Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:19:48.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Kurt Jax
Affiliation:
UFZ Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ecosystem Functioning , pp. 236 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, L. G., Simberloff, D. S., Strong, D. R. J., and Thistle, A. B. (1984). Preface. In Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, ed. Strong, D. R. J., Simberloff, D. S., Abele, L. G., and Thistle, A. B.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. vii–x.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahl, V. and Allen, T. F. H. (1996). Hierarchy Theory. A Vision, Vocabulary, and Epistemology, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H. and Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a Unified Ecology, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H. and Starr, T. B. (1982). Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allison, S. K. (2007). You can't not choose: embracing the role of choice in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 15, 601–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, T., Carstensen, J., Hernández-García, E., and Duarte, C. M. (2009). Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C. B. and Rozzi, R. (2000). Bird assemblages in the southernmost forests in the world: methodological variations for determining species composition. Anales del Institutio de la Patagonia, 28, 89–100.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. B., Rozzi, R., Torres-Mura, J. C., Mcgehee, S. M., Sherriffs, M. F., Schuettler, E., and Rosemond, A. D. (2006a). Exotic vertebrate fauna in the remote and pristine sub-antarctic Cape Horn Archipelago, Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 3295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. B., Griffith, C. R., Rosemond, A. D., Rozzi, R., and Dollenz, O. (2006b). The effects of invasive North American beavers on riparian plant communities in Cape Horn, Chile: Do exotic beavers engineer differently in sub-Antarctic ecosystems?Biological Conservation, 128, 467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. B., Martínez Pastur, G., Lencinas, M. V., Wallem, P. K., Moorman, M. C., and Rosemond, A. D. (2009). Do introduced beavers Castor canadensis engineer differently in South America? An overview with implications for restoration. Mammal Review, 39, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. B. and Rosemond, A. D. (2007). Ecosystem engineering by invasive exotic beavers reduces in-stream diversity and enhances ecosystem function in Cape Horn, Chile. Oecologia, 154, 141–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeier, P. L. and Karr, J. R. (1994). Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives. BioScience, 44, 690–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Floret, C., Floc'H, E., Ovalle, C., and Pontanier, R. (1993). Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands: I. A view from the south. Restoration Ecology, 1, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Dhillion, S., and Floc'H, E. (1995). On the need to select an ecosystem of reference, however imperfect: a reply to Pickett and Parker. Restoration Ecology, 3, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., Milton, S. J., and Blignaut, J. N. (2007). Restoring natural capital: definitions and rationale. In Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business, and Practice, ed. Aronson, J., Milton, S. J., and Blignaut, J. N.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. C. (1987). Forests. In Restoration Ecology, ed. Jordan, W. R. I., Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
Attiwill, P. M. (1994). The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management, 63, 247–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerlocher, F. (1990). The Gaia hypothesis: a fruitful fallacy?Experientia, 46, 232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R. G. (1996). Ecosystem Geography, New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, B. and Hill, E. P. (2003). Beaver (Castor canadensis). In Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation, ed. Feldhamer, G. A., Thompson, B. C., and Chapman, J. A. (2nd edn) Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 288–310.Google Scholar
Ballentine, R. K. and Guarraia, L. J. (eds) (1977). The Integrity of Waters: Proceedings of a Symposium, 10–12 March 1975, Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Balvanera, P., Kremen, C., and Martinez-Ramos, M. (2005). Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecological Applications, 15, 360–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N., He, J.-S., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D., and Schmid, B. (2006). Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9, 1146–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbee, R. D. (1968). A discussion of ecological management in the national park system. MS thesis, Colorado State University.
Barkai, A. and McQuaid, C. (1988). Predator–prey role reversal in a marine benthic ecosystem. Science, 242, 62–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D. and Oelschlaeger, M. (1995). A science for survival: values and conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 10, 905–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, O. and Schreiber, K.-F. (eds) (1994). Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft, Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Becker, E. and Jahn, T. (2006). Soziale Ökologie: Gründzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen, Frankfurt/New York, NY: Campus.Google Scholar
Beierkuhnlein, C. and Neßhöver, C. (2006). Biodiversity experiments: artificial constructions or heuristic tools?Progress in Botany, 67, 486–535.Google Scholar
Beisner, B. E., Haydon, D. T., and Cuddington, K. (2003). Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 376–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, D. R., Hoey, A. S., and Choat, J. H. (2003). Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs. Ecology Letters, 6, 281–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., and Peterson, G. D. (2005). A systems model approach to determining resilience surrogates for case studies. Ecosystems, 8, 945–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghöfer, U., Rozzi, R., and Jax, K. (2010). Many eyes on nature: diverse perspectives in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve and their relevance for conservation. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art18.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Kislalioglu, M., Folke, C., and Gadgil, M. (1998). Exploring the basic ecological unit: ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies. Ecosystems, 1, 409–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
Bird, E. A. R. (1987). The social construction of nature: theoretical approaches to the history of environmental problems. Environmental Review, 11, 255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbacher, D. (ed.) (1980). Ökologie und Ethik, Stuttgart: Reclam.
Blumrich, H., Bröring, U., Felinks, B., Fromm, H., Mrzljak, J., Schulz, F., Vorwald, J., and Wiegleb, G. (1998). Die Bedeutung der Leitbildentwicklung im Rahmen einer ‘guten naturschutzfachlichen Praxis’, dargestellt am Beispiel der naturnahen terrestrischen Bereiche der Niederlausitzer Bergbaufolgelandschaften. In Naturschutz in der Bergbaufolgelandschaft: Leitbildentwicklung, Landesumweltamt Brandenburg, Potsdam, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Boero, F. and Bonsdorff, E. (2007). A conceptual framework for marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Marine Ecology: An Evolutionary Perspective, 28, 134–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrero, L. A. (1997). The origins of ethnographic subsistence patterns in Fuego-Patagonia. In Patagonia: Natural History, Prehistory and Ethnography at the Uttermost End of the Earth, ed. McEwan, C., Borrero, L. A., and Prieto, A.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
Bouamrane, M. (ed.) (2007). Dialogue in Biosphere Reserves: References, Practices and Experiences, Paris: UNESCO.
Boughton, D. A., Smith, E. R., and O'Neill, R. V. (1999). Regional vulnerability: a conceptual framework. Ecosystem Health, 5, 312–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A. J. (1999). An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biology, 41, 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, M. S. and Haney, A. (eds) (1997). Ecosystem Management: Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources, New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. (1987). Restoration: an acid test for ecology. In Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research, ed. Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–9.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. (2002). Introduction and philosophy. In Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Vol. 1, ed. Perrow, M. R. and Davy, A. J.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. and Hüttl, R. F. (2001). Future minesite restoration involves a broader approach. Ecological Engineering, 17, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, F. (2009a). Resilience and sustainable development: an ecological inquiry. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München.
