Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Prologue
- Introduction
- 1 Samson and Dilemma: Rubens Confronts the Woman on Top
- 2 Making Assumptions: Marian Tropes after Italy
- 3 Maria de’ Medici and Isabel Clara Eugenia
- 4 Peace Embraces Plenty: Queering Female Virtue at Whitehall
- 5 All That Depends on Color: Feminizing Rubens in the Seventeenth Century
- Epilogue
- About the Author
- Index
2 - Making Assumptions: Marian Tropes after Italy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2020
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Prologue
- Introduction
- 1 Samson and Dilemma: Rubens Confronts the Woman on Top
- 2 Making Assumptions: Marian Tropes after Italy
- 3 Maria de’ Medici and Isabel Clara Eugenia
- 4 Peace Embraces Plenty: Queering Female Virtue at Whitehall
- 5 All That Depends on Color: Feminizing Rubens in the Seventeenth Century
- Epilogue
- About the Author
- Index
Summary
Abstract
This chapter addresses Rubens's highly productive period corresponding to the Truce of 1609–21, when the artist would secure commissions for the iconic Antwerp Crucifixions and execute a suite of complex mythological paintings, including Juno and Argus. Rarely examined alongside these works are Rubens's contemporaneous depictions of the Virgin Mary's Assumption, posited here as a via media between his previous Michelangelesque works and his increasingly Venetian approach to making pictures. The shift of stylistic allegiance from Rome to Venice has had important implications for responses to Rubens's art from a critical tradition long placing gestural, Titianesque painting and feminized, haptic colorito in opposition to the conventionally rational and masculine linearity considered a hallmark of central Italian disegno.
Keywords: Rubens; gender; the Assumption; Michelangelo; colorito; lactation; Juno
The Flemish and the Dutch masters are always languid unless they are profane. Leonardo is only to be seen in the Cena; Titian only in the Assumption; but Rubens only in the Battle of the Amazons, and Vandyck only at court. Altar-pieces, when wanted, of course either of them will supply as readily as anything else. Virgins in blue, or St. Johns in red, as many as you please. Martyrdoms also, by all means: Rubens especially delights in these. St. Peter head downwards, is interesting anatomically, writhings of impenitent thieves, and bishops having their tongues pulled out, display our powers to advantage, also. Theological instruction if required “Christ armed with thunder, to destroy the world, spares it at the intercession of St. Francis.” Last Judgments even, quite Michelangelesque, rich in twistings of limbs, with spiteful biting and scratching; and fine aerial effects in smoke in the pit. In all this, however, there is not a vestige of religious feeling or reverence. […] Mary of Nazareth must be painted if an order come for her; but (says polite Sir Peter), Catherine of Medicis, or Mary, her bodice being fuller, and better embroidered, would, if we might offer a suggestion, probably give greater satisfaction.
‒ John Ruskin, Modern Painters (1860)Cross-Dressing
Despite its forlorn and abject tenor, Rubens's Descent from the Cross (Plate 2) is frequently acclaimed by twentieth-century art historians as a balanced and serenely classical altarpiece—a curious departure in style and mood from the dramatic and definitively baroque Raising of the Cross (Plate 3) from around the previous year.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Figuring Faith and Female Power in the Art of Rubens , pp. 79 - 118Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2020