Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:28:23.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Impact of Context on the Perception of Emotions

from Part II - Psychological Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Ursula Hess
Affiliation:
University of Berlin
Shlomo Hareli
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Catharine Abell
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Joel Smith
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Most human interactions are imbued with emotional exchange. In fact, it is hard to imagine a meaningful interaction in which emotion communication plays no role and even banal everyday transactions such as paying at a supermarket often involve an exchange of smiles or sometimes the expression of displeasure by one or both interaction partners. Importantly, these expressions serve as social signals that provide information about the expresser as well as about the situation (Hess, Kappas and Banse 1995) and that help to coordinate and facilitate interpersonal interaction and communication (Niedenthal and Brauer 2012; Parkinson, Fischer and Manstead 2005). This chapter explores the influence of context on the social signal value of such emotion expressions. What do they in fact tell us about the person or the situation and what influence has the context they occur in on the meaning of the exchange?

When considering the impact of context, on the one hand, and the social signals inherent in emotion expressions, on the other, the first question to ask would be what emotions actually signal. The scientific study of emotion expressions is usually traced to Darwin's seminal work On the Expressions of the Emotions in Man and Animal ([1872] 1965). Darwin understood emotion expressions as the visible part of an underlying emotional state, which are evolved and (at least at some point in the past) adaptive. The notion that the expressions communicate the organisms’ state and thereby allow a prediction of the organisms’ likely behaviour was a central point in this argument. Yet, Darwin's view has been disputed and rejected by those who considered facial expressions as exclusively or predominantly social or cultural signals, which are not linked to underlying states. Research by Ekman and colleagues (Ekman 1973; Ekman and Friesen 1971; Ekman, Friesen and Ellsworth 1972; Ekman, Sorenson and Friesen 1969) as well as Izard (Izard 1971a, 1971b) initially vindicated Darwin's idea that at least some basic emotional expressions are universal and directly associated with an underlying emotional state (see Hwang and Matsumoto, this volume, for a defence of this view, and Jack and Russell, both this volume, for criticisms). To this day, this view has been repeatedly challenged by those who consider emotion expressions to be purely social signals or social constructions unconnected to an underlying state (Barrett 2013; Fridlund 1994).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Expression of Emotion
Philosophical, Psychological and Legal Perspectives
, pp. 199 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algoe, S. B., Buswell, B. N. and Delamater, J. D. 2000. ‘Gender and Job Status as Contextual Cues for the Interpretation of Facial Expression of Emotion’, Sex Roles 42: 183–208.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. B. 1960. Emotion and Personality. New York: Columbia University Press.
Aviezer, H., Hassin, R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., Moscovitch, M. and Bentin, S. 2008. ‘Angry, Disgusted, or Afraid? Studies on the Malleability of Emotion Perception’, Psychological Science 19: 724–732.Google Scholar
Bänziger, T., Grandjean, D. and Scherer, K. R. 2009. ‘Emotion Recognition from Expressions in Face, Voice, and Body: The Multimodal Emotion Recognition Test (MERT)’, Emotion 9: 691–704.Google Scholar
Barr, C. L. and Kleck, R. E. 1995. ‘Self-Other Perception of the Intensity of Facial Expressions of Emotion – Do We Know What We Show?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 608–618.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. 2006. ‘Solving the Emotion Paradox: Categorization and the Experience of Emotion’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 20–46.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. 2009. ‘Variety Is the Spice of Life: A Psychological Construction Approach to Understanding Variability in Emotion’, Cognition and Emotion 23: 1284–1306.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. 2013. ‘Psychological Construction: The Darwinian Approach to the Science of Emotion’, Emotion Review 5: 379–389.Google Scholar
Bower, G. H. and Forgas, J. P. 2000. ‘Affect, Memory, and Social Cognition’, in Eich, Kihlstrom, Bower, Forgas and Niedenthal, (eds.) Cognition and Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bower, G. H. and Forgas, J. P. 2001. ‘Mood and Social Memory. Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition’, in Forgas, (ed.) Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bruner, J. S. and Tagiuri, R. 1954. ‘The Perception of People’, in Lindzey, (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Buck, R. 1984a. The Communication of Emotion. New York: Guilford Press.
Buck, R. 1984b. ‘Nonverbal Receiving Ability’, in Buck, (ed.) The Communication of Emotion. New York: Guilford Press.
Carroll, J. M. and Russell, J. A. 1996. ‘Do Facial Expressions Signal Specific Emotions? Judging Emotion from the Face in Context’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 205–218.Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. 1980. ‘Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 752–766.Google Scholar
Dailey, M. N., Cottrell, G. W., Padgett, C. and Adolphs, R. 2002. ‘EMPATH: A Neural Network That Categorizes Facial Expressions’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 1158–1173.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. [1872] 1965. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ekman, P. 1973. Darwin and Facial Expression: A Century of Research in Review. New York: Academic Press.