Brand, F. (2009b). Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 68, 605–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, F. S. and Jax, K. (2007). Focussing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. (2008). Species' traits and ecological functioning in marine conservation and management. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 366, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breymeyer, A. I. (1981). Monitoring of the functioning of ecosystems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. and Lugo, A. E. (1994). Rehabilitation of tropical lands: a key to sustaining development. Restoration Ecology, 2, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, S. M. and Mitchell, N. (2007). People as ecological participants in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 15, 348–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, K. F. and Koontz, T. M. (2005). Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service. Environmental Management, 35, 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. E., Cuddington, K., Jones, C. G., Talley, T. S., Hastings, A., Lambrinos, J. G., Crooks, J. A., and Wilson, W. G. (2006). Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cairns, J. Jr. (1977). Quantification of biological integrity. In The Integrity of Waters: Proceedings of a Symposium, March 10–12, 1975, ed. Ballentine, R. K. and Guarraia, L. J.Washington, DC: US Environmental Agency, pp. 171–87.Google Scholar
Callicott, J. B. (1996). Do deconstructive ecology and sociobiology undermine Leopold's Land Ethic?Environmental Ethics, 18, 353–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J. B. and Nelson, M. P. (eds) (1998). The Great New Wilderness Debate, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Callicott, J. B., Crowder, L. B., and Mumford, K. (1999). Current normative concepts in conservation. Conservation Biology, 13, 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calow, P. (1992). Can ecosystems be healthy? Critical consideration of concepts. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 1, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinale, B. J., Nelson, K., and Palmer, M. A. (2000). Linking species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems: on the importance of environmental context. Oikos, 91, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, A. C. (2008). Incorporating invasive alien species into ecological assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Aquatic Invasions, 3, 361–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, G. (1962). Reflections of functionalism. Acta Sociologica, 5, 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, N. O. L., Brönmark, C., and Hansson, L.-A. (2004). Invading herbivory: the golden apple snail alters ecosystem functioning in Asian wetlands. Ecology, 85, 1575–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?Ecosystems, 4, 765–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. and Cottingham, K. L. (1997). Resilience and restoration of lakes. Conservation Ecology, 1. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. and Lathrop, R. C. (2008). Probabilistic estimate of a threshold for eutrophication. Ecosystems, 11, 601–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Westley, F., and Turner, M. G. (2005). Surrogates for resilience of social–ecological systems. Ecosystems, 8, 941–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., Defries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., Perrings, C., Reid, W. V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R. J., and Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1305–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catovsky, S. (1998). Functional groups: clarifying our use of the term. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 79, 126–7.Google Scholar
Chapin, F. S., Torn, M. S., and Tateno, M. (1996). Principles of ecosystem sustainability. American Naturalist, 148, 1016–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. L. (2006). Ecological restoration restored. Environmental Values, 15, 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, A. (1987). Playing God in Yellowstone: The Destruction of America's First National Park, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Choi, C. (2008). Tierra del Fuego: the beavers must die. Nature, 453, 968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J. S., Frank, K. T., Leggett, W. C., and Drinkwater, K. (2004). Transition to an alternate state in a continental shelf ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61, 505–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. D. (2007). Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology, 15, 351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, A., Jäger, P., Jungwirth, M., Koller-Kreimel, V., Moog, O., Muhar, S., and Schmutz, S. (2000). The Austrian way of assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: a contribution to the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia, 422, 445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. L., Bartuska, A. M., Carpenter, S. R., D'Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J. F., MacMahon, J. A., Noss, R. F., Parsons, D. J., Peterson, C. H., Turner, M. G., and Woodmansee, R. G. (1996). The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecological Applications, 6, 665–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. W. and Zaunbrecher, D. (1987). The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: The ecosystem concept in natural resource policy and management. Renewable Resources Journal, Summer, 8–16.Google Scholar
Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation, Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication No. 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewell, A. F. and Aronson, J. (2006). Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 20, 420–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clewell, A. and McDonald, T. (2009). Relevance of natural recovery to ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration, 27, 122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colautti, R. J. and MacIsaac, H. J. (2004). A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 135–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. N. (2000). Paradox of the primeval: ecological restoration in wilderness. Ecological Restoration, 18, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. N. and Landres, P. B. (1996). Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecological Applications, 6, 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, G. F. (1968). Elk and the Primary Purpose of Yellowstone National Park, Manuscript, Yellowstone National Park Library.Google Scholar
Cole, G. F. (1969). Elk and the Yellowstone Ecosystem, Manuscript, Yellowstone National Park Library.Google Scholar
Connell, J. H. and Sousa, W. P. (1983). On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. American Naturalist, 121, 789–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Convention on Biological Diversity (2004). The Ecosystem Approach (CBD Guidelines), Montreal, QC: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds) (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books.
Cooper, D. J. (2008). Is Yellowstone on the brink?Ecology, 89, 293–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R. (1992). Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, ed. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., and Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousins, S. H. (1987). Can we count natural ecosystems?Bulletin of the British Ecological Society, 18, 156–8.Google Scholar
Couve, E. and Vidal-Ojeda, C. (2000). Birds of the Beagle Channel: Cape Horn, Staten Island, Diego Ramírez Islands and Surrounding Seas, Punta Arenas: Fantastico Sur.Google Scholar
Crist, E. (2004). Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics, 26, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, W. (ed.) (1995). Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York, NY /London: W. W. Norton & Co.
Cumming, G. S. and Collier, J. (2005). Change and identity in complex systems. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 29. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. S., Barnes, G., Perz, S., Schmink, M., Sieving, K. E., Southworth, J., Binford, M., Holt, R. D., Stickler, C., and Van Holt, T. (2005). An exploratory framework for the empirical measurement of resilience. Ecosystems, 8, 975–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, K. W. (1974). Structure and function of stream ecosystems. BioScience, 24, 631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, G. C. (ed.) (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington, DC: Island Press.
Danovaro, R., Gambi, C., Dell'anno, A., Corinaidesi, C., Fraschetti, S., Vanreusel, A., Vincx, M., and Gooday, A. J. (2008). Exponential decline of deep-sea ecosystem functioning linked to benthic biodiversity loss. Current Biology, 18, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot, R. S. (1987). Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology and economics. The Environmentalist, 7, 105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, R. S. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision-making, Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff BV.Google Scholar
Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., and Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, W. T. and Born, R. J. G. (2003). Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonge, V. N. (2007). Toward the application of ecological concepts in EU coastal water management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55, 407–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Leo, G. A. and Levin, S. (1997). The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conservation Ecology, 1, 3. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art3.Google Scholar
Delcourt, H. R. and Delcourt, P. A. (1991). Quaternary Ecology. A Paleoecological Perspective, London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Demeritt, D. (2002). What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26, 767–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, C. L., Cumming, G. S., and Carpenter, S. R. (2002). Multiple states in river and lake ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 357, 635–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desjardins, J. R. (2006). Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy, Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Despain, D., Houston, D., Meagher, M., and Schullery, P. (1986). Wildlife in Transition: Man and Nature on Yellowstone's Northern Range, Boulder, CO: Roberts Rinehart.Google Scholar
deYoung, B., Barange, M., Beaugrand, G., Harris, R., Perry, R. I., Scheffer, M., and Werner, F. (2008). Regime shifts in marine ecosystems: detection, prediction and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 402–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, S., Symstad, A. J., Chapin, F. S. I., Wardle, D. A., and Huenneke, L. F. (2003). Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 140–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didham, R. K., Watts, C. H., and Norton, D. A. (2005). Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states?Oikos, 110, 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T. and Stern, P. C. (eds) (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E., Richardson, J. P., and Canuel, E. A. (2003). Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecology Letters, 6, 637–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, S. and Piégay, H. (2009). From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications, 25, 568–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1992). Species: theoretical contexts. In Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, ed. Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 312–17.Google Scholar
,Ecological Society of America (1999). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Maintaining Natural Life Support Systems (Issues in Ecology, Vol. 4), Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America.Google Scholar
,Ecological Society of America (2008). The role of ecosystem services in conservation and resource management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 1–60.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J. G. (2000). Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology, 8, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P. and Ehrlich, A. (1981). Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species, New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. and Walker, B. H. (1998). Rivets and redundancy. BioScience, 48, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., and Norberg, J. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 488–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, C. S. (1927). Animal Ecology, London: Sidgwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. (1958). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, London: Methuen & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eser, U. (1999). Der Naturschutz und das Fremde: Ökologische und normative Grundlagen der Umweltethik, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Eser, U. (2002). Der Wert der Vielfalt: “Biodiversität” zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Ethik. In Umwelt – Ethik – Recht, ed. Bobbert, M., Düwell, M., and Jax, K.Tübingen: Francke-Verlag, pp. 160–81.Google Scholar
Eser, U. and Potthast, T. (1999). Naturschutzethik: Eine Einführung für die Praxis, Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essler, W. K. (1982). Wissenschaftstheorie I: Definition und Reduktion, Freiburg/ München: Alber.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2003). Rivers and Lakes: Typology, Reference Conditions and Classification Systems. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance Document No. 10, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [online] http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/guidance_documents.Google Scholar
,European Commission (2005). Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance Document No. 13, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [online] http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/guidance_documents.Google Scholar
,European Community (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 1–72.Google Scholar
Felinks, B. and Wiegleb, G. (1998). Welche Dynamik schützt der Prozeßschutz? Aspekte unterschiedlicher Maßstabsebenen: dargestellt am Beispiel der Niederlausitzer Bergbaufolgelandschaft. Naturschute und Landschaftsplanung, 30, 298–303.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. and Young, J. C. (2007). Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation, 136, 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., and Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flahault, C. and Schröter, C. (eds) (1910). Phytogeographische Nomenklatur: III. Internationaler Botamischer Kongress, Brüssel 1910, Zürich: Zürcher & Furrer.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., and Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31, 437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fox, D. (2007). Back to the no-analog future?Science, 316, 823–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Free, A. and Barton, N. H. (2007). Do evolution and ecology need the Gaia hypothesis?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 611–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamfeldt, L. and Hillebrand, H. (2008). Biodiversity effects on aquatic ecosystem functioning: maturation of a new paradigm. International Review of Hydrobiology, 93, 550–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H., and Jonsson, P. R. (2008). Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology, 89, 1223–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandy, M. (1996). Crumbling land: the postmodernity debate and the analysis of environmental problems. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J. (1996). What is biodiversity? In Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, ed. Gaston, K. J.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Gattie, D. K., Smith, M. C., Tollner, E. W., and McCutcheon, S. C. (2003). The emergence of ecological engineering as a discipline. Ecological Engineering, 20, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giller, P. S., Hillebrand, H., Berninger, U.-G., Gessner, M. O., Hawkins, S., Inchausti, P., Inglis, C., Leslie, H., Malmqvist, B., Monaghan, M. T., Morin, P. J., and O'Mullan, G. (2004). Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environments. Oikos, 104, 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindele, M. (1999). Die Funktion der Biodiversität: zur Problematik der Redundanz von Arten in Ökologie und Naturschutz. Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung: Schriftenreihe im Fachbereich Umwelt und Gesellschaft der TU Berlin, 112.
