Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T16:51:14.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Developmental Dyslexia in French

from Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Reading comprehension requires the ability to both accurately and fluently identify written words and to understand spoken language (Perfetti, 1985, 2007). The main task facing beginning readers, then, is to find a means of understanding written texts as skillfully as they process spoken language. To this end, and to be able to allocate a large part of their processing capacity to reading comprehension, children must develop precise and rapid access to written words. Dyslexics’ reading problems, by definition, are about identifying written words (Lyon, Shaywitz, & Shaywitz, 2003). To understand the problems facing dyslexic readers, it is necessary to determine what is involved in reading in their writing system; which, for French-speaking children, is an alphabetic system.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altarelli, I., Leroy, F., & Monzalvo, K. et al. (2014). Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia: Revisiting an old question. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 57175735.Google Scholar
Altarelli, I., Monzalvo, K., Iannuzzi, S., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Ramus, F., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2013). A functionally guided approach to the morphometry of occipitotemporal regions in developmental dyslexia: Evidence for differential effects in boys and girls. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 1129611301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, D., Fluss, J., Billard, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2010). Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité: Comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L’Année Psychologique, 110, 299320.Google Scholar
Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by dyslexic children: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137175.Google Scholar
Bosse, M. L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104, 198230.Google Scholar
Bryant, P., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 124137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casalis, S. (2003). The delay-type in developmental dyslexia: Reading processes. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition, 10(1). http://journals.openedition.org/cpl/95Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114138.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Leuwers, C., & Hilton, H. (2013). Syntactic comprehension in reading and listening: A study in French dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 201219.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149180.Google Scholar
Catach, N. (2001). Histoire de l’orthographe française. Paris, France: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Chang, E. F., Rieger, J. W., Johnson, K., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 14281432.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204256.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Desrochers, A., & Levesque, K. (2017). Learning to read French. In Perfetti, C. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 243269). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2014). Reading in the brain revised and extended: Response to comments. Mind & Language, 29, 320335.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Gentaz, E., Huron, C., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2011). Apprendre à lire: Des sciences cognitives à la salle de classe. Paris, France: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., & Braga, L. W. et al. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330, 13591364.Google Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. NeuroImage, 24, 2133.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg, Germany: Jumius Gross Verlag.Google Scholar
Doignon-Camus, N., Seigneuric, A., Perrier, E., Sisti, A., & Zagar, D. (2012). Evidence for a preserved sensitivity to orthographic redundancy and an impaired access to phonological syllables in French developmental dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 117132.Google Scholar
Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2007). Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 34, 16921707.Google Scholar
Dufor, O., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Démonet, J. F. (2009). Left pre-motor cortex and allophonic speech perception in dyslexia: A PET study. Neuroimage, 46, 241248.Google Scholar
Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., Bouchafa, H., & Gombert, J. E. (2009). Computer-based training with ortho-phonological units in dyslexic children: New investigations. Dyslexia, 15, 218238.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub‐Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250283.Google Scholar
Expertise collective INSERM. (2007). Dyslexie, dysorthographie, dyscalculie: Bilan des données scientifiques. Paris, France: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).Google Scholar
Fayol, M., Thenevin, M. G., Jarousse, J. P., & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learn French written morphology. In Nunes, T. (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 4364). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Génard, N., Mousty, P., Alegria, J., Leybaert, J., & Morais, J. (1998). Methods to establish subtypes of developmental dyslexia. In Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Problems and interventions in literacy development (pp. 163176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Theurel, A. (2015). Differences in the predictors of reading comprehension in first graders from low socio-economic status families with either good or poor decoding skills. PLos One, 10(3), e0119581.Google Scholar
Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Theurel, A., & Colé, P. (2013). Reading comprehension in a large cohort of French first graders from low socio-economic status families: A 7-month longitudinal study. PLos One, 8(11), e78608.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2015). Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 4354.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 1952.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2003). Word superiority pseudoword superiority and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432440.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054.Google Scholar
Habib, M., Rey, V., Daffaure, V., Camps, R., Espesser, R., Joly-Pottuz, B., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Phonological training in children with dyslexia using temporally modified speech: A three-step pilot investigation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 289308.Google Scholar
Lallier, M., Thierry, G., & Tainturier, M. J. (2013). On the importance of considering individual profiles when investigating the role of auditory sequential deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 126, 121127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassus-Sangosse, D., N’guyen-Morel, M. A., & Valdois, S. (2008). Sequential or simultaneous visual processing deficit in developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 48, 979988.Google Scholar
Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l’Alouette. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).Google Scholar
Lehongre, K., Morillon, B., Giraud, A. L., & Ramus, F. (2013). Impaired auditory sampling in dyslexia: Further evidence from combined fMRI and EEG. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 454. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00454.Google Scholar
Lehongre, K., Ramus, F., Villiermet, N., Schwartz, D., & Giraud, A. L. (2011). Altered low-g sampling in auditory cortex accounts for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron, 72, 10801090.Google Scholar
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156166.Google Scholar
