Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T06:19:57.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Public openness of deliberation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Jürg Steiner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Normative controversies in the literature

Jürgen Habermas has insisted throughout his career that good deliberation should be public and transparent. He still very much emphasizes this point in a recent publication where he demands “publicity and transparency for the deliberative process.” He justifies the logic of publicity in claiming that this is a necessary condition to “generate legitimacy.” This Habermasian view was for a long time shared by virtually all deliberative theorists, and many of them still stress the importance of publicity and transparency as a key element of the deliberative model. Claudia Landwehr, for example, argues:

The strongest incentive for actors to name generalizable reasons and engage in argumentation of them exists where interaction is public … publicity forces actors to give the best possible justification for their premises and decisions … Accessibility could be guaranteed if doors remain ajar, for example if a committee meeting that is not organized for a large audience is nonetheless open to interested members of the public, journalists or researchers.

Although Landwehr adheres to the logic of publicity, she acknowledges that in practice publicity may be relative. Her point is that even if doors are not fully open but only ajar, the logic of publicity should still apply in the sense that reasons should be “generalizable and transferable.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy
Empirical Research and Normative Implications
, pp. 125 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Habermas, JürgenPolitical Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research,Communication Theory 16 2006 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landwehr, ClaudiaDiscourse and Coordination: Modes of Interaction and Their Roles in Political Decision-Making,Journal of Political Philosophy 18 2010 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, SimoneMeasuring Publicity’s Effect: Reconciling Empirical Research and Normative Theory,Acta Politica 40 2005 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E.Sequencing Deliberative Moments,Acta Politica 40 2005 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S.Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building,Comparative Political Studies 42 2009 1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, JürgBächtiger, AndréSpörndli, MarkusSteenbergen, Marco R.Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary DiscourseCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, EllenStasavage, DavidTwo Effects of Transparency on the Quality of Deliberation,Swiss Political Science Review 12 2006 123Google Scholar
MacCoun, Robert J.Psychological Constraints on Transparency in Legal and Government Decision Making,Swiss Political Science Review 12 2006 112Google Scholar
Naurin, DanielDeliberation Behind Closed DoorsColchesterECPR Press 2007Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E.Sequencing Deliberative Moments,Acta Politica 40 2005 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, JürgDorff, Robert H.A Theory of Political Decision Making: Intraparty Decision Making in SwitzerlandChapel HillUniversity of North Carolina Press 1980Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus M.L.Steiner, JürgEuropean DemocraciesNew YorkLongman 2010Google Scholar
Kriesi, HanspeterArgument-Based Strategies in Direct-Democratic Votes: The Swiss Experience,Acta Politica 40 2005 299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintomer, YvesRandom Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy,Constellations 17 2010 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Mark E.Pearse, HilaryDesigning Deliberative Democracy: The British Colombian Citizens’ AssemblyCambridge University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Public openness of deliberation
  • Jürg Steiner, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057486.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Public openness of deliberation
  • Jürg Steiner, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057486.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Public openness of deliberation
  • Jürg Steiner, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Book: The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057486.006
Available formats
×