Weston, J. Female genital mutilation: The law as it relates to children. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(9):864–7.Google Scholar

Liao, LM, Creighton, SM. Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: How should healthcare providers respond? BMJ 2007;334(7603):1090.Google Scholar

Liao, LM, Taghinejadi, N, Creighton, SM. An analysis of the content and clinical implications of online advertisements for female genital cosmetic surgery. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e001908.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, S. From vaginal exception to exceptional vagina: The biopolitics of female genital cosmetic surgery. Sexualities. 2012;15(7):778–94.Google Scholar

Kadian, YS, Pradeep, K, Verma, V. Feminizing genitoplasty in congenital adrenal hyperplasia: A new method for clitoral reduction. Arch Int Surg. 2016;6(3):153–7.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, N, Barr, M. Intersex surgery, female genital cutting, and the selective condemnation of “cultural practices.” Harv CR-CL Law Rev. 2005;40(1):71–140.Google Scholar

Davis, DS. Male and female genital alteration: A collision course with the law. Health Matrix. 2001;11:487–570.Google Scholar

Abusharaf, RM. Virtuous cuts: Female genital circumcision in an African ontology. Differences. 2001;12(1):112–40.Google Scholar

Abdulcadir, J, Ahmadu, FS, Catania, L, et al. Seven things to know about female genital surgeries in Africa. Hastings Center Rep. 2012;42(6):19–27.Google Scholar

WHO/UN. Eliminating female genital mutilation: An interagency statement. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2008. Available from: www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw52/statements_missions/Interagency_Statement_on_Eliminating_FGM.pdfGoogle Scholar

Stewart, PJ, Strathern, A., eds. Ritual. London: Routledge; 2017.Google Scholar

Taylor, JR, Lockwood, AP, Taylor, AJ. The prepuce: Specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. BJU Int. 1996;77(2):291–5.Google Scholar

Wilcken, A, Keil, T, Dick, B. Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: A systematic review of prevalence and complications. Bull WHO. 2010;88(12):907–14.Google Scholar

Ramos, S, Boyle, GJ. Ritual and medical circumcision among Filipino boys. In Denniston, GC, Hodges, FM, Milos, MF (eds), Understanding circumcision. New York: Springer; 2001, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar

Glass, M. Forced circumcision of men (abridged). J Med Ethics. 2014;40(8):567–71.Google Scholar

Pounder, DJ. Ritual mutilation: Subincision of the penis among Australian Aborigines. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1983;4(3):227–30.Google Scholar

Rickwood, AM. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):45–51.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, E. Circumcision: The uniquely American medical enigma. Urol Clin North Am. 1985;12(1):123–32.Google Scholar

Hofvander, Y. New law on male circumcision in Sweden. Lancet. 2002;359(9306):630.Google Scholar

Earp, BD, Sardi, LM, Jellison, WA. False beliefs predict increased circumcision satisfaction in a sample of US American men. Cult Health Sex. 2018;20(8):945–955.Google Scholar

Hammond, T, Carmack, A. Long-term adverse outcomes from neonatal circumcision reported in a survey of 1,008 men: An overview of health and human rights implications. Int J Hum Rights. 2017;21(2):189–218.Google Scholar

Ball, PJ. A survey of subjective foreskin sensation in 600 intact men. In Denniston, GC, Grassivaro Gallo, P, Hodges, FM, Milos, MF, Viviani, F (eds), Bodily integrity and the politics of circumcision. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006, pp. 177–88.Google Scholar

Bossio, JA, Pukall, CF, Steele, SS. Examining penile sensitivity in neonatally circumcised and intact men using quantitative sensory testing. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1848–53.Google Scholar

Frisch, M, Simonsen, J. Cultural background, non-therapeutic circumcision and the risk of meatal stenosis and other urethral stricture disease: Two nationwide register-based cohort studies in Denmark 1977–2013. Surgeon. 2018;16(2):107–118.Google Scholar

Krill, AJ, Palmer, LS, Palmer, JS. Complications of circumcision. Sci World J. 2011;11:2458–68.Google Scholar

Earp, BD, Allareddy, V, Rotta, AT. Factors associated with early deaths following neonatal male circumcision in the United States, 2001–2010. Clinical Pediatrics. 2018;57(13):1532–1540.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, L. South Africa: Over half a million initiates maimed under the knife. All Africa. 2014; June 25. Available from: www.health-e.org.za/2014/06/25/half-million-initiates-maimed-knife/Google Scholar

Mabuza, W. Report on public hearings on male initiation schools in South Africa, 2010. Commission for the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. Report 978–0-620–51683-9 (pp. 1–77). 2010. Available from: www.health-e.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CRL-Report-on-Public-Hearings-on-Male-Initiation-Schools-in-South-Africa.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tobian, AA, Gray, RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1479–80.Google Scholar

Bossio, JA, Pukall, CF, Steele, S. A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature. J Sex Med. 2014;11(12):2847–64.Google Scholar

Frisch, M, Earp, BD. Circumcision of male infants and children as a public health measure in developed countries: A critical assessment of recent evidence. Global Public Health. 2016. 2018;13(5):626–641.Google Scholar

Saito, S, Hata, H, Inamura, Y, Kitamura, S, Yanagi, T, Shimizu, H. Vulvar basal cell carcinoma with adhesion of the labia majora and minora. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42(1):92–3.Google Scholar

Mason, C. Exorcising excision: Medico-legal issues arising from male and female genital surgery in Australia. J Law Med. 2001;9(1):58–67.Google Scholar

Shell-Duncan, B, Hernlund, Y, eds. Female “circumcision” in Africa: Culture, controversy, and change. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2000.Google Scholar

Shahvisi, A. Cutting slack and cutting corners: An ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ “Female genital alteration: A compromise solution.” J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):156–7.Google Scholar

Fahmy, A, El-Mouelhy, MT, Ragab, AR. Female genital mutilation/cutting and issues of sexuality in Egypt. Reprod Health Matters. 2010;18(36):181–90.Google Scholar

Leonard, L. Interpreting female genital cutting: Moving beyond the impasse. Ann Rev Sex Res. 2000;11(1):158–90.Google Scholar

Merli, C. Sunat for girls in southern Thailand: Its relation to traditional midwifery, male circumcision and other obstetrical practices. Finn J Ethnic Migrat. 2008;3(2):32–41.Google Scholar

Merli, C. Male and female genital cutting among Southern Thailand’s Muslims: Rituals, biomedical practice and local discourses. Cult Health Sex. 2010;12(7):725–38.Google Scholar

Taher, M. Understanding FGM in the Dawoodi Bohra community: An exploratory study. Sahiyo. 2017. Available from: https://sahiyo.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/sahiyo_report_final-updatedbymt2.pdfGoogle Scholar

WHO. Classification of female genital mutilation. World Health Organization. 2017. Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/fgm/overview/en/Google Scholar

Hamori, CA. Aesthetic surgery of the female genitalia: Labiaplasty and beyond. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2014;134(4):661–73.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, SB. Female circumcision and clitoridectomy in the United States: a history of a medical treatment. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press; 2014.Google Scholar

Veale, D, Daniels, J. Cosmetic clitoridectomy in a 33-year-old woman. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(3):725–30.Google Scholar

Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No 378: “Vaginal rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Earp, BD. Hymen “restoration” in cultures of oppression: How can physicians promote individual patient welfare without becoming complicit in the perpetuation of unjust social norms? J Med Ethics. 2013;40(6):431.Google Scholar

Millner, VS, Eichold, BH, Sharpe, TH, Lynn, SC. First glimpse of the functional benefits of clitoral hood piercings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):675–6.Google Scholar

Narain, S, Eva, L, Luesley, D. A rare case of pseudolymphoma of the vulva. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(3):254–5.Google Scholar

Mowat, H, McDonald, K, Dobson, AS, Fisher, J, Kirkman, M. The contribution of online content to the promotion and normalisation of female genital cosmetic surgery: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(110):1–10.Google Scholar

UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. UNICEF. 2013. Available from: www.unicef.org/media/files/UNICEF_FGM_report_July_2013_Hi_res.pdfGoogle Scholar

Conroy, RM. Female genital mutilation: Whose problem, whose solution? BMJ. 2006;333(7559):106–7.Google Scholar

Kaefer, M, Rink, RC. Treatment of the enlarged clitoris. Front Pediatr. 2017;5(125):1–11.Google Scholar

Catania, L, Abdulcadir, O, Puppo, V, Verde, JB, Abdulcadir, J, Abdulcadir, D. Pleasure and orgasm in women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). J Sex Med. 2007;4(6):1666–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pearce, AJ, Bewley, S. Medicalization of female genital mutilation: Harm reduction or unethical? Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2014;24(1):29–30.Google Scholar

Arie, S. Cosmetic industry regulation is only skin deep. BMJ Online. 2017;357(j3047):1–2.Google Scholar

Earp, BD. Between moral relativism and moral hypocrisy: Reframing the debate on “FGM.” Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016;26(2):105–44.Google Scholar

Wood, PL. Cosmetic genital surgery in children and adolescents. Best Practice & Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;48(1):137–146.Google Scholar

Kelly, B, Foster, C. Should female genital cosmetic surgery and genital piercing be regarded ethically and legally as female genital mutilation? BJOG. 2012;119(4):389–92.Google Scholar

Johnsdotter, S, Mestre, RM. Female genital mutilation in Europe: An analysis of court cases. 2015. Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7fff7a7b-fc84-11e5-b713-01aa75ed71a1/language-enGoogle Scholar

Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003. Available from: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/31/pdfs/ukpga_20030031_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Dustin, M. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the UK: Challenging the inconsistencies. Eur J Womens Stud. 2010;17(1):7–23.Google Scholar

Crouch, NS, Deans, R, Michala, L, Liao, LM, Creighton, SM. Clinical characteristics of well women seeking labial reduction surgery: A prospective study. BJOG. 2011;118(12):1507–10.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. What is the dynamic between the “cosmetic versus cultural surgery” discourse and efforts to end FGM in the UK? 2013. Dissertation, Oxford Brookes University. Available from: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2015/03/Alice_Edwards_Dissertation_Dec_13_FGM.pdfGoogle Scholar

Shahvisi, A. Female genital mutilation and cultural pluralism: Racism, sexism and hypocrisy. In Kuehlmeyer, K, Odukoya, D, Klingler, C, Huxtable, R (eds), Ethical, legal and social aspects of healthcare for migrants: Perspectives from the UK and Germany.London: Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar

Arora, KS, Jacobs, AJ. Female genital alteration: A compromise solution. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):148–54.Google Scholar

Goodman, MP, Placik, OJ, Benson III, RH, et al. A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4):1565–77.Google Scholar

British Medical Association. Female genital mutilation: Caring for patients and safeguarding children. 2011. BMA: London. Available from: www.bma.org.uk/-media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/femalegenitalmutilation.pdfGoogle Scholar

Leye, E, Ysebaert, I, Deblonde, J, et al. Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13(2):182–90.Google Scholar

Earp, BD. Does female genital mutilation have health benefits? The problem with medicalizing morality. Quillette. 2017. Available from: http://quillette.com/2017/08/15/female-genital-mutilation-health-benefits-problem-medicalizing-morality/Google Scholar

Shweder, RA. The goose and the gander: The genital wars. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):348–66.Google Scholar

Earp, BD. Infant circumcision and adult penile sensitivity: Implications for sexual experience. Trends Urol Mens Health. 2016;7(4):17–21.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, C. On bodily autonomy. In Toombs, SK (ed), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. Dordrecht: Springer; 2001, pp. 417–439.Google Scholar

Mazor, J. The child’s interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(7):421–8.Google Scholar

Darby, RJ. The child’s right to an open future: Is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision? J Med Ethics. 2013;39(7):463–8.Google Scholar

Earp, BD, Darby, R. Circumcision, sexual experience, and harm. U Penn J Int Law. 2017;37(2–online), 1–56.Google Scholar

Myers, A. Neonatal male circumcision, if not already commonplace, would be plainly unacceptable by modern ethical standards. Am J Bioethics. 2015;15(2):54–5.Google Scholar

Brusa, M, Barilan, YM. Cultural circumcision in EU public hospitals: An ethical discussion. Bioethics. 2009;23(8):470–82.Google Scholar

WHO. Male circumcision: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. World Health Organization. 2007. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43749/1/9789241596169_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar

Goodman, J. Jewish circumcision: An alternative perspective. BJU Int. 1999;83(S1):2–7.Google Scholar

Xu, B, Goldman, H. Newborn circumcision in Victoria, Australia: Reasons and parental attitudes. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(11):1019–22.Google Scholar

Jacobs, AJ, Arora, KS. Punishment of minor female genital ritual procedures: Is the perfect the enemy of the good? Dev World Bioethics. 2017;17(2):134–40.Google Scholar

Earp, BD. In defence of genital autonomy for children. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):158–63.Google Scholar

Earp, BD, Hendry, J, Thomson, M. Reason and paradox in medical and family law: Shaping children’s bodies. Med Law Rev. 2017;25(4):604–27.Google Scholar

Belluck, P. Michigan case adds U.S. dimension to debate on genital mutilation. New York Times. 2017. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/health/genital-mutilation-muslim-dawoodi-bohra-michigan-case.htmlGoogle Scholar

Veale, D. Reply to Bewley (2012). Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(3):325.Google Scholar

Manderson, L. Local rites and body politics: Tensions between cultural diversity and human rights. Int Feminist J Politics. 2004;6(2):285–307.Google Scholar

Ahmadu, FS, Shweder, RA. Disputing the myth of the sexual dysfunction of circumcised women: An interview with Fuambai S. Ahmadu by Richard A. Shweder. Anthropol Today. 2009;25(6):14–7.Google Scholar

Vestbostad, E, Blystad, A. Reflections on female circumcision discourse in Hargeysa, Somaliland: Purified or mutilated? Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18(2):22–35.Google Scholar

Shweder, RA. What about “female genital mutilation”? And why understanding culture matters in the first place. Daedalus. 2000;129(4):209–32.Google Scholar

Svoboda, JS. Promoting genital autonomy by exploring commonalities between male, female, intersex, and cosmetic female genital cutting. Global Discourse. 2013;3(2):237–55.Google Scholar

Schlegel, A, Barry, H III. Pain, fear, and circumcision in boys’ adolescent initiation ceremonies. Cross Cult Res. 2017; 1069397116685780.Google Scholar

Hellsten, SK. Rationalising circumcision: From tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom – critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):248–53.Google Scholar

Aggleton, P. “Just a snip”? A social history of male circumcision. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(29):15–21.Google Scholar

Darby, R. A surgical temptation: The demonization of the foreskin and the rise of circumcision in Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013.Google Scholar

Sawires, SR, Dworkin, SL, Fiamma, A, Peacock, D, Szekeres, G, Coates, TJ. Male circumcision and HIV/AIDS: Challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2007;369(9562):708–13.Google Scholar

Almroth, L, Almroth‐Berggren, V, Hassanein, OM, et al. A community based study on the change of practice of female genital mutilation in a Sudanese village. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;74(2):179–85.Google Scholar

Lowenstein, LF. Attitudes and attitude differences to female genital mutilation in the Sudan: Is there a change on the horizon? Soc Sci Med A: Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1978;12:417–21.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. Global Islamophobia: Muslims and moral panic in the West. London: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar

Spivak, GC. Can the subaltern speak? In Morris, R (ed), Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. New York: Columbia University Press; 1998/ 2010, pp. 21–78.Google Scholar

UNICEF. The dynamics of social change towards the abandonment of female genital mutilation/cutting in five African countries. UNICEF. 2010. Available from; www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_insight_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar

Johansen, RE, Diop, NJ, Laverack, G, Leye, E. What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013(348248):1–10.Google Scholar

Townley, L, Bewley, S. Why the law against female genital mutilation should be scrapped. The Conversation. 2017. Available from: https://theconversation.com/why-the-law-against-female-genital-mutilation-should-be-scrapped-79851Google Scholar

Shahvisi, A. Why UK doctors should be troubled by female genital mutilation legislation. Clin Ethics. 2016;12(2):102–8.Google Scholar