Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:07:05.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Water Balance

from Part III - Hydrometeorology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Gordon Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Chapter Summary

This chapter introduces the hydrologic cycle on land. The overall hydrologic cycle is reviewed and simplified into an expression where the change in soil moisture is the balance between precipitation input and losses from evapotranspiration and runoff. The various terms in this equation are discussed. Some precipitation is intercepted by the plant canopy and evaporates back to the atmosphere. Evaporation is the physical process by which liquid water changes to vapor. Transpiration is the evaporation of water held internal to plants as water moves from the soil through plants into the atmosphere along a continuum of decreasing water potential. The basic meteorological and biological processes controlling evapotranspiration are introduced, but Chapters 12 and 13 provide a more in-depth discussion of meteorological processes, and Chapters 15–17 review the biological control of transpiration by leaves and plant canopies. Runoff is discussed in separate sections on infiltration and overland flow. The section on overland flow reviews the effects of soil texture, soil water, and land cover on runoff. A simple model of the water balance illustrates geographic patterns of water availability.

Cycling of Water on Land

The cycling of water over land depicted in Figure 10.1 involves much more detail than that shown in Figure 3.4. Solar energy drives the hydrologic cycle, evaporating water from soil, lakes, and rivers. When conditions are favorable, this water vapor condenses to form clouds and eventually precipitation, which replenishes soil water and renews the cycle. Precipitation occurs when air cools and water vapor condenses to form cloud droplets or ice crystals. Cooling is caused by air rising in altitude, such as when air is lifted over mountains. This type of precipitation is known as orographic precipitation. Precipitation also occurs through frontal convergence, when a warm air mass rises over a colder air mass. In summer, thunderstorms develop when strong solar radiation heats the ground, warming the surface air and causing the less dense air to rise. This type of rainfall is known as convective precipitation.

Not all of the precipitation reaches the ground. Leaves, twigs, and branches of plants intercept rain and snow. Interception is the process by which precipitation is temporarily stored on plant surfaces. This water quickly evaporates and never replenishes the soil.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Climatology
Concepts and Applications
, pp. 155 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldocchi, D. D., and Ryu, Y. (2011). A synthesis of forest evaporation fluxes – from days to years – as measured with eddy covariance. In Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, ed. Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101–116.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. S. O., Adams, M. A., Turner, N. C., and Ong, C. K. (1998). The redistribution of soil water by tree root systems. Oecologia, 115, 306–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, M. M., and Richards, J. H. (1989). Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia, 79, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldwell, M. M., Dawson, T. E., and Richards, J. H. (1998). Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia, 113, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlyle-Moses, D. E., and Gash, J. H. C. (2011). Rainfall interception loss by forest canopies. In Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, ed. Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 407–423.Google Scholar
Cuenca, R. H., Stangel, D. E., and Kelly, S. F. (1997). Soil water balance in a boreal forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 29355–29365.Google Scholar
Davies-Barnard, T., Valdes, P. J., Jones, C. D., and Singarayer, J. S. (2014). Sensitivity of a coupled climate model to canopy interception capacity. Climate Dynamics, 42, 1715–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T. E. (1993a). Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: Implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia, 95, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, T. E. (1993b). Water sources of plants as determined from xylem-water isotopic composition: Perspectives on plant competition, distribution, and water relations. In Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon–Water Relations, ed. Ehleringer, J. R., Hall, A. E., and Farquhar, G. D.. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 465–496.Google Scholar
Dawson, T. E. (1996). Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiology, 16, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, T. E., and Simonin, K. A. (2011). The roles of stable isotopes in forest hydrology and biogeochemistry. In Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, ed. Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137–161.Google Scholar
Domec, J.-C., King, J. S., Noormets, A., et al. (2010). Hydraulic redistribution of soil water by roots affects whole-stand evapotranspiration and net ecosystem carbon exchange. New Phytologist, 187, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, B. K. (1998). Introduction to Stormwater: Concept, Purpose, Design. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. B., Malhi, Y., Bonal, D., et al. (2009). The land–atmosphere water flux in the tropics. Global Change Biology, 15, 2694–2714.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. B., Whittaker, R. J., and Malhi, Y. (2011). ET come home: potential evapotranspiration in geographical ecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helvey, J. D., and Patric, J. H. (1965). Canopy and litter interception of rainfall by hardwoods of eastern United States. Water Resources Research, 1, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson-Sellers, A., McGuffie, K., Noone, D., and Irannejad, P. (2004). Using stable water isotopes to evaluate basin-scale simulations of surface water budgets. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5, 805–822.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinckley, T. M., and Ritchie, G. A. (1973). A theoretical model for calculation of xylem sap pressure from climatological data. American Midland Naturalist, 90, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. B., Sperry, J. S., and Dawson, T. E. (2000). Root water uptake and transport: Using physiological processes in global predictions. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasechko, S., Sharp, Z. D., Gibson, J. J., et al. (2013). Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration. Nature, 496, 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, M., Reichstein, M., Ciais, P., et al. (2010). Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature, 467, 951–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komatsu, H. (2005). Forest categorization according to dry-canopy evaporation rates in the growing season: comparison of the Priestley–Taylor coefficient values from various observations sites. Hydrological Processes, 19, 3873–3896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krusche, A. V., Ballester, M. V. R., and Leite, N. K. (2011). Hydrology and biogeochemistry of terra firme lowland tropical forests. In Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Past Research and Future Directions, ed. Levia, D. F., Carlyle-Moses, D., and Tanaka, T.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 187–201.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-E., Oliveira, R. S., Dawson, T. E., and Fung, I. (2005). Root functioning modifies seasonal climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 17576–17581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legates, D. R., and Willmott, C. J. (1990a). Mean seasonal and spatial variability in global surface air temperature. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 41, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legates, D. R., and Willmott, C. J. (1990b). Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge-corrected, global precipitation. International Journal of Climatology, 10, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2011a). Century-scale variability in global annual runoff examined using a water balance model. International Journal of Climatology, 31, 1739–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, G. J., and Wolock, D. M. (2011b). Independent effects of temperature and precipitation on modeled runoff in the conterminous United States. Water Resources Research, 47, W11522, doi:10.1029/2011WR010630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinzer, F. C., Brooks, J. R., Bucci, S., et al. (2004). Converging patterns of uptake and hydraulic redistribution of soil water in contrasting woody vegetation types. Tree Physiology, 24, 919–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintz, Y., and Walker, G. K. (1993). Global fields of soil moisture and land surface evapotranspiration derived from observed precipitation and surface air temperature. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 32, 1305–1334.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miralles, D. G., Gash, J. H., Holmes, T. R. H., de Jeu, R. A. M., and Dolman, A. J. (2010). Global canopy interception from satellite observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, D16122, doi:10.1029/2009JD013530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W. (2011). Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 1781–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, B., Seneviratne, S. I., Jimenez, C., et al. (2011). Evaluation of global observations-based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L06402, doi:10.1029/2010GL046230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R. B., and Cardon, Z. G. (2012). The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies. New Phytologist, 194, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noone, D., Risi, C., Bailey, A., et al. (2013). Determining water sources in the boundary layer from tall tower profiles of water vapor and surface water isotope ratios after a snowstorm in Colorado. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 1607–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 193A, 120–145.Google Scholar
Priestley, C. H. B, and Taylor, R. J. (1972). On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100, 81–92.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. H., and Caldwell, M. M. (1987). Hydraulic lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia, 73, 486–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbloom, N., and Kittel, T. G. F. (1996). A User's Guide to the VEMAP Phase I Database, Technical Note NCAR/TN-431+IA. Boulder, Colorado: National Center for Atmospheric Research.Google Scholar
Running, S. W., Waring, R. H., and Rydell, R. A. (1975). Physiological control of water flux in conifers: A computer simulation model. Oecologia, 18, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryu, Y., Baldocchi, D. D., Kobayashi, H., et al. (2011). Integration of MODIS land and atmosphere products with a coupled-process model to estimate gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration from 1 km to global scales. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 25, GB4017, doi:10.1029/2011GB004053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCS (1985). National Engineering Handbook. Section 4: Hydrology. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
SCS (1986). Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Roderick, M. L. (2012). Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature, 491, 435–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, J. B. (1977). Evaporation from the wet canopy of a pine forest. Water Resources Research, 13, 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, W. J. (1993). Evaporation. In Handbook of Hydrology, ed. Maidment, D. R.. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 4.1–4.53.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, W. J. (2007). Putting the “vap” into evaporation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 210–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, S., and Nathan, K. (1993). Site Engineering for Landscape Architects, 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Sucoff, E. (1972). Water potential in red pine: Soil moisture, evapotranspiration, crown position. Ecology, 53, 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38, 55–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W., and Mather, J. R. (1955). The Water Balance, Publications in Climatology Volume 8, Number 1. Centerton, New Jersey: Drexel Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W., and Mather, J. R. (1957). Instructions and Tables for Computing Potential Evapotranspiration and the Water Balance, Publications in Climatology Volume 10, Number 3. Centerton, New Jersey: Drexel Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Vachon, R. W., Welker, J. M., White, J. W. C., and Vaughn, B. H. (2010). Monthly precipitation isoscapes (δ18O) of the United States: Connections with surface temperatures, moisture source conditions, and air mass trajectories. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, D21126, doi:10.1029/2010JD014105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. (2011). Assessing the potential hydrological impacts of hydraulic redistribution in Amazonia using a numerical modeling approach. Water Resources Research, 47, W02528, doi:10.1029/2010WR009601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. G., Cable, W., Hultine, K., et al. (2004). Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 125, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakir, D., and Sternberg, L.da, S. L. (2000). The use of stable isotopes to study ecosystem gas exchange. Oecologia, 123, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yepez, E. A., Williams, D. G., Scott, R. L., and Lin, G. (2003). Partitioning overstory and understory evapotranspiration in a semiarid savanna woodland from the isotopic composition of water vapor. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 119, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W. (2010). A continuous satellite-derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983 to 2006. Water Resources Research, 46, W09522, doi:10.1029/2009WR008800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinke, P. J. (1967). Forest interception studies in the United States. In Forest Hydrology, ed. Sopper, W. E. and Lull, H. W.. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 137–161.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Water Balance
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Water Balance
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Water Balance
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.011
Available formats
×