Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:46:02.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Sweden: part-time work – welfare or unfair?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Ronnie Eklund
Affiliation:
Professor of Private Law, University of Stockholm
Silvana Sciarra
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi, Florence
Paul Davies
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Mark Freedland
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introductory remarks

The frequency of part-time work in Sweden is high, one of the highest in Europe. The Netherlands is reported to have the highest number of part-timers in Europe, followed by the UK, Sweden and Denmark. The current trend in Sweden, however, is that the number of part-timers is on the decrease. It is current government policy to reduce the large number of involuntary, i.e. underemployed, part-timers. The Swedish unemployment insurance scheme, as applied to the underemployed, has inherent defects particularly with regards to part-timers; in another context a Government Commission Report calls part-time work a ‘women's trap’. A huge number of part-timers is not necessarily a good omen. The EC Part-time Directive, whose basis is in part intended to encourage the growth of part-time employment, has received a cool reception in Sweden that is reflected in the Government Bill submitted to Parliament on 20 February 2002.

Why did part-time work reach high levels?

Tax reform

The impetus for part-time employment in Sweden was the tax reform of 1970, when it was declared that, if both were employed, husband and wife were to be taxed separately, i.e. independently of the other spouse's income. A discussion related to the independence of women had started in the 1960s, the tenor of this debate being that women should have jobs with an income and their own identity outside the home, which would give them a better pension. The Sweden of the 1960s was also characterised by a shortage of manpower.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×