Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:47:19.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - The Oceans as a Source of Food

from Assessment of the Cross-cutting Issues: Food Security and Food Safety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

United Nations
Affiliation:
Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Office of Legal Affairs
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the main services provided by the oceans to human societies is the provisioning service of food from capture fisheries and culturing operations. This includes fish, invertebrates, plants, and for some cultures, marine mammals and seabirds for direct consumption or as feed for aquaculture or agriculture. These ocean-based sources of food have large-scale benefits for human health and nutrition, economic returns, and employment.

A major challenge around the globe is to obtain these benefits without compromising the ability of the ocean to continue to provide such benefits for future generations, that is, to manage human use of the ocean for sustainability. In effect, this means that capture fisheries and aquaculture facilities must ensure that the supporting stocks are not overharvested and the ecosystem impacts of the harvesting or aquaculture facilities do not undermine the capacity of a given ocean area to continue to provide food and other benefits to society (see Chapter 3). Further, the social and economic goals of the fisheries and aquaculture should fully consider sustainable use in order to safeguard future benefits.

Dimensionality of the oceans as a source of food

Capture fisheries and aquaculture operate at many geographical scales, and vary in how they use marine resources for food production. Here, “small-scale” refers to operations that are generally low capital investment but high labour activities, relatively low production, and often family or community-based with a part of the catch being consumed by the producers (Bene et al., 2007; Garcia et al., 2008). Large-scale operations require significantly more capital equipment and expenditure, are more highly mechanized and their businesses are more vertically integrated, with generally global market access rather than focused on local consumption. These descriptions are at the ends of a spectrum continuum of scales with enormous variation in between.

The geography of harvesting and food production from the sea is also important. Williams (1996) documents that until the mid-1980s, developed countries dominated both harvesting and aquaculture, but thereafter developing countries became dominant, first in capture fisheries and later in mariculture. A general division of large-scale fisheries and mariculture in the developed world and small-scale operations in the developing world was never absolute.

