Pais, A., ‘Subtle Is the Lord …’: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar

Fölsing, A., Albert Einstein: A Biography (Viking, London, 1997)Google Scholar

Pais, A., Niels Bohr's Times, in Physics, Philosophy and Polity (Clarendon, Oxford, 1991)Google Scholar

Blaedel, N., Harmony and Unity: The Life of Niels Bohr (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988)Google Scholar

Born, M. (ed.), The Born–Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 2005)Google Scholar

Moore, W., Schrödinger: Life and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gell-Mann, M., The Nature of the Physical World (Wiley, New York, 1979)Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1962)Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., The Copernican Revolution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1957)Google Scholar

Langford, J. J., Galileo, Science and the Church (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1966)Google Scholar

Renn, J. (ed.), Galileo in Context (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar

Hall, A. R., Isaac Newton, Adventurer in Thought (Blackwell, Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar

Fara, P., Newton: The Making of a Genius (Macmillan, London, 2002)Google Scholar

Berry, A. J., Henry Cavendish: His Life and Scientific Work (Hutchinson, London, 1960)Google Scholar

Berry, M., Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 1989)Google Scholar

Squires, E. J., Conscious Mind in the Physical World (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1990)Google Scholar

Stewart, I., Does God Play Dice?: The Mathematics of Chaos (Blackwell, Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar

Gribbin, J., Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life (Allen Lane, London, 2004)Google Scholar

Williams, L. P., Michael Faraday: A Biography (Chapman and Hall, London, 1965)Google Scholar

Cantor, G., Michael Faraday, Sandemanian and Scientist: A Study of Science and Religion in the Nineteenth Century (Macmillan, London, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everitt, C. W. F., James Clerk Maxwell (Scribner, New York, 1975)Google Scholar

Harman, P. M., The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar

Brush, S. G., The Kind of Motion We Call Heat (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976)Google Scholar

Coveney, P. V. and Highfield, R., The Arrow of Time (Allen, London, 1990)Google Scholar

Lindley, D., Boltzmann's Atom: The Great Debate That Launched a Revolution in Physics (Free Press, New York, 2001)Google Scholar

Ihde, A. J., The Development of Modern Chemistry (Dover, New York, 1984)Google Scholar

Pais, A., Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar

Watson, J. D., The Double Helix (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1968)Google Scholar

Wheaton, B. R., The Tiger and the Shark: Empirical Roots of Wave–Particle Dualism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A., The Meaning of Relativity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2004)Google Scholar

Taylor, E. F. and Wheeler, J. A., Spacetime Physics (Freeman, New York, 2nd edn, 1993)Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894–1912 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar

Klein, M. J., Max Planck and the beginning of the quantum theory, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 1, 459–79 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kangro, H., History of Planck's Radiation Law (Taylor and Francis, London, 1976)Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, K., The World of Walther Nernst, the Rise and Fall of German Science (Macmillan, London, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richtmyer, F. K., Kennard, E. H. and Cooper, J. N., Introduction to Modern Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969)Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S., Heilborn, J. L., Forman, P. L. and Allen, L., Sources for History of Quantum Physics: An Inventory and Report (American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, 1967): http://amphilsoc.org/library/guides/ahqp/Google Scholar

Heilbron, J. L., Rutherford–Bohr atom, American Journal of Physics 49, 223–31 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jammer, M., The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966)Google Scholar

Sommerfeld, A., Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines (Methuen, London, 1923)Google Scholar

Waerden, B. L., Sources of Quantum Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967)Google Scholar

Stuewer, R. H., The Compton Effect (Neale Watson, New York, 1975)Google Scholar

Slater, J. C., Solid State and Molecular Theory: A Scientific Biography (Wiley, New York, 1975)Google Scholar

Cassidy, D. C., Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg (Freeman, New York, 1992)Google Scholar

Kragh, H., Dirac: A Scientific Biography (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar

Forman, P., Weimar culture, causality and quantum theory, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3, 1–116 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beller, M., Born's probabilistic interpretation: a case study of ‘concepts in flux’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 21, 563–88 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S., Dreams of a Final Theory: The Search for the Fundamental Laws of Nature (Vintage, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W., A Brief History of Time (Guild, London, 1990)Google Scholar

Hoddeson, L., Braun, E., Teichmann, J. and Weart, S. (eds.), Out of the Crystal Maze: Chapters from the History of Solid-State Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar

Finnis, M., Interatomic Forces in Condensed Matter (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körner, S. (ed.), Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics (Dover, New York, 1962)Google Scholar

Davies, P. C. W. and Brown, J. R. (eds.), The Ghost in the Atom (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar

Schiff, L. I., Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949)Google Scholar

Folse, H. J., The Philosophy of Niels Bohr (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985)Google Scholar

Murdoch, D., Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honner, J., The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar

Faye, J., Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petruccioli, S., Atoms, Molecules and Paradoxes: Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar

Faye, J. and Folse, H. T. (eds.), Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plotnisky, A., Complementarity and Anti-Epistemology after Bohr and Derrida (Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, 1994)Google Scholar

Ottaviani, J. and Purvis, L., Suspended in Language: Niels Bohr's Life, Discoveries and the Century He Shaped (GT Labs, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2004)Google Scholar

Bohr, N., Niels Bohr's Philosophical Writings (Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, 4 Vols, 1987–99)Google Scholar

Colodny, R. G. (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1964)Google Scholar

Beller, M., The birth of Bohr's complementarity: the context and the dialogues, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23, 147–80 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalchar, J. (ed.), Niels Bohr: Collected Works, Vol. 6 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985)Google Scholar

Jammer, M., The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974)Google Scholar

