Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T22:17:47.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Containing the frontier: the tensions of territorial chiefdoms, 1930s–1950s

from Part Two - FROM MAKAMA TO MEJLIS: THE MAKING OF CHIEFSHIP AND THE LOCAL STATE, 1920s–1950s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Cherry Leonardi
Affiliation:
Lecturer in African History at the University of Durham, a former course director of the Rift Valley Institute's Sudan course, and a member of the council of the British Institute in Eastern Africa
Get access

Summary

It is hoped that in these more peaceful times a purely territorial unit (comparable to a small English village) may come to be accepted in native eyes as a genuine coherent group. [1938]

The ideal of the village community as a territorial, social and administrative unit was imported by colonial officials from their British homeland, and in some areas imposed forcibly upon the indigenous geography of southern Sudan. During the 1920s and 1930s, such visions had interacted in tension with the emphasis of Indirect Rule on tribal units of Native Administration, culminating in the mid-late 1930s in the Equatoria Province policy of harnessing units of descent and kinship, in the hope ultimately of building tribes. By this time, however, the Condominium government was already moving away from Indirect Rule ideologies and beginning to promote territorial ‘Local Government’ on the model of English counties and parishes, governed by local councils. In the southern provinces this was expected to be a very gradual process, and administrators tended to modify the terminology rather than the basis of Native Administration, turning the existing chiefs' B courts into councils. But they did adopt the new policy with some relief, as justification for their previously pragmatic efforts to create territorial units of administration. Largely abandoning their quest for the elusive ‘tribe’, they concentrated now on the further ‘amalgamation’ of chiefships into larger territorial chiefdoms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Dealing with Government in South Sudan
Histories of Chiefship, Community and State
, pp. 107 - 124
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×