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1971. ‘Constants across Cultures in the Face and Emotion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17: 124–129.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1976. Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V. and Ellsworth, P. 1972. Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings. New York: Pergamon Press.
Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R. and Friesen, W. V. 1969. ‘Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion’, Science 164: 86–88.Google Scholar
Faucher, L. 2013. ‘Comment: Constructionisms?’, Emotion Review 5: 374–378.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., Gillebaart, M., Rotteveel, M., Becker, D. and Vliek, M. 2012. ‘Veiled Emotions: The Effect of Covered Faces on Emotion Perception and Attitudes’, Social Psychological and Personality Science 3: 266–273.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P. 1995. ‘Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM)’, Psychological Bulletin 117: 39–66.Google Scholar
Fridlund, A. J. 1994. Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. New York: Academic Press.
Frijda, N. H. 1986. The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frijda, N. H. and Mesquita, B. 1994. ‘The Social Roles and Functions of Emotions’, in Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. R. (eds.) Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H. and Savitsky, K. 2000. ‘The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment: An Egocentric Bias in Estimates of the Salience of One's Own Actions and Appearance’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 211–222.Google Scholar
Hall, C. W. 2006. ‘Self-Reported Aggression and the Perception of Anger in Facial Expression Photos’, Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 140: 255–267.Google Scholar
Hareli, S., David, S. and Hess, U. 2013. ‘Competent and Warm but Unemotional: The Influence of Occupational Stereotypes on the Attribution of Emotions’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 37: 307–317.Google Scholar
Hareli, S. and Hess, U. 2010. ‘What Emotional Reactions Can Tell us about the Nature of Others: An Appraisal Perspective on Person Perception’, Cognition and Emotion 24: 128–140.Google Scholar
Hareli, S., Elkabetz, S. and Hess, U. 2015. ‘The Role of Context in Social Inferences Drawn from Emotions as a Function of the Situative Informativeness of the Emotion – The Case of Awe and Happiness’, Manuscript.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T. and Rapson, R. L. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Madison, WI: C.W. Brown.
Hess, U. and Bourgeois, P. 2010. ‘You Smile – I Smile: Emotion Expression in Social Interaction’, Biological Psychology 84: 514–520.Google Scholar
Hess, U. and Hareli, S. 2015. ‘The Role of Social Context for the Interpretation of Emotional Facial Expressions’, Understanding Facial Expressions in Communication, pp. 119–141. India: Springer.
Hess, U., Adams, R. B., Jr. and Kleck, R. E. 2005. ‘Who May Frown and Who Should Smile? Dominance, Affiliation, and the Display of Happiness and Anger’, Cognition and Emotion 19: 515–536.Google Scholar
Hess, U., Blaison, C. and Kafetsios, K. Forthcoming. ‘Judging Facial Emotion Expressions in Context: The Influence of Culture and Self-Construal Orientation’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.
Hess, U. and Bourgeois, P. 2010. ‘You Smile – I Smile: Emotion Expression in Social Interaction’, Biological Psychology 84: 514–520.Google Scholar
Hess, U., Kappas, A. and Banse, R. 1995. ‘The Intensity of Facial Expressions Is Determined by Underlying Affective State and Social Situation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 280–288.Google Scholar
Hugenberg, K. and Bodenhausen, G. V. 2003. ‘Facing Prejudice: Implicit Prejudice and the Perception of Facial Threat’, Psychological Science 14: 640–643.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. and Simpson, J. A. 2004. ‘Motivational Aspects of Empathic Accuracy’, in Brewer, and Hewstone, (eds.) Emotion and Motivation. Perspectives on Social Psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Izard, C. E. 1971a. The Face of Emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Izard, C. E. 1971b. Human Emotions. New York: Plenum.
