Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:40:47.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Crimes Against Humanity and the International Criminal Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

By
Kai Ambos
Edited by
Leila Nadya Sadat
Kai Ambos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen, Germany
Leila Nadya Sadat
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the question of the need for a specialized Convention for Crimes against Humanity from the perspective of the existing protection granted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) Statute. The ICC's role in the prevention and prosecution of crimes against humanity is predicated on its normative framework, especially article 7 of the ICC Statute. A critical analysis of this provision and its comparison with the definition in the Proposed International Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity (Proposed Convention) lies at the heart of this chapter. A second, related issue to be dealt with is the ICC's effective capacity to prevent and prosecute crimes against humanity. This issue touches on one of the fundamental cornerstones of the criminal law: its possible effect of deterrence.

INTRODUCTION: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE OF CAH

The concept of Crimes Against Humanity (CAH) in its modern usage can be traced as far back as the declaration of May 28, 1915 by the governments of France, Great Britain, and Russia, relating to the massacres of the Armenian population in Turkey. In this declaration, the atrocities committed were described as “crimes against humanity for which all members of the Turkish Government will be held responsible together with its agents implicated in the massacres.” The novelty in this case was that the crimes were committed by citizens of a State on their own fellow citizens and not those of another State.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forging a Convention for Crimes against Humanity , pp. 279 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schwelb, Egon, Crimes Against Humanity, 23 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L. 178, 181 (1946)Google Scholar
Cerone, John P., The Jurisprudential Contributions of the ICTR to the Legal Definition of Crimes Against Humanity, 14 New Eng. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 191, 191–92 (2008)Google Scholar
Clark, Roger S., Crimes Against Humanity at Nuremberg, inThe Nuremberg Trial and International Law 193, 195–98 (George Ginsburgs & Vladimir Nikolaevich Kudriavtsev eds., 1990)Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl, Defining Crimes Against Humanity at the Rome Conference, 93 Am. J. Int'l L. 43, 44 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Roger S., Crimes Against Humanity and The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, inInternational and National Law in Russia and Eastern Europe 139–56 (Roger Clark et al. eds., 2001)Google Scholar
Luban, David, A Theory of Crimes against Humanity, 29 Yale J. Int'l L. 85, 93 et seq. (2004)Google Scholar
Vernon, Richard, What is Crime against Humanity?, 10 J. Pol. Phil. 231, 233 (2002)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Feindstrafrecht, 124 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 1 (2006)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Derecho penal del enemigo, in I Derecho penal del enimigo, supra, at 119; updated version in Kai Ambos, el derecho penal frente a amenazas extremas 81–145 (2007)Google Scholar
Hebel, Herman & Robinson, Darryl, Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court, inThe International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute – Issues, Negotiations, Results 91 (Roy S. Lee ed., 1999)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai & Wirth, Steffen, The Current Law of Crimes against Humanity. An Analysis of UNTAET Regulation 15/2000, 13 Crim. L.F. 1, 3 et seq. (2002)Google Scholar
Kress, Claus, Der Jugoslawien-Strafgerichtshof im Grenzbereich zwischen internationalem bewaffneten Konflikt und Bürgerkrieg, inVölkerrechtliche Verbrechen vor dem Jugoslawien Tribunal, nationalen Gerichten und dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof 15, 53–55 (Horst Fischer & Sascha Rolf Lüder eds., 1999)Google Scholar
Schaack, Beth, The Definition of Crimes Against Humanity: Resolving the Incoherence, 37 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 787, 819 (1999)Google Scholar
Lippman, Matthew, Crimes Against Humanity, 17 B.C. Third World L.J. 171, 173, 183 (1997)Google Scholar
Kirsch, Stefan, Zweierlei Unrecht, inFestschrift für Rainer Hamm 283, 285 et seq. (Regina Michalke et al. eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Kirsch, Stefan, Two Kinds of Wrong: On the Context Element of Crimes against Humanity, 22 Leiden J. Int'l L. 525 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryer, Robert, The Definition of International Crimes in the Al Bashir Arrest Warrant, 7 J. Int'l Crim. L. 283 (2009)Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher, Crimes Against Humanity, inCommentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Observers Notes, Article by Article Art. 7 mn. 4 (Otto Triffterer ed., 2d ed. 2008)Google Scholar
Eboe-Osuji, Chile, Crimes against Humanity: Directing Attacks against a Civilian Population, 2 Afr. J. Legal Stud. 118, 120 (2008)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai & Pirmurat, Said, Das Todesurteil gegen Saddam Hussein, 62 Juristen Zeitung 822, 824 (2007)Google Scholar
Kuschnik, Bernhard, The Legal Findings of Crimes against Humanity in the Al-Dujail Judgments of the Iraqi High Tribunal: A Forerunner for the ICC?, 7 Chinese J. Int'l L. 459, 472 (2008)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Selected Issues Regarding the “Core Crimes” in International Criminal Law, inInternational Criminal Law: Quo vadis? (Nouvelles Etudes Penales 19) 219, 243 (AIDP ed., 2004)Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl, The Elements of Crimes Against Humanity, inThe International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence 57, 63 (Roy S. Lee ed., 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parenti, Pablo, Los Crímenes Contra la Humanidad y el Genocidio en el Derecho Internacional, inLos crímenes contra la humanidad y el genocidio en el derecho internacional: origen y evolución de las figuras, elementos típicos, jurisprudencia internacional59–60 (Pablo Parenti et al. eds., 2007)Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, The Legal Framework of Transitional Justice: A Systematic Study with a Special Focus on the Role of the ICC, inBuilding a Future on Peace and Justice 19, 73–74 (Kai Ambos et al. eds., 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Prosecuting International Crimes at the National and International Level: Between Justice and Realpolitik, inInternational Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes 55 (Wolfgang Kaleck et al. eds., 2006)Google Scholar
