Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T09:59:47.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

27 - A natural legacy

from Theme 5 - The future – applying scientific method to conserving biodiversity and restoring degraded environments

Mike Calver
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Alan Lymbery
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Jennifer McComb
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Get access

Summary

The case of the toxic moths

In 2001 scientists from the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (now Department of Environment and Climate Change), La Trobe University and an environmental consulting firm investigated a mysterious death of grass outside a cave in Australia's Snowy Mountains. Heavy rains had washed dead bogong moths (Agrotis infusa) from the cave and grass touched by this outwash died. Investigations revealed that arsenic concentrated in the dead bogong moths poisoned the grass. Worryingly, arsenic occurred in the bodies or the droppings of three mammal species eating bogong moths, so arsenic contamination was spreading in the food chain.

The arsenic came from the plains of Queensland and western New South Wales, where bogong moths breed in autumn (Figure 27.1). The grubs, called cutworm caterpillars, eat grasses and crops before pupating in the soil to develop into winged adult moths. Arsenic-based insecticides were used intensively in the early 20th century and some are still available, so cutworm caterpillars probably absorb arsenic when eating crops. The adults migrate to the Snowy Mountains, aestivating during summer in caves until cooler weather when they return to the plains (Figure 27.2).

The bogong migration is amazing and inspirational, part of the natural legacy bequeathed by the Australian environment to its human occupants. By contrast, the moths' residual arsenic toxicity is disturbing, showing how human intervention may squander or spoil rich natural assets.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Biology , pp. 601 - 618
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×