Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: August 2009

5 - Beware of the libertarian wolf in the clothing of the egalitarian sheep: an essay on the need to clarify ends and means

Summary

Summary

Ideologies permeate policy debates in health care. However, they do so in an implicit manner and the combatants rarely reveal their underlying objectives. Typically, in both public and private health care systems, policy makers focus on expenditure control and efficiency, paying lip-service to equity issues. A focus on efficiency is clearly merited, as many health care interventions have no evidence base; there are large variations in clinical practice, which have been well evidenced and ignored for decades. Furthermore there is an absence of outcome measurement and evidence that consumers' health is improved by expensive health care systems.

Political frustration about the inefficiency of health care enables policy advocates holding competing libertarian and egalitarian perspectives to debate reform as if it were ideologically neutral. Libertarians seek economic and social structures that maximize individual freedom, minimize the role of government and ensure that health care is delivered by market-orientated insurers and providers. Egalitarians seek to maximize equality of opportunity. They regard government as a means by which the inequalities of market provision and finance can be reduced to provide real opportunities for all, and in particular the disadvantaged.

Reform debates in socialized health care systems are characterized by libertarians advocating reforms to increase individual freedom and undermine equality. In more libertarian systems, the egalitarians seek reforms to increase equality and circumscribe the freedom of the advantaged to experience better care. Rarely do the combatants reveal their ideological preferences. Egalitarians should beware libertarian wolves posing in sheep's clothing.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Angell, M. (2004) The Truth about the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About it. New York: Random House.
Bloor, K. and Maynard, A. (2002) Consultants: managing them means measuring them. Health Service Journal. 112: 10–11.
BMJ Publishing Group (2005) Clinical Evidence Concise. (14)
Campbell, D. T. (1969) Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist. 24(4): 409–429.
DHSS (1976) The RAWP Report. Resource Allocation Working Party. Sharing Resources for Health in England. London: HMSO.
Donabedian, A. (1970) Social responsibility for personal health services: an examination of basic values. Inquiry. 8(2): 3–19.
Ellwood, P. M., Enthoven, A. C. and Etheredge, L. (1992) The Jackson hole initiatives for the twenty-first century American health care system. Health Economics. 1(3): 149–168.
Emanuel, E. J. and Fuchs, V. R. (2005) Health care vouchers: a proposal for universal coverage. New England Journal of Medicine. 352: 1255–1260.
Eriksson, J. G. (2005) The fetal origins hypothesis – 10 years on. British Medical Journal. 330: 1096–1097.
Evans, R., Maynard, A., Preker, A. and Reinhardt, U. (1994) Health care reform. Health Economics. 3: 359.
Evans, R. and Vujicic, M. (2005) Political wolves and economic sheep: the sustainability of public health insurance in Canada. In Maynard, A., ed., The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. pp. 117–140.
Fisher, E. S. (2003) Medical care: is more always better?New England Journal of Medicine. 349(17): 1665–1667.
Grossman, M. (2000) The human capital model. In Culyer, A. J. and Newhouse, J., ed. Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1A, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hall, J. and Maynard, A. (2005) Healthcare lessons from Australia: what can Michael Howard learn from John Howard?British Medical Journal. 330: 357–360.
Iglehart, J. K., ed., (2004) Variations revisited. Health Affairs. supplement, web exclusive (7 October). http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.var.5/DC1.
Kerr, E. A., McGlynn, E. A., Adams, J., Keesey, J. and Asch, S. M. (2004) Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study. Health Affairs. 23(3): 247–256.
Kind, P. and Williams, A. (2004) Measuring success in health care: the time has come to do it properly. Health Policy Matters. 9 www.york.ac.uk/healthsciences/pubs/hpmindex.htm.
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M. and Donaldson, M. S., eds, (2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Maynard, A. (1997) Evidence based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices. Lancet. 349: 126–128.
Maynard, A., ed., The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. pp. 117–140.
Maynard, A. and Chalmers, I., eds, (1997) Non-Random Reflections on Health Services Research: on the 25th Anniversary of Archie Cochrane's Effectiveness and Efficiency. London: BMJ Publishing.
Maynard, A. and Sheldon, T. (2002) Funding for the National Health Service. Lancet. 360: 576.
Maynard, A. and Bloor, K. (2006) Consultant clinical activity is key to improving productivity. Health Service Journal. 116: 18–19.
Maynard, A. and Street, A. (2006) Seven years of feast, seven years of famine: boom to bust in the NHS. British Medical Journal. 332: 906.
Moynihan, R. and Cassels, A. (2005) Selling Sickness: How Drug Companies Are Turning Us All Into Patients. Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Nightingale, F. (1863) Notes on Hospitals. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Nolte, E. and McKee, M. (2004) Does Health Care Save Lives? Avoidable Mortality Revisited. London: Nuffield Trust.
Reinhardt, U. E. (1993) Comment on the Jackson Hole initiatives for the twenty-first century American care system. Health Economics. 2(1): 7–14.
Reinhardt, U. E. (2006) Uninsured Americans and the new Democratic Congress. British Medical Journal. 333: 1134.
Rochaix, L. and Hartmann, L. (2005) Public–private mix for health in France. In Maynard, A., ed., (2005) The Public–Private Mix for Health: Plus Ca Change, Plus C'est la Même Chose. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. p. 141
Schut, F. T. and Ven, W. P. M. M. (2005) Rationing and competition in the Dutch health care system. Health Economics. 14: S59–S74.
Shaw, M., Davey-Smith, G. and Dorling, D. (2005) Health inequalities and New Labour: how promises compare with real progress. British Medical Journal. 330: 1016–1021.
Skrabanek, P. and McCormick, J. (1989) Follies and Fallacies in Medicine. Glasgow: Tarragon Press.
Williams, A. (1974) Need as a demand concept (with special reference to health). In Culyer, A. J., ed., Economic Policies and Social Goals: Aspects of Public Choice. London: Martin Robertson.
Williams, A. (1988) Priority setting in public and private health care: a guide through the ideological jungle. Journal of Health Economics. 7(2): 173–183.
Yi, Y., Maynard, A., Liu, G., Xiong, X. and Lin, F. (2005) Equity in health care financing: evaluation in the current urban employee health insurance reform in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 10(4): 506–527.