Gitay, H., Wilson, J. B., and Lee, W. G. (1996). Species redundancy: a redundant concept?Journal of Ecology, 84, 121–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glacken, C. J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1917). The structure and development of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 44, 463–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 53, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, D., Carr, M., and Harting, B. (1991). An Environmental Profile of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Bozeman, MT: Greater Yellowstone Coalition.Google Scholar
Gobster, P. H. and Hull, R. B. (2000). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B. (1993). A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More than the Sum of its Parts, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. (1975). The theory of diversity–stability relationships in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 50, 237–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorke, M. (2007). Eigenwert der Natur: Ethische Begründung und Konsequenzen. Habilitationsschrift. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Greifswald.
Grant, W. E. and French, N. R. (1980). Evaluation of the role of small mammals in grassland ecosystems: a modelling approach. Ecological Modelling, 8, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee (1990). Vision for the Future: A Framework for Coordination in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Draft, Billings, MT: Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. N., O'Gorman, E. J., Emmerson, M. C., Jenkins, S. R., Klein, A.-M., Loreau, M., and Symstad, A. J. (2009). Biodiversity and the stability of ecosystem functioning. In Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, ed. Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D., Cook, R., Christensen, S., Ekelund, F., Sorensen, S. J., Baath, E., Bloem, J., de Ruiter, P. C., Dolfing, J., and Nicolardot, B. (2000). Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos, 90, 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, Chichester: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grimm, V. and Wissel, C. (1997). Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia, 109, 323–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grisebach, A. (1838). Über den Einfluß des Klimas auf die Begrenzung der natürlichen Floren. In Gesammelte Abhandlungen und kleinere Schriften zur Pflanzengeographie, ed. Grisebach, A.Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Gross, M. (2003). Inventing Nature: Ecological Restoration by Public Experiments, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Großer, K.-H. (1995). Das Lausitzer Braunkohlerevier: Der Naturraum und seine Gestaltung. In Braunkohletagebau und Rekultivierung, ed. Pflug, W.Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, NY: Springer, pp. 461–74.Google Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. (1994a). Conservation biology in context: an interview with Michael Soulé. In Environmental Policy and Biodiversity, ed. Grumbine, R. E.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 99–105.Google Scholar
Grumbine, R. E. (1994b). What is ecosystem management?Conservation Biology, 8, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience: in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 31, 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (eds) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gusinde, M. (1937). Die Feuerland-Indianer. Vol. 2: Die Yamana: vom Leben und Denken der Wassernomaden am Kap Horn, Mödling bei Wien: Verlag der Internationalen Zeitschrift ‘Anthropos’.Google Scholar
Haber, W. (1979). Theoretische Anmerkungen zu ‘ökologischen Planung’. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 7, 19–30.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What?, Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Häge, K. (1996). Recultivation in the Lusatian mining region: targets and prospects. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 91, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, S. and Jax, K. (2007). The application of environmental ethics in biological conservation: a case study from the southernmost tip of the Americas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 2559–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampicke, U. (1993). Naturschutz und Ethik: Rückblick auf eine 20jährige Diskussion, 1973–1993, und politische Folgerungen. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz, 2, 73–86.Google Scholar
Hard, G. (1969). ‘Kosmos’ und ‘Landschaft’: Kosmologische und landschafts-physiognomische Denkmotive bei Alexander von Humboldt und in der geographischen Humboldt-Auslegung des 20. Jahrhunderts. In Alexander von Humboldt. Werk und Weltgeltung, ed. Pfeiffer, H.München: Piper-Verlag, pp. 133–77.Google Scholar
Hargrove, E. C. (1989). Foundations of Environmental Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. and Hawksworth, D. L. (1994). Biodiversity: measurement and estimation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 345, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. A., Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. S., and Aronson, J. (2006). Ecological restoration and climate change. Restoration Ecology, 14, 170–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartje, V., Klaphake, A., and Schliep, R. (2003). The International Debate on the Ecosystem Approach: Critical Review, International Actors, Obstacles and Challenges, Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.Google Scholar
Haselhuhn, I. and Leßmann, D. (2005). Rahmenbedingungen der Entwicklung der Lausitzer Bergbaulandschaft, insbesondere der Entstehung und des Managements von Tagebauseen. Gewässerreport Nr. 9. BTU Cottbus, Aktuelle Reihe 2/2005, Cottbus: TU Cottbus.Google Scholar
Haskell, B. D., Norton, B. G., and Costanza, R. (1992). What is ecosystem health and why should we worry about it? In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, ed. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., and Scheu, S. (2005). Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 36, 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton-Ellis, T. (2008). The hitchhiker's guide to the Water Framework Directive. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubold-Rosar, M. (2002). Landwirtschaft. In Wissenschaftliche Begleitung der ostdeutschen Braunkohlensanierung: Forschungsprojekte 1994–2000, ed. Lmbv. Berlin: LMBV Eigenverlag, pp. 132–54.Google Scholar
Haubold-Rosar, M. (2004). Rekultivierung von Braunkohlenbergbauflächen für eine nachhaltige landwirtschaftliche Nutzung: Bisherige Forschungsergebnisse und aktueller Forschungsbedarf. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Umweltforschung (ZAU), Sonderheft 14, 158–68.Google Scholar
Hector, A. and Bagchi, R. (2007). Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature, 448, 188–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hector, A., Bell, T., Connolly, J., Finn, J., Fox, J., Kirwan, L., Loreau, M., McLaren, J., Schmid, B., and Weigelt, A. (2009). The analysis of biodiversity experiments: from pattern toward mechanism. In Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, ed. Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heger, T. and Trepl, L. (2003). Predicting biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 5, 313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heger, T. and Trepl, L. (2008). Was sind invasive gebietsfremde Arten?Natur und Landschaft, 83, 399–401.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, A. S., Bund, W., Cardoso, A. C., and Nõges, P. (2004). Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe: interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. Water Science and Technology, 49, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1952). Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hering, D., Feld, C. K., Moog, O., and Ofenbock, T. (2006). Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives. Hydrobiologia, 566, 311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, H. (2000). Vom Zweck zur Funktion: Hinweise aus wissenschaftsphilosophischer Sicht. In Funktionsbegriff und Unsicherheit in der Ökologie, ed. Jax, K.Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 19–30.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. (1997). What is good ecological restoration?Conservation Biology, 11, 338–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E. (2003). Nature by Design: People, Natural Processes and Ecological Restoration, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, R. H., Watts, A. C., and Randle, A. M. (2005). The myths of restoration ecology. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Norton, D. A. (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology, 4, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Davis, M. A., Slobodkin, L. B., Lackey, R. T., Halvorson, W., and Throop, W. (2004). Restoration ecology: the challenge of social values and expectations (Forum). Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A., Epstein, P. R., Ewel, J. J., Klink, C. A., Lugo, A. E., Norton, D., Ojima, D., Richardson, D. M., Sanderson, E. W., Valladares, F., Vila, M., Zamora, R., and Zobel, M. (2006). Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., and Harris, J. A. (2009). Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In Engineering with Social Constraints, ed. Schulze, P. C.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Solan, M., Symstad, A. J., Díaz, S., Gessner, O., Buchmann, N., Degrange, V., Grime, P., Hulot, F., Mermillod-Blondin, F., Roy, J., Spehn, E., and Peer, L. (2002). Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S. I., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Setala, H., Symstad, A. J., Vandermeer, J., and Wardle, D. A. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs, 75, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, B. (1990). Physiognomik der Vegetation zur Zeit von Alexander von Humboldt. In Alexander von Humboldt. Weltbild und Wirkung auf die Wissenschaften, ed. Lindgren, U. Köln, Wien: Böhlau, pp. 77–102.Google Scholar
Hornborg, A. (2009). Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50, 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. B. (1971). Ecosystems of national parks. Science, 172, 648–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, D. B. (1981). Yellowstone elk: some thoughts on experimental management. Pacific Park Science, 1, 4–6.Google Scholar
Houston, D. B. (1982). The Northern Yellowstone Elk: Ecology and Management, New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huff, D. E. and Varley, J. D. (1999). Natural regulation in Yellowstone National Park's northern range. Ecological Applications, 9, 17–29.Google Scholar
Humboldt, A. (1807 [1969]). Ansichten der Natur, Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1978). An Introduction to Population Ecology, New Haven, CT/ London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hüttl, R. F. (1998). Ecology of post strip-mining landscapes in Lusatia, Germany. Environmental Science & Policy, 1, 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttl, R. F. (2000). Forstliche Rekultivierung im Lausitzer Braunkohlerevier. Rundgespräche der Kommission für Ökologie, 20, 53–64.Google Scholar
Hüttl, R. F. and Weber, E. (2001). Forest ecosystem development in post-mining landscapes: a case study of the Lusatian lignite district. Naturwissenschaften, 88, 322–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibelings, B. W., Portielje, R., Lammens, E. H. R. R., Noordhuis, R., Berg, M. S., Joosse, W., and Meijer, M. L. (2007). Resilience of alternative stable states during the recovery of shallow lakes from eutrophication: Lake Veluwe as a case study. Ecosystems, 10, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,IPCC (2008). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Ives, A. R. and Carpenter, S. R. (2007). Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science, 317, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaksic, F. M., Iriate, J. A., Jiménez, J. E., and Martínez, D. R. (2002). Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biological Invasions, 4, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. (1977). What are dandelions and aphids?American Naturalist, 111, 586–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, ed. Jasanoff, S.London: Routledge, pp. 13–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jax, K. (1998). Holocoen and ecosystem: on the origin and historical consequences of two concepts. Journal of the History of Biology, 31, 113–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jax, K. (2000). Verschiedene Verständnisse des Funktionsbegriffs in den Umweltwissenschaften. In Funktionsbegriff und Unsicherheit in der Ökologie, ed. Jax, K.Frankfurt/Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 7–17.Google Scholar
Jax, K. (2001). Naturbild, Ökologietheorie und Naturschutz: zur Geschichte des Ökosystemmanagements im Yellowstone-Nationalpark. Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie, 7, 115–34.Google Scholar
