Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:35:16.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Origin, Development and Evolution of the Fish Skull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 December 2018

Zerina Johanson
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Charlie Underwood
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Martha Richter
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Get access

Summary

The evolutionary origin of the brain and braincase of fishes remains largely elusive. The development of the vertebrate skull is dependent on the presence of an embryonic neural crest whose cells migrate to induce the formation of various elements of the cranial skeleton, dentitions and certain soft tissues. Much progress has been made in the understanding of the vertebrate skull since pioneering anatomical descriptions made last century. In the last few decades, studies involving micro-anatomy, ontogenetic development, molecular biology and gene expression have shed light on key developmental processes that seem to be widely shared among vertebrates. However, molecular biology and ontogenetic studies have been restricted to a small number of fish species. There is still much uncertainty about precise homologies between parts of the skull of distinct groups of fishes, due to the fact that the vertebrate skull shows a remarkable morphological and anatomical plasticity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, NC, Webb, JF. 2014. Heterochrony, modularity, and the functional evolution of the mechanosensory lateral canal system of fishes. EvoDevo 5:122.Google Scholar
Blieck, A, Turner, S, Burrow, CJ, Schultze, H-P, Rexrad, PB, Nowlan, GS. 2011. Fossils, histology, and phylogeny: Why conodonts are not vertebrates. Episodes 33:234241.Google Scholar
Brazeau, MD 2009. The braincase and jaws of a Devonian ‘acanthodian’ and modern gnathostome origins. Nature 457:305308.Google Scholar
Brazeau, MD, Friedman, M 2014. The characters of Palaeozoic jawed vertebrates. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 170:779821.Google Scholar
Brazeau, MD, de Winter, V. 2015. The hyoid arch and braincase anatomy of Acanthodes support chondrichthyan affinity of “acanthodians”. Proc R Soc B 282:20152210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrow, C, Hu, Y, Young, G. 2015. Placoderms and the evolutionary origin of teeth: A comment on Rücklin and Donoghue 2015. Biol Lett 12: 20160159.Google Scholar
Carroll, RL. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Cerny, R, Horacek, I, Olsson, L. 2006. The trabeculla cranii: Development and homology of an enigmatic vertebrate head structure. Anim Biol 56:503518.Google Scholar
Chen, A, Huang, D. 2008 Gill rays of primitive vertebrate Yunnanozoon from the Early Cambrian: A first record. Front Biol China, Translated from Acta Pal Sinica 45:345350.Google Scholar
Chen, YY, Dzik, J, Edgecombe, GD, Ramsköld, L, Zhou, GQ. 1995. A possible Early Cambrian chordate. Nature 377:720722.Google Scholar
Chen, JY, Huang, DY, Li, CW. 1999. An early Cambrian craniate-like chordate. Nature 402:518522.Google Scholar
Coates, MI. 1996. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: Postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod relationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans R Soc Edinb 87:363421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, MI, Gess, RW, Finarelli, JA, Criswell, KE and Tietjen, K. 2017. A symmoriiform chondrichthyan braincase and the origin of chimeroid fishes. Nature 541:208211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collar, DC, Wainwright, PC, Alfaro, ME, Revell, LJ, Mehta, R. 2014. Biting disrupts integration to spur skull evolution in eels. Nat Commun 5:5505Google Scholar
Conway, MS, Caron, JB. 2014 A primitive fish from the Cambrian of North America. Nature 512:419422.Google Scholar
Couly, GF, Coltey, PM, Le Douarin, M. 1993. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: A study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117:409429.Google Scholar
Couly, G, Creuzet, S, Bennaceur, S, Vincent, C, Le Douarin, NM. 2002. Interactions between Hox-negative cephalic crest cells and the foregut endoderm in patterning the facial skeleton in the vertebrate head. Development 129:10611073.Google Scholar
Cooper, WJ, Wirgau, RM, Sweet, EM, Albertson, RG. 2013. Deficiency of zebrafish Fgf20a results in aberrant skull remodeling that mimics both human cranial disease and evolutionarily important fish skull morphologies. Evol Dev 15: 426441.Google Scholar
