Bibliography

J. Steven Reznick

doi:10.1017/9781108155359.014

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017

J. Steven Reznick

Show author details

J. Steven Reznick: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: The Developmental Scientist's Companion
Improving Research Methodology and Achieving Professional Success
, pp. 190 - 200

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108155359.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar

Achor, S. (2012). Positive intelligence. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 100–102.Google Scholar

Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2011). Sampling development. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(4), 411–423.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurements Used in Education. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51(2, pt. 2), 1–38. doi: 10.1037/h0053479.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., Colombo, J., & Shaddy, D. (2006). Visual scanning and pupillary responses in young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1238–1256.Google Scholar

Aslin, R. N. (2007). What’s in a look? Developmental Science, 10, 48–53.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Babineau, B. A., Yang, M., & Crawley, J. N. (2012). Mainstreaming mice. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(1), 300–301. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.168.Google Scholar

Barlow, D. H. (2010). Negative effects from psychological treatments: A perspective. American Psychologist, 65(1), 13–20.Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 326–339.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauer, D. J. (2007). Observations on the use of growth mixture models in psychological research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 757–786.Google Scholar

Bauer, D. J. (2011). Evaluating individual differences in psychological processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 115–118.Google Scholar

Bauer, D. J., Gottfredson, N. C., Dean, D., & Zucker, R. A. (2013). Analyzing repeated measures data on individuals nested within groups: Accounting for dynamic group effects. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Bauer, D. J., & Reyes, H. L. M. (2010). Modeling variability in individual development: Differences of degree or kind? Child Development Perspectives, 4, 114–122.Google Scholar

Bauer, D. J., Sterba, S. K., & Hallfors, D. D. (2008). Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(2), 210–236. doi: 10.1080/00273170802034810.Google Scholar

Bauer, P. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2014). The National Institutes of Health Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function: A tool for developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 119–124.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 396–403.Google Scholar

Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3(11), 255–272.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of science: An overview for cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Beck, D. M. (2010). The appeal of the brain in the popular press. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 762–766.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2, 131–160.Google Scholar

Berlin, L. J., Dodge, K. A., & Reznick, J. S. (2013). Examining pregnant women’s hostile attributions about infants predict offspring maltreatment. JAMA Pediatrics, 167, 549–553.Google Scholar

Blair, C., Granger, D., Kivlighan, K., Mills-Koonce, R., Willoughby, M., Greenberg, M., et al. (2008). Maternal and child contributions to cortisol response to emotional arousal in young children from low-income, rural communities. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1095–1109.Google Scholar

Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5(1), 3–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.3.Google Scholar

Borsboom, D., Romeijn, J., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: Is fair selection possible? Psychological Methods, 13, 75–98.Google Scholar

Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design – for market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980.Google Scholar

Burchinal, M., Skinner, D., & Reznick, J. (2010). European American and African American mothers’ beliefs about parenting and disciplining infants: A mixed-method analysis. Parenting: Science And Practice, 10(2), 79–96.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2012). A history of social neuroscience. In Kruglanski, A. W., Stroebe, W., Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 123–136). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Decety, J. (2009). What are the brain mechanisms on which psychological processes are based? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 10–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cacioppo, J. T., Semin, G. R., & Berntson, G. G. (2004). Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific symbiosis: Psychological theory as a search for truth and the discovery of solutions. American Psychologist, 59, 214–223.Google Scholar

Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). “Clear as mud”: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, 1–13.Google Scholar

Cairns, R. B., Elder, G. H., Jr., & Costello, E. J. (1996). Developmental science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (Ed.). (1974). Philosophy of Karl Popper (Vol. 1). LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar

Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4, 0844–0854.Google Scholar

Carnegie, D. (1936). How to win friends and influence people. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: Survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chan, M. E., & Arvey, R. D. (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79–92.Google Scholar

