Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2010
Summary
THE RETRIBUTIVE EMOTIONS
Whoever has done me harm must suffer harm; whoever has put out my eye must lose an eye; and whoever has killed must die. This is an emotion, and a particularly violent one, and not a principle. … Retaliation does no more than ratify and confer the status of law on [this] pure impulse of nature.
Albert Camus, “Reflections on the Guillotine”The critical legal studies movement has, in my judgment, raised at least one important issue for jurisprudence and moral philosophy. I am thinking of its claim that traditional moralistic jurisprudence errs in confining its inquiries to formal, abstract, and public doctrines and to the intellectual rationales for those doctrines. According to the “crits,” a full philosophical grasp of law and morality requires an examination of the underlying causal forces that in part generate both the doctrines and the intellectual rationales for them. The person who seeks total enlightenment about morality and the law is invited to look, not just to the ideological superstructure, but to the underlying substructure that gives the superstructure at least a part of its point. This seems to me an invitation that those of us who practice traditional jurisprudence should accept.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Forgiveness and Mercy , pp. 1 - 13Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1988
- 2
- Cited by