Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:36:15.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Isotopes as Tracers of Atmospheric and Groundwater Methane Sources

from Part II - Environmental Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2022

By
Amy Townsend-Small
Edited by
John Stolz ,
Daniel Bain  and
Michael Griffin
John Stolz
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Pittsburgh
Daniel Bain
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Michael Griffin
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas and can create explosion risk at elevated concentrations. Because there are several major anthropogenic sources of methane and other natural sources of methane that are elevated due to climate feedbacks, there is currently no scientific consensus on the cause of increasing global atmospheric methane concentrations. Methane dissolved in groundwater can also have multiple sources that are difficult to distinguish. Luckily, methane has several naturally occurring stable and radioactive isotopes that can help to differentiate these sources. In this chapter I will present an overview of the isotopic composition of various methane sources, including stable and radioactive isotopes of both carbon and hydrogen; give examples of using isotopes to decipher atmospheric methane sources at the local, regional, and global level; and then give examples of using isotopes to distinguish between major sources of methane in groundwater. All of these examples will include natural gas sources, since that is the theme of this book, although isotope tools can be applied to many other types of methane sources.

Keywords

carbon-13carbon-14deuteriumbiogenic methanethermogenic methanecoalbed methane
Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Impacts from the Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Reserves , pp. 272 - 291
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, RA, Zavala-Araiza, D, Lyon, DR, Allen, DT, Barkley, ZR, Brandt, AR, Davis, KJ, Herndon, SC, Jacob, D., Karion, A, Kort, EA, Lamb, BK, Lauvaux, T, Maasakkers, JD, Marchese, AJ, Omara, M, Pacala, SW, Peischl, J, Robinson, AL, Shepson, PB, Sweeney, C, Townsend-Smal, A, Wofsy, SC, and Hamburg, SP. (2018). Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science. 7204. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7204Google Scholar
Aydin, M, Verhulst, KR, Saltzman, ES, Battle, MO, Montzka, SA, Blake, DR, Tang, Q, and Prather, MJ. (2011). Recent decreases in fossil-fuel emissions of ethane and methane derived from firn air. Nature. 476: 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10352Google Scholar
Baldassare, F and Chapman, E. (2018). Chapter 4 - The application of isotope geochemistry in stray gas investigations: Case studies. In Stout, SA and Wang, Z (eds.) Oil Spill Environmental Forensics Case Studies. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-12-804434-6.00004-5Google Scholar
Barth-Naftilan, E, Sohng, J, and Saiers, JE. (2018). Methane in groundwater before, during, and after hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale. PNAS. 115: 6970–6975. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720898115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botner, EC, Townsend-Small, A, Nash, DB, Xu, X, Schimmelmann, A, and Miller, JH. (2018). Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 190: 322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661–018-6696-1Google Scholar
Clayton, JL. (1998). Geochemistry of coalbed gas – A review. International Journal of Coal Geology. 35: 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166–5162(97)00017-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, DD, Liu, C-L, Hackley, KC, and Pelphrey, SR. (1995). Isotopic Identification of Landfill Methane. Environmental Geosciences. 2: 95–103.Google Scholar
Golding, SD, Boreham, CJ, and Esterle, JS. (2013). Stable isotope geochemistry of coal bed and shale gas and related production waters: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology. 120: 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.09.001Google Scholar
Hammond, PA. (2016). The relationship between methane migration and shale-gas well operations near Dimock, Pennsylvania, USA. Hydrogeology Journal. 24: 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040–015-1332-4Google Scholar
Howarth, RW. (2019). Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? Biogeosciences. 16: 3033–3046. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3033-2019Google Scholar
Howarth, RW. (2021). Methane and climate change. In Stolz, JF, Griffin, WM, and Bain, DJ (eds.) Environmental Impacts from the Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas Reserves. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, RB, Vengosh, A, Darrah, TH, Warner, NR, Down, A, Poreda, RJ, Osborn, SG, Zhao, K, and Karr, JD. (2013). Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction. PNAS. 110: 11250–11255. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221635110Google Scholar
Kai, FM, Tyler, SC, Randerson, JT, and Blake, DR. (2011). Reduced methane growth rate explained by decreased Northern Hemisphere microbial sources. Nature. 476: 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10259Google Scholar
