Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:42:19.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Household finance and the law – a case study on economic transplants

from Part II - Investor and borrower protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

By
Katja Langenbucher
Edited by
Ester Faia ,
Andreas Hackethal ,
Michael Haliassos  and
Katja Langenbucher
Ester Faia
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main
Andreas Hackethal
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main
Michael Haliassos
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main
Katja Langenbucher
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Financial Regulation
A Transatlantic Perspective
 , pp. 313 - 335
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1962). “Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften”. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozial-Psychologie 14(2): 249–263.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George (2007). “The missing motivation in macroeconomics”. American Economic Review 97(5): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, G. C. (1959). “Welfare economics, ethics and essentialism”. Economica 26(104): 316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin (1999). Gubernative Rechtsetzung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm (1993). “Funktion, Struktur und Falsifikation juristischer Theorien”. Juristen Zeitung 48: 377–428.Google Scholar
Caplin, Andrew (2008). “Economic theory and psychological data: bridging the divide”. In Caplin, Andrew and Schotter, Andrew (eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin and Fisk, Catherine (1998–1999). “In defense of the big tent: the importance of recognizing the many audiences for legal scholarship”. Tulsa Law Journal 34(677): 667–678.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. (2008). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard (1991). “The mathematization of economic theory”. American Economic Review 81(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil (1993). “Non-natural social science: reflecting on the enterprise of more heat than Light”. History of Political Economy 25(5): 978–982.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1986). Law’s empire. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, Sigrid (2006). Gesetzgebungskunst: Gute Gesetzgebung als Gegenstand einer legislativen Methodenbewegung in der Rechtswissenschaft um 1900 – Zur Geschichte der Gesetzgebungslehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. (2002). “Let the ‘fundamental things apply’: necessary and contingent truths in legal scholarship”. Harvard Law Review 115: 1288–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Holger (2007). “Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht als wissenschaftliche Disziplin”. In Engels, Christoph and Schön, Wolfgang (eds.), Das Proprium der Rechtswissenschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 51–76.Google Scholar
François, Pierre (2008). Sociologie des marchés. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1953). “The methodology of positive economics”. In Essays in positive economics. University of Chicago Press: 3–43.Google Scholar
Gale, Douglas (2008). “Revealed preference and bounded rationality”. In Caplin, Andrew and Schotter, Andrew (eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. A Handbook. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, John C. P. (2012). “Introduction: pragmatism and private law”. Harvard Law Review 125: 1640–1663.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Charles (1997). “Economics and the law: too much one-way traffic?” The Modern Law Review 60(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorard, Stephen (2013). Research design: creating robust approaches for the social sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1994). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August (1942). “Economics and knowledge: scientism and the study of society; Part I”. Economica New Series 9(35): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August (1979). The counter-revolution of science: studies on the abuse of reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. (1973). “Economics as a ‘value-free’ science”. Social Research (40)129, reprinted in: Marr, William L. and Raj, Baldev (eds.) (1983). How economists explain. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Heise, Michael (2002). “The past, present, and future of empirical legal scholarship: judicial decision making and the new empiricism”. University of Illinois Law Review 4: 819–850.Google Scholar
Hilgendorf, Eric (2010). “Bedingungen gelingender Interdisziplinarität – am Beispiel der Rechtswissenschaft”. Juristen Zeitung 65(19): 913–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1897). “The path of the law”. Harvard Law Review 457(10): 465–466.Google Scholar
Jestaz, Phillippe and Jamin, Christophe (2004). La Doctrine. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, Otto (1974). “On use and misuse of comparative law”. Modern Law Review 37(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1786). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Riga: Hartnoch.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrère, Catherine (1992). L’invention de l’Économie au XVIIIe Siècle. Du droit naturel à la physiocratie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lazear, Edward P. (2000). “Economic imperialism”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 99–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leddy, Thomas (1986). “Is there a fallacy of small sample?” Informal Logic 8(1): 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legrand, Pierre (1997). “The impossibility of ‘legal transplants’”. Maastricht Journal of European Comparative Law 4: 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, Wassily (1982). “Academic economics. Letters”. Science 217(4555): 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lianos, Ioannis (2009). “‘Lost in translation’: towards a theory of economic transplants”. Jean Monnet Working Paper 08/09, NYU School of Law.Google Scholar
Little, Ian (1957). A critique of welfare economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Andrew W. and Mueller, Mark T. (2010). “WARNING: Physics envy may be hazardous to your wealth!” MIT Sloan School of Management 8 (2), Second Quarter 2010, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1563882 and http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1563882.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz (1961). “Are the social sciences really inferior?” Southern Economic Journal 27: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, Uskali (2009). The methodology of positive economics: reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1824). “Essays on economics and society part I”. In Robson, John M. (eds.), The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume IV. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip (1989). More heat than light. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, Edward J. (1981). Introduction to normative economics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe (2006). “A concept of progress for normative economics”. Economics and Philosophy 22: 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongin, Philippe (2006). “Value judgments and value neutrality in economics”. Economica 73(290): 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Theodore (1988). “Theory versus empiricism in academic economics: update and comparisons”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Andrew J. (1991). “Progress and microeconomic data”. The Economic Journal 101: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passeron, J. C. (2001). “Formalisation, rationalité et histoire”. In Grenier, Jean-Yves, Grignon, Claude and Menger, Pierre-Michel (eds.), Le Modèle et le récit. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme: 215–243.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (2002). “Legal scholarship today”. Harvard Law Review 115: 1314–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1907). “The need for a sociological jurisprudence”. Green Bag 19: 607–615.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1912). “The scope and purpose of sociological jurisprudence”. Harvard Law Review 25(6): 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel (1945). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan and Co.; 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro (2001). The wealth of ideas: a history of economic thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edward L. (1992). “On beyond truth: a theory for evaluating legal scholarship”. California Law Review 80(4): 889–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, Geoffrey (2008). “Is law really a social science?” Cambridge Law Journal 67(2): 288–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarcz, Steven L. (1997/98). “Is law an autonomous discipline?” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 21: 85–87.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan (2011). “Two culture problems in law and economics”. Yale Law and Economics Research Paper 432: 101–138.Google Scholar
Sneed, Joseph D. (1979). The logical structure of mathematical physics. University of California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spamann, Holger (2010). “The ‘Antidirector Rights Index’ revisited”. The Review of Financial Studies 23(2): 467–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1986). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophie II(3). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Stilwell, Frank J. B. (1975). Normative economics: an introduction to microeconomic theory and radical critiques. Rushcutters Bay, N.S.W.: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1998). “Legal irritants: good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences”. Modern Law Review 61: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, Andrew (1995). “Marshall and the mathematization of economics”. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17(247).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian (2006). Judging under uncertainty: an institutional theory of legal interpretation. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian (2007). “Connecting positive and normative legal theory”. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 10: 387–398.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan (1974). Legal transplants. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1995). The idea of private law. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Xifaras, Mikhail (2004). “Science social, science morale? Note sur la pénétration de l’économie dans la pensée juridique française au XIXe siècle”. In Mohnhaupt, Heinz and Kervégan, Jean-François (eds.), Droit, philosophie et économie. Frankfurt: Klostermann, Ius Commune: 185–226.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×