Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:09:00.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Context-Specific Redress Mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

Ignacio de la Rasilla
Affiliation:
Wuhan University Institute of International Law, China
Jorge E. Viñuales
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Experiments in International Adjudication
Historical Accounts
, pp. 125 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Amador, F. V. García, Sohn, Louis Bruno and Baxter, Richard R.. Recent Codification of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1974).Google Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K.Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’ (2004) 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 809.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M. The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, or, the Law of International Claims (New York: Banks Law Publishing Company, 1915).Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M.The Opinions of the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany’ (1925) 19:1 American Journal of International Law 133.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin M.The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1939) 33 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law’s Annual Meeting 1921–1969 51.Google Scholar
Burchard, Arthur.The Mixed Claims Commission and German Property in the United States of America’ (1927) 21:3 American Journal of International Law 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, Rudolf.Mixed Claims Commissions’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf and Macalister-Smith, Peter (eds.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Dunn, Frederick Sherwood and Walter Hines Page School of International Relations. The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Friedmann, Wolfgang.The Disintegration of European Civilisation and the Future of International Law: Some Observations on the Social Foundations of Law’ (1938) 2:3 Modern Law Review 194.Google Scholar
‘International Law: Calvo Clause: Mixed Claims Commission’s Jurisdiction Over Claims of United States Nationals against Mexican Government’ (1927) 27:6 Columbia Law Review 741.Google Scholar
Jessup, Philip C. Responsibility of States for Injuries to Individuals’ (1946) 46:6 Columbia Law Review 903.Google Scholar
Root, Elihu. The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad (Washington, DC: American Society of International Law, 1910).Google Scholar
Shea, Donald. The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1955).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Barker, C. (ed.), The Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal (Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2007), 8086.Google Scholar
Borchard, E., ‘Recent Opinions of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico’ (1931) 25(4) American Journal of International Law 735740.Google Scholar
Bordin, F. L., ‘Reflections on Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 535567.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. R., and Grant, T., ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to Foreigners’ in Grant, J. P. and Barker, J. Craig (eds.), The Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal (Buffalo, NY: Hein, 2007).Google Scholar
Corten, O., and Klein, P., ‘La Commission du droit international comme agent de la formalisation du droit de la responsabilité’ in Alland, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O. and Vinuales, J. (eds.), Unity and Diversity of International Law: Essays in Honour of Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2014), 415.Google Scholar
De Beus, J. G., The Jurisprudence of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico, under the Convention of September 8, 1923 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1938).Google Scholar
Fehr, J. C., ‘International Law as Applied by U.S.-Mexico Claims Commission’ (1928) 14 American Bar Association Journal 312.Google Scholar
Hunt, B. L., ‘Work of the General Claims Commission, United States and Mexico’ (1937) 3 Federal Bar Association Journal 83.Google Scholar
Juliard, P., ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Jansen, N., The Making of Legal Authority. Non-legislative Codifications in Historical and Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Nissel, A., ‘The Duality of State Responsibility’ (2013) 44 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 793.Google Scholar
Nolte, G., ‘From Dionisio Anzilotti to Roberto Ago: The Classical International Law of State Responsibility and the Traditional Primacy of a Bilateral Conception of Inter-state Relations’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1083, esp. 1084–1086.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B., ‘The Settlement of Outstanding Claims between Mexico and the United States’ (1924) 18 American Journal of International Law 315.Google Scholar
Shabtai, R. (ed.), The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility, Part 1, Articles 1–35 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar
Spiermann, O., International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice, The Rise of the International Judiciary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 41ff.Google Scholar
Spiermann, O., ‘“Who Attempts too Much Does Nothing Well”: The 1920 Advisory Committee of Jurists and the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (2002) 73 British Yearbook of International Law 187260.Google Scholar
Stuyt, A. M., The General Principles of Law as Applied by International Tribunals to Disputes on Attribution and Exercise of State Jurisdiction (Berlin: Springer, 1946).Google Scholar
Van Vollenhoven, C., et al.General Claims Commission – United States and Mexico: Illinois Central Railroad Company v. United Mexican States’ (1926) 20(4) American Journal of International Law 794799.Google Scholar
Woolsey, L. H., ‘Settlement of Claims between the United States and Mexico’ (1936) 30 American Journal of International Law 99.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Al Ghunaimi, M. T., The Muslim Conception of International Law and the Western Approach (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968).Google Scholar
Alter, K., The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Alter, K. and Helfer, L., Supranational Legal Transplants: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Barnett, M. and Solingen, E., ‘Designed to Fail or Failure of Design? The Origins and Legacy of the Arab League’, in Acharya, A. and Johnston, A. I. (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 180220.Google Scholar
Bouony, L., ‘La Cour Maghrèbine de Justice’ (1993) 26 Revue Belge de Droit International 356.Google Scholar
Kerr, M., The Arab Cold War: Gamal ‘Abd al-Nasir and His Rivals, 1958–1970 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed. 1971).Google Scholar
Lombardini, M., ‘The International Islamic Court of Justice: Towards an International Islamic Legal System?’ (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law 665.Google Scholar
Maged, A., ‘Arab and Islamic Shari’a Perspectives on the Current System of International Criminal Justice’ (2008) 8 International Criminal Law Review 477.Google Scholar
Romano, C., ‘The Shadow Zones of International Judicialization’, in Romano et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press Handbook of International Adjudication, pp. 90–110.Google Scholar
Romano, C., ‘Trial and Error in International Judicialization’, in Romano et al. (eds.), Oxford University Press Handbook of International Adjudication, pp. 111–134.Google Scholar
Romano, C., Alter, K and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford University Press Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Shapiro, M., Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1981), pp. 194222.Google Scholar
Thani, A. F., The Projected Arab Court of Justice: A Study to Its Draft Statute and Rules, with Specific Reference to the International Court of Justice and Principles of Islamic Sharia (PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 1999), p. 335.Google Scholar
Willis, W., Politics and Power in the Maghreb: Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco from Independence to the Arab Spring (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), pp. 282284.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×