Bohr, N., Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958)Google Scholar

K. Popper, Quantum mechanics without the observer, in Quantum Theory and Reality (Bunge, M., ed.) (Springer, New York, 1967), pp. 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. Bunge, The turn of the tide, in Quantum Theory and Reality (M. Bunge, ed.) (Springer, New York, 1967), pp. 1–6

Baggott, J., The Meaning of Quantum Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992)Google Scholar

Stapp, H. P., The Copenhagen interpretation, American Journal of Physics 40, 1098–116 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (Library of the Living Philosophers, Evanston, Illinois, 1949)Google Scholar

Rozental, S. (ed.), Niels Bohr: His Life and Work As Seen by Friends and Colleagues (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967)Google Scholar

Capra, F., The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism (Flamingo, London, 1975)Google Scholar

Bell, J. S., Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edn, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boer, J., Dal, E. and Ulfbeck, O. (eds.), The Lesson of Quantum Theory (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986)Google Scholar

Bernstein, J., Quantum Profiles (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1991)Google Scholar

Hanson, N. R., Patterns in Discovery (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K., Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (New Left Books, London, 1975)Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K., Science in a Free Society (New Left Books, London, 1978)Google Scholar

Hanson, N. R., Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory, American Journal of Physics 27, 1–15 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930)Google Scholar

Bohr, N., Essays 1958–62 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1963)Google Scholar

Thwaite, A. (ed.), Larkin at Sixty (Faber, London, 1982)Google Scholar

Motion, A., Philip Larkin: A Writer's Life (Faber, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Neumann, J., Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955)Google Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 42, 358–81 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., Resource letter IQM-2: foundations of quantum mechanics since the Bell inequalities, American Journal of Physics 55, 785–92 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macrae, N., John von Neumann: The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the Modern Computer, Game Theory, Nuclear Deterrence and Much More (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1999)Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H. (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Good, L. J. (ed.), The Scientist Speculates – An Anthology of Partly-Baked Ideas (Heinemann, London, 1961)Google Scholar

Mehra, J., The Solvay Conferences on Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A., The Shaky Game (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986)Google Scholar

Guy, R. and Deltete, R., Fine, Einstein and ensembles, Foundations of Physics 20, 943–65 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, A., Einstein and ensembles: response, Foundations of Physics 20, 967–89 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., Ensemble interpretations of quantum mechanics: a modern perspective, Physics Reports 210, 223–317 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., Einstein's interpretation of quantum mechanics, American Journal of Physics 40, 1763–71 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A., Physics and reality, Journal of the Franklin Institute 221, 349–82 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrödinger, E., Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik [The present situation in quantum mechanics], Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–12, 823–8, 844–9 (1935) (Translation by J. D. Trimmer in [91], pp. 152–67)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wigner, E. P., On hidden variables and quantum mechanical probabilities, American Journal of Physics 38, 1005–9 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Penrose, R. and Isham, C. (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N., Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical Review 47, 777–80 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahti, P. and Mittelstaedt, P. (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics: Fifty Years of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Gedankenexperiment (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985)Google Scholar

M. Dickson, Bohr on Bell: a proposed reading of Bohr and its implications for Bell's theorem, in Non-locality and Modality (Placek, T. and Butterfield, J., eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., The EPR paper and Bohr's response: a re-assessment, Foundations of Physics 34, 1305–1340 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, D., Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1951)Google Scholar

Bohm, D., Interview with D. Home, Science Today, November, 1986, p. 25Google Scholar

Bohr, N., Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Physical Review 48, 696–702 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K., Complementarity, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supplementary Volume) 32, 75–104 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

J. T. Cushing, A Bohmian response to Bohr's complementarity, in [60], pp. 57–75

M. Beller and A. Fine, Bohr's response to EPR, in [60], pp. 1–31.

Beller, M., Quantum Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999)Google Scholar

H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, Reconsidering Bohr's reply to EPR, in Non-locality and Modality (Placek, T. and Butterfield, J., eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002), pp. 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. and Infeld, L., The Evolution of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1938)Google Scholar

Speziali, P. (ed.) Albert Einstein–Michele Besso Correspondence (Hermann, Paris, 1972)Google Scholar

Davies, P. C. W., The Forces of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edn, 1986)Google Scholar

Eliezer, S. and Eliezer, Y., Fourth State of Matter: An Introduction to the Physics of Plasma (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Close, F., Too Hot to Handle: The Story of the Race for Cold Fusion (Allen, London, 1990)Google Scholar

Raimes, S., The Wave Mechanics of Electrons in Metals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961)Google Scholar

Landé, A, Quantum Mechanics (Pitman, London, 1951)Google Scholar

Pines, D., David Bohm 1917–92, Physics World 6 (3), 67 (1993)Google Scholar

Bohm, D., Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, D., Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1980)Google Scholar

Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. J., The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1993)Google Scholar

Bohm, D., Thought As a System (Routledge, London, 1994)Google Scholar

Hiley, B. J. and Peat, F. D. (eds.), Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1987)Google Scholar

Holland, P., The Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, D., A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’, I and II, Physical Review 85, 166–93 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heisenberg, W., Physics and Philosophy (Allen and Unwin, London, 1959)Google Scholar

George, A. (ed.), Louis de Broglie, physicien et penseur (Albin-Michel, Paris, 1953)Google Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., John Bell and the most profound discovery of science, Physics World 11 (12), 29–34 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

M. A. B. Whitaker, John Bell in Belfast: early years and education, in [215], pp. 7–20

A. Shimony, John S. Bell: Some reminiscences and reflections, in [215], pp. 51–60

Jackiw, R. and Shimony, A., The depth and breadth of John Bell's physics, Physics in Perspective 4, 78–116 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Born, M., Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (Clarendon, Oxford, 1949)Google Scholar