Keeling, CD. (1958). The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 13: 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(58)90033-4Google Scholar
Keeling, CD. (1961) The concentration and isotopic abundances of carbon dioxide in rural and marine air. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 24: 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(61)90023-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, C and Doctor, DH. (2003). 5.11 - Stable Isotope Applications in Hydrologic Studies. In Holland, HD and Turekian, KK (eds.), Treatise on Geochemistry. Pergamon, pp. 319–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0–08-043751-6/05081-7Google Scholar
Lamb, BK, Edburg, SL, Ferrara, TW, Howard, T, Harrison, MR, Kolb, CE, Townsend-Small, A, Dyck, W, Possolo, A, and Whetstone, JR. (2015). Direct measurements show decreasing methane emissions from natural gas local distribution systems in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology. 49: 5161–5169. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505116pGoogle Scholar
Lassey, KR, Etheridge, DM, Lowe, DC, Smith, AM, and Ferretti, DF. (2007a). Centennial evolution of the atmospheric methane budget: What do the carbon isotopes tell us? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 7: 2119–2139. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2119-2007Google Scholar
Lassey, KR, Lowe, DC, and Smith, AM. (2007b). The atmospheric cycling of radiomethane and the “fossil fraction” of the methane source. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 7: 2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2141-2007Google Scholar
Mace, EK, Aalseth, CE, Day, AR, Hoppe, EW, Keillor, ME, Moran, JJ, Panisko, ME, Seifert, A, Tatishvili, G, and Williams, RM. (2016). First results of a simultaneous measurement of tritium and 14C in an ultra-low-background proportional counter for environmental sources of methane. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 155–156: 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, AM, Walter, LM, Budai, JM, Ku, TCW, Kaiser, CJ, and Schoell, M. (1998). Genetic and temporal relations between formation waters and biogenic methane: Upper Devonian Antrim Shale, Michigan Basin, USA. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 62: 1699–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016–7037(98)00090-8Google Scholar
McIntosh, JC, Hendry, MJ, Ballentine, C, Haszeldine, RS, Mayer, B, Etiope, G, Elsner, M, Darrah, TH, Prinzhofer, A, Osborn, S, Stalker, L, Kuloyo, O, Lu, Z-T, Martini, A, and Lollar, BS. (2019). A critical review of state-of-the-art and emerging approaches to identify fracking-derived gases and associated contaminants in aquifers. Environmental Science & Technology. 53: 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05807Google Scholar
Milkov, AV, Schwietzke, S, Allen, G, Sherwood, OA, and Etiope, G. (2020). Using global isotopic data to constrain the role of shale gas production in recent increases in atmospheric methane. Scientific Reports. 10: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–020-61035-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbet, EG et al. (2016). Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 30: 1356–1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, et al. (2019). Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 33: 318–342. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NOAA Global Monitoring Division. (2020). NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division - FTP Navigator [WWW Document]. URL www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/data/index.php?parameter_name=C13%252FC12%2Bin%2BMethane (accessed March 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Osborn, SG and McIntosh, JC. (2010). Chemical and isotopic tracers of the contribution of microbial gas in Devonian organic-rich shales and reservoir sandstones, northern Appalachian Basin. Applied Geochemistry. 25: 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, SG, Vengosh, A, Warner, NR, and Jackson, RB. (2011). Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. PNAS. 108: 8172–8176. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100682108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pataki, DE, Ehleringer, JR, Flanagan, LB, Yakir, D, Bowling, DR, Still, CJ, Buchmann, N, Kaplan, JO, and Berry, JA. (2003). The application and interpretation of Keeling plots in terrestrial carbon cycle research. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peischl, J. et al. (2013). Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 118: 4974–4990. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50413Google Scholar
Pétron, G. et al. (2014) A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 119: 6836–6852. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeburgh, WS. (2007). Global methane biogeochemistry. In Holland, HD and Turekian, KK (eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry. Pergamon, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0–08-043751-6/04036-6Google Scholar
