Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T21:24:08.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Jumping About

The Role of Mind-Wandering and Attentional Flexibility in Facilitating Creative Problem Solving

from III - Pathways to Insight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2024

Carola Salvi
Affiliation:
John Cabot University, Rome
Jennifer Wiley
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Steven M. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Research has shown that taking a break, or an "incubation interval," can facilitate creative problem solving. One interpretation of this phenomenon is that it allows for task-switching and attentional flexibility, which can improve creative performance. Task-switching may allow individuals to break their mental set and identify solutions that were previously unavailable. It may also encourage the alternation between idea generation and evaluation, leading to attentional flexibility. This chapter discusses the evidence for the benefits of attentional flexibility and its relationship to mind-wandering, and presents a new study on the potential sources of benefit for task-switching on creativity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnoli, S., Vanucci, M., Pelagatti, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). Exploring the link between mind wandering, mindfulness, and creativity: A multidimensional approach. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 4153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology, 19(2), 143146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., et al. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 11171122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 16041611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Both, L., Needham, D., & Wood, E. (2004). Examining tasks that facilitate the experience of incubation while problem-solving. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 5767.Google Scholar
Braem, S. (2017). Conditioning task switching behavior. Cognition, 166, 272276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosowsky, N. P., & Crump, M. J. C. (2016). Context-specific attentional sampling: Intentional control as a pre-requisite for contextual control. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 146160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosowsky, N. P., & Crump, M. J. C. (2018). Memory-guided selective attention: Single experiences with conflict have long-lasting effects on cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 11341153. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosowsky, N. P., & Crump, M. J. C. (2021). Contextual recruitment of selective attention can be updated via changes in task relevance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 75(1), 1934. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosowsky, N. P., DeGutis, J., Esterman, M., Smilek, D., & Seli, P. (2020). Mind wandering, motivation, and task performance over time: Evidence that motivation insulates people from the negative effects of mind wandering. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosowsky, N. P., & Egner, T. (2021). Appealing to the cognitive miser: Using demand avoidance to modulate cognitive flexibility in cued and voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(10), 1329.Google Scholar
Brosowsky, N. P., Murray, S., Schooler, J. W., & Seli, P. (2021a). Attention need not always apply: Mind wandering impedes explicit but not implicit sequence learning. Cognition, 209, 104530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosowsky, N. P., Murray, S., Schooler, J. W., & Seli, P. (2021b). Thought dynamics under task demands: Evaluating the influence of task difficulty on unconstrained thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(9), 12981312. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000944.Google ScholarPubMed
Browne, B. A., & Cruse, D. F. (1988). The incubation effect: Illusion or illumination? Human Performance, 1(3), 177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugg, J. M. (2014). Conflict-triggered top-down control: Default mode, last resort, or no such thing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 567. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035032.Google ScholarPubMed
Danek, A. H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring and the Aha! experience: A new model of non-monotonic problem solving. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (Ed.), Insight: On the origins of new ideas (pp. 5178). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Flanders, J. L., & Peterson, J. B. (2008). Cognitive abilities involved in insight problem solving: An individual differences model. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 278290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, R. A., Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The use of environmental clues during incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 287304. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach, G. (2012). Mechanisms of cognitive control: The functional role of task rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach, G., & Fröber, K. (2019). On how to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the stability-flexibility balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418800030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 334338. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egner, T. (2014). Creatures of habit (and control): A multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, E., Ponce, P., & Loprinzi, P. D. (2021). Active or inert? An experimental comparison of creative ideation across incubation periods. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gable, S. L., Hopper, E. A., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). When the muses strike: Creative ideas of physicists and writers routinely occur during mind wandering. Psychological Science, 30(3), 396404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618820626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, T., & Wiley, J. (2019). Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 305313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). Breaking functional fixedness by adapting alternate uses to new objects [unpublished raw data]. University of California.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jones, T., Caulfield, L., Wilkinson, D., & Weller, L. (2011). The relationship between nonclinical schizotypy and handedness on divergent and convergent creative problem-solving tasks. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 222228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leboe, J. P., Wong, J., Crump, M. J. C., & Stobbe, K. (2008). Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(6), 935945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leszczynski, M., Chaieb, L., Reber, T. P., et al. (2017). Mind wandering simultaneously prolongs reactions and promotes creative incubation Scientific Reports, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10616-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). “Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 6375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, S., Liang, N., Brosowsky, N., & Seli, P. (2021). What are the benefits of mind wandering to creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 3477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlet, S. (2008). An expanding view on incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 297308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802278743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, A. S. (1986). The role of ability in creative “incubation.” Personality and Individual Differences, 7(2), 169174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). Creativity – the unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, J., Iwan, F., Steindorf, L., & Danek, A. H. (2021). The role of attention for insight problem solving: Effects of mindless and mindful incubation periods. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 33(6–7), 757769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Franconeri, S. L., Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 18141819. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, E. (2004). Incubation in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 141148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 605617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, J., & Bugg, J. M. (2016). Dissociating divergent thinking and creative achievement by examining attentional flexibility and hypomania. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 416424. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1977). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In Models of discovery (pp. 286303). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 94120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smeekens, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2016). Working memory capacity, mind-wandering, and creative cognition: An individual-differences investigation into the benefits of controlled versus spontaneous thought. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 389415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. P., Brosowsky, N., Murray, S., et al. (2022). Fixation, flexibility, and creativity: The dynamics of mind wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(7), 689710.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In Sternberg, Robert J & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 229251). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311314. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03334612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 6187. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., Gerkens, D. R., & Angello, G. (2017). Alternating incubation effects in the generation of category exemplars. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 95106 https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Ellwood, S., Yates, A., & Pallier, G. (2004). Nonconscious idea generation. Psychological Reports, 94(3_suppl), 13251330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steindorf, L., Hammerton, H. A., & Rummel, J. (2021). Mind wandering outside the box – about the role of off-task thoughts and their assessment during creative incubation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 584–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.) (1995). The nature of insight. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tan, T., Zou, H., Chen, C., & Luo, J. (2015). Mind wandering and the incubation effect in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 375382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 701710. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought (Vol. 10). Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(3), 235258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). Mind wandering “Ahas” versus mindful reasoning: Alternative routes to creative solutions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×