The 1641 Irish Rebellion has long been recognized as a key event in the mid-17th century collapse of the Stuart monarchy. By 1641, many in England had grown restive under the weight of intertwined religious, political and economic crises. To these audiences, the Irish rising seemed a realization of England's worst fears: a war of religious extermination supported by European papists, whose ambitions extended across the Irish Sea. 'England and the 1641 Irish Rebellion' explores the consequences of this emergency by focusing on survivors of the rising in local, national and regional contexts. In Ireland, the experiences of survivors reflected the complexities of life in multiethnic and religiously-diverse communities. In England, by contrast, pamphleteers, ministers, and members of parliament simplified the issues, presenting the survivors as victims of an international Catholic conspiracy and asserting English subjects' obligations to their countrymen and coreligionists. These obligations led to the creation of relief projects for despoiled Protestant settlers, but quickly expanded into sweeping calls for action against recusants and suspected popish agents in England. 'England and the 1641 Irish Rebellion' contends that the mobilization of this local activism played an integral role in politicizing the English people and escalating the political crisis of the 1640s. JOSEPH COPE is Associate Professor at the State University of New York at Geneseo.

[A]nother splendid addition to the consistently fine Boydell Studies in Early Modern Cultural, Political and Social History series.'

Source: English Historical Review

This is a useful study that explores an important series of aspects of the relationship between England and Ireland. [...] Overall, this book works as a fine set of case studies with an interesting argument, while calling out for further reconsideration and exploration. It is a book to be commended.'

Source: Journal of British Studies

An extremely useful and suggestive book. It is a substantial addition to the existing historiography of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, and will have to play a significant part in any future attempt to make sense of the cataclysm of 1641 and its contested legacy.'

Source: H-Net