Rice, AL, Butenhoff, CL, Teama, DG, Röger, FH, Khalil, MAK, and Rasmussen, RA. (2016). Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase. PNAS. 113: 10791–10796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522923113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlegel, ME, McIntosh, JC, Bates, BL, Kirk, MF, and Martini, AM. (2011). Comparison of fluid geochemistry and microbiology of multiple organic-rich reservoirs in the Illinois Basin, USA: Evidence for controls on methanogenesis and microbial transport. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 75: 1903–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwietzke, S, Sherwood, OA, Bruhwiler, LMP, Miller, JB, Etiope, G, Dlugokencky, EJ, Michel, SE, Arling, VA, Vaughn, BH, White, JWC, and Tans, PP. (2016). Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature. 538: 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797Google Scholar
Scott, AR, Kaiser, WR, and Ayers, WB. (1994). Thermogenic and secondary biogenic gases, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico: Implications for coalbed gas producibility. AAPG Bulletin. 78: 1186–1209. https://doi.org/10.1306/A25FEAA9–171B-11D7–8645000102C1865DGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, OA, Schwietzke, S, Arling, VA, and Etiope, G. (2017). Global inventory of gas geochemistry data from fossil fuel, microbial and burning sources, version 2017. Earth System Science Data. 9: 639–656. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-639-2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, DI, Azzolina, NA, Smith, BJ, Perry, AE, and Bothun, RL. (2015). Methane Concentrations in Water Wells Unrelated to Proximity to Existing Oil and Gas Wells in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Environmental Science & Technology. 49: 4106–4112. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505775cGoogle Scholar
Smith, JW and Pallasser, RJ. (1996). Microbial Origin of Australian Coalbed Methane. AAPG Bulletin. 80: 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1306/64ED88FE-1724-11D7–8645000102C1865DGoogle Scholar
Thomas, MA. (2018). Chemical and isotopic characteristics of methane in groundwater of Ohio, 2016, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2018–5097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend-Small, A, Tyler, SC, Pataki, DE, Xu, X, and Christensen, LE. (2012). Isotopic measurements of atmospheric methane in Los Angeles, California, USA: Influence of “fugitive” fossil fuel emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016826Google Scholar
Townsend-Small, A, Botner, EC, Jimenez, KL, Schroeder, JR, Blake, NJ, Meinardi, S, Blake, DR, Sive, BC, Bon, D, Crawford, JH, Pfister, G, and Flocke, FM. (2016). Using stable isotopes of hydrogen to quantify biogenic and thermogenic atmospheric methane sources: A case study from the Colorado Front Range: Hydrogen Isotopes in the Front Range. Geophysical Research Letters. 43: 11,462-11,471. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of the Interior. (2001). Technical Measures for the Investigation and Mitigation of Fugitive Methane Hazards in Areas of Coal Mining. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.Google Scholar
US EPA National Center for Environmental Assessment, I.O. (2016). Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report) [WWW Document]. URL https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=332990 (accessed 5.7.20).Google Scholar
Vengosh, A, Jackson, RB, Warner, N, Darrah, TH, and Kondash, A. (2014). A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology. 48: 8334–8348. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405118yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidic, RD, Brantley, SL, Vandenbossche, JM, Yoxtheimer, D, and Abad, JD. (2013). Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science. 340. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235009Google Scholar
Vigneron, A, Bishop, A, Alsop, EB, Hull, K, Rhodes, I, Hendricks, R, Head, IM, and Tsesmetzis, N. (2017). Microbial and Isotopic Evidence for Methane Cycling in Hydrocarbon-Containing Groundwater from the Pennsylvania Region. Frontiers in Microbiology. 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00593Google Scholar
Vinson, DS, Blair, NE, Martini, AM, Larter, S, Orem, WH, and McIntosh, JC. (2017). Microbial methane from in situ biodegradation of coal and shale: A review and reevaluation of hydrogen and carbon isotope signatures. Chemical Geology. 453: 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.01.027Google Scholar
Wennberg, PO, Mui, W, Wunch, D, Kort, EA, Blake, DR, Atlas, EL, Santoni, GW, Wofsy, SC, Diskin, GS, Jeong, S, and Fischer, ML. (2012). On the Sources of Methane to the Los Angeles Atmosphere. Environmental Science & Technology. 46: 9282–9289. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301138yGoogle Scholar
Whiticar, MJ. (1999). Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chemical Geology. 161: 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009–2541(99)00092-3Google Scholar
Whiticar, M and Schaefer, H. (2007). Constraining past global tropospheric methane budgets with carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios in ice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 365: 1793–1828. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worden, JR, Bloom, AA, Pandey, S., Jiang, Z., Worden, H.M., Walker, T.W., Houweling, S, and Röckmann, T. (2017). Reduced biomass burning emissions reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget. Nature Communication. 8: 2227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×