Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:47:53.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Teaching trust law in the twenty-first century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Elise Bant
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Matthew Harding
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Introduction

I met Michael Bryan in 2004 at the Obligations II conference at the Melbourne Law School. It was my first time presenting a paper at an international conference and I was quite nervous. Michael, who was chairing my session, was extremely warm and supportive and put me quickly at ease. After the session, he generously gave me many insightful suggestions on how to improve my paper. Over the years, I have heard that this is just typical of Michael as a person; colleagues from Melbourne have often been effusive in their praise of Michael. Michael has certainly shown us the way in what is possible in academia – being a respected and inspiring scholar, teacher, colleague and friend. It is my privilege to write an essay dedicated to Michael on the occasion of his retirement. To honour Michael's substantial contribution as a scholar and teacher in trust law, I have decided to write a chapter on teaching trust law.

There are a number of pitfalls associated with writing a chapter on teaching. For one thing, there is the danger of sounding overly prescriptive or presumptuous. I am also acutely aware of my limited experience in this area, as compared to other trust teachers, having taught the subject for less than ten years. Thus, this chapter does not have a prescriptive agenda; I do not suggest that there is one way or a ‘correct’ approach to teaching trust law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring Private Law , pp. 125 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hayton, D and Mitchell, C, Hayton and Marshall Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Trusts and Equitable Remedies (12th edn Sweet & Maxwell, London 2005) 28–47Google Scholar
Edwards, HT, ‘The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession’ (1992−93) 91 Mich L Rev34, 39–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarrell, J, ‘Modern Trusts in Legal Education’ [1991] 25 Law Teacher227, 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D, ‘Integrity of Trusteeship’ (2004) 120 LQR1Google Scholar
Latynina, Y, ‘Losing the Plot in Kukura Kidnapping’ The Moscow Times (Moscow 25 September 2002)Google Scholar
Nolan, R, ‘Controlling Fiduciary Powers’ (2009) 68 CLJ293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayton, D, Matthews, P and Mitchell, C, Underhill and Hayton: Law of Trust and Trustees (17th edn LexisNexis Butterworths, London 2007) 835–9Google Scholar
Waters, D, ‘The Protector: New Wine in Old Bottles?’ in Oakley, A (ed), Trends in Contemporary Trust Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996) 63Google Scholar
Tey, TH, ‘Trust Protector’ (2008) 20 S Ac LJ99Google Scholar
Matthews, P, ‘Capacity to Create a Trust: The Onshore Problems, and the Offshore Solutions’ (2002) 6 Edin LR176Google Scholar
Duckworth, A, ‘Forced Heirship: Where Are We Now?’ (2005) 4 PCB208Google Scholar
Thomas, G and Hudson, A, The Law of Trusts (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004) ch 39Google Scholar
Wong, E, ‘Singapore: Financial Reforms’ (2003) 18 JIBLR16Google Scholar
Tang, HW and Sandrasegara, DP, ‘Equity and Trusts’ in Teo, KS (ed), Developments in Singapore Law Between 2001 and 2005 (Singapore Academy of Law, Singapore 2006) 892–4Google Scholar
Arnold, W, ‘Singapore Makes a Pitch to Draw the Wealth’ New York Times (New York 26 April 2007)Google Scholar
Tan, L, ‘Spore Needs Up to 1,000 More Wealth Managers Now’ The Straits Times (Singapore 30 June 2006)Google Scholar
Calmes, J and Andrews, EL, ‘Obama Asks Curb On Use Of Havens To Reduce Taxes’ New York Times (New York 5 May 2009)Google Scholar
Browning, L, ‘Banking Scandal Unfolds Like a Thriller’ New York Times (New York 15 August 2008)Google Scholar
Kulish, N and Dougherty, C, ‘Deutsche Post Chief Under Tax Inquiry’ New York Times (New York 15 February 2008)Google Scholar
Whitlock, C, ‘Swiss Talk Tough in Banking Battle: Blacklist Threat Looms Over Tax Havens’ The Washington Post (Washington DC 29 March 2009)Google Scholar
Charles, J, ‘Caribbean Wonders about McCain, Obama Policies’ The Miami Herald (Miami 25 July 2008)Google Scholar
Hay, RJ, ‘Information Exchange And The Offshore Financial Centres’ (2002) J Financial Regulation and Compliance141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudrle, RT, ‘Did Blacklisting Hurt The Tax Havens?’ (2009) 12 J Money Laundering Control33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, M, ‘Tax Havens under Siege Amid New Consensus over Sanctions’ The Independent (London 4 April 2009)Google Scholar
Langbein, JH, ‘The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce’ (1997) 107 Yale LJ165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, MA, ‘A Legal Road Map for Securitisation of Assets and Other Structured Finance Transactions in the British Virgin Islands’ (2005) 20 JIBLR475Google Scholar
Booth, R (ed), Real Estate Investment Trusts: A Global Analysis (Globe Business Publishing, London 2006)
O'Harrow, R Jnr and Dennis, B, ‘Downgrades and Downfall: How Could a Single Unit of AIG Cause the Giant Company's Near-Ruin and Become a Fulcrum of the Global Financial Crisis?’ The Washington Post (Washington DC 31 December 2008)Google Scholar
Morgenson, G, ‘Debt Watchdogs: Tamed or Caught Napping?’ New York Times (New York 7 December 2008)Google Scholar
Shankari, U, ‘Pressure Building Up in Crowded S-Reit Sector’ The Business Times (Singapore 17 December 2007)Google Scholar
Theresianto, N, ‘Funds Still Drawn to Asian Real Estate’ The Edge (Singapore 23 June 2008)Google Scholar
Pearce, R and Stevens, J, The Law of Trusts and Equitable Obligations (4th edn Oxford Univerisity Press, Oxford 2006)Google Scholar
Gardner, S, An Introduction to the Law of Trusts (Clarendon Press, Oxford 2003) 25–50Google Scholar
Parkinson, P, ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’ (2002) 61 CLJ657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, JH, ‘The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts’ (1995) 105 Yale LJ625, 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayton, D, ‘Developing the Obligation Characteristic of the Trust’ (2001) 117 LQR96Google Scholar
Langbein, JL, ‘Mandatory Rules in the Law of Trusts’ (2004) 98 Northwestern U L Rev1105Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×