Criswell, KE. 2015. The comparative osteology and phylogenetic relationships of African and South American lungfishes (Sarcopterygii: Dipnoi). Zool J Linn Soc 174:801858.Google Scholar
Daeschler, EB, Shubin, NH, A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body-plan. Nature 440:757–763.Google Scholar
Dean, MN, Summers, AP. 2006. Mineralised cartilage in the skeleton of chondrichthyan fishes. Zoology 109:164168.Google Scholar
De Beer, GR 1985. The Development of the Skull. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted from 1937 edition.Google Scholar
Depew, MJ, Lufkin, T, Rubenstein, JLR. 2002. Specification of jaw subdivisions by Dix genes. Science 298:381385.Google Scholar
Donoghue, PCJ. 2002. Evolution of development of the vertebrate dermal and oral skeletons: Unravelling concepts, regulatory theories, and homologies. Paleobiology 28:474507.Google Scholar
Donoghue, PCJ, Forey, PL, Aldridge, RJ. 2000. Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny. Biol Rev 75:191251.Google Scholar
Donoghue, PCJ, Keating, JN. 2014. Early vertebrate evolution. Palaeontology 57: 879893.Google Scholar
Donoghue, PCJ, Sansom, I. 2002. Origin and early evolution of vertebrate skeletonization. Microsc Res Tech 59:352372.Google Scholar
Dutel, H, Herbin, M, Clément, G and Herrel, A. 2015. Bite force in the extant coelacanth Latimeria: The role of the intracranial joint and the basicranial muscle. Curr Biol 25:12281233.Google Scholar
Eames, BF, Allen, N, Young, J, Kaplan, A, Helms, JA, Schneider, RA. 2007. Skeletogenesis in the swell shark Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. J Anat 210:542554.Google Scholar
Gai, X, Donoghue, PCJ, Zhu, M and Stampanoni, M. 2011. Fossil jawless fish from China foreshadows early jawed vertebrate anatomy. Nature 476:24327.Google Scholar
Gans, C. 1993. Evolutionary origin of the vertebrate skull. In: Hanken, J, Hall, BK, editors. The Skull-Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Vol. 2. pp. 135.Google Scholar
Gardiner, BG. 1984. The relationships of palaeoniscid fishes, a review based on new specimens of Mimia and Moythomasia from the Upper Devonian of Western Australia. Bull Brit Mus Nat Hist Geol 37:173428.Google Scholar
Gess, RW, Coates, MI, Rubidge, BS. 2006. A lamprey from the Devonian period of South Africa. Nature 443:981984.Google Scholar
Giles, S, Friedman, M. 2014. Virtual reconstruction of endocast anatomy in early ray-finned fishes (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii). J Paleo 88:636651.Google Scholar
Giles, S, Friedman, M, Brazeau, MD. 2015. Osteichthyan-like cranial conditions in an Early Devonian stem gnathostome. Nature 520:8285.Google Scholar
Giles, S, Rücklin, M, Donoghue, PC. 2013. Histology of “placoderm” dermal skeletons: Implications for the nature of the ancestral gnathostome. J Morph 274:627644.Google Scholar
Giles, S, Xu, GH, Near, TJ, Friedman, M. 2017. Early members of ‘living fossil’ lineage imply later origin of modern ray-finned fishes. Nature 549:265268.Google Scholar
Goodrich, ES. 1911. On the segmentation of the occipital region of the head in Batrachia Urodela. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1911:101120.Google Scholar
Goodrich, ES. 1918. The development of the segments of the head in Scyllium. Quart J Micr Sci 63:130.Google Scholar
Goodrich, ES. 1930. Studies on the Structure and Development of the Vertebrates. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Grande, L, Bemis, WE. 1998. A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. J Vert Paleo Suppl Mem 4, 8:1690.Google Scholar
Finarelli, JA, Coates, MI. 2014. Chondrenchelys problematica (Traquair, 1888) redescribed: A Lower Carboniferous, eel-like holocephalan from Scotland. Earth Env Sci, Trans R Soc Edinburgh 105:3559.Google Scholar
Forey, P, Janvier, P. 1993. Agnathans and the origin of jawed vertebrates. Nature 361:129134.Google Scholar
Hall, BK. 1975. Evolutionary consequences of skeletal differentiation. Am Zool 15:329350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeckel, E. 1866. Generalle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Hanken, J, Hall, BK. 1993. The Skull. Vols. 1–3, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hardisty, MW. 1979. Biology of the Cyclostomes. Springer.Google Scholar
Herring, SW. 1993. Epigenetic and functional influences on skull growth. In: Hanken, J, Hall, BK, editors. The Skull. Vol. 1. Chicago: Univerity of Chicago Press. pp. 153206.Google Scholar
