Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:51:01.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - SAARC and the Evolving Asian Regionalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Kripa Sridharan
Affiliation:
Head of Research-Asia
S. D. Muni
Affiliation:
Institute of South Asian Studies, Singapore
Get access

Summary

The Asia-Pacific region lacks a continent-wide regional association and an overarching regional framework is yet to evolve in the region. Currently there are several dialogue forums and conclaves which, among other things, discuss the desirability of an integrated region. This is usually expressed in terms of an emerging Asian community. The phrase ‘evolving Asian regionalism’ therefore should be defined in line with the community-building effort that is underway in the region. The countries from East Asia, Southeast Asia and some from South Asia meet regularly and propose measures that will foster closer regional integration and lead towards an Asian regional community. External powers with a strong interest in regional affairs are also part of such conclaves. Some of these forums are anchored and driven by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Prominent among them are the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), ASEAN+3 (APT), Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), Shangri-La Dialogue, and East Asia Summit (EAS). They hold wide ranging discussions on strategic, economic, environmental and non-traditional cross border security issues such as human trafficking, terrorism and pandemics. The participating states are aware that such cross border threats can only be tackled through collective action which is propelling Asian countries to coordinate their activities more closely. Economic interdependence is a fairly evident phenomenon triggering the need for greater coordination of policies. It is believed that the 1997/1998 regional economic meltdown was a turning point that ‘underscored Asia's integration and shared interests and exposed the weaknesses in the global policy architecture.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×