Chandra, A., Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., & Miu, A. (2008). Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? Findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth. Pediatrics, 122, 1047–1054.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M., & Churchland, P. S. (1998). On the contrary: Critical essays 1987–1997. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cizek, G. J. (2012). Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use. Psychological Methods, 17, 31–43.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. B. (2010). Just how many different forms of culture are there? American Psychologist, 65(1), 59–61. doi:10.1037/a0017793.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cook, T. D. (1985). Postpositivist critical multiplism. In Shotland, R. L. & Mark, M. M. (Eds.), Social science and social policy (pp. 21–62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Cooper, H., & Koenka, C. (2012). The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. American Psychologist, 67(6), 446–462.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Curran, P., Hussong, A., Cai, L., Huang, W., Chassin, L., Sher, K., et al. (2008). Pooling data from multiple longitudinal studies: The role of item response theory in integrative data analysis. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 365–380.Google Scholar

Decety, J., & Cacioppo, J. (2010). Frontiers in human neuroscience: The golden triangle and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 767–771.Google Scholar

DeFries, J. C., & Fulker, D. W. (1988). Multiple regression analysis of twin data: Etiology of deviant score versus individual differences. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemeologiae, 37, 205–216.Google Scholar

De Los Reyes, A., & Wang, M. (2012). Applying psychometric theory and research to developing a continuously distributed approach to making research funding decisions. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 298–304. doi:10.1037/a0027250.Google Scholar

Diamond, A., Cruttenden, L., & Neiderman, D. (1994). AB with multiple wells: I. Why are multiple wells sometimes easier than two wells? II. Memory or memory + inhibition? Developmental Psychology, 30, 192–205.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … overcome methodological barriers to progress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 469–491.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155–174.Google Scholar

Elder, G. J., Shanahan, M. J., & Jennings, J. A. (2015). Human development in time and place. In Bornstein, M. H., Leventhal, T., Lerner, R. M., Bornstein, M. H., Leventhal, T., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes (7th ed.) (pp. 6–54). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar

Enders, C. K. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perpectives, 7, 27–31. doi: 10.1111/cdep/12008.Google Scholar

Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods. American Psychologist, 63, 591–601.Google Scholar

Erkut, S. (2010). Developing multiple language versions of instruments for intercultural research. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 19–24. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00111.x.Google Scholar

Fantz, R. L. (1958). Pattern vision in young infants. Psychological Review, 8, 43–47.Google Scholar

Feldman, R., & Reznick, J. S. (1996). Maternal perception of infant intentionality at 4 and 8 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 483–496.Google Scholar

Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. F., & Brannick, M. T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 120–128.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. doi:10.1177/1745691612462587.Google Scholar

Firick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379–390.Google Scholar

Fisher, Sir Ronald A. (1935) Mathematics of a lady tasting tea. In J. R. Newman (1956, Ed.), The world of mathematics (Vol. 3, Part 8): Statistics and the design of experiments (pp. 1514–1521). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Fiske, D. W., & Campbell, D. T. (1992). Citations do not solve problems. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 393–395.Google Scholar

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.Google Scholar

Gehlbach, H., & Brinkworth, M. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387. doi:10.1037/a0025704.Google Scholar

Gilmore, J., Lin, W., Gerig, G., & Tamminga, C. (2006). Fetal and neonatal brain development. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 2046–2046.Google Scholar

Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Will we march to utopia, or be dragged there? Past failures and future hopes for publishing our science. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 263–266. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.706506.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1085–1108. doi:10.1037/a0028044.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10, 1–11.Google Scholar

Gough, B., & Madill, A. (2012). Subjectivity in psychological science: From problem to prospect. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 374–384. doi:10.1037/a0029313.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 99–108. doi:10.1177/1745691611434210 1.Google Scholar

Grothe, I., & Plöchl, M. (2008). Amplitude asymmetry: A direct link between ongoing oscillatory activity and event-related potentials? The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(49), 13025–13027. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4670-08.2008.Google Scholar

Gullo, M. J., & O’Gorman, J. G. (2012). DSM-5 Task Force proposes controversial diagnosis for dishonest scientists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 689. doi:10.1177/1745691612460689.Google Scholar

Gunnar, M., Sebanc, A., Tout, K., Donzella, B., & van Dulmen, M. (2003). Peer rejection, temperament, and cortisol activity in preschoolers. Developmental Psychobiology, 43, 346–358.Google Scholar

Haith, M. M. (1980). Rules that babies look by: The organization of newborn visual activity. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Handy, T. C. (2004). Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (B&T).Google Scholar

Harmon, A. G., Hibel, L. C., Rumyantseva, O., & Granger, D. A. (2007). Measuring salivary cortisol in studies of child development: Watch out – what goes in may not come out of saliva collection devices. Developmental Psychobiology, 49(5), 495–500.Google Scholar

Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brooks.Google Scholar

Hartmann, W. E., Kim, E. S., Kim, J. H. J., Nguyen, T. U., Wendt, D. C., Nagata, D. K., & Gone, J. P. (2013). In search of cultural diversity, revisited: Recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 243–254.Google Scholar

Hedges, L. V. (2008). What are effect sizes and why do we need them? Child Development Perspectives, 2, 167–171.Google Scholar

Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.Google Scholar

Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12, 205–218.Google Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (2003). A treatise of human nature. New York, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.Google Scholar

James, W. J. (1890/1981). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jarde, A., Losilla, J., Vives, J., & Rodrigo, M. F. (2013). Q-Coh: A tool to screen the methodological quality of cohort studies in systematic reviews and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13(2), 138–146.Google Scholar

Johnson, V. E. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 19313–19317.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jones, J. M. (2010). I am white and you’re not: The value of unraveling ethnocentric science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 700–707.Google Scholar

Kagan, J. (2009a). Categories of novelty and states of uncertainty. Review of General Psychology, 13, 290–301.Google Scholar

Kagan, J. (2009b). Two is better than one. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 22–23.Google Scholar

Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Snidman, N. (1988). Biological bases of childhood shyness. Science, 240, 167–171.Google Scholar

Kagan, J. & Snidman, N. (2004). The long shadow of temperament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, O., Doyen, S., Leys, C., de Saldanha da Gama, P. M., Miller, S., Questienne, L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Low hopes, high expectations: Expectancy effects and the replicability of behavioral experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 572–584. doi:10.1177/1745691612463704.Google Scholar

Kosslyn, S. M. (1999). If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 354, 1283–1294.Google Scholar

Kraemer, H. C., Yesavage, J. A., Taylor, J. L., & Kupfer, D. (2000). How can we learn about developmental processes from cross-sectional studies, or can we? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 163–171. PMID: 10671382.Google Scholar

Krause, M. S. (2012). Measurement validity is fundamentally a matter of definition, not correlation. Review of General Psychology, 16, 391–400.Google Scholar

Krause, M. S. (2013). The data analytic implications of human psychology’s dimensions being ordinally scaled. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 318–325.Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis. Oxford, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Laborda, M. A., Miguez, G., Polack, C. W., & Miller, R. R. (2012). Animal models of psychopathology: Historical models and the Pavlovian contribution. Terapia Psicológica, 30, 45–59.Google Scholar

Lane, D., & Sándor, A. (2009). Designing better graphs by including distributional information and integrating words, numbers, and images. Psychological Methods, 14, 239–257.Google Scholar

LeBel, E. P., Borsboom, D., Giner-Sorolla, R., Hasselman, F., Peters, K. R., Ratliff, K. A., & Smith, C. T. (2013). PsychDisclosure.org: Grassroots support for reforming reporting standards in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 424–432.Google Scholar

Leevers, H., & Harris, P. (2000). Counterfactual syllogostic reasoning in normal 4-year-olds, children with learning disabilities, and children with autism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76(1), 64–87.Google Scholar

Logothetis, N. K. (2007). The ins and outs of fMRI signals. Nature Neuroscience, 10(10), 1230–1232. doi:10.1038/nn1007-1230.Google Scholar

LoLordo, V. M. (1971). Facilitation of food-reinforced responding by a signal for response-independent food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15(1), 49–55.Google Scholar

Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-relates potential technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychology Review, 55, 95–107.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254–271. doi:10.1037/a0013220.Google Scholar

Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In Cairns, R. B., Bergman, L. R., & Kagan, J. (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Marcovitch, S., & Zelazo, P. (1999). The A-not-B error: Results from a logistic meta-analysis. Child Development, 70, 1297–1313.Google Scholar

Marshall, P. J. (2009). Relating psychology and neuroscience: Taking up the challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 113–125.Google Scholar

Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147–163.Google Scholar

McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Preventing missing data by design. In D. A. Kenny (Ed.), Missing data: A gentle introduction (pp. 65–87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.Google Scholar

Medin, D., Bennis, W., & Chandler, M. (2010). Culture and the home-field disadvantage. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 708–713. doi:10.1177/1745691610388772.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risk and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.Google Scholar