Hirasawa, T, Kuratani, S. 2015. Evolution of vertebrate skeleton: Morphology, embryology and development. Zool Lett 1:117.Google Scholar
Hirasawa, T, Karatani, S. 2016. Palaeospondylus as a primitive hagfish. Zool. Lett 2:20.Google Scholar
Holland, LZ, Holland, ND. 2001. Evolution of the neural crest and placodes; amphioxus as a model for the ancestral vertebrate? J Anat 1999:8598.Google Scholar
Hou, XG, Ramsköld, L, Bergström, J. 1991. Composition and preservation of the Chengjiang fauna – A lower Cambrian soft-bodied biota. Zool Scr 20:395411.Google Scholar
Holland, ND, Chen, J. 2001. Origin and early evolution of the vertebrates: New insights from advances in molecular biology, anatomy, and palaeontology. BioEssays 23:142151.Google Scholar
Huxley, TH. 1858. The Croonian Lecture: On the theory of the vertebrate skull. Proc Zool Soc Lond 8:381457.Google Scholar
Jacobson, AG. 1993. Somitosomes: Mesodermal segments of the head and trunk. In: Hanken, J. Hall BK, , editors. The Skull. Vol. 1 Development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 4276.Google Scholar
Janvier, P. 1996. Early Vertebrates. Oxford: Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics. 393 p.Google Scholar
Janvier, P. 2015. Facts and fancies about early fossil chordates and vertebrates. Nature 520:83489.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1952. On the fish-like tail in the ichthyostegid stegocephalians. Medd Groenl. 114:190.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1996. The Devonian tetrapod Ichthyostega. Fossils Strata 40:1213.Google Scholar
Johanson, Z, Kearsley, A, den Blaauwen, J, Newman, M, Smith, M. 2011. Ontogenetic development of an exceptionally preserved Devonian cartilaginous skeleton. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 318:5058.Google Scholar
Johanson, Z, Smith, MM, Sanchez, S, Senden, T, Trinajstic, K and Pfaff, C. 2017. Questioning hagfish affinities of the enigmatic Devonian vertebrate Palaeospondylus. Roy Soc Open Sci 4:170214.Google Scholar
Jollie, MT. 1977. Segmentation of the vertebrate head. Amer Zool 17:323333.Google Scholar
Jollie, MT. 1984. Development of the head skeleton and pectoral girdle of salmons, with a note on the scales. Can J Zool 62:17571778.Google Scholar
Knight, RD, Schilling, TF. 2006. Cranial neurocrest and the development of the head skeleton. In: Saint-Jeannet JP, editor. Neural Crest Induction and Differentiation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 589:120133.Google Scholar
Köntges, G, Lumsden, A. 1996. Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny. Development 122:32293242.Google Scholar
Kuratani, S, Horigome, N, Hirano, S. 1999. Developmental morphology of the head mesoderm and reevaluation of segmental theories of the vertebrate head: Evidence from embryos of an agnathan vertebrate. Lampetra japonica. Developmental Biology 210:381400.Google Scholar
Kuratani, S. 2004. Evolution of the vertebrate jaw: Comparative embryology and molecular developmental biology reveal the factors behind evolutionary novelty. J Anat 205:335347.Google Scholar
Kuratani, S. 2005. Craniofacial development and evolution of the vertebrates: The old problems on a new background. Zool Sci 22:119.Google Scholar
Kuratani, S. 2008. Is the vertebrate head segmented? Integr Comp Biol 48: 647657.Google Scholar
Kuratani, S, Adachi, N, Wada, N, Oisi, Y, Sugahara, F. 2013. Developmental and evolutionary significance of the mandibular arch and prechordal/premandibular cranium in vertebrates: Revisiting the heterotopy scenario of gnathostome jaw evolution. J Anat 222:4155.Google Scholar
Lauder, GV. 1983. Functional design and evolution of the pharyngeal jaw apparatus in euteleostean fishes. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 77:138.Google Scholar
Lauder, GV, Wainright, PC. 1992. Function and history: The pharyngeal jaw apparatus in primitive ray-finned fishes. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 77:138.Google Scholar
Long, JA 1992. Gogodipterus paddyensis (Miles), gen. nov., a new chirodipterid lungfish from the late Devonian Gogo formation, Western Australia. Beagle: Rec Mus Art Gall North Ter 9:1120.Google Scholar
Long, JA, Burrow, CJ, Maisey, JG, Trinajstic, KM, Coates, MI, Young, GC and Senden, TJ. 2015. First shark from the Late Devonian (Frasnian) Gogo Formation, Western Australia sheds new light on the development of tessellated calcified cartilage. PLoS ONE 10:e0126066.Google Scholar
