Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:34:17.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Reptiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Simon Blomberg
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research and School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Richard Shine
Affiliation:
Zoology A08, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
William J. Sutherland
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Most common survey methods employed to estimate the abundance of reptiles involve capturing individuals (Table 8.1). This is for two reasons: (a) reptiles tend to be mobile and/or shy and cryptic, so not all members of a population will be visible (and therefore amenable to counting by sight) at any one time; and (b) much more information can be obtained from an animal that has been captured than can be obtained from an animal that has simply been seen. For example, the animal may be weighed and measured, have its sex and reproductive condition determined, and have its parasite load assessed. An identifying mark may also be placed on the animal so that it can be re-identified, should it be recaptured at a later time. As well as providing advice on capturing reptiles, we also provide information on common techniques for marking individuals.

Reptiles are ectotherms. That is, they obtain their body heat from the external environment. This has major implications for any survey technique, in that weather conditions may greatly affect the activity and therefore the catchability of reptiles. The effect of weather can vary seasonally, as well as on a daily basis. This should be kept in mind when designing a survey programme.

Because it is unlikely that the whole population will be counted in any one census period (some individuals will be missed), statistical mark–recapture methods should generally be used to estimate population sizes/densities or survival probabilities for reptile populations (see Chapter 3).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Census Techniques
A Handbook
, pp. 297 - 307
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, A. M. & Sadlier, R. A. (1992). The use of mouse glue traps to capture lizards. Herpetological Review 23, 112–113.Google Scholar
Bennett, D., Hampson, K. & Yngente, V. (2001). A noose trap for catching a large arboreal lizard, Varanus olivaceus. Herpetological Review 32, 167–168.Google Scholar
Bertram, B. P. & Cogger, H. G. (1971). A noosing gun for live captures of small lizards. Copeia, 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattstrom, B. H. (1996). The “skink scooper:” a device for catching leaf litter skinks. Herpetological Review 27, 189.Google Scholar
Bryan, T. W., Blankenship, E. L. & Guyer, C. (1991). A new method of trapping gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Herpetological Review 22, 19–21.Google Scholar
Camper, J. D. & Dixon, J. R. (1988). Evaluation of a microchip marking system for amphibians and reptiles. Research Publication 7100-159. Austin, Texas, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Doan, T. M. (1997). A new trap for the live capture of large lizards. Herpetological Review 28, 79.Google Scholar
Downes, S. J. & Borges, P. (1998). Sticky traps: an effective way to catch small terrestrial lizards. Herpetological Review 29, 94.Google Scholar
Durden, L. A., Dotson, E. M. & Vogel, G. N. (1995). Two efficient techniques for catching skinks. Herpetological Review 26, 137.Google Scholar
Durtsche, R. D. (1996). A capture technique for small, smooth-scaled lizards. Herpetological Review 27, 12–13.Google Scholar
Engeman, R. M. (1998). An easy capture method for brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis). The Snake 28, 101–102.Google Scholar
Fitch, H. S. (1987). Collecting and life-history techniques. In Snakes: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, ed. Seigel, R. A., Collins, J. T. & Novak, S. S., New York, Macmillan, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
Friend, G. R., Smith, G. T., Mitchell, D. S. & Dickman, C. R. (1989). Influence of pitfall and drift fence design on capture rates of small vertebrates in semi-arid habitats of Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 16, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianaroli, M, Lanzi, A. & Fontana, R. (2001). Utilizzo di trappole del tipo “bagno di sole artificiale” per la cattura di testuggini palustri. Pianura 13, 153–155Google Scholar
James, C. D. (1989). Comparative ecology of sympatric scincid lizards (Ctenotus) in spinifex grasslands of central Australia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
James, C. D. (1991). Population dynamics, demography and life history of sympatric scincid lizards (Ctenotus) in central Australia. Herpetologica 47, 194–210.Google Scholar
Keck, M. B. (1994). Test for detrimental effects of PIT tags in neonatal snakes. Copeia, 226–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjoss, V. A. & Litvaitis, J. A. (2001). Comparison of two methods to sample snake communities in early successional habitats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 153–157.Google Scholar
Kofron, C. P. (1989). A simple method for capturing large Nile crocodiles. African Journal of Ecology 27, 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legler, J. M. (1960). A simple and inexpensive device for trapping freshwater turtles. Proceedings of the Utah Academy of Science 37, 63–66.Google Scholar
Mazzotti, F. J. & Brandt, L. A. (1988). A method of live-trapping wary crocodiles. Herpetological Review 19, 40–41.Google Scholar
Morton, S. R., Gillam, M. W., Jones, K. R. & Fleming, M. R. (1988). Relative efficiency of different pit-trap systems for sampling reptiles in spinifex grasslands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, A. (1998). A new capture technique for arboreal lizards. Herpetological Review 29, 159.Google Scholar
Petokas, P. J. & Alexander, M. M. (1979). A new trap for basking turtles. Herpetological Review 10, 90.Google Scholar
Rodda, G. H., McCoid, M. J. & Fritts, T. H. (1993). Adhesive trapping II. Herpetological Review 24, 99–100.Google Scholar
Rodda, G. H., Sawai, Y., Chizsar, D. & Tanaka, H. (1999). Problem Snake Management; the Habu and the Brown Treesnake. Ithaca, New York, Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar
Strong, D., Leatherman, B. & Brattstrom, B. H. (1993). Two new simple methods for catching small fast lizards. Herpetological Review 24, 22–23.Google Scholar
Witz, B. W. (1996). A new device for capturing small and medium-sized lizards by hand: the lizard grabber. Herpetological Review 27, 130–131.Google Scholar
Woodbury, A. M. (1956). Uses of marking animals in ecological studies: marking amphibians and reptiles. Ecology 37, 670–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zani, P. A. & Vitt, L. J. (1995). Techniques for capturing arboreal lizards. Herpetological Review 26, 136–137.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Reptiles
    • By Simon Blomberg, Centre for Mental Health Research and School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, Richard Shine, Zoology A08, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Reptiles
    • By Simon Blomberg, Centre for Mental Health Research and School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, Richard Shine, Zoology A08, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Reptiles
    • By Simon Blomberg, Centre for Mental Health Research and School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, Richard Shine, Zoology A08, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • Edited by William J. Sutherland, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Ecological Census Techniques
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508.009
Available formats
×