Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:19:11.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Counseling single women and single men choosingparenthood

from Section 4 - The expanding image of families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

By
Lauri A. Pasch  and
Sarah R. Holley
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling
Clinical Guide and Case Studies
 , pp. 166 - 179
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artificial insemination: Its socio-legal aspects. Minn Law Rev 1949; 145: 150–1.Google Scholar
Curie-Cohen, M, Luttrell, L, Shapiro, S. Current practice of artificial insemination by donor in the United States. N Engl J Med 1979 Mar 15; 300(11): 585–90.Google Scholar
Kerr, MG, Rogers, C. Donor insemination. J Med Ethics 1975; 1: 30–3.Google Scholar
Strong, C, Schinfeld, JS. The single woman and artificial insemination by donor. J Reprod Med 1984 May; 29(5): 293–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Baetens, P, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I, Devroey, P, Van Steirteghem, AC. Artificial insemination by donor: an alternative for single women. Hum Reprod 1995 Jun; 10(6): 1537–42.Google Scholar
Englert, Y. Artificial insemination of single women and lesbian women with donor semen. Artificial insemination with donor semen: particular requests. Hum Reprod 1994 Nov; 9(11): 1969–71.Google Scholar
Kritchevsky, B. The unmarried woman's right to artificial insemination: a call for an expanded definition of family. Harv Women's Law J 1981 Spring; 4(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility treatment by gays, lesbians, and unmarried persons. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 1333–35.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (c. 22), (2008).Google Scholar
International Federation of Fertility Societies. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010. Available from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.iffs-reproduction.org/resource/resmgr/newsletters/iffs_surveillance_2010.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar
Hamilton, BE, Martin, JA, Ventura, SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Report [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60_02.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar
Mosher, WD, Jones, J, Abma, JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. National Health Statistics Reports [Internet]. 2012; 55. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60_02.pdf. Accessed October 2014.Google Scholar
French, HW. Single mothers in China forge a difficult path. The New York Times. 6 April 2008.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Office of National Statistics. Statistical Bulletin: Families and Households, 2013. 2013.Google Scholar
Pakizegi, B. Emerging family forms: single mothers by choice – demographic and psychosocial variables. Matern Child Nurs J 1990 Spring; 19(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
McCartney, CF. Decision by single women to conceive by artificial donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 4(4): 321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechaneck, R, Klein, E, Kuppersmith, J. Single mothers by choice: A family alternative. Women Ther 1987; 6(1–2): 263–81.Google Scholar
Eiduson, BT, Kornfein, M, Zimmerman, IL, Weisner, TS. Comparative socialization practices in traditional and alternative families. In: Lamb, M, editor. Nontraditional Families. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1982.Google Scholar
Jadva, V, Badger, S, Morrissette, M, Golombok, S. ‘Mom by choice, single by life's circumstance…’ Findings from a large scale survey of the experiences of single mothers by choice. Human Fertil (Camb) 2009 Dec; 12(4): 175–84.Google Scholar
Lamb, ME. Mothers, fathers, families, and circumstances: Factors affecting children's adjustment. Appl Dev Sci 2012; 16(2): 98–111.Google Scholar
Patterson, CJ. Children of lesbian and gay parents: Psychology, law, and policy. Am Psychol 2009; 64(8): 727–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S, Tasker, F, Murray, C. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: family relationships and the socioemotional development of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997 Oct; 38(7): 783–91.Google Scholar
Murray, C, Golombok, S. Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: follow-up at age 2 years. Hum Reprod 2005 Jun; 20(6): 1655–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccallum, F, Golombok, S. Children raised in fatherless families from infancy: a follow-up of children of lesbian and single heterosexual mothers at early adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004 Nov; 45(8): 1407–19.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Spencer, A, Rutter, M. Children in lesbian and single-parent households: psychosexual and psychiatric appraisal. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1983 Oct; 24(4): 551–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shechner, T, Slone, M, Meir, Y, Kalish, Y. Relations between social support and psychological and parental distress for lesbian, single heterosexual by choice, and two-parent heterosexual mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2010 Jul; 80(3): 283–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navarro, M. The bachelor life includes a family. The New York Times. 7 September 2008.Google Scholar
Tuttle, I. Single fathers by choice: The newest trend. National Review Online. July 2, 2012.Google Scholar
Morrissette, M. Choosing Single Motherhood: The Thinking Woman's Guide. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2008.Google Scholar
Reichenberg, A, Gross, R, Weiser, M, Bresnahan, M, Silverman, J, Harlap, S, et al. Advancing paternal age and autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006 Sep; 63(9): 1026–32.Google Scholar
Scheib, JE, Cushing, RA. Open-identity donor insemination in the United States: is it on the rise? Fertil Steril 2007 Jul; 88(1): 231–2.Google Scholar
Scheib, JE, Riordan, M, Rubin, S. Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years later. Hum Reprod 2003 May; 18(5): 1115–27.Google Scholar
Pakizegi, B. Single-parent adoptions and clinical implications. In: Javier, RA, Baden, AL, Biafora, FA, Camacho-Gingerich, A, editors. Handbook of Adoption: Implications for Researchers, Practitioners, and Families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2007. pp. 190–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadva, V, Freeman, T, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Hum Reprod 2009 Aug; 24(8): 1909–19.Google Scholar
Scheib, JE, Riordan, M, Rubin, S. Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds. Hum Reprod 2005 Jan; 20(1): 239–52.Google Scholar
Murray, C, Golombok, S. Going it alone: solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2005 Apr; 75(2): 242–53.Google Scholar
Beeson, DR, Jennings, PK, Kramer, W. Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process. Hum Reprod 2011 Sep; 26(9): 2415–24.Google Scholar
Scheib, JE, Ruby, A. Contact among families who share the same sperm donor. Fertil Steril 2008 Jul; 90(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
Freeman, T, Jadva, V, Kramer, W, Golombok, S. Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Hum Reprod 2009 Mar; 24(3): 505–16.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×