Stapp, H. P., Are superluminal connections necessary?, Il Nuovo Cimento 40B, 191–205 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mermin, N. D., Is the Moon there when nobody looks?, Physics Today 38 (4), 38–47 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. and Holt, R. A., Proposed experiment to test hidden-variable theories, Physical Review Letters 23, 880–4 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selleri, F., Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, S. J. and Clauser, J. F., Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Physical Review Letters 28, 938–41 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clauser, J. F., Experimental investigation of a polarization correlation anomaly, Physical Review Letters 36, 1223–6 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fry, E. S. and Thompson, R. C., Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Physical Review A 37, 465–8 (1976)Google Scholar

Holt, R. A., Atomic Cascade Experiments (PhD Thesis, Harvard University, 1973)Google Scholar

Clauser, J. F. and Shimony, A., Bell's Theorem: experimental tests and implications, Reports on Progress in Physics 41, 1881–1927 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G., Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities, Physical Review Letters 49, 91–4 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aspect, A., Dalibard, J. and Roger, G., Experimental tests of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analysers, Physical Review Letters 49, 1804–7 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., Theory and experiment in the foundations of quantum theory, Progress in Quantum Electronics 24, 1–106 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeilinger, A., Testing Bell's inequalities with periodic switching, Physics Letters A 118, 1–2 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P. M., Hidden-variable example based upon data rejection, Physical Review D 2, 1418–25 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eberhard, P. H., Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment, Physical Review A 47, R747–50 (1993)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shih, Y. H. and Alley, C. O., New type of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion, Physical Review Letters 61, 2921–4 (1988)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ou, Z. Y. and Mandel, L., Violation of Bell's inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment, Physical Review Letters 61, 50–3 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V. and Shih, Y. H., New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs, Physical Review Letters 75, 4337–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger, A., Violation of Bell's inequalities under strict Einstein locality conditions, Physical Review Letters 81, 5039–43 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rarity, J. G. and Tapster, P. R., Experimental violation of Bell's inequality based on phase and momentum, Physical Review Letters 64, 2495–8 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. and Zeilinger, A., Two particle interferometry, Physical Review Letters 62, 2209–12 (1989)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Franson, J. D., Bell inequality for position and time, Physical Review Letters 62, 2205–8 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M. and Chiao, R. Y., High-visibility interference in a Bell-inequality experiment for energy and time, Physical Review A 47, R2472–5 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aerts, S., Kwiat, P., Larsson, J. A. and Zukowski, M., Two-photon Franson-type experiments and local realism, Physical Review Letters 83, 2872–5 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuelsson, P., Sukhorukov, E. V. and Büttiker, M., Orbital entanglement and violation of Bell's inequalities in mesoscopic conductors, Physical Review Letters 91, 157002 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Gisin, B., Herzog, T., Zbinden, H. and Gisin, N., Experimental demonstration of quantum-correlations over more than 10 kilometers, Physical Review A 57, 3229–32 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H. and Gisin, N., Violation of Bell's inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart, Physical Review Letters 81, 3563–6 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Gisin, N. and Zbinden, H., Long-distance Bell-type tests using energy–time entangled photons, Physical Review A 59, 4150–63 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeh, H.-D., On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory, Foundations of Physics 1, 69–76 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zurek, W. H., Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, Physics Today 44 (10), 36–44 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furry, W. H., Note on the quantum-mechanical theory of measurement, Physical Review 49, 393–9 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P., Might god toss coins?, Foundations of Physics 12, 249–63 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghirardi, G.-C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T., Uniform dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems, Physical Review D 34, 470–91 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwiat, P. G., Eberhard, P. H., Steinberg, A. M. and Chiao, R. Y., Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment, Physical Review A 49, 3209–20 (1994)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huelga, S. F., Ferrero, M. and Santos, E., Loophole-free test of the Bell inequality, Physical Review A 51, 5008–11 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Santos, E., Entropy inequalities and Bell inequalities for two-qubit systems, Physical Review A 69, 022305 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, E., Proposed optical tests of Bell's inequalities not resting upon the fair sampling assumption, Physical Letters A 327, 33–7 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lo, T. K. and Shimony, A., Proposed molecular test of local hidden-variable theories, Physical Review A 23, 3003–12 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fry, E. S., Walther, T. and Li, S., Proposal for a loophole free test of the Bell inequalities, Physical Review A 52, 4381–95 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oliver, B. J. and Stroud, C. R., Bell's inequalities for Rydberg atoms, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 4, 1426–8 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freyberger, M., Aravind, P. K., Horne, M. A. and Shimony, A., Proposed test of Bell's inequality without a detection loophole by using entangled Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A 53, 1232–44 (1996)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hagley, E., Maître, X., Nogues, G., Wunderlich, C., Brune, M., Raimond, J. M. and Haroche, S., Generation of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen pairs of atoms, Physical Review Letters 79, 1–5 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beige, A., Munro, W. J. and Knight, P. L., Bell's inequality test with entangled atoms, Physical Review A 62, 052102 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brif, C. and Mann, A., Bell's inequality test with entangled atoms, Europhysics Lettes 49, 1–7 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamehi-Rachti, M. and Mittig, W., Quantum mechanics and hidden variables: a test of Bell's inequalities by the measurement of spin correlation in low-energy proton–proton scattering, Physical Review D 14, 2543–55 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Datta, A. and Home, D., Is Bell-type inequality violated for K0K̄0, B0B̄0 systems?, Foundations of Physics Letters 4, 165–78 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selleri, F., Incompatibility between local realism and quantum mechanics for pairs of neutral kaons, Physical Review A 56, 3493–506 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bramon, A. and Nowakowski, M., Bell inequalities for entangled neutral kaons, Physical Review Letters 83, 1–5 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertlmann, R. A. and Hiesmayr, B. C., Bell's inequalities for entangled kaons and their unitary time evolution, Physical Review A 63, 062112 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Genovese, M., Entanglement properties of kaons and tests of hidden-variable models, Physical Review A 69, 022103 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Go, A. (Belle collaboration), Observation of Bell inequality violation in B mesons, Journal of Modern Optics 51, 991–8 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertlmann, R. A., Bramon, A., Garbarino, G. and Hiesmayr, B. C., Violation of a Bell inequality in particle physics experimentally verified?, Physics Letters A 332, 355–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, D. H., Introduction to High Energy Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 4th edn, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J. S. and Bertlmann, R. A., Magic moments, Nuclear Physics B 177, 218–36 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. A. Bertlmann, Magic moments: a collaboration with John Bell, in [215], pp. 29–47