Mitchell, G. (2012). Revisiting truth or triviality: The external validity of research in the psychological laboratory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 109–117. doi:10.1177/1745691611432343.Google Scholar

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2015). The developing genome: An introduction to behavioral epigenetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mussen, P. M. E. (1960). Handbook of research methods in child development. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Muthén, B. O. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class – latent growth modeling. In Sayer, A. & Collins, L. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 289–322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Neuenschwander, E. (2013). Qualitas and quantitas: Two ways of thinking in science. Quality & Quantity: International Journal Of Methodology, 47(5), 2597–2615. doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9674-7.Google Scholar

Neuroskeptic (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644.Google Scholar

Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2013). Standards for talking and thinking about validity. Psychological Methods, 18, 301–319.Google Scholar

Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241–301.Google Scholar

Palida, S. F., Butko, M. T., Ngo, J. T., Mackey, M. R., Gross, L. A., Ellisman, M. H., & Tsien, R. Y. (2015). PKMζ, but not PKCλ, is rapidly synthesized and degraded at the neuronal synapse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(20), 7736–7749. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0004-15.2015.Google Scholar

Pan, B., Rowe, M., Singer, J., & Snow, C. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76, 763–782.Google Scholar

Pelphrey, K., & Morris, J. (2006). Brain mechanisms for interpreting the actions of others from biological-motion cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 136–140.Google Scholar

Pelphrey, K. A., Reznick, J. S., Goldman, B. D., Sasson, N., Morrow, J., Donahoe, A., & Hodgson, K. (2004). Development of visuospatial short-term memory in the second half of the first year. Developmental Psychology, 40, 836–851.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952/1936). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1954/1937). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Pinkham, A., Hopfinger, J., Pelphrey, K., Piven, J., & Penn, D. (2008). Neural bases for impaired social cognition in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 99, 164–175.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1934/2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Porges, S., Doussard-Roosevelt, J., Portales, L., & Suess, P. (1994). Cardiac vagal tone: Stability and relation to difficultness in infants and 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychobiology, 27, 289–300.Google Scholar

Poulin, F., Dishion, T., & Burraston, B. (2001). 3-year iatrogenic effects associated with aggregating high-risk adolescents in cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions. Applied Developmental Science, 5(4), 214–224.Google Scholar

Pungello, E. P., Iruka, I. U., Dotterer, A. M., Mills-Koonce, R., & Reznick, J. S. (2009). The effects of income, race, sensitive parenting and harsh parenting on receptive and expressive language development in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 544–557.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.Google Scholar

Ratto, A. B. (2013). The impact of cultural factors on the diagnostic process in autism: A comparison of Latina and European American mothers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing database. (Dissertation number: 3593268.)Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (1951). The rise of scientific philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. (2006). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Reinhart, A. (2015). Statistics done wrong: The woefully complete guide. San Francisco: No Starch Press.Google Scholar

Rennie, D. L. (2012). Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 385–398. doi:10.1037/a0029250.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S. (2007). Working memory in infants and toddlers. In Oakes, L. M. & Bauer, P. J. (Eds.), Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood: Taking the first steps toward remembering (pp. 3–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S. (2008). Inferring infant intentionality. Berlin: VDM Dr. Müller.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S., Baranek, G. T., Reavis, S., Watson, L. R., & Crais, E. R. (2007). A parent-report instrument for identifying one-year olds at risk for an eventual diagnosis of autism: The first year inventory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1691–1710.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S., Corley, R., & Robinson, J. (1997). A longitudinal twin study of intelligence in the second year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1, Serial No. 249).Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S., Morrow, J. D., Goldman, B. D., & Snyder, J. (2004). The onset of working memory in infants. Infancy, 6, 145–154.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S., & Richman, C. L. (1976). Effects of class complexity, class frequency, and preexperimental bias on rule learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(6), 774–782. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.6.774.Google Scholar

Reznick, J. S., & Schwartz, B. B. (2001). When is an assessment an intervention? Parent perception of infant intentionality and language. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 11–17.Google Scholar

Richards, J., & Gibson, T. (1997). Extended visual fixation in young infants: Look distributions, heart rate changes, and attention. Child Development, 68, 1041–1056.Google Scholar

