among family and friends. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(4), 617–46.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (2005). Using participants’ video-stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In te Molder, H. and Potter, J., eds, Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–113.Google Scholar
Ruhi, S. (2009). Evoking face in self and other-presentation in Turkish. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Haugh, M., eds, Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox, pp. 155–74.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L., eds, Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. Speech Acts. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). Classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992a). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992b). Cross-cultural communication: compliments and offers. Parousia 8, 49–69.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1993). Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua 12(1), 69–79.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2015). Conceptualizing politeness in Greek: evidence from Twitter corpora. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 25–30.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2011). On the concept of face and politeness. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Politeness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–58.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2013). On culture, face and politeness. Again. Paper presented at the 1st Sosnowiec Symposium on Communication across Cultures: Face and Interaction, 26–27 April 2013, Institute of English, University of Silesia, Poland.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. and Bella, S. (2019). Twitter, politeness, self-presentation. In Blitvich, P. Garcés-Conejos and Bou-Franch, P., eds, Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 341–65.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. and Tzanne, A. (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4), 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, V. (2015). ‘There’s definitely gonna be some serious carnage in this house’ or how to be genuinely impolite in Big Brother UK. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(2), 317–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005). (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1), 95–120.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4), 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2015). Beyond sarcasm: the metalanguage and structures of mock politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 87, 127–41.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2005). Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2), 237–62.Google Scholar
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Bom, I. and Mills, S. (2015). A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 179–206.Google Scholar
Vásquez, C. (2011). Complaints online: the case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6), 1707–17.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2005). Linguistic politeness research: quo vadis? In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds, Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd Edn, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. xi–xlvii.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K. (1992). Introduction. In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds, Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zinken, J. and Ogiermann, E. (2013). Responsibility and action: invariants and diversity of requests for objects in British English and Polish interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(3), 256–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×