Lu, J, Giles, S, Friedman, M, den Blaauwen, J, Zhu, M. 2016. The oldest actinopterygian highlights the cryptic early history of the hyperdiverse ray-finned fishes. Curr Biol 26:16021608.Google Scholar
Maisey, JG, Carvalho, MR. 1997. A new look at old sharks. Nature 385:779780.Google Scholar
Mallatt, J. 1996. Ventilation and the origin of jawed vertebrates. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 117:329404.Google Scholar
Mallatt, J, Chen, J. 2003. Fossil sister group of craniates: Predicted and found. J Morph 258: 131.Google Scholar
Meier, S. 1979. Development of the chick mesoblast. Formation of the embryonic axis and establishment of the metameric pattern. Dev Biol 73:2545.Google Scholar
Meier, S. 1981. Development of the chick embryomesoblast: Morphogenesis of the prechordal plate and cranial segments. Dev Biol 83:4961.Google Scholar
Miyake, T, McEachran, JD. 1991. The morphology and evolution of the ventral gill arch skeleton in batoid fishes. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 102:75100.Google Scholar
Miyake, T, McEachran, JD, Walton, PJ, Wall, B. 1992. Development and morphology of rostral cartilages in batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea), with comments on homology within vertebrates. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 46:259298.Google Scholar
Morris, SC, Caron, JB. 2014. A primitive fish from the Cambrian of North America. Nature 512: 419422.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, JA, Miles, RS 1971. Palaeozoic Fishes. 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Northcutt, RG, Gans, C. 1983. The genesis of neural crest and epidermal placodes: A reinterpretation of vertebrate origins. Quart Rev Biol 58:128.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T. 1967. Phylogeny of tooth tissues: Evolution of some calcified tissues in early vertebrates. In: Miles, AEW, editor. Structural and Chemical Organisation of Teeth. New York: Academic Press. pp. 45110.Google Scholar
Ørvig, T. 1980. Histologic studies of ostracoderms, placoderms and fossil elasmobranchs. Zool Scr 9:141159.Google Scholar
Osório, J, Rétaux, S. 2008. The lamprey in evolutionary studies. Dev Genes Evol 218:221235.Google Scholar
Pallas, PS. 1774. Spicilegia Zoologica. Fasc 10. 19 p.Google Scholar
Platt, JB. 1897. The development of the cartilaginous skull and branchial and hypoglossal musculature in Necturus. Morph Jahrb 25:3774464.Google Scholar
Purnell, M. 2001. Feeding in extinct jawless heretostracan fishes and testing scenarios of early vertebrate evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:8388.Google Scholar
Qiao, T, Long, J, Ahlberg, PE, Zhu, M. 2016. Early gnathostome phylogeny revised: Multiple method consensus. PLoS ONE 11: e0163157.Google Scholar
Richardson, MK. 2012. A phylotypic stage for all animals? Dev Cell 22:903904.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A, Gilbert-Tomlinson, J. 1977. First Ordovician vertebrates from the Southern Hemisphere. Alcheringia 1:351368.Google Scholar
Romer, AS. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rose, CS, Reiss, JO. 1993. Metamorphosis and the vertebrate skull: Ontogenetic patterns and development mechanisms. In: Hanken, J, Hall, BK, editors. The Skull. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 289346.Google Scholar
Rupke, N. 1985. Richard Owen’s Hunterian lectures on comparative anatomy and physiology, 1837–55. Med Hist 29:237258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallan, L, Giles, S, Sansom, RS, Clarke, JT, Johanson, Z, Sansom, IJ, Janvier, P. 2017. The ‘Tully Monster’ is not a vertebrate: Characters, convergence and taphonomy in Palaeozoic problematic animals. Palaeontology 60:149157.Google Scholar
Samson, RS, Gabbott, SE, Purnell, MA. 2010. Non-random decay of chordate characters causes bias in fossil interpretation. Nature 463:797800.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B, Rosen, DE. 1961. Major adaptative levels in the evolution of the actinopterygian feeding mechanism. Am Zool 1:187204.Google Scholar
Schilling, TF, Thorogood, PV 2000. Development and evolution of the vertebrate skull. In: O’Higgins, P, Cohn, M, editors. Development, Growth and Evolution: Implications for the Study of the Hominid Skeleton. London: Linnean Society of London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schultze, H-P. 1993. Patterns of diversity in the skulls of jawed fishes. In: Hall, Hanken J. BK, editors. The Skull. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 189254.Google Scholar
