Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:02:10.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - Mysticeti

from Part VI - Marine mammals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Christine M. Janis
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Gregg F. Gunnell
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Mark D. Uhen
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, O. (1938). Vorläufige mitteilungen uber die revision der Fossilen Mystococeten aus dem Tertiär Belgines I. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 14, 1–34.Google Scholar
Abel, O.(1941). Vorläufige mitteilungen uber die revision der Fossilen Mystococeten aus dem Tertiär Belgines V. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 17, 1–29.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. (1973). Pliocene cetaceans of the San Diego Formation, Sand Diego, California. In Studies on the Geology and Geologic Hazards of the Greater San Diego Area, California, ed. Ross, A. and Dowlen, R. J., pp. 37–42. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Geologists.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1977). Outline of eastern North Pacific fossil cetacean assemblages. Systematic Zoology, 25, 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1987). Aetiocetus and Chonecetus, primitive Oligocene toothed mysticetes and the origin of baleen whales. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 7 (suppl. to no. 3), p. 10A.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1989). Aetiocetus and Chonecetus (Mammalia: Cetacea): primitive Oligocene toothed mysticetes and the origin of baleen whales. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Theriological Congress, Vol. 1, p. 479.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1991). The fossil marine vertebrate fauna of the latest Miocene Almejas formation, Isla Cedros, Baja California, Mexico. Memorias Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, Primera Reunion Internacional Sobre Geologia de la Peninsula de Baja California, pp. 147–66.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G.(1998). The sequence of fossil marine mammal assemblages in Mexico. Advances en Investigación Special Publication, 1, 26–79.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. and McLeod, S. A. (1984). The fossil record and phyletic relationships of gray whales. In The Gray Whale: Eschrichtius robustus, ed. Jones, M. L., Swartz, S. L., and Leatherwood, S., pp. 3–32. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G. and Sanders, A. E. (1996a). The transition from archaeocetes to mysticetes: late Oligocene toothed mysticetes from near Charleston, South Carolina. [Proceedings of the Sixth North American Paleontological Convention] Paleontological Society Special Publication, 8, p. 24.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., and Sanders, A. E. (1996b). The transition from Archaeoceti to Mysticeti: late Oligocene toothed mysticetes from South Carolina, USA. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16(suppl. to no. 3), p. 21A.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Hutchinson, J. H., and Welton, B. J. (1981). The vertebrate fossils of the marine Cenozoic San Mateo Formation at Oceanside, California. In Geologic Investigations of the Coastal Plain, San Diego County, California, ed. Abbott, P. L. and Dunn, S. O', pp. 53–70. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Geologists.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Raschke, R. E., and Brown, J. C. (1984). A fossil baleen whale from the Capistrano Formation in Laguna Hills, California. Memoirs of the Natural History Foundation of Orange County, 1, 11–18.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Raschke, R. E., and Brown, J. C. (1987). A fossil baleen whale. Whalewatcher, 21, 7–10.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. G., Kimura, M., Furusawa, H., and Sawamura, H. (1995). Classification and distribution of Oligocene Aetiocetidae (Mammalia; Cetacea; Mysticeti) from western North America and Japan. The Island Arc, 3, 392–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, G. R. and Wheeler, W. H. (1977). Cetaceans from the St. Marys and Yorktown Formations, Surry County, Virginia. Journal of Paleontology, 51, 492–504.Google Scholar
Bisconti, M. (2000). New description, character analysis and preliminary phyletic assessment of two Balaenidae skulls from the Italian Pliocene. Palaeontolographia Italica, 87, 37–66.Google Scholar
Bisconti, M.(2003). Evolutionary history of Balaenidae. Cranium(Tijdschrift van de Werkgroep Pleistocene Zoogdieren), 20, 9–50.Google Scholar
Borowski, G. H. (1781). Gemeinnüzzige Naturgeschichte des Thierreichs, Vol. 2, p. 21. Berlin and Stalsund.Google Scholar
Bouetel, V. (2005). Phylogenetic implications of skull structure and feeding behavior in balaenopterids (Cetacea, Mysticeti). Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 139–46.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, L. R., Esperante, R., Chadwick, A. V., Porras, O. P., and Alomía, M. (2004). Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru. Geology, 32, 165–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, J. F. (1843). De cetotherio, novo balaenarum familiae genre in Rossia Meridionali ante aliquot annos effoso. Bulletin de La Classe Physico-Mathématique de L'Académie Impérial des Sciences de St. Pétersberg, 1, 145–8.Google Scholar
(1872). Über eine neue Classification der Bartenwale (Balaenoidea) mit Berücksichtigung der untergegangenen Gattungen derselben. Bulletin de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersberg, 17, 113–29.
