Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: July 2012

Chapter 3 - Natural selection and rational decisions

References

BatesonM. and HealyS. D. (2005). Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol., 20, 659664.
BednekoffP. A. (2007). Foraging in the face of danger. In: Foraging (eds. StephensD. W., BrownJ. S. and YdenbergR. C.). University of Chicago Press, pp. 305–329.
BirnbaumM. H. (2010). Testing lexicographic semiorders as models of decision making: priority dominance, integration, interaction, and transitivity. J. Math. Psychol., 54, 363386.
BirnbaumM. H. and GutierrezR. J. (2007). Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semi-order. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 104, 96112.
BirnbaumM. H. and LaCroixA. R. (2008). Dimension integration: testing models without trade-offs. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 105, 122133.
BirnbaumM. H. and SchmidtU. (2010). Testing transitivity in choice under risk. Theory Decis., 69, 599614.
BrandstatterE., GigerenzerG. and HertwigR. (2006). The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs. Psychol. Rev., 113, 409432.
BrowneW. J., CaplenG., EdgarJ., WilsonL. R. and NicolC. J. (2010). Consistency, transitivity and inter-relationships between measures of choice in environmental preference tests with chickens. Behav. Processes, 83, 7278.
CharnovE. L., Los-den HartoghR. L., JonesW. T. and Van den AssemJ. (1981). Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature, 289, 2733.
ClarkC. W. and MangelM. (2000). Dynamic state variable models in ecology. Oxford University Press.
CooperW. S. (2001). The evolution of reason. Cambridge University Press.
DayB. and LoomesG. (2010). Conflicting violations of transitivity and where they may lead us. Theory Decis., 68, 233242.
DicksonE. S. (2008). Expected utility violations evolve under status-based selection mechanisms. J. Theor. Biol., 254, 650654.
EdwardsS. C. and PrattS. C. (2009). Rationality in collective decision-making by ant colonies. Proc. R. Soc. B, 276, 36553661.
FantinoE. and AbarcaN. (1985). Choice, optimal foraging, and the delay-reduction hypothesis. Behav. Brain Sci., 8, 315330.
FishburnP. C. (1973). Binary choice probabilities: on the varieties of stochastic transitivity. J. Math. Psychol., 10, 327352.
FranksN. R., MallonE. B., BrayH. E., HamiltonM. J. and MischlerT. C. (2003). Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim. Behav., 65, 215223.
GigerenzerG. (2000). Adaptive thinking. Oxford University Press.
GreenL. and EstleS. J. (2003). Preference reversals with food and water reinforcers in rats. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 79, 233242.
GustafssonJ. E. (2010). A money-pump for acyclic intransitive preferences. Dialectica, 64, 251257.
HeymanG. M. and HerrnsteinR. J. (1986). More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules – a replication and review. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 46, 331351.
HoustonA. I. (1987). The control of foraging decisions. In: Quantitative analyses of behavior VI – foraging (eds. CommonsM. L., KacelnikA. and ShettleworthS. J.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 4161.
HoustonA. I. (1991). Violations of stochastic transitivity on concurrent chains – implications for theories of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 55, 323335.
HoustonA. I. (1997). Natural selection and context-dependent values. Proc. R. Soc. B, 264, 15391541.
HoustonA. I. (2009). Flying in the face of nature. Behav. Processes, 80, 295305.
HoustonA. I., ClarkC., McNamaraJ. and MangelM. (1988). Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Nature, 332, 2934.
HoustonA. I. and McNamaraJ. M. (1989). The value of food: effects of open and closed economies. Anim. Behav., 37, 546562.
HoustonA. I. and McNamaraJ. M. (1999). Models of adaptive behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
HoustonA. I., McNamaraJ. M. and SteerM. D. (2007a). Do we expect natural selection to produce rational behaviour?Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 362, 15311543.
HoustonA. I., McNamaraJ. M. and SteerM. D. (2007b). Violations of transitivity under fitness maximization. Biol. Lett., 3, 365367.
HoustonA. I., SumidaB. H. and McNamaraJ. M. (1987). The maximization of overall reinforcement rate on concurrent chains. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 48, 133143.
HutchinsonJ. M. C. and GigerenzerG. (2005). Connecting behavioural biologists and psychologists: clarifying distinctions and suggestions for further work. Behav. Processes, 69, 159163.
KacelnikA. (1984). Central place foraging in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). 1. Patch residence time. J. Anim. Ecol., 53, 283299.
KacelnikA. (2006). Meanings of rationality. In: Rational animals? (eds. HurleyS. and NuddsM.). Oxford University Press, pp. 87–106.
KalenscherT., ToblerP. N., HuijbersW., DaselaarS. M. and PennartzC. M. A. (2010). Neural signatures of intransitive preferences. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 4, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.000491967.