Kafetsios, K. and Hess, U. 2013. ‘Effects of Activated and Dispositional Self-Construal on Emotion Decoding Accuracy’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 37: 191–205.Google Scholar
Kirouac, G. and Hess, U. 1999. ‘Group Membership and the Decoding of Nonverbal Behavior’, in Philippot, Feldman and Coats, (eds.) The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koopmann-Holm, B. and Matsumoto, D. 2011. ‘Values and Display Rules for Specific Emotions’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42: 355–371.Google Scholar
Kret, M. E. and De Gelder, B. 2012. ‘Islamic Headdress Influences How Emotion Is Recognized from the Eyes’, Frontiers in Psychology 3: 110.Google Scholar
Krumhuber, E. and Manstead, A. S. R. 2009. ‘Can Duchenne Smiles Be Feigned? New Evidence on Felt and False Smiles’, Emotion 9: 807–820.Google Scholar
Landmann, H., David, S., Hareli, S. and Hess, U. 2015. ‘How I See You Depends on What You See and Vice Versa: The Bidirectional Relation of Emotion Perception and Morality’, Manuscript.Google Scholar
Larkin, K. T., Martin, R. R. and Mcclain, S. E. 2002. ‘Cynical Hostility and the Accuracy of Decoding Facial Expressions of Emotions’, Journal of Behavioral Medicine 25: 285–292.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S. and Van De Veerdonk, E. 2008. ‘Placing the Face in Context: Cultural Differences in the Perception of Facial Emotion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94: 365–381.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. and Hwang, H. S. 2010. ‘Judging Faces in Context’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4: 393–402.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Seung Hee, Y. and Fontaine, J. 2008. ‘Mapping Expressive Differences around the World: The Relationship between Emotional Display Rules and Individualism versus Collectivism’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 39: 55–74.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B. and Boiger, M. 2014. ‘Emotions in Context: A Sociodynamic Model of Emotions’, Emotion Review 6: 298–302.Google Scholar
Motley, M. T. and Camden, C. T. 1988. ‘Facial Expression of Emotion: A Comparison of Posed Expressions versus Spontaneous Expressions in an Interpersonal Communications Setting’, Western Journal of Speech Communication 52: 1–22.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M. and Brauer, M. 2012. ‘Social Functionality of Human Emotion’, Annual Review of Psychology 63: 259–285.Google Scholar
Noh, S. R. and Isaacowitz, D. M. 2013. ‘Emotional Faces in Context: Age Differences in Recognition Accuracy and Scanning Patterns’, Emotion 13: 238–249.Google Scholar
Park, B. and Rothbart, M. 1982. ‘Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 1051–1068.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H. and Manstead, A. S. R. 2005. Emotion in Social Relations: Cultural, Group, and Interpersonal Processes. New York: Psychology Press.
Ratcliff, N. J., Franklin, R. G., Nelson, A. J. and Vescio, T. K. 2012. ‘The Scorn of Status: A Bias toward Perceiving Anger on High-Status Faces’, Social Cognition 30: 631–642.Google Scholar
Righart, R. and de Gelder, B. 2008. ‘Recognition of Facial Expressions Is Influenced by Emotional Scene Gist’, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 264–272.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. and Clore, G. 2002. ‘Belief and Feeling: Evidence for an Accessibility Model of Emotional Self-Report’, Psychological Bulletin 128: 934–960.Google Scholar
Roseman, I. J. 1991. ‘Appraisal Determinants of Discrete Emotions’, Cognition and Emotion 5: 161–200.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S. and Haidt, J. 1999. ‘The CAD Triad Hypothesis: A Mapping between Three Moral Emotions (Contempt, Anger, Disgust) and Three Moral Codes (Community, Autonomy, Divinity)’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 574–586.Google Scholar
Sarid, O. 2015. ‘Assessment of Anger Terms in Hebrew: A Gender Comparison’, The Journal of Psychology 149: 303–324.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. 1978. ‘Personality Inference from Voice Quality: The Loud Voice of Extraversion’, European Journal of Social Psychology 8: 467–487.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. 1987. ‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of Emotion: The Component Process Model of Affective States’, Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication. www.affective-sciences.org/node/402.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. 1999. ‘Appraisal Theory’, in Dalgleish, T. and Power, M. J. (eds.) Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 637–663.
Scherer, K. R. and Grandjean, D. 2008. ‘Facial Expressions Allow Inference of Both Emotions and Their Components’, Cognition and Emotion 22: 789–801.Google Scholar
Senécal, S., Murard, N. and Hess, U. 2003. ‘Do You Know What I Feel? Partners’ Predictions and Judgments of Each Other's Emotional Reactions to Emotion-Eliciting Situations’, Sex Roles 48: 21–37.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. A Mathematical Model of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Shields, S. A. 2005. ‘The Politics of Emotion in Everyday Life: “Appropriate” Emotion and Claims on Identity’, Review of General Psychology 9: 3–15.Google Scholar
Showers, C. and Cantor, N. 1985. ‘Social Cognition: A Look at Motivated Strategies’, Annual Review of Psychology 36: 275–305.Google Scholar
Szczurek, L., Monin, B. and Gross, J. J. 2012. ‘The Stranger Effect: The Rejection of Affective Deviants’, Psychological Science 23: 1105–1111.Google Scholar
Thibault, P., Bourgeois, P. and Hess, U. 2006. ‘The Effect of Group-Identification on Emotion Recognition: The Case of Cats and Basketball Players’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 676–683.Google Scholar
Thibault, P., Levesque, M., Gosselin, P. and Hess, U. 2012. ‘The Duchenne Marker Is NOT a Universal Signal of Smile Authenticity: But It Can Be Learned!’, Special Issue of Social Psychology on Culture as Process 43: 215–221.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×