Kreuzer, Arthur, Prävention durch Repression, inAngewandte Kriminologie zwischen Freiheit und Sicherheit 205, 205 (Heinz Schöch & Jörg-Marin Jehle eds., 2004)Google Scholar
Dölling, Dieter & Hermann, Dieter, Befragungsstudien zur negativen Generalprävention: Eine Bestandsaufnahme, inKriminalität, Ökonomie und Europäischer Sozialstaat 133, 162 (Hans-Jörg Albrecht & Horst Entorf eds., 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antony, Jürgen & Entorf, Horst, Zur Gültigkeit der Abschreckung im Sinne der ökonomischen Theorie der Kriminalität: Grundzüge einer Meta-Studie, inKriminalität, Ökonomie und Europäischer Sozialstaat 167, 170 (Hans-Jörg Albrecht & Horst Entorf eds., 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Herbert, Hört das Kriminalitätskonzept vor der Makrokriminalität auf? – Offene Fragen und Denkansätze, inVom Recht der Macht zur Macht des Rechts – Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur Zukunft internationaler Strafgerichtsbarkeit 45, 57 (Frank Neubacher & Anne Klein eds., 2006)Google Scholar
Ku, Julian G. & Nzelibe, Jide, Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 777, 790 (2006)Google Scholar
Koller, David, The Faith of the International Criminal Lawyer, 40 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 1019, 1029 (2008)Google Scholar
Akhavan, Payam, Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?, 95 Am. J. Int'l L. 7, 9 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadat, Leila, Exile, Amnesty and International Law, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 955, 998 (2006)Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre, Measuring the Impact of Punishment and Forgiveness: A Framework for Evaluating Transitional Justice, 88 ICRC Int'l Rev. 19, 35 (2006)Google Scholar
Burke-White, William Whitney, Complementarity in Practice: The International Criminal Court as Part of a System of Multi-Level Global Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. 559, 58 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Richard, Historical Evolution – From Nuremberg to the International Criminal Court, 25 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 763, 767–68 (2007)Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Just Revenge? The Deterrence Argument in International Criminal Law, 12 Finnish Y.B. Int'l L. 249 et seq. (2001)Google Scholar
Nsereko, Daniel Ntanda, The Role of the International Criminal Tribunals in the Promotion of Peace and Justice: The Case of the ICC, 19 Crim. L.F. 373, 376–77, 392 (2008)Google Scholar
Blewitt, Graham T., The Importance of a Retributive Approach to Justice, inThe Legacy of Nuremberg: Civilising Influence or Institutionalized Vengeance 39, 45 et seq. (David A. Blumenthal & Timothy McCormack eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Ohlin, Jens David, Peace, Security, and Prosecutorial Discretion, inThe Emerging Practice of the ICC 185, 202 et seq. (Carsten Stahn & Göran Sluiter eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Grono, Nick & O'Brien, Adam, Justice in Conflict? The ICC and Peace Processes, inCourting Conflict? Justice, Peace and the ICC in Africa 13, 17 (Nicholas Waddell & Phil Clark eds., 2008)Google Scholar
Mani, Rama, Reparation as a Component of Transitional Justice: Pursuing ‘Reparative Justice’ in the Aftermath of Violent Conflict, inOut of the Ashes 53, 76 (Koen de Feyter et al. eds., 2005)Google Scholar
Crocker, David A., Punishment, Reconciliation, and Democratic Deliberation, 5 Buff. Crim. L. Rev. 509, 536–37 (2002)Google Scholar
Robinson, Darryl, Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court, 14 Eur. J. Int'l L. 481, 489 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo & Saffon, Maria Paula, Justicia transicional y justicia restaurativa: tensiones y complementariedades, inEntre el perdón y el paredón. Preguntas y dilemas de la Justicia Transicional 211, 225–26 (Angelika Rettberg ed., 2005)Google Scholar
Olson, Laura M., Provoking the Dragon on the Patio: Matters of Transitional Justice: Penal Repression vs. Amnesties, 88 ICRC Int'l Rev. 275, 291 (2006)Google Scholar
Malamud-Goti, Jaime, Transitional Government in the Breach: Why Punish State Criminals?, inI Transitional Justice: General Considerations 189, 196 (Neil J. Kritz ed., 1995)Google Scholar
Méndez, Juan E., National Reconciliation, Transnational Justice and the International Criminal Court, 15 Ethics Int'l Aff. 25, 30–31 (2001)Google Scholar
Zolo, Danilo, Peace through Criminal Law?, 2 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 727, 732 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, Mary, Lest We Fail: The Importance of Enforcement in International Criminal Law, 15 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 321, 325 (2000)Google Scholar
Smidt, Michael, The International Criminal Court: An Effective Means of Deterrence?, 167 Mil. L. Rev. 156, 188 (2001)Google Scholar
Tolmein, Oliver, Strafrecht als Instrument zur Schaffung von Frieden: Das Beispiel des ICTY, inHumanitäres Völkerrecht 493, 507 (Jana Hasse et al. eds., 2001)Google Scholar
Neubacher, Frank, Strafzwecke und Völkerstrafrecht, 59 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 966, 968 (2006)Google Scholar
Sievert, Ron, A New Perspective on the International Criminal Court: Why the Right Should Embrace the ICC and How America Can Use It, 68 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 77, 99 (2006)Google Scholar
Sutter, Daniel, The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court, inInternational Conflict Resolution 9, 23 (Stefan Voigt et al. eds., Mohr Siebeck 2006)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×