Type
Chapter
Information
The First Global Integrated Marine Assessment
World Ocean Assessment I
, pp. 185 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, E.H., Delaporte, A., and Hellebrandt de Silva, D. (2013). Integrating fisheries management and aquaculture development with food security and livelihoods for the poor. Report submitted to the Rockefeller Foundation, School of International Development, University of East Anglia Norwich, 124p.
Avadí, A., and Fréon, P. (2013) Life cycle assessment of fisheries: A review for fisheries scientists and managers. Fisheries Research 143: 21-38.Google Scholar
Beddington, J.R., Agnew, D.J., and Clark, C.W. (2007). Current problems in the management of marine fisheries. Science 316(5832): 1713–1716.Google Scholar
Béné, C., Macfadyen, G., and Allison, E. (2007). Increasing the contribution of smallscale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security. Fao Fisheries Technical Paper No. 481. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 125p.
Béné, C., Belal, E., Baba, M.O., Ovie, S., Raji, A., Malasha, I., Njaya, F., Na Andi, M., Russell, A., and Neiland, A. (2009). Power Struggle, Dispute and Alliance over Local Resources: Analyzing ‘Democratic’ Decentralization of Natural Resources through the Lenses of Africa Inland Fisheries. World Development 37: 1935–1950.Google Scholar
Beveridge, M., Phillips, M., Dugan, P., and Brummett, R. (2010). Barriers to Aquaculture Development as a Pathway to Poverty Alleviation and Food Security: Policy Coherence and the Roles and Responsibilities of Development Agencies. OECD Workshop, Paris, France, 12–16 April 2010.
Bnp (2009). Big Number Program. Intermediate report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization and WorldFish Center.
Bonham, M.P., Duffy, E.M., Robson, P.J., Wallace, J.M., Myers, G.J., Davidson, P.W., Clarkson, T.W., Shamlaye, C.F., Strain, J., and Livingstone, M.B.E. (2009). Contribution of fish to intakes of micronutrients important for foetal development: a dietary survey of pregnant women in the Republic of Seychelles. Public Health Nutrition 12(9):1312–1320.Google Scholar
Bostock, T., Greenhalgh, P., and Kleih, U. (2004). Policy Research: Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries.Synthesis report. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, UK, 68p.
Delgado, C., Wada, N., Rosegrant, M.W., Meijer, S., and Ahmed, M. (2003). Fish to 2020: Supply and Demand in Changing Global Markets. International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington, DC and WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia.
Dey, M.M., Mohammed, R.A., Paraguas, F.J., Somying, P., Bhatta, R., Ferdous, M.A., and Ahmed, M. (2005). Fish consumption and food security: a disaggregated analysis by types of fish and classes of consumers in selected Asian countries. Aquaculture Economics and Management 9: 89–111.Google Scholar
Dyck, A.J., and Sumaila, U.R. (2010). Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 227–243.Google Scholar
Fao (2003). Report of the expert consultation on international fish trade and food security. Fao Fisheries Report. No.708. Rome.
Fao (2012). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fao Rome. 209 pp.
Fao (2014a). The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Fao Rome. 239 pp.
Fao (2014b). Low-Income Food-Deficit Countries (LIFDC) – List for 2014. http://www.Fao.org/countryprofiles/lifdc/en/.
Garcia, S., Allison, E.H, Andrew, N., Béné, C., Bianchi, G., de Graaf, G., Kalikoski, D., Mahon, R., and Orensanz, L.. (2008). Towards integrated assessment and advice in small-scale fisheries: Principles and Processes. Fao Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No.515. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 84, p.
Garcia, S.M., Rice, J., and Charles, A.T. (eds). (2014). Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Co-evolution. Wiley Interscience. London. 486 pp.
Hall, S.J., Delaporte, A., Phillips, M.J., Beveridge, M., O'Keefe, M. (2011). Blue Frontiers: Managing the Environmental Costs of Aquaculture. The WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia.
HLPE, (2014). Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome.
Kawarazuka, N., and Béné, C. (2011). The potential role of small fish species in improving micronutrient deficiencies in developing countries: building evidence. Public Health Nutrition 14: 1927–1938.Google Scholar
Kawarazuka, N., and Béné, C. (2010). Linking small-scale fisheries and aquaculture to household nutritional security: a review of the literature. Food Security 2: 343–357.Google Scholar
Kurien, J. (2004). Fish trade for the people: Toward Understanding the Relationship between International Fish Trade and Food Security. Report of the Study on the impact of international trade in fishery products on food security, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Mogensen, L., Hermansen, J.E., Halberg, N., Dalgaard, R., Vis, R.C., and Smith, B.G. (2012). Life Cycle Assessment Across the Food Supply Chain. In: Baldwin, C., editor. Sustainability in the Food Industry. Wiley, London. pp. 115-144.
Naylor, R.L., Hardy, R.W., Bureau, D.P., Chiu, A., Elliott, M., Farrell, A.P., Forster, I., Gatlin, D.M., Goldburg, R.J., Hua, K., and Nichols, P.D. (2009). Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 18040.Google Scholar
Phillips, M., Van, N.T., and Subasinghe, R. (2013). Aquaculture Big Numbers>. Working Paper. 12 June 2012. WorldFish and Fao.
Pikitch, E., Boersma, P.D., Boyd, I.L., Conover, D.O., Cury, P., Essington, T., Heppell, S.S., Houde, E.D., Mangel, M., Pauly, D., Plagányi, É., Sainsbury, K., and Steneck, R.S. (2012). Little Fish, Big Impact: Managing a Crucial Link in Ocean Food Webs.p.108. Lenfest Ocean Program. Washington, DC.
Roos, N., Wahab, M.A., Chamnan, C, and Thilsted, S.H. (2007). The role of fish in foodbased strategies to combat Vitamin A and mineral deficiencies in developing countries. Journal of Nutrition 137: 1106–1109.Google Scholar
Smith, T.D. (1994). Scaling Fisheries: The Science of Measuring the Effects of Fishing 1855-1955. Cambridge Studies in Applied Ecology and Resource Management. Cambridge, 384 pp.
WHO (1985). Energy and protein requirements. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Williams, M.J. (1996). The transition in the contribution of living aquatic resources to food security. International Food Policy Research Institute: Food Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper No. 13: 41pp.Google Scholar
Waite, R. et al. 2014. Improving Productivity and Environmental Performance of Aquaculture.
Working Paper, Installment 5 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Accessible at http://www.worldresourcesreport.org.
World Bank/Fao/WorldFish (2012). Hidden Harvest: The Global Contribution of Capture Fisheries. World Bank, Report No. 66469-GLB, Washington, DC. 69 pp.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×