Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: April 2016

Chapter 29 - The perinatal postmortem examination

from Section 9 - Diagnostic and therapeutic invasive procedures
1.Report of Joint Working Group, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), and Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and Perinatal Pathology. London: RCOG, 2001.
2.Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Perinatal Mortality 2007. Dorchester UK: Dorset Press, 2009.
3.Burton, JL, Underwood, J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 2007; 369: 1471–80.
4.Shojania, KG, Burton, EC, McDonald, KM, et al. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849–56.
5.Roulson, J, Benbow, EW, Hasleton, PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of postmortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005; 47: 5519.
6.Gordijn, SJ, Erwich, JJHM, Khong, TY. Value of the perinatal autopsy: critique. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2002; 5: 480–8.
7.Griffiths, PD, Variend, D, Evans, M, et al. Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24(1): 22–7.
8.Wigglesworth, JS, Singer, DB. Textbook of Fetal and Perinatal Pathology, 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell Science, 1998.
9.Gardosi, J, Kady, SM, McGeown, P, et al. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331(7525): 1113–7.
10.Gordijn, SJ, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY. The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 37.
11.McHaffie, HE. Crucial Decisions at the Beginning of Life. Parents’ experiences of treatment withdrawals from infants. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd, 2001.
12.Rahman, HA, Khong, TY. Survey of women’s reactions to perinatal necropsy. BMJ 1995; 310: 870–1.
13.McDermott, M. The continuing decline of autopsies in clinical trials: is there any way back? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F198F199.
14.UK Legislation. Human Tissue Act 2004 (
15.Cox, P, Marton, T. Pathological assessment of intrauterine growth restriction. BestPract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23: 751–64.
16.Cohen, MC, Blakey, S, Donn, T, et al. An audit of parents’/guardians’ wishes recorded after coronial autopsies in cases of sudden unexpected death in infancy: issues raised and future directions. MedSci Law 2009; 49: 179–84.
17.Royal College of Pathologists (RCPATH). Service specification for paediatric and perinatal histopathology. London: RCPATH, 1995.
18.Fox, H, Sebire, NJ. Pathology of the Placenta, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007.
19.Heazell, AE, Martindale, EA. Can post-mortem examination of the placenta help determine the cause of stillbirth? J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29(3): 225–8.
20.Thayyil, S, Sebire, NJ, Chitty, LS, et al; MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 2013; 382(9888): 223–33.
21.Sebire, NJ, Weber, MA, Thayyil, S, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25(5): 513–8.
22.Cannie, M, Votino, C, Moerman, P, et al. Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39(6): 659–65.