KatsikopoulosK. V. and GigerenzerG. (2008). One-reason decision-making: modeling violations of expected utility theory. J. Risk Uncertain., 37, 3556.
LattyT. and BeekmanM. (2011). Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences. Proc. R. Soc. B, 278, 307312.
LimaS. L. (1998). Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior: Stress and Behavior, vol. 27, pp. 215–290.
LimaS. L. and DillL. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool., 68, 619640.
LinaresP. (2009). Are inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisons. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 193, 492498.
LoomesG. and SugdenR. (1982). Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J., 92, 805824.
LuceR. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. John Wiley, New York.
LuceR. D. and SuppesP. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In: Handbook of mathematical psychology (eds. LuceR.D., BushR.R. and GalanterE.). John Wiley, New York, pp. 249–410.
MazurJ. E. (1981). Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a 2-response situation. Science, 214, 823825.
McNamaraJ. M. (1982). Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theor. Popul. Biol., 21, 269288.
McNamaraJ. M. (1990). The policy which maximizes long-term survival of an animal faced with the risks of starvation and predation. Adv. Appl. Prob., 22, 295308.
McNamaraJ. M., GassonC. E. and HoustonA. I. (1999). Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature, 401, 368371.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1985). Optimal foraging and learning. J. Theor. Biol., 117. 231–249.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1986). The common currency for behavioral decisions. Am. Nat., 127, 358378.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1987). Partial preferences and foraging. Anim. Behav., 35, 10841099.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1992). Risk-sensitive foraging – a review of the theory. Bull. Math. Biol., 54, 355378.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1994). The effect of a change in foraging options on intake rate and predation rate. Am. Nat., 144, 9781000.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (1997). Currencies for foraging based on energetic gain. Am. Nat., 150, 603617.
McNamaraJ. M. and HoustonA. I. (2009). Integrating function and mechanism. Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 670675.
NavarickD. J. and FantinoE. (1972). Transitivity as a property of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 18, 3, 389401
NavarickD. J. and FantinoE. (1974). Stochastic transivity and unidimensional behavior theories. Psychol. Rev., 81, 426441.
NavarickD. J. and FantinoE. (1975). Stochastic transivity and the unidimensional control of choice. Learn. Motiv., 6, 179201.
PavlicT. P. and PassinoK. M. (2010). When rate maximization is impulsive. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 64, 12551265.
RachlinH. and GreenL. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 17, 15–22.
ReaneyL. T. (2009). Female preference for male phenotypic traits in a fiddler crab: do females use absolute or comparative evaluation?Anim. Behav., 77, 139143.
RegenwetterM., DanaJ. and Davis-StoberC. P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev., 118, 4256.
RieskampJ. (2008). The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 34, 14461465.
RobinsonE. J. H., SmithF. D., SullivanK. M. E. and FranksN. R. (2009). Do ants make direct comparisons?Proc. R. Soc. B., 276, 26352641.
RoyleN. J., LindstromJ. and MetcalfeN. B. (2008). Context-dependent mate choice in relation to social composition in green swordtails Xiphophorus helleri. Behav. Ecol., 19, 9981005.
Schuck-PaimC., PompilioL. and KacelnikA. (2004). State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice. PLoS. Biol., 2, 23052315.
ShafirS. (1994). Intransitivity of preferences in honey-bees – support for comparative-evaluation of foraging options. Anim. Behav., 48, 5567.
SimonH. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev., 63, 129138.
SimonH. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 41, 119.
StephensD. W. and KrebsJ. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton University Press.
ToddP. M. and GigerenzerG. (2003). Bounding rationality to the world. J. Econ. Psychol., 24, 143165.
ToddP. M. and GigerenzerG. (2007). Environments that make us smart: ecological rationality. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 16, 167171.
TsetsosK., UsherM. and ChaterN. (2010). Preference reversal in multiattribute choice. Psychol. Rev., 117, 12751293.
TverskyA. (1969). Intransitivity of preference. Psychol. Rev., 76, 3148.
TverskyA. and RussoJ. E. (1969). Substitutability and similarity in binary choices. J. Math. Psychol., 6, 112.
TverskyA. and SimonsonI. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Manage. Sci., 39, 11791189.
WaiteT. A. (2001). Intransitive preferences in hoarding gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 50, 116121.
WaksbergA., SmithA. and BurdM. (2009). Can irrational behaviour maximise fitness?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 63, 461471.