Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:34:32.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Day Fines in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Michael Faure
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

This chapter deals with the penalty of day fines in Spanish criminal law, examined both from the perspective of its legal regulation and its practical implementation. Particular attention is paid to explaining a remarkable peculiarity of the way in which day fines are applied in Spanish judicial practice: routinely lawyers, prosecutors and judges pay only superficial attention to the indications of the Spanish Penal Code as to how the daily fees of this penalty should be calculated. Hypothetically, the sole criterion for setting the daily unit should be the overall financial situation of the convicted, including not only his regular personal income but also property and other assets, debts, other sources of income, family obligations and other personal circumstances. However, in practice, in the vast majority of cases certain routine quantities are used through a method that is halfway between custom and intuition. Therefore, it can be said that theday fines system in Spain represents, instead of a way to take wealth seriously, rather one of taking income lightly

Type
Chapter
Information
Day Fines in Europe
Assessing Income-Based Sanctions in Criminal Justice Systems
, pp. 238 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barquín Sanz, J. and del Castillo, Luna, J. D. 2012. ‘En los dominios de la prisión: distribución numérica de las penas en el código y en la justicia penal’, Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología 1416: 152.Google Scholar
Barquín Sanz, J., Cano Paños, M. Á. and Calvo Alba, M. Á. 2018. ‘Resocialización y encuestas de calidad de vida penitenciaria’, Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología 20: 251–85.Google Scholar
Baumann, J. 1968. ‘Was erwarten wir von der Strafrechtsreform?’, in Baumann, J. (ed.), Programm für ein neues Strafgesetzbuch. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bücherei.Google Scholar
Brandáriz García, J. A. 2015. ‘La evolución del sistema penitenciario español, 1995–2014: Transformaciones de la penalidad y modificación práctica de la realidad penitenciaria’, Crítica Penal y Poder 9: 131.Google Scholar
Cano Paños, M. Á. 2016. ‘50 años del Proyecto Alternativo del Código Penal Alemán (1966–2016)’, Cuadernos de Política Criminal 119: 73120.Google Scholar
Cardenal Montraveta, S. 2020. La pena de multa. Estudio sobre su justificación y la determinación de su cuantía. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar
Díez Ripollés, J. L. 2006. ‘La evolución del sistema de penas en España: 1975-2003’, Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología 08–07: 125.Google Scholar
Dünkel, F. 2017. ‘European Penology: The Rise and Fall of Prison Population Rates in Europe in Times of Migrant Crises and Terrorism’, European Journal of Criminology 14: 629–53.Google Scholar
Faraldo Cabana, P. 2015. ‘Novedades en la pena de responsabilidad personal subsidiaria por impago de multa (arts. 35 in fine y 53.1)’, in González Cussac, J. L. (ed.), Comentarios a la Reforma Penal de 2015. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Faraldo Cabana, P. 2017. Money and the Governance of Punishment. A Genealogy of the Penal Fine. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garcés Peregrina, J. M. 2014. ‘El enjuiciamiento de los delitos urbanísticos en la provincia de Málaga’, Jueces para la Democracia 81: 126–51.Google Scholar
García San Martín, J. 2015. Las medidas alternativas al cumplimiento de las penas privativas de libertad: adaptado a las reformas del Código penal y de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal de 2015. Madrid: Dykinson.Google Scholar
González Tascón, M. M., Loredo Colunga, M., Roca Agapito, L., Villa Sieiro, S. V., Albuerne Gutiérrez, M. A. and Bravo Arteaga, A. 2015. ‘Aproximación a la pena de trabajos en beneficio de la comunidad a partir de la evidencia empírica: la aplicación judicial de la pena’, Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología 17–08: 126.Google Scholar
Gracia Martín, L., Boldova Pasamar, M. Á. and Alastuey Dobón, C. (eds.) 2016. Lecciones de consecuencias jurídicas del delito. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Killias, M., Aebi, M. A. and Kuhn, A. 2012. Précis de criminologie. Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
Mapelli Caffarena, B. 2011. Las consecuencias jurídicas del delito. Pamplona: Civitas.Google Scholar
Martínez-Buján Pérez, C. 1997. ‘La regulación de la pena de multa en el Código Penal Español de 1995. (Los días-multa y la multa proporcional, con referencia a la responsabilidad personal subsidiaria en caso de impago)’, Estudios penales y criminológicos 20: 225–86.Google Scholar
Mir Puig, S. 2016. Derecho penal. Parte general. Barcelona: Reppertor.Google Scholar
Moliné, J. C. and Larrauri Pijoan, E. (eds.) 2002. Jueces penales y penas en España. Aplicación de las penas alternativas a la privación de libertad en los juzgados de lo penal. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Morillas Cueva, L. 1991. Teoría de las consecuencias jurídicas del delito. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
Morillas Cueva, L. and Barquín Sanz, J. (eds.) 2013. La aplicación de las alternativas a la pena de prisión en España. Madrid: Defensor del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Roca Agapito, L. 2007. El sistema de sanciones en el Derecho penal español. Barcelona: J.M. Bosch.Google Scholar
Roldán Barbero, H. 1982. El dinero, objeto fundamental de la sanción penal: un estudio histórico de la moderna pena de multa. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Suárez López, J. M. 2013. ‘Multa’, in Cueva, L. Morillas and Sanz, J. Barquín (eds.), La aplicación de las alternativas a la pena de prisión en España. Madrid: Defensor del Pueblo,Google Scholar
Varona Gómez, D. 2004. ‘El arresto de fin de semana: lecciones a aprender de su breve historia. (Sobre las razones y excusas para su reforma)’, Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología 13: 4780.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×