Jax, K. (2002a). Die Einheiten der Ökologie. Analyse, Methodenentwicklung und Anwendung in Ökologie und Naturschutz, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jax, K. (2002b). Zur Transformation ökologischer Fachbegriffe beim Eingang in Verwaltungsnormen und Rechtstexte: das Beispiel des Ökosystem-Begriffs. In Umwelt, Ethik & Recht, ed. Bobbert, M., Düwell, M., and Jax, K.Tübingen: Francke-Verlag, pp. 69–97.Google Scholar
Jax, K. (2003). Wofür braucht der Naturschutz die wissenschaftliche Ökologie? Die Kontroversen um den Hudson River als Testfall. Natur und Landschaft, 78, 93–9.Google Scholar
Jax, K. (2005). Function and ‘functioning’ in ecology? What does it mean?Oikos, 111, 641–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jax, K. (2006). The units of ecology: definitions and application. Quarterly Review of Biology, 81, 237–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jax, K. (2007). Can we define ecosystems? On the confusion between definition and description of ecological concepts. Acta Biotheoretica, 55, 341–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jax, K. and Rozzi, R. (2004). Ecological theory and values in the determination of conservation goals: examples from the temperate regions of Germany, USA and Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 77, 349–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jax, K. and Schwarz, A. (2010). Structure of the handbook. In Revisiting Ecology: Reviewing Concepts, Advancing Science, ed. Schwarz, A. and Jax, K.Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Jax, K., Jones, C. G., and Pickett, S. T. A. (1998). The self-identity of ecological units. Oikos, 82, 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeltsch, F., Weber, G. E., and Grimm, V. (2000). Ecological buffering mechanisms in savannas: a unifying theory of long-term tree–grass coexistence. Plant Ecology, 150, 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetzkowitz, J. and Stark, C. (2003). Einführung: Der Funktionalismus und die Frage nach der Methodologie. In Soziologischer Funktionalismus. Zur Methodologie einer Theorietradition, ed. Jetzkowitz, J., and Stark, C.Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69, 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M. (1997). Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology, 78, 1946–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D. (1987). Restoration ecology: ecological restoration as a technique to basic research. In Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research, ed. Jordan, W. R., Gilpin, M. E., and Aber, J. D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, S. E. (1992). Exergy and ecology. Ecological Modelling, 63, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, S. E., Patten, B. C., and Straskraba, M. (1992). Ecosystems emerging: toward an ecology of complex systems in a complex future. Ecological Modelling, 62, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, B., Buchecker, M., and Müller-Böker, U. (2007). Objectives of public participation: which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations?Water Resources Research, 43(10), W10438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1790 [2009]). Kritik der Urteilskraft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Karr, J. R. (1991). Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications, 1, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karr, J. R. (1993). Defining and assessing ecological integrity: beyond water quality. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12, 1521–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J. R. (1996). Ecological integrity and ecological health are not the same. In Engineering with Social Constraints, ed. Schulze, P. C.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
Karr, J. R. (2000). Health, integrity, and biological assessment: the importance of measuring whole things. In Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, ed. Pimentel, D., Westra, L., and Noss, R. F.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 209–26.Google Scholar
Karr, J. R. and Dudley, D. R. (1981). Ecological perspective in water quality goals. Environmental Management, 5, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, C. E. (1995). Aboriginal overkill and native burning: implications for modern ecosystem management. In Sustainable Society and Protected Areas: Contributed Papers of the 8th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands, April 17–21, 1995, Portland, Oregon, ed. Linn, R.Hancock, MI: The George Wright Society, pp. 107–18.Google Scholar
Kay, C. E. (1997). Viewpoint: ungulate herbivory, willows, and political ecology in Yellowstone. Journal of Range Management, 50, 139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. J. (1991). A nonequilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity. Environmental Management, 15, 483–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. J. (1993). On the nature of ecological integrity: some closing comments. In Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, ed. Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G.Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press, pp. 201–12.Google Scholar
Keiter, R. B. and Boyce, M. S. (eds) (1991). The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America's Wilderness Heritage, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Keller, E. F. (2005). Ecosystems, organisms, and machines. BioScience, 55, 1069–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidner, D. W. (2000). Fabricating nature: a critique of the social construction of nature. Environmental Ethics, 22, 339–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. W. (1993). Considerations of scale and hierarchy. In Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, ed. Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G.Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar
King, E. G. and Hobbs, R. J. (2006). Identifying linkages among conceptual models of ecosystem degradation and restoration: towards an integrative framework. Restoration Ecology, 14, 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W., and Tilman, D. (eds) (2001). The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity. Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Kirchhoff, T., Brand, F., Hoheisel, D., and Grimm, V. (2010). The one-sidedness and cultural bias of the resilience approach. Gaia, 19, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, F. and Udo de Haes, H. A. (1994). A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implication for ecological land classification. Landscape Ecology, 9, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., Haddad, N. M., Naeem, S., Mitchell, C. E., Haarstad, J., Ritchie, M. E., Howe, K. M., Reich, P. B., Siemann, E., and Groth, J. (1999). Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecology Letters, 2, 286–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, N. (1992). Thresholds and multiple stable states in coral-reef community dynamics. American Zoologist, 32, 674–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?Ecology Letters, 8, 468–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kremen, C. and Ostfeld, R. S. (2005). A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 540–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, R. T. (1998). Seven pillars of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, R. T. (2001). Values, policy, and ecosystem health. Bioscience, 51, 437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T. H., Williams, N. M., and Kremen, C. (2005). Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 8, 538–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, B. M. H. (2005). The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S. and Garnier, E. (2002). Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 16, 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, S. P., Armesto, J. J., and Kareiva, P. (2001). How relevant to conservation are studies linking biodiversity and ecosystem functioning? In The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, ed. Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W., and Tilman, D.Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 294–313.Google Scholar
Lawton, J. H. (1994). What do species do in ecosystems?Oikos, 71, 367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. and Brown, V. K. (1994). Redundancy in ecosystems. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, ed. Schulze, E.-D., and Mooney, H. A.Berlin: Springer, pp. 255–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H., Naeem, S., Woodfin, R. M., Brown, V. K., Gange, A., Godfray, H. J. C., Heads, P. A., Lawler, S., Magda, D., Thomas, C. D., Thompson, L. J., and Young, S. (1993). The ecotron: a controlled environmental facility for the investigation of population and ecosystem processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 341, 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, K., Pitois, S., Scott, C., Frid, C., and Mackinson, S. (2006). Characterizing regime shifts in the marine environment. Fish and Fisheries, 7, 104–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). The land ethic. In A Sand County Almanach and Sketches Here and There, ed. Leopold, A.New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–26.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. S., Cain, S. A., Cottham, C. M., Gabrielson, I. M., and Kimball, T. L. (1963). Wildlife management in the national parks. American Forests, 63, 32–5, 61–3.Google Scholar
Leps, J. (2004). What do the biodiversity experiments tell us about consequences of plant species loss in the real world?Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 529–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leßmann, D. and Nixdorf, B. (2002). Probleme der Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie bei Tagebauseen. BTU Cottbus, Aktuelle Reihe, 5(2), 147–59.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems, 1, 431–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. A. (2005). Self-organization and the emergence of complexity in ecological systems. BioScience, 55, 1075–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libralato, S., Torricelli, P., and Pranovi, F. (2006). Exergy as ecosystem indicator: an application to the recovery process of marine benthic communities. Ecological Modelling, 192, 571–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizarralde, M. (1993). Current status of the introduced beaver (Castor canadensis) population in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Ambio, 22, 351–8.Google Scholar
Longino, H. E. (1983). Beyond ‘bad science’: skeptical reflections on the value-freedom of scientific inquiry. Science, Technology & Human Values, 8, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Loreau, M. (2004). Does functional redundancy exist?Oikos, 104, 606–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loreau, M. (2008). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the mystery of the deep sea. Current Biology, 18, R126–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P. (eds) (2002a). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loreau, M., Downing, A. L., Emmerson, M. C., Gonzalez, A., Hughes, J., Inchausti, P., Joshi, J., Norberg, J., and Sala, O. E. (2002b). A new look at the relationship between diversity and stability. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
Loucks, O. L. (2000). Patterns of forest integrity in the eastern United States and Canada: measuring loss and recovery. In Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, ed. Pimentel, D., Westra, L., and Noss, R. F.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1936 [1957]). The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A New Look on Earth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (1989). Geophysiology, the science of Gaia. Reviews in Geophysics, 27, 215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C., and Ehrlich, P. R. (2003). Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, G. W., Harrington, R., Harrison, P., Kremen, C., Berry, P. M., Bugter, R., Dawson, T. P., de Bello, F., Diaz, S., Feld, C. K., Haslett, J. R., Hering, D., Kontogianni, A., Lavorel, S., Rounsevell, M., Samways, M. J., Sandin, L., Settele, J., Sykes, M. T., Hove, S., Vandewalle, M., and Zobel, M. (2009). Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience, 59, 223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludovisi, A., Pandolfi, P., and Taticchi, M. I. (2005). The strategy of ecosystem development: specific dissipation as an indicator of ecosystem maturity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 235, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyche Solheim, A. (ed.) (2005). Reference Conditions of European Lakes: Indicators for the Water Framework Directive. Assessment of Reference Conditions. REBECCA Project, Deliverable 7. [online] URL: http://www.rbm-toolbox.net/rebecca.
