Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: June 2012

14 - Deeper Learning in Reading Comprehension

from Part C - Learning Processes and Mental Structures that Support Quality of Learning

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biggs, J. B. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance (pp. 111–134). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill Education.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
Cain, K. (1999). Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strategies are related to reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 293–309.
Cain, K. (2006). Individual differences in children’s memory and reading comprehension: an investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits. Memory, 14, 553–569.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In K. Cain & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 41–75). New York: Guilford Press.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2005). The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 65–87.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489–503.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference making ability and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 29, 850–859.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681.
Campbell, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Questioning as an instructional method: Does it affect learning from lectures?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 747–759.
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.
Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present ... and future?Memory, 10, 305–318.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2007). Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test 2007: Released selections and test questions. Retrieved from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_E/07/07P020E.pdf
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313–339). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 430–445.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.
Kirby, J. R., & Cantwell, R. H. (1985). Use of advance organizers to facilitate higher-level text comprehension. Human Learning, 4, 159–168.
Kirby, J. R., & Pedwell, D. (1991). Students’ approaches to summarization. Educational Psychology, 11, 297–307.
Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the Simple View deal with the complexities of reading?Literacy, 42, 75–82.
Kirby, J. R., & White, B. (2011). Levels of processing in adolescents’ reading comprehension. Manuscript in preparation.
Kirby, J. R., & Woodhouse, R. A. (1994). Measuring and predicting depth of processing in learning. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 40, 147–161.
Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders’ abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1424–1429.
Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 615–629.
Manning, M. K. (1989). The effects of summary purpose on summarization and recall. Unpublished Master of Education thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don’t understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253.
Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680–690.
Naglieri, J. A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test – Short Form. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Nelson Education (1998). Canadian tests of basic skills. Toronto: Nelson Education.
Oakhill, J. V. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders’ memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 13–20.
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language and Speech, 29(1), 25–37.
Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19, 228–242.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083–2093.
Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 13, 5–22.
Paris, S. G., Saarnio, D. A., & Cross, D. R. (1986). A metacognitive curriculum to promote children’s reading and learning. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 107–123.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.
Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 276–279.
Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition of semantic, syntactic, and lexical changes in sentences. Psychonomic Bulletin, 1, 17–18.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469–508.
Snow, C. E. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165–189.
Stein, B. L., & Kirby, J. R. (1992). The effects of text absent and text present conditions on summarization and recall of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 217–232.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Titsworth, B. S., & Kierwa, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student notetaking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461.
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (1999). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. Taylor, M. Graves & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1–31). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of reader’s standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
Yuill, N. M., & Oakhill, J. V. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2, 33–45.
Yuill, N. M., Oakhill, J. V., & Parkin, A. J. (1989). Working memory, comprehension skill and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 351–361.
Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 1–53.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.