Cabrera, A. (1926). Cétácéos fossiles del Museo de la Plata. Revista Museo de La Plata 29, 363–411.Google Scholar
Capellini, G. (1876). Sulle balene fossili toscane. Atti della Royal Accademia (nazionale) dei Lincei, Rome, Memoire della Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Mathematiche e Naturale, series2, 3, 9–14.Google Scholar
Capellini, G.(1901). Balaenottera miocenica del Monte Titano Repubblica di S. Marino. Memorie della Royal Accademia delle Scienze dell'Instiuto di Bologna, 9, 237–60.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D. (1868a). [Extinct Cetacea from the Miocene bed of Maryland.]. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 20, 150–60.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1868b). Second contribution to the history of the Vertebrata of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 20, 184–94.Google Scholar
(1869). Third contribution to the fauna of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 11, 6--12.
Cope, E. D.(1870a). Discovery of a huge whale in North Carolina. The American Naturalist, 4, 128.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1870b). Fourth contribution to the history of the fauna of the Miocene and Eocene periods of the United States. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 11, 285–94.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1890). The Cetacea. The American Naturalist, 24, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1891). Syllabus of Lectures on Geology and Paleontology, Part 3: Paleontology of the Vertebrata. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1895). Fourth contribution to the marine fauna of the Miocene period of the United States. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 34, 135–55.Google Scholar
Cope, E. D.(1896). Sixth contribution to the knowledge of the marine Miocene fauna of North America. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Society, 35, 139–46.Google Scholar
Czyzewska, T. and Ryziewicz, Z. (1976). Pinocetus polonicus gen. n., sp. n. (Cetacea) from the Miocene limestones of Pìnczów, Poland. Acta Paläeontologia Polonica 21, 259–91.Google Scholar
Meuter, F. J. and Laga, P. G. (1976). Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy based on benthonic foraminifera of the Neogene deposits of northern Belgium. Bulletin de la Société Belge de Géologie, 85, 133–52.Google Scholar
Démére, T. A. (1986). The fossil whale, Balaenoptera davidsonii (Cope 1872), with a review of other Neogene species of Balaenoptera (Cetacea: Mysticeti). Marine Mammal Science, 2, 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Démére, T. A., Berta, A., and McGowen, M. R. (2005). The taxonomic and evolutionary history of fossil and modern balaenopteroid mysticetes. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 12, 99–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domning, D. P. (1978). Sirenian evolution in the North Pacific Ocean. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 118, 1--176.
Dooley, A. C. Jr. (1993). The vertebrate fauna of the Calvert Formation (Middle Miocene) at the Caroline Stone Quarry, Caroline County, VA. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 13(suppl. to no. 3), p. 33A.Google Scholar
Dooley, A. C., Jr., Fraser, N. C., and Luo, Z. (2004). The earliest known member of the rorqual-gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24, 453–63.Google Scholar
Dorr, J. A. Jr. and Eschman, D. F. (1971). Geology of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ellerman, J. R. and Morrisson-Scott, T. C. S. (1951). Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals: 1758 to 1946. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Emlong, D. R. (1966). A new archaic cetacean from the Oligocene of northwest Oregon. Oregon University Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 3, 1–51.Google Scholar
Flower, W. H. and Lydekker, R. (1891). An Introduction to the Study of Mammals, Living and Extinct. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. (1989). Problematic early Oligocene toothed whale (Cetacea,?Mysticeti) from Waikari, north Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 32, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(1992). Cetacean evolution and Eocene–Oligocene environments. In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution, ed. Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A., pp. 368–81. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(2002a). Neoceti. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 787–91. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(2002b). Oligocene origins of skim-feeding right whales: a small archaic balaenid from New Zealand. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22(suppl. to no. 3), p. 54A.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(2003). The toothed stem-mysticete Llanocetus in the Latest Eocene of the southern Ocean. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 23(suppl. to no. 3), p. 50A–1A.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E.(2004). The transition from Archaeoceti to Neoceti: Oligocene archaeocetes in the Southwest Pacific. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24(suppl. to no. 3), p. 59A.Google Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. and Barnes, L. G. (1994). The evolutionary history of whales and dolphins. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 22, 419–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, R. E. and Muizon, C., de (2001). Evolutionary history of cetaceans: a review. In Secondary Adaptations of Tetrapods to Life in Water, ed. J.-M. Mazin and V. de Buffrénil, pp. 169--223. Munich: Friedrich Pfeil.