Lyche Solheim, A., Rekolainen, S., Moe, S. J., Carvalho, L., Phillips, G., Ptacnik, R., Penning, W. E., Toth, L. G., O'Toole, C., Schartau, A.-K. L., and Hesthagen, T. (2008). Ecological threshold responses in European lakes and their applicability for the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation: synthesis of lakes results from the REBECCA project. Aquatic Ecology, 42, 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36, 533–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mageau, M. T., Costanza, R., and Ulanowicz, R. E. (1995). The development and initial testing of a quantitative assessment of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health, 1, 201–13.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mahner, M. and Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy, Berlin/Heidelberg/ New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, C. R. (2000). Ecosystem management policies in state government of the USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquard, E., Weigelt, A., Temperton, V. M., Roscher, C., Schumacher, J., Buchmann, N., Fischer, M., Weisser, W. W., and Schmid, B. (2009). Plant species richness and functional composition drive overyielding in a six-year grassland experiment. Ecology, 90, 3290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, N. D. (1996). Defining and measuring functional aspects of biodiversity. In Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference, ed. Gaston, K. J.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 114–48.Google Scholar
Martínez Pastur, G., Lencinas, M. V., Escobar, J., Quiroga, P., Malmierca, L., and Lizarralde, M. (2006). Understorey succession in Nothofagus forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina) affected by Castor canadensis. Applied Vegetation Science, 9, 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinic, M. (2002). Brief History of the Land of Magellan, Punta Arenas: Ediciones de la Universidad de Magallanes.Google Scholar
Mason, N. W. H., Mouillot, D., Lee, W. G., and Wilson, J. B. (2005). Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos, 111, 112–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M. (1974). Stability and Complexity in Model-Ecosystems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1988a). The multiple meanings of teleological. In Towards a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist, ed. Mayr, E.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1988b). The species category. In Towards a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist, ed. Mayr, E.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp. 315–34.Google Scholar
McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity–stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, D. J. (2006). Selling out on nature. Nature, 443, 27–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, B. R. (1968). The ecosystem: a unifying concept for the management of natural areas in the national park system. MS Thesis, Colorado State University.
McConnell, F. (1996). The Biodiversity Convention: A Negotiating History, London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
McCoy, E. D. (1996). Advocacy as part of conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 10, 919–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. (1998). The myth of community as organism. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 41, 426–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, P. (2001). What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-reproducing Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, P. (2005). Funktion. In Philosophie der Biologie, ed. Krohs, U. and Töpfer, G.Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Meagher, M. and Houston, D. B. (1998). Yellowstone and the Biology of Time, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Meine, C. and Meffe, G. K. (1996). Conservation values, conservation science: a healthy tension. Conservation Biology, 10, 916–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. L. (1997). Stream health: incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 439–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, J. (1987). Vegetation succession: past and present concepts. In Colonization, Succession and Stability, ed. Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J., and Edwards, P. J.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Mitsch, W. J. and Jørgensen, S. E. (2003). Ecological engineering: a field whose time has come. Ecological Engineering, 20, 363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Brooks, T. M., Pilgrim, J. D., Konstant, W. R., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Kormos, C. (2003). Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 10309–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moog, O. and Chovanec, A. (2000). Assessing the ecological integrity of rivers: walking the line among ecological, political and administrative interests. Hydrobiologia, 422–3, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Ehrlich, P. R. (1997). Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. In Nature's Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G. C.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Moore, D. M. (1983). Flora of Tierra del Fuego, Oswestry: Anthony Nelson.Google Scholar
Moore, W. E. (1978). Functionalism. In A History of Sociological Analysis, ed. Bottomore, T. B. and Nisbet, R. A.New York, NY: Basic Books, pp. 321–61.Google Scholar
Moorman, M. C., Eggleston, D. B., Anderson, C. B., Mansilla, A., and Szejner, P. (2009). Implications of beaver Castor canadensis and trout introductions on native fish in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 138, 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, B. (2007). Shallow lakes, the Water Framework Directive and life: What should it all be about?Hydrobiologia, 584, 381–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, B. (2008). The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise?Science of the Total Environment, 400, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, B., Stephen, D., Alvarez, C., Becares, E., Bund, W., Collings, S. E., Donk, E., Eyto, E., Feldmann, T., Fernández-Aláez, C., Fernández-Aláez, M., Franken, R. J. M., García-Criado, F., Gross, E. M., Gyllström, M., Hansson, L.-A., Irvine, K., Järvalt, A., Jensen, J.-P., Jeppesen, E., Kairesalo, T., Kornijów, R., Krause, T., Künnap, H., Laas, A., Lill, E., Lorens, B., Luup, H., Miracle, M. R., Nõges, P., Nõges, T., Nykänen, M., Ott, I., Peczula, W., Peeters, E. T. H. M., Phillips, G., Romo, S., Russell, V., Salujäe, J., Scheffer, M., Siewertsen, K., Smal, H., Tesch, C., Timm, H., Tuvikene, L., Tonno, I., Virro, T., Vicente, E., and Wilson, D. (2003). The determination of ecological status in shallow lakes: a tested system (ECOFRAME) for implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13, 507–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, T. P. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in conservation of rivers and streams. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 9, 573–8.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, C. P. H., Bazeley-White, E., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Hector, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., and Schmid, B. (2004). Species evenness and productivity in experimental plant communities. Oikos, 107, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. and Jørgensen, S. E. (2000). Ecological orientors: a path to environmental applications of ecosystem theories. In Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management, ed. Jørgensen, S. E. and Müller, F.Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, pp. 561–75.Google Scholar
Mumby, P. J., Hastings, A., and Edwards, H. J. (2007). Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature, 450, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Münch, R. (2003). Funktionalismus: Geshichte und Zukunftsperspektive einer Theorietradition. In Soziologischer Funktionalismus. Zur Methodologie einer Theorietradition, ed. Jetzkowitz, J. and Stark, C.Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 17–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabakov, P. and Loendorf, L. (2002). American Indians and Yellowstone National Park: A Documentary Overview, Yellowstone National Park, WY: National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources.Google Scholar
Naeem, S. (1998). Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology, 12, 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S. (2000). Reply to Wardle et al. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 241–6.Google Scholar
Naeem, S. (2002). Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology, 83, 1537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S. (2006). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in restored ecosystems: extracting principles for a synthetic perspective. In Foundations of Restoration Ecology, ed. Falk, D. A., Palmer, M. A., and Zedler, J. B.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 210–37.Google Scholar
Naeem, S. and Wright, J. P. (2003). Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecology Letters, 6, 567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, S., Loreau, M., and Inchausti, P. (2002). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the emergence of a synthetic ecological framework. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C. (eds) (2009a). Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C. (2009b). Introduction: the ecological and social implications of changing biodiversity: an overview of a decade of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. In Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, ed. Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: a summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1977). Functional explanations in biology. Journal of Philosophy, 74, 280–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R. J., Johnston, C. A., and Kelley, J. C. (1988). Alteration of North-American streams by beaver. Bioscience, 38, 753–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American Mind, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
,National Park Service (1968). Administrative Policies for Natural Areas of the National Park System, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,National Park Service (1978). Management Policies, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,National Park Service (1988). Management Policies, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,National Park Service (2006). Management Policies 2006, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,National Research Council (2002). Ecological Dynamics on Yellowstone's Northern Range, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, M. P. and Callicott, J. B. (eds) (2008). The Wilderness Debate Rages On, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Neßhöver, C. (2005). The role of plant functional diversity in Central European grassland systems for ecosystem functioning. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie, 110, 1–278.Google Scholar
Niemann, E. (1977). Eine Methode zur Erarbeitung der Funktionsleistungsgrade von Landschaftselementen. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftsforschung, 17, 119–57.Google Scholar
Nixdorf, B., Mischke, U., and Lessmann, D. (1998). Chrysophytes and chlamydomonads: pioneer colonists in extremely acidic mining lakes (pH < 3) in Lusatia (Germany). Hydrobiologia, 370, 315–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixdorf, B., Lessmann, D., and Deneke, R. (2005). Mining lakes in a disturbed landscape: application of the EC Water Framework Directive and future management strategies. Ecological Engineering, 24, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, J. R. and Slatyer, R. O. (1980). The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio, 43, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nõges, P., Bund, W., Cardoso, A. C., Solimini, A. G., and Heiskanen, A.-S. (2009). Assessment of the ecological status of European surface waters: a work in progress. Hydrobiologia, 633, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. H. and Thoms, M. C. (1999). What is river health?Freshwater Biology, 41, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. G. (1992). A new paradigm for environmental management. In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, ed. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 23–41.Google Scholar