Sewertzoff, AN. 1911. Die Kiemenbogennerven der Fische. Anat Anz 38:487495.Google Scholar
Sewertzoff, AN. 1928. The head skeleton and muscles of Acipenser ruthenus. Acta Zool 9:1127.Google Scholar
Shu, DG, Zhang, XL, Chen, L. 1996. Reinterpretation of Yunnanozoon as the earliest known hemichordate. Nature 380:428430.Google Scholar
Shu, D-G, Luo, H-L, Conway Morris, S, Zhang, X-L, Hu, S-X, Chen, L, Han, J, Zhu, M, Li, Y, Chen, L-Z. 1999. Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China. Nature 402:4246.Google Scholar
Shu, D-G, Conway Morris, S, Han, J, Zhang, Z-F, Yasul, K, Janvier, P, Chen, L, Zhang, X-L, Liu, J-N, Li, Y, Liu, H-O. 2003. Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys. Nature 421:526529.Google Scholar
Smith, MM, Hall, BK. 1990. Development and evolutionary origins of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues. Biol Rev 65:277373.Google Scholar
Smith, MM, Johanson, Z. 2003a. Separate evolutionary origins of teeth from evidence in fossil jawed vertebrates. Science 299:12351236.Google Scholar
Smith, MM, Johanson, Z. 2003b. Response to comment on ‘Separate evolutionary origins of teeth from evidence in fossil jawed vertebrates’. Science 300: 1661.Google Scholar
Smith, MM, Samson, I, Smith, MP. 1996. ‘Teeth’ before armour: The earliest vertebrate mineralized tissues. Mod Geol 20: 303319.Google Scholar
Stensiö, EA 1927. The Devonian and Downtonian vertebrates of Spitzbergen. I. Family Cephalaspidae. Skrift Svalbard Ishav 12:1391.Google Scholar
Stensiö, EA. 1932. The Cephalaspids of Great Britain. London: Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist).Google Scholar
Stensiö, EA. 1969. Elasmobranchiomorphi Placodermata Arthrodires. Traité Paléontol 4. 2: 71692.Google Scholar
Sugahara, F, Pascual-Anaya, J, Oisi, Y, Kuraku, S, Aota, S-I, Adachi, N, Takagi, W, Hirai, T, Sato, N, Murakami, Y, Kuratani, S. 2016. Evidence from cyclostomes for complex regionalization of the ancestral vertebrate brain. Nature, Research Letter. doi:10.1038/nature16518Google Scholar
Summers, A. 2000. Stiffening the stingray skeleton – An investigation of durophagy in myliobatid stingrays (Chondrichthyes, Batoidea, Myliobatidae). J Morph 243:113126.Google Scholar
Thomson, KS. 1993. Segmentation, the adult skull, and the problem of homology. In: Hanken, J, Hall, BK, editors. The Skull. Vol. 2. Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 3668.Google Scholar
Underwood, CJ, Johanson, Z, Smith, MM. 2016. Cutting blade dentitions in squaliform sharks form by modification of inherited alternate tooth ordering patterns. Roy Soc Open Sci 3:160385.Google Scholar
Vogt, C. 1842. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Geburtshelferkroete (Alytes obstetricans). Solothurn: Jent & Gassmann.Google Scholar
von Baer, KE 1828. Über Entwicklungsgechichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion. Königsberg: Bornträger.Google Scholar
Webb, J, Noden, DM. 1993. Ectodermal placodes: Contributions to the development of the vertebrate head. Amer Zool 33:434447.Google Scholar
Westneat, MW. 2004. Evolution of levers and linkages in the feeding mechanism of fishes. Integr Comp Biol 44: 378–89.Google Scholar
Wilga, C. 2002. A functional analysis of jaw suspension in elasmobranchs. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 75:483505.Google Scholar
Wimberger, PH. 1991. Plasticity of jaw and skull morphology in the neotropical cichlids Geophagus brasiliensis and G. steindachneri. Evolution 45:5451563.Google Scholar
Yu, J-K, Meulemans, D, McKeown, S, Bronner-Fraser, M. 2008. Insights from the amphioxus genome on the origin of the vertebral neural crest. Genome Res 18: 11271132.Google Scholar
Zhu, M, Ahlberg, PE, Pan, Z, Zhu, Y, Qiao, T, Zhao, W, Jia, L, Lu, J. 2016. A Silurian maxillate placoderm illuminates jaw evolution. Science 354:334336.Google Scholar
Zhu, M, Wang, W, Yu, X-B. 2010. Meemania eos, a basal sarcopteryian fish from the Lower Devonian of China – Expanded description and significance. In: Elliott, DK, Maisey, JG, Yu, X-B, Miao, D-S, editors. Morphology, Phylogeny and Palaeobiogeography of fossil fishes. München: Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil. pp. 199214.Google Scholar
Zhu, M, Yu, X, Ahlberg, PE, Choo, B, Lu, J, Qiao, T, Qu, Q, Zhao, W, Jia, L, Bloom, H, Zhu, Y. 2013. A Silurian placoderm with osteichthyan-like marginal jaw bones. Nature 502:188193.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×