Geisler, J. H. and Luo, Z. (1996). The petrosal and inner ear of Herpetocetus sp. (Mammalia: Cetacea) and their implications for the phylogeny and hearing of archaic mysticetes. Journal of Paleontology, 70, 1045–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geisler, J. H. and Sanders, A. E. (2003). Morphological evidence for the phylogeny of Cetacea. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 10, 23–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, D. D. (1975). Catalogue of the type specimens of fossil vertebrates, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia. Introduction and Part I: marine mammals. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 127, 63–6.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, L. and Janvier, P. (1971). Les mammif res marins des faluns Miocenes de la Touraine et de l'Anjou. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sciences de la TerreSérie, 6, 22, 161–95.Google Scholar
Gottfried, M. D., Bohaska, D. J., and Whitmore, F. C. Jr. (1994). Miocene cetaceans of the Chesapeake Group. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 229–38.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. (1846). On the cetaceous animals. In The Zoology of the Voyage of HMS Erebus and Terror, under the Command of Capt. Sir J. C. Ross, RN, FRS, During the Years 1839 to 1843, ed. Richardson, J. and Gray, J. E., pp. 13–53. London: E. W. Janson.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1864). Notes on the whalebone-whales; with a synopsis of the species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 14, 345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. E.(1868). Synopsis of the Species of Whales and Dolphins in the Collection of the British Museum. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Hanna, G. D. and McLellan, M. E. (1924). A new species of whale from the type locality of the Monterey Group. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 13, 237–41.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R. (1988). The late Quaternary development of the Champlain Sea Basin: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 35. In Marine Mammals of the Champlain Sea, and the Problem of Whales in Michigan, ed. Gadd, N. R., pp. 225–40. Ottawa: Geological Association of Canada.Google Scholar
Hay, O. P. (1902). Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershkovitz, P. (1966). Catalog of Living Whales. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 246, 1–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, J. A. (1995). Ancient Life of the Great Lakes Basin. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsen, K. (1962). Development of tooth germs and adjacent structures in the whalebone whale (Balaenoptera physalus (L.)). Hvalrådets Skrifter: Scientific Results of Marine Biological Research, 45, 1–56.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. (1922). Description of the skull of Megaptera miocaena, a fossil humpback whale from the Miocene diatomaceous earth of Lompoc, California. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 61, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1924). Description of a new genus and species of whalebone whale from the Calvert Cliffs, Maryland. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 63, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1925). Additions to the Tertiary history of the pelagic mammals on the Pacific coast of North America. II. Fossil cetotheres from California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 348, 35–56.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1929). A new cetothere from Southern California. Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, University of California Publications, 18, 449–57.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1931). Pelagic mammals from the Temblor Formation of the Kern River Region, California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 19, 217–397.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1934a). The Patagonian fossil whalebone whale, Cetotherium moreni (Lydekker). Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 447, 65–81.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1934b). A new cetothere from the Modelo Formation at Los Angeles, California. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 447, 83–104.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1940). Whales, giants of the sea. National Geographic Magazine, 67, 35–90.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1944). Fossil cetaceans from the Florida Tertiary. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 94, 433–71.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1965). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 1: A new whalebone whale from the Miocene Calvert Formation. United States National Museum Bulletin, 247, 1–45.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1968a). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 6: A hitherto unrecognised Calvert cetothere. United States National Museum Bulletin, 247, 133–61.