Nyström, M. (2006). Redundancy and response diversity of functional groups: implications for the resilience of coral reefs. Ambio, 35, 30–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyström, M., Folke, C., and Moberg, F. (2000). Coral reef disturbances and resilience in a human-dominated environment. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 413–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyström, M., Graham, N. A. J., Lokrantz, J., and Norström, A. V. (2008). Capturing the cornerstones of coral reef resilience: linking theory to practice. Coral Reefs, 27, 795–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V. (1976). Ecosystem persistence and heterotrophic regulation. Ecology, 57, 1244–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Ausmus, B. S., Jackson, D. R., Vanhook, R. I., Vanvoris, P., Washburne, C., and Watson, A. P. (1977). Monitoring terrestrial ecosystems by analysis of nutrient export. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 8, 271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. V., Deangelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H. (1986). A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1985). Trends expected in stressed ecosystems. Bioscience, 35, 419–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, H. T. (1971). Environment, Power and Society, New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. (1983). Systems Ecology: An Introduction, New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Olenin, S., Minchin, D., and Daunys, D. (2007). Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55, 379–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orians, G. H. (1975). Diversity, stability and maturity in natural ecosystems. In Unifying Concepts in Ecology, ed. Dobben, W. H. V.The Hague: Jungk, pp. 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, K. (2008). A modest proposal to proceed in order to solve the problem of inherent moral value in nature. In Reconciling Human Existence with Ecological Integrity, ed. Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., and Westra, R.London: Earthscan, pp. 39–59.Google Scholar
Palmer, M., Bernhardt, E., Chornesky, E., Collins, S., Dobson, A., Duke, C., Gold, B., Jacobson, R., Kingsland, S., Kranz, R., Mappin, M., Martinez, M. L., Micheli, F., Morse, J., Pace, M., Pascual, M., Palumbi, S., Reichman, O. J., Simons, A., Townsend, A., and Turner, M. (2004). Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304, 1251–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palumbi, S. R., Sandifer, P. A., Allan, J. D., Beck, M. W., Fautin, D. G., Fogarty, M. J., Halpern, B. S., Incze, L. S., Leong, J.-A., Norse, E., Stachowicz, J. J., and Wall, D. H. (2009). Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 204–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, I. M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P. M., Williamson, M. H., Holle, B., Byers, J. E., and Goldwasser, L. (1999). Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions, 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parris, T. M. and Kates, R. W. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petchey, O. L. and Gaston, K. J. (2006). Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters, 9, 741–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, C. G. J. (1913). Valuation of the sea: II. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 21, 1–44.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (1935). Succession, development, the climax, and the complex organism: an analysis of concepts. Part III: the complex organism. Conclusions. Journal of Ecology, 23, 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, S. M., Soong, O., Lowenstein, J. H., Luz Polido, A., Tobar Lopez, D., Flynn, D. F. B., and Declerck, F. (2009). Functional richness and ecosystem services: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. Ecological Applications, 19, 1858–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L. (2002). The ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems, 5, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. and Ostfeld, R. S. (1995). The shifting paradigm in ecology. In A New Century for Natural Resources Management, ed. Knight, R. L. and Bates, S. F.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 261–78.Google Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Collins, S. L., and Armesto, J. J. (1987). A hierarchical consideration of causes and mechanisms of succession. Vegetatio, 69, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Kolasa, J., and Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological Understanding, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pielke, Jr., R. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., Westra, L., and Noss, R. F. (eds) (2000). Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, Washington, DC: Island Press.
Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307, 321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J. (1969). Theorems on boundaries in hierarchical systems. In Hierarchical Structures, ed. Whyte, L. L., Wilson, A. G., and Wilson, D.New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 201–13.Google Scholar
Potthast, T. (2000a). Bioethics and epistemic–moral hybrids: perspectives from the history of science. Biomedical Ethics, 5, 20–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Potthast, T. (2000b). Funktionssicherung und/oder Aufbruch ins Ungewisse? Anmerkungen zum Prozeßschutz. In Funktionsbegriff und Unsicherheit in der Ökologie, ed. Jax, K.Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
Potthast, T. (2005). Umweltforschung und das Problem epistemisch-moralischer Hybride: Ein Kommentar zur Rhetorik, Programmatik und Theorie interdisziplinärer Forschung. In Wissenschaftsphilosophie interdisziplinärer Umweltforschung, ed. Baumgärtner, S. and Becker, C.Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Prach, K. and Hobbs, R. J. (2008). Spontaneous succession versus technical reclamation in the restoration of disturbed sites. Restoration Ecology, 16, 363–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prach, K., Bartha, S., Joyce, C. B., Pyšek, P., Diggelen, R., and Wiegleb, G. (2001). The role of spontaneous vegetation succession in ecosystem restoration: a perspective. Applied Vegetation Science, 4, 111–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pranger, R. (1990). Towards a pluralistic concept of function: function statements in biology. Acta Biotheoretica, 38, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, J. A. (1999). Preserving Yellowstone's Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, J. D. (1998). The social construction of nature: relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 352–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G. L., Williamson, M., and Kirscher, J. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53, 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder, H. (1992). Normative reflexions on constructivist approaches to science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 22, 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, D. J. (1989). What constitutes ecosystem health?Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 33, 120–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapport, D. J. (1992). What is clinical ecology? In Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management, ed. Costanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell, B. D.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 144–56.Google Scholar
Rapport, D. J. (1995). Ecosystem health: exploring the territory. Ecosystem Health, 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
Rapport, D. J., Regier, H. A., and Hutchinson, T. C. (1985). Ecosystem behavior under stress. American Naturalist, 125, 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The statistics of life-forms as a basis for biological plant geography. In The Life-forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography, ed. Raunkiaer, C.Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 111–47.Google Scholar
Ravnborg, H. M. and Westermann, O. (2002). Understanding interdependencies: stakeholder identification and negotiation for collective natural resource management. Agricultural Systems, 73, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebertus, A. J. and Veblen, T. T. (1993). Structure and tree-fall gap dynamics of old-growth Nothofagus forests in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4, 641–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, H. A. (1993). The notion of natural and cultural integrity. In Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, ed. Woodley, S., Kay, J., and Francis, G.Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Reid, N. J. (1968). Ecosystem management in the national parks. In Transactions of the Thirty-Third North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, March 11, 12, 13, 1968, Washington, DC: Wildlife Management Institute, pp. 160–9.Google Scholar
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., and Woodward, G. (2009). Emerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 505–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridder, B. (2007). The naturalness versus wildness debate: ambiguity, inconsistency, and unattainable objectivity. Restoration Ecology, 15, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridder, B. (2008). Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W. J. and Beschta, R. L. (2004). Wolves and the ecology of fear: can predation risk structure ecosystems?BioScience, 54, 755–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, W. J. and Beschta, R. L. (2007). Restoring Yellowstone's aspen with wolves. Biological Conservation, 138, 514–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, H. I. (1990). Biology and philosophy in Yellowstone. Biology and Philosophy, 5, 241–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, H. I. (1994). Value in nature and the nature of value. In Philosophy and the Natural Environment, ed. Attfield, R. and Belsey, A.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscher, C., Schumacher, J., Baade, J., Wilcke, W., Gleixner, G., Weisser, W. W., Schmid, B., and Schulze, E.-D. (2004). The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community. Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. S. (2002). Logical fallacies in the assessment of functional redundancy. Conservation Biology, 16, 837–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozzi, R., Massardo, F., Berghöfer, A., Anderson, C. B., Mansilla, A., Plana, J., Berghöfer, U., Araya, P., and Barros, E. (2006). Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve: Nomination Document of the Cape Horn Archipelago Territory into the World Biosphere Reserve Network. MAB Programme: UNESCO, Punta Arenas: Edicones Universidad de Magallanes.Google Scholar
Rozzi, R., Armesto, J. J., Goffinet, B., Buck, W., Massardo, F., Silander, J., Arroyo, M. T. K., Russell, S., Anderson, C. B., Cavieres, L. A., and Callicott, J. B. (2008). Changing lenses to assess biodiversity: patterns of species richness in sub-Antarctic plants and implications for global conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruesink, J. L. and Srivastava, D. S. (2001). Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores. Oikos, 93, 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1987). Biological species: natural kinds, individuals, or what?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38, 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1989). Teleology in biology: is it a cause for concern?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 4, 51–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagoff, M. (2003). The plaza and the pendulum: two concepts of ecological science. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 529–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, R. W. (1991). Mixotrophic protists in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Journal of Protozoology, 38, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandin, L. and Solimini, A. G. (2009). Freshwater ecosystem structure–function relationships: from theory to application. Freshwater Biology, 54, 2017–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, N. and Putz, F. E. (2009). Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’ in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters, 2, 226–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabel, H. G. and Palmer, S. L. (1999). The Dauerwald: its role in the restoration of natural forests. Journal of Forestry, 97, 20–5.Google Scholar
Scharf, B. W. and Björk, S. (eds) (1992). Limnology of Eifel Maar Lake: Ergebnisse der Limnologie, Heft 38, Stuttgart: Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Scheffer, M. and Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 648–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M., Hosper, S. H., Meijer, M. L., Moss, B., and Jeppesen, E. (1993). Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 275–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherzinger, W. (1990). Das Dynamik-Konzept im flächenhaften Naturschutz: Zieldiskussion am Beispiel der Nationalpark-Idee. Natur und Landschaft, 65, 292–8.Google Scholar
Schläpfer, F. and Schmidt, B. (1999). Ecosystem effects of biodiversity: a classification of hypotheses and exploration of empirical results. Ecological Applications, 9, 893–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, B. and Hector, A. (2004). The value of biodiversity experiments. Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, B., Hector, A., Huston, M. A., Inchausti, P., Nijs, I., Leadley, P. W., and Tilman, D. (2002). The design and analysis of biodiversity experiments. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., and Inchausti, P.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. and Willott, E. (eds) (2002). Environmental Ethics: What Really Works, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Schröder, A., Persson, L., and Roos, A. M. (2005). Direct empirical evidence for alternative stable states: a review. Oikos, 110, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schullery, P. (1997). Searching for Yellowstone: Ecology and Wonder in the Last Wilderness, Boston, MA/New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Schultz, A. M. (1967). The ecosystem as a conceptual tool in the management of natural resources. In Natural Resources: Quality and Quantity, ed. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. and Parsons, J. J.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 139–61.Google Scholar
Schulz, F. and Wiegleb, G. (2000). Development options of natural habitats in a post-mining landscape. Land Degradation & Development, 11, 99–110.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, E.-D. and Mooney, H. A. (eds) (1993). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Schwartz, M. W., Brigham, C. A., Hoeksema, J. D., Lyons, K. G., Mills, M. H., and Mantgem, P. J. (2000). Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia, 122, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwind, W. (1984). Der Eifelwald im Laufe der Jahrhunderte, Düren: Eifelverein.Google Scholar
Seastedt, T. R., Hobbs, R. J., and Suding, K. N. (2008). Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required?Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 547–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, P. J., Armstrong, D. P., and Maloney, R. F. (2007). Combining the fields of reintroduction biology and restoration ecology. Conservation Biology, 21, 1388–90.Google Scholar
Sellars, R. W. (1997). Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
,Servicio Agrícola Y Ganadero (2003). Programa Control de Fauna Dañina en la XII Regón, Punta Arenas: Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, XII Region.Google Scholar
Sheperd, G. (2004). The Ecosystem Approach: Five Steps to Implementation, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Sheperd, G. (ed.) (2008). The Ecosystem Approach: Learning from Experience, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.CrossRef
Shrader-Frechette, K. (1996). Throwing out the bathwater of positivism, keeping the baby of objectivity: relativism and advocacy in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 10, 912–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. S. and McCoy, E. D. (1993). Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sielfeld, W. and Venegas, C. (1980). Poblamiento e impacto ambiente de Castor canadensis KUHL, en la Isla Navarino, Chile. Anales del Institutio de la Patagonia, 11, 247–57.Google Scholar
Silow, E. A. and In-Hye, O. (2004). Aquatic ecosystem assessment using exergy. Ecological Indicators, 4, 189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1998). Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era?Conservation Biology, 83, 247–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, F. J. (ed.) (1996). Effects of Grazing by Wild Ungulates in Yellowstone National Park: Technical Report NPS/NRYELL/NRTR/96–01, Denver, CO: USDI/NPS.
Skewes, O., González, F., Rubilar, L., Quezada, M., Olave, R., Vargas, V., and Ávila, A. (1999). Investigacón, Aprovechamiento y Control del Castor en Islas Tierra del Fuego y Navarino, Punta Arenas: Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, XII Region.Google Scholar
Skewes, O., González, F., Olave, R., Ávila, A., Vargas, V., Paulsen, P., and König, H. E. (2006). Abundance and distribution of American beaver, Castor canadensis (Kuhl 1820), in Tierra del Fuego and Navarino Islands, Chile. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52, 292–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. D. and Knapp, A. K. (2003). Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecology Letters, 6, 509–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H., and Woodward, F. I. (1997). Plant Functional Types, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V. H. and Schindler, D. W. (2009). Eutrophication science: where do we go from here?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 201–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Society for Ecological Restoration (2004). The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration, Tucson, AZ: SER International.Google Scholar
Solan, M., Cardinale, B. J., Downing, A. L., Engelhardt, K. A. M., Ruesink, J. L., and Srivastava, D. S. (2004). Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science, 306, 1177–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solimini, A. G., Ptacnik, R., and Cardoso, A. C. (2009). Towards holistic assessment of the functioning of ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 28, 143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology?BioScience, 35, 727–34.Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. and Lease, G. (1995). Preface. In Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction, ed. Soulé, M. E. and Lease, G.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. xv–xvii.Google Scholar
Spehn, E. M., Hector, A., Joshi, J., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Bazeley-White, E., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J., Harris, R., Hogberg, P., Huss-Danell, K., Jumpponen, A., Koricheva, J., Leadley, P. W., Loreau, M., Minns, A., Mulder, C. P. H., O'Donovan, G., Otway, S. J., Palmborg, C., Pereira, J. S., Pfisterer, A. B., Prinz, A., Read, D. J., Schulze, E. D., Siamantziouras, A. S. D., Terry, A. C., Troumbis, A. Y., Woodward, F. I., Yachi, S., and Lawton, J. H. (2005). Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecological Monographs, 75, 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, D. S. and Vellend, M. (2005). Biodiversity–ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation?Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 36, 267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachowicz, J. J., Bruno, J. F., and Duffy, J. E. (2007). Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38, 739–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmüller, W. (1986). Wertfreiheit, Interessen und Objektivität: das Wertfreiheitspostulat von Max Weber. In Rationale Rekonstruktion von Wissenschaft und ihrem Wandel, ed. Stegmüller, W.Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 177–203.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steyaert, P. and Ollivier, G. (2007). The European Water Framework Directive: how ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society, 12. [online]: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. and Welp, M. (eds) (2006). Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management: Theory and Practice, Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
Sturm, K. (1993). Prozeßschutz: ein Konzept für naturschutzgerechte Waldwirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz, 2, 181–92.Google Scholar
Sukhdev, P. E. A. (2008). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): An Interim Report, Brussels: EU Commission.Google Scholar
Suter, G. W. I. (1993). A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12, 1533–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, M. J., Izac, A. M. N., and Noordwijk, M. (2004). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: are we asking the right questions?Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 104, 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takacs, D. (1996). The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise, Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (1988). Technocratic optimism, H.T. Odum, and the partial transformation of ecological metaphor after World War II. Journal of the History of Biology, 21, 213–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiel, C. (1992). Funktion(alismus). In Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. Seiffert, H. and Radnitzky, G.München: dtv, pp. 86–8.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1923). Die Gewässer Mitteleuropas: Eine hydrobiologische Charakterstik ihrer Haupttypen. In Handbuch der Binnenfischerei Mitteleuropas, Stuttgart: Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1925). Der See als Lebenseinheit. Naturwissenschaften, 13, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. and Starzomski, B. M. (2007). What does biodiversity actually do? A review for managers and policy makers. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 1359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1997). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G. C.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., and Knops, J. (1996). Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., and Reich, P. (2001). Experimental and observational studies of diversity, productivity, and stability. In The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, ed. Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W., and Tilman, D.Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 42–70.Google Scholar
Tischew, S. (ed.) (2004). Renaturierung nach dem Braunkohleabbau, Stuttgart: Teubner.CrossRef
Töpfer, G. (2005). Teleologie. In Philosophie der Biologie, ed. Krohs, U. and Töpfer, G.Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar
Trepl, L. (1983). Ökologie: eine grüne Leitwissenschaft? Über Grenzen und Perspektiven einer modischen Disziplin. Kursbuch, 74, 6–27.Google Scholar
Trepl, L. (1987). Geschichte der Ökologie: Vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart, Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Trepl, L. (1995). Die Diversitäts-Stabilitäts-Diskussion in der Ökologie. Berichte der Bayerischen Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (ANL), Beiheft, 12, 35–49.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. W. (1979). The value decisions we know as science. Advances in Nursing Science, 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuhkanen, S. (1992). The climate of Tierra del Fuego from a vegetation geographical point of view and its ecoclimatic counterparts elsewhere. Acta Botanica Fennica, 145, 1–64.Google Scholar
Tuhkanen, S., Kuokka, I., Hyvönen, J., Stenroos, S., and Nielmä, J. (1989). Tierra del Fuego as a target for biogeographical research in the past and present. Anales del Institutio de la Patagonia, 19, 1–107.Google Scholar
Turner, M. G. (2008). Another perspective on Yellowstone's northern range. BioScience, 58, 173–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2000). Toward the measurement of ecological integrity. In Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, ed. Pimentel, D., Westra, L., and Noss, R. F.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
,UNEP (2008). UNEP Ecosystem Management Programme: An Ecosystem Approach. 10th Global Meeting on the Regional Seas. Guayaquil. Ecuador, 25–27 November 2008, UNEP (DEPI)/RS.10/4. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/external/unep/unep-eco-2008-11-en.pdf.Google Scholar
,UNEP/CBD (2000). Ecosystem approach. In Decisions Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Fifth Meeting, Nairobi, 15–26 May 2000, accessed 8 January 2009. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/COP-05-dec-en.pdf, pp. 103–9.
,UNESCO (2000). Solving the Puzzle: The Ecosystem Approach and Biosphere Reserves, Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
,US Fish and Wildlife Service (1995). Ecosystem Approach to Fish and Wildlife Conservation: Concept Document, Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/policy/npi95_03.pdf.Google Scholar
Valéry, L., Fritz, H., Lefeuvre, J.-C., and Simberloff, D. (2009). Ecosystem-level consequences of invasions by native species as a way to investigate relationships between evenness and ecosystem function. Biological Invasions, 11, 609–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maarel, E. (1997). Biodiversity: From Babel to Biosphere Management, Uppsala: Opulus Press.Google Scholar
Molen, D. T., Portielje, R., Boers, P. C. M., and Lijklema, L. (1998). Changes in sediment phosphorus as a result of eutrophication and oligotrophication in Lake Veluwe, the Netherlands. Water Research, 32, 3281–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, W. J. (1990). Concepts in biology: a survey of practical methodological principles. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 143, 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Langevelde, F., Vijver, C. A. D. M., Kumar, L., Koppel, J., Ridder, N., Andel, J., Skidmore, A. K., Hearne, J. W., Stroosnijder, L., Bond, W. J., Prins, H. H., and Rietkerk, M. (2003). Effects of fire and herbivory on the stability of savanna ecosystems. Ecology, 84, 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villagrán de Leon, J. C. (2006). Vulnerability: A Conceptual and Methodological Review, Bonn: UNU-EHS.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. (1990). Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos, 57, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M. and Hooper, D. U. (1993). Biological diversity and terrestrial biogeochemistry. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, ed. Schulze, E.-D. and Mooney, H. A.Berlin: Springer, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Voigt, A. (2009). Die Konstruktion der Natur: Ökologische Theorien und politische Philosphien der Vergesellschaftung, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Vos, W., Harms, B., and Stortelder, A. (1979). Einige Beispiele der Anwendung landschaftsökologischer Erkenntnisse in der Raumplanung in den Niederlanden. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie, 7, 85–99.Google Scholar
Wagner, F. H. (2006). Yellowstone's Destabilized Ecosystem: Elk Effects, Science, and Policy Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, F. H. and Kay, C. E. (1993). ‘Natural’ or ‘healthy’ ecosystems: are US National Parks providing them? In Humans as Components of Ecosystems: The Ecology of Subtle Human Effects and Populated Areas, ed. McDonnell, J. M. and Pickett, S. T. A.New York, NY: Springer, pp. 257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, F. H., Foresta, R., Gill, R. B., McCullough, D. R., Pelton, M. R., Porter, W. F., and Salwasser, H. (1995). Wildlife Policies in the US National Parks, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B. (1992). Biodiversity and redundancy. Conservation Biology, 6, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. (1995). Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conservation Biology, 9, 747–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. and Salt, D. (2006). Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G. D., and Pritchard, R. (2002). Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a partici-patory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6: 14 [online] http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139, 235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A., Huston, M. A., Grime, J. P., Berendse, F., Garnier, E., Lauenroth, W. K., Setäla, H., and Wilson, S. D. (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem function: an issue in ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81, 235–9.Google Scholar
Warren, C. R. (2007). Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warzocha, J. (1995). Classification and structure of macrofaunal communities in the southern Baltic. Archive of Fishery and Marine Research, 42, 225–37.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1917 [1968]). Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed. Weber, M.Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 489–540.Google Scholar
Webler, T., Tuler, S., and Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27, 435–50.Google Scholar
Weil, A. (2005). Das Modell ‘Organismus’ in der Ökologie: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Beschreibung synökologischer Einheiten, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Werner, R., Jax, K., and Böhmer, H. J. (2009). Vegetationsdynamik verlandeter Biberteiche auf der Insel Navarino (Feuerland-Archipel, Chile). Tuexenia, 29, 277–96.Google Scholar
Westra, L. (1994). An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Westra, L. (1998). The ethics of integrity. In The Land Ethic: Meeting Human Needs for Land and its Resources, ed. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
Westra, L., Miller, P., Karr, J. R., Rees, W. E., and Ulanowicz, R. E. (2000). Ecological integrity and the aims of the Global Integrity Project. In Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health, ed. Pimentel, D., Westra, L., and Noss, R. F.Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 19–41.Google Scholar
Whisenant, S. G. (1999). Repairing Damaged Wildlands: A Process-oriented, Landscape-scale Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. S. and Jentsch, A. (2001). The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Progress in Botany, 62, 399–450.Google Scholar
White, P. S. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1985). Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, ed. Pickett, S. T. A. and White, P. S.San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
Wicklum, D. and Davies, R. W. (1995). Ecosystem health and integrity?Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 997–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegleb, G. (1989). Explanation and prediction in vegetation science. Vegetatio, 83, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegleb, G. (1996). Konzepte der Hierarchie-Theorie in der Ökologie. In Systemtheorie in der Ökologie, ed. Mathes, K., Breckling, B., and Ekschmitt, K.Landsberg: Ecomed, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Wiegleb, G. and Felinks, B. (2001). Primary succession in post-mining landscapes of Lower Lusatia: chance or necessity?Ecological Engineering, 17, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegleb, G., Bröring, U., Mrzljak, J., and Schulz, F. (eds) (2000). Naturschutz in Bergbaufolgelandschaften: Landschaftsanalyse und Leitbildentwicklung, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRef
Wilkinson, D. M. (1999). Gaia and natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 256–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, L. R. R. and Kapustka, L. A. (2000). Ecosystem vulnerability: a complex interface with technical components. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 1055–8.Google Scholar
Wilsey, B. J. and Potvin, C. (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: importance of species evenness in an old field. Ecology, 81, 887–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. and Sober, E. (1989). Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 136, 337–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. (ed.) (1988). Biodiversity, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Wilson, J. B. (1999). Guilds, functional types and ecological groups. Oikos, 86, 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K., Pressey, R. L., Newton, A., Burgman, M., Possingham, H. P., and Weston, C. (2005). Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environmental Management, 35, 527–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winfree, R. and Kremen, C. (2009). Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wöllecke, J., Anders, K., Durka, W., Elmer, M., Wanner, M., and Wiegleb, G. (eds) (2007). Landschaft im Wandel: Natürliche und Anthropogene Besiedlung der Niederlausitzer Bergbaufolgelandschaft, Aachen: Shaker-Verlag.
Wollmann, K., Deneke, R., Nixdorf, B., and Packroff, G. (2000). Dynamics of planktonic food webs in three mining lakes across a pH gradient (pH 2–4). Hydrobiologia, 433, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M. and Moriarty, P. V. (2001). Strangers in a strange land: the problem of exotic species. Environmental Values, 10, 163–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, F. I. (1993). How many species are required for a functional ecosystem? In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, ed. Schulze, E.-D. and Mooney, H. A.Berlin: Springer, pp. 271–91.Google Scholar
Wright, J. P., Symstad, A. J., Bullock, J. M., Engelhardt, K., and Bernhardt, E. (2009). Restoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: will an integrated approach improve results? In Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, ed. Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., and Perrings, C.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. (1994). Functions. In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, ed. Sober, E., 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar
Yachi, S. and Loreau, M. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 1463–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffee, S. L. (1996). Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
,Yellowstone National Park (1995). Resource Management Plan, Mammoth Hot Springs, WY: National Park Service.Google Scholar
,Yellowstone National Park (1997). Yellowstone's Northern Range: Complexity and Change in a Wildland Ecosystem, Mammoth Hot Springs, WY: National Park Service.Google Scholar
Zavaleta, E., Pasari, J., Moore, J., Hernández, D., Suttle, K. B., and Wilmers, C. C. (2009). Ecosystem responses to community disassembly. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2009, 1162, 311–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Zenetos, A. (1996). Classification and interpretation of the established Mediterranean biocoenoses based solely on bivalve molluscs. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 76, 403–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbe, S. and Wiegleb, G. (eds) (2009). Renaturierung von Ökosystemen in Mitteleuropa, Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Kurt Jax
  • Book: Ecosystem Functioning
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781216.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Kurt Jax
  • Book: Ecosystem Functioning
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781216.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Kurt Jax
  • Book: Ecosystem Functioning
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781216.008
Available formats
×