Aspect, A., Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever, Nature 398, 189–90 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowe, M. A., Klepinski, D., Meyer, V., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C. and Wineland, D. J., Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection, Nature 409, 791–4 (2001)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grangier, P., Count them all, Nature 409, 774–5 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbieri, M., Martini, F., DiNepi, G. and Mataloni, P., Towards a test of non-locality without ‘supplementary assumptions’, Physics Letters A 334, 23–9 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, J., Collins, D., Hardy, L., Kent, A. and Popescu, S., Quantum nonlocality, Bell inequalities and the memory loophole, Physical Review A 66, 042111 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nha, H. and Carmichael, H. J., Proposed tests of quantum nonlocality for continuous variables, Physical Review Letters 93, 020401 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

García-Patrón, R., Fiuráššek, J., Cerf, N. J., Wenger, J., Tualle-Brouri, R. and Grangier, P., Proposal for a loophole-free Bell test using homodyne detection, Physical Review Letters 93, 130409 (2004)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne and A. Zeilinger, Going beyond Bell's theorem, in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptations of the Universe (Kafatos, M., ed.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989)Google Scholar

Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. and Zeilinger, A., Bell's theorem without inequalities, American Journal of Physics 58, 1131–43 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mermin, N. D., Quantum mysteries revisited, American Journal of Physics 58, 731–4 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger, A., Observation of three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement, Physical Review Letters 82, 1345–9 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouwmeester, D., Pan, J.-W., Mattle, K., Eibl, M., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger, A., Experimental quantum teleportation, Nature 390, 575–9 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger, A., Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted, Physical Review Letters 80, 3891–4 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, L., Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories, Physical Review Letters 68, 2981–4 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hardy, L., Spooky action at a distance in quantum mechanics, Contemporary Physics 39, 419–29 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elitzur, A. and Vaidman, L., Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements, Foundations of Physics 23, 987–97 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, L., Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states, Physical Review Letters 71, 1665–8 (1993)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giuseppe, G. Di, Martini, F. and Boschi, D., Experimental test of the violation of local realism in quantum mechanics without Bell inequalities, Physical Review A 56, 176–81 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boschi, D., Branca, S., Martini, F. and Hardy, L., Ladder proof of nonlocality without inequalities: theoretical and experimental results, Physical Review Letters 79, 2755–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merwe, A., Selleri, F. and Tarozzi, G. (eds.), Bell's Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992)Google Scholar

Thompson, C. H., The chaotic bell: an intuitive analogy for EPR experiments, Foundations of Physics Letters 9, 357–82 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, C. H., Subtraction of accidentals and the validity of Bell tests, Galilean Electrodynamics 14, 43–50 (2003)Google Scholar

Cushing, J. T. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana 1989)Google Scholar

Bertlmann, R. and Zeilinger, A. (eds.), Quantum (Un)speakables: From Bell to Quantum Information (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbert, N., Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics (Anchor, New York, 1987)Google Scholar

Redhead, M., Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism, a Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar

Dickson, W. M., Quantum Chance and Non-locality: Probability and Non-locality in the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bub, J., Interpreting the Quantum World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar

Maudlin, T., Quantum Non-locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Aspects of Modern Physics (Blackwell, Oxford, 2nd edn, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baggott, J., Beyond Measure: Modern Physics, Philosophy and the Meaning of Quantum Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar

Ghirardi, G.-C., Sneaking a Look at God's Cards: Unravelling the Mysteries of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2nd edn, 2005)Google Scholar

Gribbin, J., The man who proved Einstein was wrong, New Scientist 128, 43–5 (1990)Google Scholar

Romer, R. H., John S. Bell (1928–90), the man who proved Einstein was right, American Journal of Physics 59, 299–300 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushing, J. T., Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994)Google Scholar

Howard, D., Review of The Shaky Game by A. Fine, Synthese 86, 123–41 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philippidis, C., Dewdney, C. and Hiley, B. J., Quantum interference and the quantum potential, Il Nuovo Cimento 52B, 15–28 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewdney, C. and Hiley, B. J., A quantum potential description of one-dimensional time-dependent scattering from square barriers and square wells, Foundations of Physics 12, 27–48 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leavens, C. R., Time of arrival in quantum and Bohmian mechanics, Physical Review A 58, 840–7 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muga, J. C., Mayato, R. Sala and Egusquiza, I. L. (eds.), Time in Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, H., The Theory of the Universal Wave Function (PhD Thesis, Princeton University, 1957)Google Scholar

Everett, H., ‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 454–62 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, J. A., Assessment of Everett's ‘relative state’ formulation of quantum theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 463–5 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witt, B. and Graham, N. (eds.) The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1973)Google Scholar

Squires, E. J., Many views of one world, European Journal of Physics 8, 171–3 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, D. and Loewer, B., Interpreting the many-worlds interpretation, Synthese 77, 195–213 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockwood, M., Mind, Brain and the Quantum (Blackwell, Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar

Lockwood, M., ‘Many minds’ interpretations of quantum mechanics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 159–88 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P., Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2nd edn, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, J., The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar

Donald, M. J., Quantum theory and the brain, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 427, 43–93 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., The relative states and many worlds interpretations of quantum mechanics and the EPR problem, Journal of Physics A 18, 253–64 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., Many worlds, many minds, many views, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 54, 369–91 (2000)Google Scholar

Hartle, J. B. and Hawking, S. W., Wavefunction of the universe, Physical Review D 28, 2960–75 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, B. J. and Rees, M. J., The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world, Nature 278, 605–12 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986)Google Scholar

Bostrom, N., Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy (Routledge, New York, 2002)Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, J., Belief in God in an Age of Science (Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1998)Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S. and Wheeler, J. A., Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, California, 1973)Google Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., On Hacking's criticism of the Wheeler anthropic principle, Mind 97, 259–64 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, D., Quantum theory as a universal physical theory, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 24, 1–41 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, D., The Fabric of Reality (Allen Lane, London, 1997)Google Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., Can the statistical postulate of quantum theory be derived? – a critique of the many-universes interpretation, Foundations of Physics 3, 229–40 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P., Bell's theorem and the foundations of quantum physics, American Journal of Physics 53, 306–17 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sudbery, A., This damned quantum jumping, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 387–411 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, A., Against many-world interpretations, International Journal of Theoretical Physics A 5, 1745–62 (1990)Google Scholar

Vaidman, L., On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12, 245–61 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vaidman, L., The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (2002): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-manyworlds/Google Scholar

Deutsch, D., Quantum theory of probability and decisions, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 455, 3129–37 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, S., Time, decoherence and quantum mechanics, Synthese 102, 235–66 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, S., Time, quantum mechanics and tense, Synthese 107, 19–53 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, S., Time, quantum mechanics and probability, Synthese 114, 373–404 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saunders, S., Derivation of the Born rule from operational assumptions, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 460, 1–18 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

S. Saunders, What is probability?, in Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics? (Elitzur, A., Dolev, S. and Kolenda, N., eds.) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, D., Worlds in the Everett interpretation, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33, 637–61 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, D., Everett and structure, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 87–105 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, D., Everettian rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 415–39 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greaves, H., Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic universe, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35, 423–56 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. C., Real patterns, Journal of Philosophy 87, 27–51 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finetti, B., Theory of Probability (Wiley, New York, 1974)Google Scholar

Laurikainen, K. V. and Montonen, C. (eds.), Symposia on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1992 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

d'Espagnat, B., Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995)Google Scholar

d'Espagnat, B., Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts, 2nd edn, 1976)Google Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., The inadequacy of effective incoherence interpretations of quantum theory as demonstrated by analysis of EPR measurements, Physics Letters A 211, 5–11 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, Oxford, 2nd edn, 1977)Google Scholar

Gottfried, K., Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1966)Google Scholar

Kampen, N. G., 10 theorems about quantum-mechanical measurements, Physica A 153, 97–113 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfried, K., Does quantum mechanics carry the seeds of its own destruction?Physics World 4 (10), 34–40 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampen, N. G., Quantum criticism, Physics World 3 (10), 20 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampen, N. G., Mystery of quantum measurement, Physics World 4 (12), 16–17 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peierls, R., In defence of ‘measurement’, Physics World 4 (1), 19–20 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Squires, E. J., Quantum challenge, Physics World 5 (1), 18 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J. and Amati, D., Quantum Reflections (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar

Bell, M., Gottfried, K. and Veltmann, M. (eds.), Quantum Mechanics, High Energy Physics and Accelerators (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995). [The papers on quantum mechanics were republished on their own in 2001 as John S. Bell on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics with the same editors and publisher.]Google Scholar

Gottfried, K., Inferring the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics from the classical limit, Nature 405, 533–6 (2000)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottfried, K. and Yan, T.-M., Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals (Springer, New York, 2nd edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Whitaker, A., review of [286], Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General Physics 37, 3073–6 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampen, N. G., Macroscopic systems in quantum mechanics, Physica A 194, 542–50 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kampen, N. G., Note on the 2-slit experiment, Journal of Statistical Physics 77, 345–50 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., On a model of wave-function collapse, Physica A 255, 455–66 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., What do we learn about quantum mechanics from the theory of measurement?, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27, 211–8 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O. and Zeh, H.-D., Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2nd edn, 2003)Google Scholar

Anderson, J. L.; Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R. and Pearle, P.; Gisin, N.; Albert, D. Z. and Feinberg, G.; Holland, P. R.; Ambegaokar, V.; Epstein, K. J.; and Zurek, W. H., Negotiating the tricky border between quantum and classical, Physics Today 46 (4), 13–51, 81–90 (1993)Google Scholar

Atkins, P., Galileo's Finger: The Great Ideas of Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics 36, 219–72 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Correlations in separated quantum systems: a consistent history analysis of the EPR problem, American Journal of Physics 55, 11–17 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics using quantum trajectories, Physical Review Letters 70, 2201–4 (1993)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Omnès, R., Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 64, 339–82 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Omnès, R., Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994)Google Scholar

Omnès, R., Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1999)Google Scholar

Omnès, R., Quantum Philosophy: Understanding and Interpreting Contemporary Science (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1999)Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S., Ezawa, H., Murayama, Y. and Nomura, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1990)Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. B., Classical equations for quantum systems, Physical Review D 47, 3345–82 (1993)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diósi, L. and Lukács, B. (eds.) Stochastic Evolution of Quantum States in Open Systems and Measurement Processes (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowker, F. and Kent, A., On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics, Journal of Statistical Physics 82, 1575–646 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Bohmian mechanics and consistent histories, Physics Letters A 261, 227–34 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartle, J. B., Bohmian histories and decoherent histories, Physical Review A 69, 042111 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamada, N., Speakable and unspeakable in the tunnelling time problem, Physical Review Letters 83, 3350–3 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokolovski, D., Nature of quantum measurement of quantities not represented by Hermitian operators, Physical Review A 66, 032107 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egusquiza, I. L. and Muga, J. G., Consistent histories, the quantum Zeno effect, and time of arrival, Physical Review A 62, 032103 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Consistent histories and quantum delayed choice, Fortschritte der Physik 46, 741–8 (1998)3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, R. B., Consistent Quantum Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)Google Scholar