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1968b). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 5: Miocene Calvert mysticetes described by Cope. United States National Museum Bulletin, 247, 103–32.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1968c). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 7: A sharp-nosed cetothere from the Miocene Calvert. United States National Museum Bulletin, 247, 163–73.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1968d). Fossil marine mammals from the Miocene Calvert Formation of Maryland and Virginia. Part 8: Supplement to description of Parietobalaena palmeri. United States National Museum Bulletin, 247, 175–95.Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.(1969). Cetothere skeletons from the Miocene Choptank Formation of Maryland and Virginia. United States National Museum Bulletin, 294, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, T. and Ozawa, T. (2002). A new cetothere (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the early Miocene of Japan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 22, 684–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacépède, B. G. E. (1804). Histoire Naturelle des Cetaces. Paris: Chez Plassan.Google Scholar
Lambertson, R. H. (1983). Internal mechanism of rorqual feeding. Journal of Mammalogy, 64, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, R. G. and Dizon, A. E. (2002). Reconstructing the rorqual phylogeny: with comments on the use of molecular and morphological data for systematic study. In Molecular and Cell Biology of Marine Mammals, ed. Pfieffer, C. J., pp. 100–10. Melbourne, FL: Kreiger.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. (1851). [Descriptions of two fossil species of Balaena,B. palaeatlantica and B. prisca.]Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 5, 308–9.Google Scholar
Leidy, J.(1869). The extinct mammalian fauna of Dakota and Nebraska, including an account of some allied forms from other localities, together with a synopsis of the mammalian remains of North America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 2, 1–472.Google Scholar
Lilljeborg, W. (1861). Hvalben, funna i jorden på Gräsön i Roslagen i Sverige. Föredrag vid Naturforskaremötet i Kopenhamn, 1860, 599–616.Google Scholar
Lindow, B. E. K. (2002). Bardehvalernes indbyrdes slægtskabsforhold: en forelebig analyse. [The internal relationships of the baleen whales: a preliminary analysis.] In Resumé-hæfte. Hvaldag 2002, ed. Lindow, B. E. K., pp. 12–19. Gram, Denmark: Midts⊘nderjyllands Museum.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus and Differentiis, 10th edn, Reformata, Vol. I. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. (1894). Cetacean skulls from Patagonia. Annales del Museo de la Plata, Paleontología Argentina II, 1–13.Google Scholar
Martini, E. and Müller, C. (1975). Calcareous nannoplankton from the type Chattian. Proceedings of the Sixth Congress on Neogene Mediterranean Stratigraphy, Bratislava, Yugoslavia, 1975, Vol. 1, pp. 37–41.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. A., Whitmore, F. C., Jr., and Barnes L. G. (1993). Evolutionary relationships and classification. In The Bowhead Whale, ed. Burnes, J. J., Montague, J. J., and Cowles, C. J., pp. 45–70. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy.Google Scholar
Messenger, S. L. and McGuire, J. A. (1998). Morphology, molecules and the phylogenetics of cetaceans. Systematic Biology, 47, 90–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milinkovitch, M. C. (1995). Molecular phylogeny of cetaceans prompts revision of morphological transformations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 328–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. S. Jr. (1923). The telescoping of the cetacean skull. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 76, 1–71.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. D. (1989). A new cetacean from the late Eocene La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 46, 2219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. S. (1994). Miocene and Pliocene marine mammal faunas from the Bone Valley Formation of central Florida. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 239–68.Google Scholar
Packard, E. L. (1947). Fossil baleen from the Pliocene of Cape Blanco, Oregon. Oregon State Monographs, Studies in Geology, 5, 3–11.Google Scholar
Packard, E. L. and Kellogg, R. (1934). A new cetothere from the Miocene Astoria Formation of Newport, Oregon. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 447, 1–62.Google Scholar
Perrin, W. F. and Brownell, R. L. (2001). Update of the list of recognized species of cetaceans. Journal of Cetacean Research Management, 3(suppl.), pp. 364–7.Google Scholar
Pilleri, G. (1986). Beobachtungen an den fossilen Cetaceen des Kaukasus. Ostermundigen, Switzerland: Hirnanatomisches Institut.Google Scholar
Pivorunas, A. (1979). The feeding mechanisms of baleen whales. American Scientist, 67, 432–40.Google Scholar