Lobier, M., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Le Bas, J. F. & Valdois, S. (2014). Visual processing of multiple elements in the dyslexic brain: Evidence for a superior parietal dysfunction. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 8, 479. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00479.Google Scholar
Lobier, M., Zoubrinetzky, R., & Valdois, S. (2012). The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal. Cortex, 48, 768773.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 114.Google Scholar
Magnan, A., Ecalle, J., Veuillet, E., & Collet, L. (2004). The effects of an audio-visual training program in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 131140.Google Scholar
Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2013). Is the impaired N170 print tuning specific to developmental dyslexia? A matched reading-level study with poor readers and dyslexics. Brain and Language, 127, 539544.Google Scholar
Mahé, G., Bonnefond, A., Gavens, N., Dufour, A., & Doignon-Camus, N. (2012). Impaired visual expertise for print in french adults with dyslexia as shown by N170 tuning. Neuropsychologia, 50, 32003206.Google Scholar
Maïonchi-Pino, N., Taki, Y., & Yokoyama, S. et al. (2013). Is the phonological deficit in developmental dyslexia related to impaired phonological representations and to universal phonological grammar? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 5373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the basis of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J., Colé, P., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., Zorman, M., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2010). Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 238264.Google Scholar
Maurer, U., Blau, V. C., Yoncheva, Y. N., & McCandliss, B. (2010). Development of visual expertise for reading: Rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 404422.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322352.Google Scholar
Messaoud-Galusi, S., Hazan, V., & Rosen, S. (2011). Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: Is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 16821701.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279293.Google Scholar
Mody, M. (2003). Rapid auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: A commentary on two differing views. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 529539.Google Scholar
Monzalvo, K., Fluss, J., Billard, C., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2012). Cortical networks for vision and language in dyslexic and normal children of variable socio-economic status. Neuroimage, 61, 258274.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Mitterer, H., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013a). Neural evidence of the 501 allophonic mode of speech perception in adults with dyslexia. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124, 11511162.Google Scholar
Noordenbos, M. W., Segers, E., Serniclaes, W., & Verhoeven, L. (2013b). Neural evidence of allophonic perception in children at risk for dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2010–2017.Google Scholar
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324339.Google Scholar
Paulesu, E., Démonet, J. F., & Fazio, F. et al. (2001). Dyslexia, Cultural diversity and Biological unity. Science, 291, 21652167.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2013). The contribution of morphology to the consistency of spelling-to-sound relations: A quantitative analysis based on French elementary school readers. L’Année Psychologique, 213, 113133.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730.Google Scholar
Piquard-Kipffer, A., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2013). Early predictors of future reading skills: A follow-up of French-speaking children from the beginning of kindergarten to the end of the second grade (age 5 to 8). L’Année Psychologique, 113, 491521.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2015). Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 345376.Google Scholar
Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212218.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 129141.Google Scholar
Reilhac, C., Jucla, M., Iannuzzi, S., Valdois, S., & Démonet, J. F. (2012). Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154.Google Scholar
Ruff, S., Cardebat, D., Marie, N., & Démonet, J. F. (2002). Enhanced response of the left frontal cortex to slowed down speech in dyslexia: An fRMI study. Neuroreport, 13, 12851289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serniclaes, W., Collet, G., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Review of neural rehabilitation programs for dyslexia: How can an allophonic system be changed into a phonemic one? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00190.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Reading impairment: From behavior to brain. In Bahr, R. & Silliman, E. (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders (pp. 3445). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Carré, R., & Demonet, J. F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 384399.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151218.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. A., Gruen, J., Mody, M., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2009). Dyslexia. In Schwartz, R. G. (Ed.), The handbook of child language disorders (pp. 115139). Boca Raton, FL: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2003). Reading acquisition: Cross linguistic data. In Nunes, T. & Bryant, P. (Eds.), Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 4366). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Kipffer-Piquard, A., Pinton, F., & Billard, C. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 22, 811842.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 88104.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia (Essays in developmental psychology). New-York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194217.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Jiménez, J. E., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). Prevalence and reliability of phonological, surface, and mixed profiles in dyslexia: A review of studies conducted in languages varying in orthographic depth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 498501.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114127.Google Scholar
Strong, G. K., Torgerson, C. J., Torgerson, D., & Hulme, C. (2011). A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the “Fast ForWord” language intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 224235.Google Scholar
Szenkovits, G., & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit I: Lexical versus sub-lexical and input versus output processes. Dyslexia, 11, 253268.Google Scholar
Valdois, S., Bosse, M. L., & Tainturier, M. J. (2004). Cognitive correlates of developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional deficit. Dyslexia, 10, 125.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182198.Google Scholar
Talli, I., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Stavrakaki, S. (2015). Is there an overlap between specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia? New insights from French. In Stavrakaki, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and language disorders (pp. 5788). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bus, A. G. (1994). Meta-analytic confirmation of the nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 266275.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151178.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits, and symbols: What purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Developmental Science, 13, F8F14.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science, 12, 732745.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947953.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120397.Google Scholar
Zoubrinetzky, R., Bielle, F., & Valdois, S. (2014). New insights on developmental dyslexia subtypes: Heterogeneity of mixed reading profiles. PLoS One, 9(6), e99337.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×