Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: October 2014

4 - Processing ‘words’ in early-stage foreign language acquisition: a comparison of first exposure and low proficiency learners

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

Barcroft, J. and VanPatten, B. (1997). Acoustic salience of grammatical forms: the effect of location, stress, and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. In W. R Glass and A. T. Pérez-Leroux (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, Vol. IV: Production Processing and Comprehension (pp. 109–121). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Braine, M. (1986). Learning the position of words relative to a marker element. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 532–540.
Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carroll, S. E. (2010). Exploring the locus of transfer in the L2 pronunciation of novel words. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Carroll, S. E. (2012a). Segmentation on first exposure to an L2: Evidence for knowledge-driven, top-down processing. In K. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel, and B. Hänel-Faulhaber (eds.), HSM13. Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (pp. 23–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carroll, S. E. (2012b). When is input salient? An exploratory study of the sentence location principle and word length. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50, 1–29.
Carroll, S. E., Jackson, S., and MacDonald, D. M. (2009). Adult L2 learners process phonology from first exposure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Mind-context Divide: Language Acquisition and Interfaces of Cognitive-linguistic Modules, University of Iowa.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., and Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.
Cutler, A. (2001). Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting, 5, 1–18.
Cutler, A. (2008). The abstract representations in speech processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1601–1619.
Cutler, A. and Broersma, M. (2005). Phonetic precision in listening. In W. J. Hardcastle and J. M. Beck (eds.), A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver (pp. 93–91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cutler, A. and Norris, D. G. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 113–121.
De Groot, A. M. B. and Keijzer, R. (2000). What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, 50, 1–56.
Ellis, N. C. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631–664.
Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
Ellis, N.C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, N.C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.
Endress, A. and Bonatti, L. L. (2007). Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream. Cognition, 105, 247–299.
Finn, A. and Hudson Kam, C. L. (2008). The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 108, 477–499.
Folia, V., Uddén, J., De Vries, M., Forkstam, C., and Petersson, K. M. (2010). Artificial language learning in adults and children. Language Learning, 60, 188–220.
Friel, B. M. and Kennsion, S. M. (2001). Identifying German–English cognates, false cognates, and non-cognates: Methodological issues and descriptive norms. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 4, 249–274.
Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436.
Gregory, M. and Carroll, S. E. (1978). Language and Situation: Language Varieties and Their Social Context. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., and Indefrey, P. (2010). Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60(2), 5–24.
Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 287–298.
Han, Z.-H. and Liu, Z. (2013). Input processing of Chinese by ab initio learners. Second Language Research, 29, 145–164.
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). What’s in the lexicon? In S. Nooteboom, F. Weerman, and F. Wijnen (eds.), Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty (pp. 23–58). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Jackendoff, R. (2008). Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language, 84, 8–28.
Katz, J. J. (1977). A proper theory of names. Philosophical Studies, 31, 1–80.
Katz, J. J. (2001). The end of Millianism: Multiple bearers, improper names and compositional meaning. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 137–166.
Kittleson, M. M., Aguilar, J. M., Tokerud, G. L., Plante, E., and Asbjørnsen, A. E. (2010). Implicit language learning: Adults’ ability to segment words in Norwegian. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 13, 513–523.
Leplus, T., Langlais, P., and Lapalme, G. (2004). Weather report translation using a translation memory. In R. E. Frederking and K. B. Taylor (eds.), Machine Translation: From Real Users to Research (pp. 154–163). Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., and Logan, J. S. (1992). Some effects of training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, and Y. Sagisaka (eds.), Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure (pp. 175–196). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Mattys, S. L. and Clark, J. H. (2002). Lexical activity in speech processing: evidence from pause detection. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 343–359.
Mattys, S. L. and Melhorn, J. F. (2007). Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 554–567.
Mattys, S. L., White, L., and Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 134, 477–500.
Mayo, L., Florentine, M., and Buus, S. (1997). Age of second language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 40, 686–693.
McQueen, J. M. (2005). Speech perception. In K. Lamberts and R. Goldstone (eds.), The Handbook of Cognition (pp. 255–275). London: Sage.
Mellow, J. D. (2008). Emergentist approaches to teaching and measurement: It’s about time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., June 4.
Monaghan, P. and Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Words in puddles of sound: Modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation. Journal of Child Language, 37, 545–564.
Morgan, J. L. and Saffran, J. R. (1995). Emerging integration of sequential and suprasegmental information in preverbal speech segmentation. Child Development, 66, 911–936.
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1983). Prosodic structure above the word. In A. Cutler and D. R. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements (pp. 123–140). Berlin: Springer.
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Park, E. S. and Han, Z.-H. (2008). Learner spontaneous attention in L2 input processing: An exploratory study. In Z.-H. Han (ed.), Understanding Second Language Process (pp. 106–132). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (2002). Signal-driven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604–607.
Perruchet, P., Tyler, M. D., Galland, N., and Peereman, R. (2004). Learning non-adjacent dependencies: No need for algebraic-like computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 133, 573–583.
Rast, R. (2008). Foreign Language Input: Initial Processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rast, R. (2010). The role of linguistic input in the first hours of adult language learning. Language Learning, 60, 64–84.
Rast, R. and Dommergues, J.-Y. (2003). Towards a characterisation of saliency on first exposure to a second language. In S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Doehler (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook: Papers from the Annual Conference of the European Second Language Association, Vol. III (pp. 131–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Robinson, P. J. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they?Language Learning, 60, Supplement 2, 245–263.
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., and Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: the role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 606–621.
Selkirk, E. O. (1978). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In T. Fretheim (ed.), Nordic Prosody II (pp. 111–140). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir.
Shoemaker, E. and Rast, R. (2013). Extracting words from the speech stream at first exposure. Second Language Research, 29, 165–183.
Valian, V. V. and Coulson, S. (1988). Anchor points in language learning: the role of marker frequency. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 71–86.
Wong Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.