Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: August 2016

3 - Neoliberalism, Resource Governance and the Everyday Politics of Protests in the Philippines

from Part II - From Development to Multiple Modernities


I have challenged the mining industry to provide evidence of at least one case of a town that developed through large-scale mining. Up until now, they cannot provide a concrete example.

Danny Arias

The quote above vividly captures the recent conflicts on the role of mining and social development in the Philippines. Danny Arias, responsible for linking local communities to national campaigns against large-scale mining, contests the possibilities of transnational investments bringing long-term economic development to a country characterized by challenging geographies for mineral extraction, political violence and a history of socioenvironmental disasters. Importantly, his critique opens up an important intellectual space for academic research that places questions of rights, agency and political mobilization as key organizing concepts in understanding why the ‘logic of globalization’ is neither inevitable nor necessarily desirable. As the pace of neoliberal reforms intensifies in the region, ordinary people – especially those with limited material and political resources – make justice claims in very difficult circumstances, sometimes not always successfully, in order to alter the configuration of global and local power structures.

Danny Arias's position reflects two important countervailing ideas about neoliberalism and development in Southeast Asia, which we will develop in this chapter. First, Arias's critique reflects the contestation of a neoliberal model of mining management expressed specifically by local political actors sidelined in national political debates. Market reforms in the natural resources sector involved designing complex privatization and liberalization policies. The consolidation of a national anti-mining movement indicates the strength of resistance against foreign direct investment (FDI)-led, large-scale mining (as opposed to mining per se). The movement links the diverse efforts of activists, community leaders and the Catholic Church to think about alternative policy paradigms in the mining industry. Civil society actors question the promise of mining-led development, particularly the government's strategy of attracting transnational investments as a way of spurring growth and raising the contribution of mining to the country's exports, revenues and potential for technological development. In addition to the national movement, local communities and regional elites have also challenged the normative commitment of the government towards private capital participation through a nuanced critique of large-scale mining. These actors have come to constitute a somewhat unified political voice against neoliberalism as a development paradigm.

Alyansa Tigil Mina (2011a) ‘Palawan Case Study: Mining and Biodiversity Draft’, accessed from Alyansa Tigil Mina:
Alyansa Tigil Mina (2011b) ‘Indigenous Peoples (IP) Rights in Resource Conflict Areas Zambales Experience’, accessed from Alyansa Tigil Mina:
Carroll, T. (2012) ‘Working On, Through and Around the State: The Deep Marketisation of Development in Asia-Pacific’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 42(3): 378–404.
Cutler, C., Hauffler, V. and Porter, T. (eds.) (1999) Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Elias, J. (2010) ‘Locating the “Everyday” in International Political Economy’, International Studies Review 12(4): 603–609.
Gomez, E. T. (2012) ‘State-Business Linkages in East Asia: The Developmental State, Neoliberalism and Enterprise Development’, in Walter, A and Zhang, X (eds.) East Asian Capitalism: Diversity, Continuity and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodland, R. and Wicks, C. (2009) Philippines: Mining or Food. London: Working Group on Mining in the Philippines.
Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. (eds.) (2009) Governance After Neoliberalism in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamm, B., Schax, A. and Sheper, C. (2013) Human Rights Impact Assessment of the Tampakan Copper-Gold Project. Aachen, Germany: Institute for Peace and Development (INEF), MISEREOR, Fastenopfer, and Bread for All.
Hatcher, P. (2014) Regimes of Risk: The World Bank & New Mining Regimes in Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holden, W. N. and Jacobson, R. D. (2008) Civil Society Opposition to Nonferrous Metals Mining in Guatemala’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 19(4): 325–350.
Kuhonta, E. (2011) The Institutional Imperative: The Politics of Equitable Development in Southeast Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lopez, S. (1992) Isle of Gold: A History of Mining in the Philippines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marzan, A., Garganera, J., Arayata, R. and Rodne, G. (2010) ‘CSO Assessment of the MTPDP (2006–2010)’, accessed from Alyansa Tigil Mina:
Mines and Geosciences Bureau (2013a) Complete List of Mineral Sharing Production Agreement. Quezon City, Philippines: Mining Tenements Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Mines and Geosciences Bureau (2013b) Mining Industry Statistics. Quezon City, Philippines: Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
National Commission on Indigenous People (2012) The Revised Guidelines on Free and Prior Informed Consent, NCIP Administrative Order, No. 3. Quezon City, Philippines: Office of the President.
Nem Singh, J. T. and Bourgouin, F. (eds.) (2013) Resource Governance and Developmental States in the Global South: Critical International Political Economy Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nem Singh, J. T., Grugel, J. and Hatcher, P. (2014) The Philippines: The Political Economy of Financing Children's Rights through Extractive Industries. Geneva: UNRISD and UNICEF.
Nevins, J. and Peluso, N. (eds.) (2008) Taking Southeast Asia to Market: Commodities, Nature, and People in the Neoliberal Age. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Ong, A. (2006) Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. London and Durham: Duke University Press.
Ong, A. (1999) ‘Clash of Civilizations or Asian Liberalism? An Anthropology of the State and Citizenship’, in Moore, H. L. (ed.) Anthropological Theory Today. Malden, MA: Polity Press, pp. 48–73.
Orfenio, R. (2009) ‘Failure to Launch: Industrialization in Metal-rich Philippines’, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 14(2): 194–209.
Quimpo, N. (2007) Contested Democracy and the Left in the Philippines after Marcos. New Haven: Yale University of Southeast Asian Studies.
Recidoro, R. (2013) ‘THE “ALTERNATIVE” MINING BILL – A Bill Designed to Kill Responsible Mining in the Philippines’. Pasig City, Philippines. Chamber of Mines of the Philippines.
Rovillos, R. D., Ramo, S. B. and Corpuz, Jr., C. (2003) ‘When the Isles of Gold Turns into the Isle of Dissent: A Case Study on the Philippine Mining Act of 1995’. Paper presented at the meeting on Indigenous Peoples, Extractive Industries and the World Bank. Oxford, England: Tebtebba Foundation, 1–32.
Scott, J. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Form of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Slater, D. (2010) Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, M. (1996) The Anti-Marcos Struggle: Personalistic Rule and Democratic Transition in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press.
World Investment Report (2007) World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Corporations, Extractive Industries, and Development. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.