Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:55:11.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Surrogate decision-making

from Part II - Moral foundations of the therapeutic relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

John C. Moskop
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Case example

Ms. Tina Cartrette is a 28-year-old woman with severe intellectual disability (also known as cognitive disability or mental retardation). Ms. Cartrette also has cerebral palsy and a seizure disorder. She has been a resident of a long-term care facility since she was 5 years old, and has never been able to sit up, walk, talk, dress, or bathe herself. Ms. Cartrette is fed through a tube inserted directly into her stomach. She has been hospitalized five times in the past year for urinary tract infections, which, in her case, cause high fever and seizures.

When Ms. Cartrette reached the age of 18, she was declared legally incompetent, and her mother, Ms. Diane Arnder, was appointed to serve as her legal guardian. Ms. Arnder lives in a distant city; she calls the residential care facility regularly to check on Ms. Cartrette and visits her daughter about twice a year.

Twelve days ago, Ms. Cartrette was hospitalized once again with a high fever and uncontrolled seizures. She received IV antibiotics and medications to control her seizures, but the medications led to respiratory depression, and, with Ms. Arnder's consent, Ms. Cartrette was intubated, placed on a mechanical ventilator, and transferred to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). She remains in the MICU on ventilator support. Dr. Friedland, Ms. Cartrette's attending physician, has discussed her treatment options with Ms. Arnder. Dr. Friedland told Ms. Arnder that continuing ventilator support could make Ms. Cartrette permanently ventilator-dependent, but removal of the ventilator would probably result in her death. After discussions with her husband and her pastor, Ms. Arnder has requested that the ventilator be withdrawn, explaining that she does not want to see her daughter suffer any longer. Most of the members of Ms. Cartrette's treatment team (including Dr. Friedland, several nurses, and a social worker) are willing to honor this request, but one of the residents disagrees. He points out that Ms. Cartrette is neither terminally ill nor unconscious, and he asserts that she should not simply be allowed to die. How should the team proceed?

The moral issue, and the available options

As noted in Chapter 8, a patient's lack of decision-making capacity is a generally recognized exception to the legal and moral duty to obtain the patient's informed consent to medical treatment.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Health Care
An Introduction
, pp. 114 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, Jeffrey T., DeRenzo, Evan G., and Schwartz, Jack. 2008. Surrogate decision making: reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine 149: 48–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, Allen E. and Brock, Dan W. 1989. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, Thaddeus Mason. 2013. Making medical decisions for patients without surrogates. New England Journal of Medicine 369: 1976–1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, Rosamond and Holzman, Ian R. 2004. The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25: 367–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Surrogate decision-making
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Surrogate decision-making
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Surrogate decision-making
  • John C. Moskop, Wake Forest University, North Carolina
  • Book: Ethics and Health Care
  • Online publication: 05 February 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058575.012
Available formats
×