Rice, D. W. (1998). Marine Mammals of the World. Systematics and Distribution. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, H. C., Brownell, R. L., Brown, M. W.et al. (2000). World-wide genetic differentiation of Eubalaena: questioning the number of right whale species. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1793–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, F. (1978). Mesocetus argillarius sp. n. (Cetacea, Mysticeti) from Upper Miocene of Denmark, with remarks on the lower jaw and the echolocation system in whale phylogeny. Zoologica Scripta, 7, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothausen, K. (1971). Cetotheriopsis tobieni n. sp., der erste paläogene Bartenwal (Cetotheriidae, Mysticeti, Mamm.) nördlich des Tethysraumes. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 60, 131–47.Google Scholar
Russell, L. S. (1968). A new cetacean from the Oligocene Sooke Formation of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 5, 929–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychel, A. L., Reeder, T. W., and Berta, A. (2004). Phylogeny of mysticete whales based on mitochondrial and nuclear data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32, 892–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, A. E., and Barnes, L. G. (2002a). Paleontology of the Late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina. 3: Eomysticetidae, a new family of primitive mysticetes (Mammalia: Cetacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 313–56.Google Scholar
Sanders, A. E., and Barnes, L. G. (2002b). Paleontology of the Late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina. 2: Micromysticetus rothauseni, a primitive cetotheriid mysticete (Mammalia, Cetacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 271–93.Google Scholar
Sasaki, T., Nikaido, M., Hamilton, H.et al. (2005). Mitochondrial phylogenetics and evolution of mysticete whales. Systematic Biology, 54, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85, 1–350.Google Scholar
Slijper, E. J. (1936). Die Cetaceen. Capta Zoologica, 7, 1–590.Google Scholar
Slijper, E. J.(1962). Whales. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
True, F. W. (1912a). The genera of fossil whalebone whales allied to Balaenoptera. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 59, 1–8.Google Scholar
True, F. W.(1912b). On the correlation of North American and European genera of fossil cetaceans. Proceedings of the Seventh International Zoological Congress, 7, 779–81.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. (2002). Dental morphology (cetacean), evolution of. In Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, ed. Perrin, W. F., Würsig, B., and Thewissen, J. G. M., pp. 316–19. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uhen, M. D. and Gingerich, P. D. (2001). New genus of dorudontine archaeocete (Cetacea) from the middle-to-late Eocene of South Carolina. Marine Mammal Science, 17, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneden, P. J. (1859). Rapport de M. Van Beneden. Bulletins de l'Académie Royal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 8, 123–46.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J.(1867). Rapport sur les Collections Paléontologiques de l'Université de Louvain. Louvain: Université de Louvain.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J.(1872). Les Balaenidés fossiles d'Anvers. Journal de Zoologie, 1, 405–19.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J.(1880). Les Mysticètes à courts fanons des sables des environs d'Anvers. Bulletins de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 50, 11–26.Google Scholar
Beneden, P. J. and Gervais, P. (1880). Ostéographie des Cétacés Vivants et Fossiles. Paris: Arthus Bertrand.Google Scholar
Valen, L. M. (1968). Monophyly or diphyly in the origin of whales. Evolution, 22, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westgate, J. W. and Whitmore, F. C. Jr. (2002). Balaena ricei, a new species of bowhead whale from the Yorktown Formation (Pliocene) of Hampton, Virginia. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 295–312.Google Scholar
Whitmore, F. C. Jr. (1994). Neogene climate change and the emergence of the modern whale fauna of the North Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 223–7.Google Scholar
Winge, H. (1910). Om Plesiocetus og Squalodon fra Danmark. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Foreng, Copenhagen, Series7, 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Winge, H.(1921). A review of the interrelationships of the Cetacea. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 72, 1–97.Google Scholar
Zeigler, C. V., Chan, G. L., and Barnes, L. G. (1997). A new Late Miocene balaenopterid whale (Cetacea: Mysticeti), Parabalaenoptera baulinensis, (new genus and species) from the Santa Cruz mudstone, Point Reyes Peninsula, California. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 50, 115–38.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×