Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: July 2009

14 - The United States: democracy, hegemony, and accountability


To the proverbial Martian who steps out of a flying saucer and asks what American law is concerning the use of force, the United States would represent a conundrum. Although its legal regime in this area is among the most elaborate on the planet, its political culture seems out of step with that regime. Its Constitution provides that war shall be declared by Congress – yet armed force has been used well over 200 times throughout its history, and in only five conflicts has Congress declared war. A law enacted following the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution, was aimed at restoring the “partnership” between Congress and the president in decisions to use armed force – yet armed force has been used even more frequently since its enactment, with Congress having approved such use only once, in connection with the Gulf War in 1991. The United States was one of the prime movers in establishing the United Nations and its collective security regime – and yet it led a massive bombing campaign at the end of the twentieth century that flouted that regime. What, the Martian might ask, is going on in this country?

The law governing use of force by the United States

The introduction of United States armed forces into hostilities is governed by a complicated mix of constitutional and statutory provisions. That regime is designed in part to render those who order and direct the use of force accountable to democratic control.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO