Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:00:19.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Translations from Human Development to Public Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2010

By
Neal Halfon ,
Emily S. Barrett  and
Alice Kuo
Edited by
Carol M. Worthman ,
Paul M. Plotsky ,
Daniel S. Schechter  and
Constance A. Cummings
Carol M. Worthman
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Paul M. Plotsky
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Daniel S. Schechter
Affiliation:
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
Constance A. Cummings
Affiliation:
Foundation for Psychocultural Research, California
Get access

Summary

Early childhood development (ECD) is receiving increased attention and scrutiny as policy makers attempt to respond to several historical, economic, scientific, and cultural changes that are transforming our understanding of the importance of the early years. This chapter tracks the evolution of our understanding about ECD and discusses the type of policy changes required to ensure that young children have the opportunity for optimal development. We propose a policy transformation framework to help guide the evolution of the current fragmented model of ECD services to a more responsive, comprehensive, integrated, and high performing early childhood system for the twenty-first century.

OVERVIEW

Our analysis begins with a discussion of the historical, political, and cultural contexts that influence ECD policies, practices, and programs, with a special emphasis on the transactional relationship between cultural norms and policy development, decision-making, and implementation. We then discuss the evolution of early childhood policy in the United States, focusing specifically on outcomes that are reflected in current measures of children's health, development, and well-being and what we know about the performance of services, programs, and policies currently in place to improve child health and developmental outcomes. We introduce the Life Course Health Development framework to link theories of social, cognitive, and emotional development with clinical and policy-oriented approaches toward optimizing health development outcomes. The Life Course Health Development framework also provides the basis for a more integrated approach to ECD, one that is more in tune with the human capital development orientation of a post-industrial society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Formative Experiences
The Interaction of Caregiving, Culture, and Developmental Psychobiology
 , pp. 505 - 530
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, S.E. (1993). Discrimination. In Winston, K. I. & Bane, M. (Eds.), Gender and public policy: Cases and comments (pp. 173–175). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
,Department for Children, School and Families. (n.d.). The children's plan. Retrieved from http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/childrensplan/
Dube, S. R., Felitti, M. D., Dong, M, Giles, W. H., & Anda, R. F. (2003). The impact of adverse childhood experiences on health problems: Evidence from four birth cohorts dating back to 1900. Preventive Medicine, 37, 268–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American Psychologist, 59, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnar, M. R., Fisher, P. A., & the Early Experience, Stress and Prevention Science Network (2006). Bringing basic research on early experience and stress neurobiology to bear on preventive interventions for neglected and maltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 651–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halfon, N., & Hochstein, M. (2002). Life course health development: An integrated framework for developing health and financing health intervention. The Milbank Quarterly, 80, 433–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfon, N., & McLearn, K. T. (2002). Families with children under 3: What we know and implications for results and policy. In Halfon, N. & McLearn, K. T. (Eds.), Child rearing in America: Challenges facing parents with young children (pp. 367–412). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfon, N., DuPlessis, H., & Barrett, E. (2008). Looking back at pediatrics to move forward in obstetrics. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20(6), 566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfon, N., Du Plessis, H., & Inkelas, M. (2007). Transforming the U.S. child health system. Health Affairs, 26(2), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertzman, C., Power, C., Matthews, S., & Manor, O. (2001). Using an interactive framework of society and lifecourse to explain self-rated health in early childhood. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1575–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (2001). Child and family policies in the United States at the opening of the twenty-first century. Social Policy and Administration, 35(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, M. (1986). Saving children. In Katz, M. B. (Ed.), In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America (pp. 117–151). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Keating, D., & Hertzman, C. (2000). Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social, biological, and educational dynamics. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kuh, D., & Hardy, R. (Eds.). (2002). A life course approach to women's health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchior, M., Moffitt, T. E., Milne, B. J., Poulton, R., & Caspi, A. (2007). Why do children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families suffer from poor health when they reach adulthood? A life-course study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166(8), 966–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, R., Ribar, D. C., & Wilhelm, M. (1998). The decline of welfare benefits in the U.S.: The role of wage inequality. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newacheck, P. W., & Halfon, N. (2000). Prevalence and impact of disabling chronic conditions in childhood. American Journal of Public Health 88(4), 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phipps, S. (2001). Value, policies and the well-being of young children in Canada, Norway and the United States. In Vleminckx, K., & Smeeding, T. M. (Eds.), Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nation: What do we know? (pp. 79–98). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2007). Child wellbeing and income inequality in rich societies: Ecological cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 335(7629), 1080–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, C., Hypponen, E., & Davey Smith, G. (2005). Socioeconomic position in childhood and early adult life and risk of mortality: A prospective study of mothers of the 1958 British birth cohort. American Journal of Public Health, 95(8), 1396–1402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, S. (2005). Parental leave and child health across OED countries. The Economic Journal, 115 (501), F7–F28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Florence: Innocenti Report Card.Google Scholar
Wise, P. H. (2004). The transformation of child health in the United States. Health Affairs, 23(5), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, E. N. (2001). The rich get richer: And why the poor don't [Electronic version]. The American Prospect 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles/article=the_rich_get_richerGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×