Richman, C. L., Mitchell, D. B., & Reznick, J. S. (1979). Mental travel: Some reservations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(1), 13–18. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.1.13.Google Scholar

Richters, J. E. (1997). The Hubble hypothesis and the developmentalist’s dilemma. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 193–229.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. P., & Martin, S. (2008). What do happy people do? Social Indicators Research, 89, 565–571.Google Scholar

Rodgers, J. L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. (1979). “File drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Salapatek, P., & Kessen, W. (1966). Visual scanning of triangles by the human newborn. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 155–167.Google Scholar

Salmon, P. (2003). How do we recognize good research? The Psychologist, 16(1), 24–27.Google Scholar

Sanders, L. (2009). Trawling the brain. Science News, 176, 16–20.Google Scholar

Sanders, L. (2011). Residents of the brain: Scientists turn up startling diversity among nerve cells. Science News, July 30.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. (2010). Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 233–242. doi:10.1177/1745691610369339.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.Google Scholar

Schwartzer, J. J., Koenig, C. M., & Berman, R. F. (2013). Using mouse models of autism spectrum disorders to study the neurotoxicology of gene–environment interactions. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 3617–3635. doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2012.08.007.Google Scholar

Scott-Phillips, T. C., Dickins, T. E., & West, S. A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6 (1), 38–47.Google Scholar

Shonkoff, J. P., & Bales, S. N. (2011). Science does not speak for itself: Translating child development research for the public and its policymakers. Child Development, 82(1), 17–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01538.x.Google Scholar

Simmering, V. R., Triesch, J., Deák, G. O., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). A dialogue on the role of computational modeling in developmental science. Child Development Perspectives, 4(2), 152–158. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00134.x.Google Scholar

Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 13, 238–241.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1972). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60, 16–26.Google Scholar

Staats, A. W. (1999). Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda. Review of General Psychology, 3, 3–13.Google Scholar

Steinberg, L., & Fletcher, A. C. (1998). Data analytic strategies in research on ethnic minority youth. In McLoyd, V. C. & Steinberg, L. (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 279–294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Unified psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 1069–1079.Google Scholar

Sulloway, F. J. (1997). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Thompson, R. A. (2006). The development of the person: Social understanding, relationships, conscience, self. In Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 24–98). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tudge, J., Putnam, S., & Valsiner, J. (1996). Culture and cognition in developmental perspective. In Cairns, R. B., Elder, G. H., Jr., & Costello, E. J. (Eds.), Developmental science (pp. 190–222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

van der Worp, H. B., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., Porritt, M. J., Rewell, S., O’Collins, V., & Macleod, M. R. (2010). Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Medicine, 7(3), 1–8.Google Scholar

Vaughn, B., Taraldson, B., Crichton, L., & Egeland, B. (1981). The assessment of infant temperament: A critique of the Carey Infant Temperament Questionnaire. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 1–17.Google Scholar

Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x.Google Scholar

Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2012). Voodoo and circularity errors. Neuroimage, 62(2), 945–948. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.027.Google Scholar

Wagenmakers, E., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. doi:10.1177/1745691612463078.Google Scholar

Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Weigold, A., Weigold, I. K., & Russell, E. J. (2013). Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 53–70.Google Scholar

Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Bartsch, K. (1987). A meta-analysis of research on Stage 4 object permanence: The A-not-B error. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(3), 1–62.Google Scholar

Wellman, H., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(May), 655–684.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Wöhr, M., & Scattoni, M. L. (2013). Behavioural methods used in rodent models of autism spectrum disorders: Current standards and new developments. Behavioural Brain Research, 251, 5–17. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.047.Google Scholar

Xiaolong, J., Shan, S., Cadwell, C. R., Berens, P., Sinz, F., Ecker, A. S., … Tolias, A. S. (2015). Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex. Science, 350(6264), 1–10. doi:10.1126/science.aac9462.Google Scholar

Yarnold, P., & Soltysik, R. (2005). Multiple sample analysis. Optimal data analysis: A guidebook with software for windows. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T. S., Kalil, A., & Way, N. (2013). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Qualitative Psychology, 1(S), 3–18.Google Scholar

Yuste, R. (2013). Electrical compartmentalization in dendritic spines. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 429–444.Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 198–226. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.198.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive