Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:03:40.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Punishment and crime

from i - CHANGING POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, AND SOCIAL LANDSCAPE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Anna Schur
Affiliation:
Keene State College
Deborah A. Martinsen
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Olga Maiorova
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

The last two decades of Dostoevsky's life, when he wrote his most influential works, coincided with significant changes in the Russian penal system. While penal reforms were not as radical or as comprehensive as some of the other Great Reforms of the 1860s, such as the abolition of serfdom (1861) or the court reform (1864), they thrust questions regarding the efficacy and morality of state punishment to the center of public consciousness.

Condemned to death for participating in the Petrashevsky circle*, Dostoevsky had first-hand experience of the Russian penal system. His status as a political criminal did not entitle him to significantly different treatment, but it made him vulnerable to capital punishment, a verdict that was later commuted to a sentence of hard labor. Dostoevsky knew what it felt like to live through a mock execution, to spend months in solitary confinement and years in communal prison quarters for common criminals, to witness corporal punishment from perilous proximity, and to be nearly whipped himself. Upon returning from close to a decade of hard labor and exile in Siberia (1850–9), Dostoevsky was thus well prepared to enter widespread public debates about the practice and theory of punishment in Russia and the West.

When Ivan Karamazov asks his devil what sorts of torments, besides the “quadrillion kilometers,” exist in the other world, the devil replies: “What other torments? Ah, don't even ask: before it was one thing and another, but now it's mostly the moral sort, ‘remorse of conscience’ and all that nonsense. That also started because of you, from the ‘mellowing of your mores’” (15:78; Bk. 11, Ch. 9). The quotation marks around “mellowing of your mores” and “remorse of conscience” indicate both the devil's irony and Dostoevsky's assumption that the idioms would be familiar to his readers. Indeed, both phrases were rhetorical staples in overviews of Western penal history that, from the late 1850s onward, regularly appeared in the Russian press. “Remorse of conscience” was often associated with the new institution of the penitentiary which, in contrast to the old gaol, aspired to enact deep changes in the criminal's moral character. “Mellowing of the mores” described the general direction of Western penal politics viewed approvingly by liberally inclined, West-oriented Russian commentators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Bruce. The Politics of Punishment: Prison Reform in Russia, 1863–1917. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 1996.
Daly, Jonathan. “Russian Punishments in the European Mirror.” In McCaffray, Susan P. and Melancon, Michael, (eds.), Russia in the European Context 1789–1914: A Member of the Family. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 161–88.
Offord, Derek. “Crime and Punishment and Contemporary Radical Thought.” In Peace, Richard (ed.), Fyodor Dostoevsky's “Crime and Punishment:” A Casebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 119–47.
Schrader, Abby. Languages of the Lash: Corporal Punishment and Identity in Imperial Russia. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2002.
Schur, Anna. Wages of Evil: Dostoevsky and Punishment. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2012.
Wood, Alan. “Crime and Punishment in the House of the Dead.” In Crisp, Olga and Edmonson, Linda (eds.), Civil Rights in Imperial Russia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. 215–33.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×