Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T22:16:57.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

8 - Science and the Enlightenment: God's order and man's understanding

Dorinda Outram
Dorinda Outram
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Get access

Summary

The Creator doubtless did not bestow so much curiosity and exquisite workmanship and skill upon his creatures, to be looked upon with a careless or incurious eye, especially to have them slighted or condemned; but to be admired by the rational part of the world, to magnify his own power, wisdom and goodness throughout all the world, and the ages thereof…my text commends God's works, not only for being great, but also approves of those curious and ingenious enquirers, that seek them out, or pry into them. And the more we pry into and discover of them, the greater and more glorious we find them to be, the more worthy of, and the more expressly to proclaim their great Creator.

The first man I saw was of a meagre aspect, with sooty hands and face, his hair and beard long, ragged and singed in several places. His clothes, shirt, and skin were all of the same colour. He had been eight years upon a project for extracting sunbeams out of cucumbers, which were to be put into vials hermetically sealed, and let out to warm the air in raw inclement summers. He told me, he did not doubt in eight years more, that he should be able to supply the Governor's gardens with sunshine at a reasonable rate; but he complained that his stock was low, and entreated me to give him something as an encouragement to ingenuity, especially since this had been a very dear season for cucumbers. I made him a small present, for my Lord had furnished me with money on purpose, because he knew their practice of begging from all who go to see them.

Science is today probably the most powerful force in twenty-first-century culture. It determines our potential for technological control of the environment, many of our cultural and intellectual assumptions, and our economic, technological and agricultural base. In the twentieth century almost all science receives some form of public funding, and scientific practices and assumptions have also heavily influenced much current thinking about the way governments should be run. None of this was the case in the eighteenth century. The intellectual status of science was contested, its institutional organisations often weak, and certainly thin on the ground, and the nature of its relations with the economy and with government often tenuous.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Enlightenment , pp. 99 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Derham, William, Physico-Theology: or, a Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God, from His Works of Creation (2 vols., London 1798) II, 394
Swift, Jonathan, Gulliver's Travels (1726) (London, 1967), 223–4 (‘A Voyage to Laputa’, part III, section 5)
Lovejoy, A. O., ‘Nature as an Aesthetic Norm’, in Essays in the History of Ideas (New York, 1960), 69–77
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York, 1973)
Ross, Sydney,‘“Scientist”: The Story of a Word’, Annals of Science, 18 (1962), 65–86Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (London, 1976)
Cunningham, A. and Williams, P., ‘De-centring the Big Picture’, British Journal for the History of Science, 26 (1993), 407–32Google Scholar
Jasmin, B. and Limoges, Camille (eds.), C. Linné, ‘A Quoi Sert-il?’ in L’Equilibre de la nature (Paris, 1972), 145–6
Céard, J. (ed.), La curiosité à la Renaissance (Paris, 1986)
d’Alembert and Diderot (eds.), Encyclopédie (Paris, 1754), 577–8
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne, Traîté de la concupiscence (1731) eds. C. Urbain and E. Lenesque (Paris, 1930)
Rousseau, Jean Jacques, Emile ou de l’éducation (1762), ed. F. and P. Richard (Paris, 1964), 185, 271
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de, Traîté des sensations (Paris, 1754)
Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, R. S. (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science (Cambridge, 1980)
Porter, R., The Making of Geology: Earth Science in Britain, 1660–1815 (Cambridge, 1979)
Jordanova, L. J. and Porter, R. (eds.), Images of the Earth: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences (Chalfont St Giles, 1978)
Roger, J., Les sciences de la vie dans la penseé française au dix-huitième siècle (Paris, 1963)
Heilbron, J., Electricity in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics (Berkeley, 1979)
Holmes, F. L., Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life: An Exploration of Scientific Creativity (Madison, WI, 1985)
as Francesco Algarotti, II newtonismo per le Dame (1737)
Newberry, John, Tom Telescope's Philosophy of Tops and Balls (London, 1761)
Cohen, I. B., The Newtonian Revolution (Cambridge, 1980)
Lovejoy, A. O., The Great Chain of Being (New York, 1936)
Jacques, Roger, Buffon: un philosophe au Jardin du Roi (Paris, 1989)
Foucault, The Order of Things. Werner's Short Classification and Description of the Rocks (Freiburg, 1787)
Porter, R., ‘Science, Provincial Culture and Public Opinion in Enlightenment England’, British Journal of Eighteenth-Century Studies, 3 (1980), 16–25Google Scholar
Hahn, R., The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: the Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803 (Berkeley, CA, 1971)
Schofield, R. E., The Lunar Society of Birmingham (Oxford, 1963)
McClellan, J. E., Science Reorganised: Scientific Societies in the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1985)
Daston, L., Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ, 1988)
Gigerenzer, G. et al. (eds.), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life (Cambridge, 1989)
Mitchel, H., ‘Rationality and Control in French Eighteenth Century Medical Views of the Peasantry’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 21 (1979), 81–112Google Scholar
Darnton, R., Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France (Princeton, NJ, 1964)
Daston, L., ‘Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Pre-history of Objectivity’, Annals of Scholarship (Spring, 1992)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×