Gisin, N. and Percival, I. C., The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems, Journal of Physics A 25, 5677–91 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gisin, N. and Percival, I. C., Quantum state diffusion, localization and quantum dispersion entropy, Journal of Physics A 26, 2233–43 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gisin, N. and Percival, I. C., The quantum state diffusion picture of physical processes, Journal of Physics A 26, 2245–60 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gisin, N., Quantum measurements and stochastic processes, Physical Review Letters 52, 1657–60 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diósi, L., Quantum stochastic processes as models for state vector reduction, Journal of Physics A 21, 2885–98 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diósi, L., Gisin, N., Halliwell, J. and Percival, I. C., Decoherent histories and quantum state diffusionPhysical Review Letters 74, 203–7 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zeh, H. D., There are no quantum jumps, nor are there particles, Physics Letters A 172, 189–92 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gisin, N. and Percival, I. C., Stochastic wave equations versus parallel world components, Physics Letters A 175, 144–5 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diósi, L., Gisin, N. and Strunz, W. T., Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion, Physical Review A 58, 3068–79 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yu, T., Diósi, L., Gisin, N. and Strunz, W. T., Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion: perturbation approach, Physical Review A 60, 91–103 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockburger, J. T. and Grabert, H., Non-Markovian quantum state diffusion, Chemical Physics 268, 249–56 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuer, H. P. and Petruccione, F., Relativistic formulation of quantum-state diffusion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General Physics 31, 33–52 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diósi, L., Relativistic formulation of quantum-state diffusion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General Physics 31, 9601–3 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breuer, H. P. and Petruccione, F., Reply to ‘Relativistic formulation of quantum-state diffusion’, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General Physics 31, 9605–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Percival, I. C., Primary state diffusion, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 447, 189–209 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Percival, I. C., Quantum State Diffusion (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)Google Scholar

Spiller, T. P., Quantum state diffusion [Review of Ref. 328], Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33, 707–16 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

N. D. Mermin, Whose knowledge?, in [215], pp. 271–80

Brun, T. A., Finkelstein, J. and Mermin, N. D., How much state assignments can differ, Physical Review A 65, 032315 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brukner, Č. and Zeilinger, A., Operationally invariant information in quantum measurements, Physical Review Letters 83, 3354–7 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Č. Brukner and A. Zeilinger, Information and fundamental elements of the structure of quantum theory, in Time, Quantum, Information (Castell, L. and Ischbek, O., eds.) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Č. Brukner and A. Zeilinger, Quantum physics as a science of information, in Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics (Elitzur, A., Dolev, S. and Kolenda, N., eds.) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weizsäcker, C. F., Aufbau der Physik (Carl Hanser, Munich, 1958)Google Scholar

J. A. Wheeler, Law without law, in Quantum Theory and Measurement (Wheeler, T. A. and Zurek, W. H., eds.) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983), pp. 182–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, E., Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1967)Google Scholar

Nelson, E., Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1985)Google Scholar

Peña, L. and Cetto, A. M., Stochastic theory for classical and quantum mechanical systems, Foundations of Physics 5, 355–70 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, L. and Cetto, A. M., Does quantum mechanics accept a stochastic support?, Foundations of Physics 12, 1017–37 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peña, L. and Cetto, A. M., Why Schrödinger's equation?, International Journal of Quantum Theory 12, 23–37 (1977)Google Scholar

Marshall, T. W., Random electrodynamics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 276, 475–91 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarozzi, G. and Merwe, A. (eds.), Open Questions in Quantum Physics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, E., Comment on ‘Source of vacuum electromagnetic zero-point energy’, Physical Review A 44, 3383–4 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garbaczewski, P. and Vigier, J. P., Quantum dynamics from the Brownian recoil principle, Physical Review A 46, 4634–8 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wallstrom, T. C., Inequivalence between the Schrödinger equation and the Madelung hydrodynamic equation, Physical Review A 49, 1613–17 (1994)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bacciagaluppi, G., Nelsonian mechanics revisited, Foundations of Physics Letters 12, 1–16 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P., Stochastic dynamical reduction theories and superluminal communication, Physical Review D 33, 2240–52 (1986)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Squires, E. J., The Mystery of the Quantum World (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghirardi, G. C., Grassi, R. and Pearle, P., Relativistic dynamic reduction models — general framework and examples, Foundations of Physics 20, 1271–1316 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P., Relativistic collapse model with tachyonic features, Physical Review A 59, 80–101 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicrosini, O. and Rimini, A., Relativistic spontaneous localization: a proposal, Foundations of Physics 33, 1061–84 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghirardi, G. C., Pearle, P. and Rimini, A., Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous localization of systems of identical particles, Physical Review A 42, 78–89 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fine, A., Forbes, M. and Wessels, L. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan, 1990)Google Scholar

Lewis, P. J., Quantum mechanics, orthogonality, and counting, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 313–28 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, P. J., Counting marbles: a reply to my critics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54, 165–70 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifton, R. and Monton, B., Losing your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 697–717 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifton, R. and Monton, B., Counting marbles with ‘accessible’ mass density: a reply to Bassi and Ghirardi, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 125–30 (2000)Google Scholar

Ghirardi, G. and Bassi, A., Do dynamical reduction models imply that arithmetic does not apply to ordinary macroscopic objects?, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 49–64 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G., More about dynamical reduction and the enumeration principle, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 719–34 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G., Counting marbles: reply to Clifton and Monton, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52, 125–30 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bassi, A. and Ghirardi, G., Dynamical reduction models, Physics Reports 379, 257–426 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero, A., Are GRW tails as bad as they say?, Philosophy of Science 66, S59–71 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, D., Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 607–20 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, D. Z. and Vaidman, L., On a proposed postulate of state-reduction, Physics Letters A 139, 1–4 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, D. Z., Quantum Mechanics and Experience (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992)Google Scholar

Aicardi, F., Borsellino, A., Ghirardi, G. C. and Grassi, R., Dynamical models for state-vector reduction: do they ensure that measurements have outcomes?, Foundations of Physics Letters 4, 109–28 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P. and Squires, E. J., Bound state excitation, neutron decay experiments and models of wavefunction collapse, Physical Review Letters 73, 1–5 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collett, B., Pearle, P., Avignone, F. and Nussinov, S., Constraint on collapse models by limit on spontaneous X-ray emission in Ge, Foundations of Physics, 25, 1399–1412 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearle, P., Ring, J., Collar, J. I. and Avignone, F. T., The CSL collapse model and spontaneous radiation: an update, Foundations of Physics 29, 465–80 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rae, A. I. M., Can GRW theory be tested by experiments on SQUIDs?, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General Physics 23, L57–60 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buffa, A. M., Nicrosini, O. and Rimini, A., Dissipation and reduction effects of spontaneous localization on superconducting states, Foundations of Physics Letters 8, 105–25 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinkham, M., Introduction to Superconductivity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edn, 1996)Google Scholar

Serot, O., Carjan, N. and Strottman, D., Transient behaviour in quantum tunnelling: time dependent approach to alpha decay, Nuclear Physics A 569, 562–74 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenland, P. T., Seeking non-exponential decay, Nature 335, 298 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jittoh, T., Matsumoto, S., Sato, J., Sato, Y. and Takeda, K., Nonexponential decay of an unstable quantum system: small-Q-value s-wave decay, Physical Review A 71, 012109 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, E. B., Gazes, S. B., Crane, S. G. and Bennett, D. A., Test of the exponential decay law at short and long times, Physical Review Letters, 60, 2246–9 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, E. B., Sur, B., Lesko, K. T., Larimer, R. M., Depaolo, D. J. and Owens, T. L., An improved test of the exponential decay law, Physics Letters B 357, 521–5 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, S. R., Bharucha, C. F. and six others, Experimental evidence for non-exponential decay in quantum tunnelling, Nature 387, 575–7 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelkar, N. G., Nowakowski, M. and Khemchandani, K. P., Hidden evidence of nonexponential nuclear decay, Physical Review C 70, 024601 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicke, R. H., Interaction-free quantum mechanics — a paradox, American Journal of Physics 49, 925–30 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., Negative-result experiments, and the requirement of wavefunction collapse, Journal of Physics A 25, 2387–94 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Degasperis, A., Fonda, L. and Ghirardi, G. C., Does the lifetime of an unstable system depend on the measuring apparatus?, Il Nuovo Cimento 21A, 471–84 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A. and Weber, T., On the quantum foundations of the experimental decay law, Il Nuovo Cimento 15A, 689–704 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E. C. G., The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 18, 756–63 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiu, C. B., Sudarshan, E. C. G. and Misra, B., Time evolution of unstable quantum states and a resolution of Zeno's paradox, Physical Review D 16, 520–9 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballentine, L. E., Quantum Mechanics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990)Google Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., Reflections on the quantum Zeno paradox, Journal of Physics A 19, 1847–54 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., The many-worlds and relative states interpretations of quantum mechanics and the quantum Zeno paradox, Journal of Physics A 20, 3339–45 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitaker, M. A. B., On Squires' many-views interpretation of quantum theory, European Journal of Physics 10, 73–4 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., A critical re-examination of the quantum Zeno paradox, Journal of Physics A 25, 657–64 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inagaki, S., Namiki, M. and Tajiri, T., Possible observation of the quantum Zeno effect by means of neutron spin-flipping, Physics Letters A 166, 5–12 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., A unified framework for quantum Zeno processes, Physics Letters A 173, 327–31 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pascazio, S., Namiki, M., Badurek, G. and Rauch, H., Quantum Zeno effect with neutron spin, Physics Letters A 179, 155–60 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J., Bollinger, J. J. and Wineland, D. J., Quantum Zeno effect, Physical Review A 41, 2295–300 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, R. J., What are quantum jumps?, Physica Scripta T21, 49–51 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wineland, D. J. and Itano, W. M., Laser cooling, Physics Today 40 (6), 34–40 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C. and Wineland, D. J., Laser spectroscopy of trapped atomic ions, Science 237, 612–17 (1987)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peres, A. and Ron, A., Incomplete collapse and partial quantum Zeno effect, Physical Review A 42, 5720–22 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petrovsky, T., Tasaki, S. and Prigogine, I., Quantum Zeno effect, Physics Letters A 151, 109–13 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakazato, H., Namiki, M. and Pascazio, S., Temporal behaviour of quantum mechanical systems, International Journal of Modern Physics B 10, 247–95 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., A conceptual analysis of quantum Zeno: paradox, measurement and experiment, Annals of Physics 258, 237–85 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Facchi, P. and Pascazio, S., Quantum Zeno and inverse quantum Zeno effects, Progress in Optics 42, 147–217 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Facchi, P. and Pascazio, S., Quantum Zeno subspaces, Physical Review Letters 89, 080401 (2002)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nakazato, H., Takazawa, T. and Yuasa, K., Purification through Zeno-like measurements, Physical Review Letters 90, 060401 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koshino, K. and Shimizu, A., Quantum Zeno effect for exponentially decaying systems, Physical Review Letters 92, 030401 (2004)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Facchi, P., Lidar, D. A. and Pascazio, S., Unification of dynamical decoupling and the quantum Zeno effect, Physical Review A 69, 032314 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Facchi, P., Nakazoto, H. and Pascazio, S., From the quantum Zeno to the inverse quantum Zeno effect, Physical Review Letters 86, 2699–703 (2001)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roy, S. M., Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno paradoxes, Pramāṇa 56, 169–78 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, M. C., Gutierrez-Medina, B. and Raizen, M. G., Observation of the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in an unstable system, Physical Review Letters 87, 040202 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luis, A., Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in two-level systems, Physical Review A 67, 062113 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruseckas, J. and Kaulakys, B., General expression for the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects, Physical Review A 69, 032104 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapp, H. P., Quantum theory and the role of mind in physics, Foundations of Physics 31, 1465–99 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H., Treimer, W. and Bonse, U., Test of a single crystal neutron interferometer, Physics Letters A 47, 369–71 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonse, U. and Hart, M., An X-ray interferometer, Applied Physics Letters 6, 155–6 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werner, S. A., Neutron interferometry, Physics Today 33 (12), 24–30 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberger, D. M., The neutron interferometer as a device for illustrating the strange behaviour of quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 55, 875–905 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H., Neutron interferometric tests of quantum mechanics, Contemporary Physics 27, 345–60 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H., Neutron interferometry, Science 262, 1384–5 (1993)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Summhammer, J., Badurek, G., Rauch, H. and Kischko, U., Explicit experimental verification of quantum spin-state superposition, Physics Letters A 90, 110–2 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewdney, C., The quantum potential approach to neutron interferometry experiments, Physica B 151, 160–70 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H. and Vigier, J. P., Proposed neutron interferometry test of Einstein's ‘Einweg’ assumption in the Bohr–Einstein controversy, Physics Letters A 151, 269–75 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unnerstall, T., A comment on the Rauch–Vigier experiments on neutron interferometry, Physics Letters A 151, 263–8 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, P. B., Comment on [422], Physics Letters A 157, 309–10 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H. and Vigier, J. P., Reply to comment on [422], Physics Letters A 157, 311–13 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werner, S. A., Clothier, R., Kaiser, H., Rauch, H. and Wölwitsch, H., Spectral filtering in neutron interferometry, Physical Review Letters 67, 683–6 (1991)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vigier, J. P., Possible test of the reality of superluminal phase waves and particle phase space motions in the Einstein–de Broglie–Bohm causal stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics 24, 61–83 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zawisky, M., Baron, M. and Loidl, R., Three-beam interference and which-way information in neutron interferometry, Physical Review A 66, 063608 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagh, A. G., Neutron interferometry was the first to correlate complementarity and ‘which-way’ information, Physics Letters A 259, 81–2 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauch, H. and Werner, S., Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar

Hafner, M. and Summhammer, J., Experiment on interaction-free measurement in neutron interferometry, Physics Letters A 235, 563–8 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasegawa, Y., Loidl, R., Badurek, G., Baron, M. and Rauch, H., Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometer experiments: quantum contextuality, Journal of Modern Optics 51, 967–72 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basu, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Kar, G. and Home, D., Bell's inequality for a single spin-½ particle and quantum contextuality, Physics Letters A 279, 281–6 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement, Progress of Theoretical Physics (Supplement) 69, 80–100 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Macroscopic quantum tunnelling, Physics Today 37, S15–16 (1984)Google Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Schrödinger's cat and her laboratory cousins, Contemporary Physics 25, 583–98 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J. and Garg, A., Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: is the flux there when nobody looks?, Physical Review Letters 54, 857–60 (1985)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leggett, A. J., Macroscopic quantum tunnelling and related matters, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 26, Supplement 3, 1986–93 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Experimental approaches to the quantum measurement paradox, Foundations of Physics 18, 939–52 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Some thought-experiments involving macrosystems as illustrations of various interpretations of quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics 29, 445–56 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., The significance of the MQC experiment, Journal of Superconductivity 12, 683–7 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R415–51 (2002)Google Scholar

Leggett, A. J., Probing quantum mechanics towards the everyday world: where do we stand?, Physica Scripta T102, 69–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, A. J., The quantum measurement problem, Science 307, 871–2 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedman, J. R., Patel, V., Chen, W., Tolpygo, S. K. and Lukens, J. E., Quantum superposition of distinct macroscopic states, Nature 406, 43–6 (2000)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waal, C. H., Haar, A. C. J. and six others, Quantum superposition of macroscopic persistent-current states, Science 290, 773–7 (2000)Google Scholar

Arndt, M., Nairz, O., Vos-Andreae, J., Keller, C., Zouw, G. and Zeilinger, A., Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules, Nature 401, 680–2 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nairz, O., Arndt, M. and Zeilinger, A., Quantum interference experiments with large molecules, American Journal of Physics 71, 319–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Awschalom, D. D., DiVincenzo, D. P. and Smyth, J. F., Macroscopic quantum effects in nanometer-scale magnets, Science 258, 414–21 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Julsgaard, B., Kozhekin, A. and Polzik, E. S., Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects, Nature 413, 400–3 (2001)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elby, A. and Foster, S., Why SQUID experiments can rule out non-invasive measurability, Physics Letters A 166, 17–23 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, L., Home, D., Squires, E. J. and Whitaker, M. A. B., Realism and the quantum-mechanical two-state oscillator, Physical Review A 45, 4267–70 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Home, D. and Whitaker, M. A. B., Quantum Zeno effect: relevance for local realism, macroscopic realism and noninvasive measurability at the macroscopic level, Physics Letters A 239, 6–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar