Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T14:24:31.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

37 - Visual ergonomics of binocular and biocular systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2010

George Smith
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
David A. Atchison
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A wide variety of visual optical instruments are designed for binocular viewing, but probably the most well known are binoculars. Binocular viewing seems to offer a number of advantages over monocular viewing. Monocular viewing usually requires one eye to be closed, which may often lead to fatigue or discomfort, especially over extended viewing periods, although it may be possible for some people to keep both eyes open when viewing monocularly. This is possible if the image of the other eye is suppressed. In comparison, binocular viewing uses both eyes and hence is probably far less fatiguing. Binocular instruments also have the potential for stereoscopic viewing. Thus superficially, binocular viewing seems to be superior to monocular viewing. However a badly designed, badly manufactured or damaged binocular system can lead to significant problems in binocular viewing. Therefore we should be aware of the need for design and constructional tolerances for binocular instruments.

Stereoscopic and non-stereoscopic constructions

Not all binocular systems provide a stereoscopic image. The production of stereoscopic images requires that the two optical axes at the eyepieces be separated in object space. Let us look at several constructions and see how this requirement may be achieved.

Non-stereoscopic systems

Figure 37.1 shows a possible schematic construction of a binocular instrument, in which the two optical axes are identical in object space and hence the eyes will not see a stereoscopic image. In practical systems, the beam-splitting and deviations are often done with prisms rather than with mirrors as depicted in the diagram.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×