Book contents
- Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Current Perspectives in Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Dynamics of Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Section 1 The Co-emergence of Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Section 2 The Situated Brain
- 5 Culture in Mind – An Enactivist Account
- 6 The Brain as a Cultural Artifact
- 7 Cultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
- 8 Culture, Self, and Agency
- Section 3 How Social Coordination and Cooperation are Achieved
- Part II Applications
- Index
- References
7 - Cultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
from Section 2 - The Situated Brain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Current Perspectives in Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Dynamics of Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Section 1 The Co-emergence of Culture, Mind, and Brain
- Section 2 The Situated Brain
- 5 Culture in Mind – An Enactivist Account
- 6 The Brain as a Cultural Artifact
- 7 Cultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
- 8 Culture, Self, and Agency
- Section 3 How Social Coordination and Cooperation are Achieved
- Part II Applications
- Index
- References
Summary
Culture as shared values/beliefs and behavioral scripts not only influences human behavior and cognition but modulates the underlying brain activity as well. Cultural impacts on the human brain have been investigated by cultural neuroscience research that examines cultural group differences in brain activities involved in specific cognitive/affective processes. The findings, however, do not allow inference of causal relationships between specific cultural values/beliefs and brain activity. Cultural priming approach tests how brain activities underlying various cognitive/affective processes are modulated by recent exposure to specific cultural symbols or activation of specific cultural values/beliefs. Increasing evidence indicates that cultural priming leads to subsequent changes of brain activities in response to perception, attention, reward, self-reflection, etc. The findings suggest that culture provides a key frame in which the human brain develops and functions to mediate multiple cognitive and affective processes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Culture, Mind, and BrainEmerging Concepts, Models, and Applications, pp. 223 - 243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Blakemore, S. J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–77. https://doi.org/10.11038/nrn2353Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this ‘we’? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83Google Scholar
Bromm, B., & Chen, A. C. N. (1995). Brain electrical source analysis of laser evoked potentials in response to painful trigeminal nerve stimulation. Electroencephalography of Clinical Neurophysiology, 95(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(95)00032-TGoogle Scholar
Cheon, B. K., Im, D.-m., Harada, T., Kim, J.-S., Mathur, V. A., Scimeca, J. M., Parrish, T. B., Park, H. W., & Chiao, J. Y. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. NeuroImage, 57(2), 642–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiao, J. Y., & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In: Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 237–54). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Komeda, H., Li, Z., Mano, Y., Saito, D., Parrish, T. B., Sadato, N., & Iidaka, T. (2009). Dynamic cultural influences on neural representations of the self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21192Google Scholar
Christmann, C., Koeppe, C., Braus, D., Ruf, M., & Flora, H. (2007). A simultaneous EEG-fMRI study of painful electrical stimulation. NeuroImage, 34, 1428–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.006Google Scholar
Colzato, L. S., de Bruijn, E. R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00341Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). ‘I’ value freedom, but ‘we’ value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00162Google Scholar
Han, S. (2015). Understanding cultural differences in human behavior: A cultural neuroscience approach. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.013Google Scholar
Han, S. (2017). The sociocultural brain: A cultural neuroscience approach to human nature. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2016). Self-construal: A cultural framework for brain function. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.013Google Scholar
Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2014). Cultural differences in human brain activity: A quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 99, 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.062Google Scholar
Han, S., & Ma, Y. (2015). A culture-behavior-brain loop model of human development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 666–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.010Google Scholar
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 646–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2456Google Scholar
Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B. E., Kitayama, S., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2013). A cultural neuroscience approach to the biosocial nature of the human brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 335–59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071112-054629Google Scholar
Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02038.xGoogle Scholar
Hong, Y.-y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–20. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.7.709Google Scholar
Hong, Y., Wan, C., No, S., & Chiu, C-.y. (2007). Multicultural identities. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 323–46). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Yanagisawa, K., Ito, A., Ueda, R., Uchida, Y., & Abe, N. (2017). Reduced orbitofrontal cortical volume is associated with interdependent self-construal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7969–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704831114Google Scholar
Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(5), 492–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00011-2Google Scholar
Lin, Z., & Han, S. (2009). Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 802–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802271650Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Lin, Y., & Han, S. (2008). Self-construal priming modulates visual activity underlying global/local perception. Biological Psychology, 77(1), 93–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.002Google Scholar
Luo, S., Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Li, B., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Li, X., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2015). Interaction between oxytocin receptor polymorphism and interdependent culture on human empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1273–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv019Google Scholar
Luo, S., Yu, D., & Han, S. (2017). 5-HTTLPR moderates the association between interdependence and brain responses to mortality threats. Human Brain Mapping, 38(12), 6157–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23819Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Bang, D., Wang, C., Allen, M., Frith, C., Roepstorff, A., & Han, S. (2014). Sociocultural patterning of neural activity during self-reflection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss103Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Wang, C., Li, B., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Does self-construal predict activity in the social brain network? A genetic moderation effect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(9), 1360–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst125Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Hamedani, M. G. (2007). Sociocultural psychology: The dynamic interdependence among self systems and social systems. In Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 3–39). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557Google Scholar
Martínez, A., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz, D. J., Wong, E. C., Hinrichs, H., Heinze, H. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2(4), 364–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/7274Google Scholar
Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 51(4), 1468–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyamoto, Y. (2013). Culture and analytic versus holistic cognition: Toward multilevel analysis of cultural influences. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 131–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00003-6Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Kitayama, S., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15348–53. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112Google Scholar
Ng, S. H., Han, S., Mao, L., & Lai, J. C. L. (2010). Dynamic bicultural brains: fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01303.xGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. H., & Lai, J. C. L. (2009). Effects of culture priming on the social connectedness of the bicultural self: A self-reference effect approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 170–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108328818Google Scholar
Oyserman, D. (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 164–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.627187Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2007). Priming “culture”: Culture as situated cognition. In Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D.. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 255–79). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Novin, S., Flinkenflögel, N., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Integrating culture-as-situated-cognition and neuroscience prediction models. Culture and Brain, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-014-0016-6Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216Google Scholar
Peyron, R., Laurent, B., & García-Larrea, L. (2000). Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000). Neurophysiologie Clinique, 30(5), 263–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-6Google Scholar
Shaw, C., & McEachern, J. (Eds.). (2001). Toward a theory of neuroplasticity. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sui, J., & Han, S. (2007). Self-construal priming modulates neural substrates of self-awareness. Psychological Science, 18(10), 861–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01992.xGoogle Scholar
Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Chiu, C.-y. (2007). Bicultural mind, self-construal, and self-and-mother reference effects: Consequences of cultural priming on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 818–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.005Google Scholar
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2018). 2018 Revision of world urbanization prospects. New York, NY: Population Division of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3(3), 177–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000001Google Scholar
Varnum, M. E. W., Shi, Z., Chen, A., Qiu, J., & Han, S. (2014). When “your” reward is the same as “my” reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends’ rewards. NeuroImage, 87, 164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.042Google Scholar
Wang, C., Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2014). Self-construal priming modulates pain perception: Event-related potential evidence. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(1), 3–9. http://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.797388Google Scholar
Wang, C., Oyserman, D., Liu, Q., Li, H., & Han, S. (2013). Accessible cultural mind-set modulates default mode activity: Evidence for the culturally situated brain. Social Neuroscience, 8(3), 203–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.775966Google Scholar
Wang, C., Oyserman, D., Liu, Q., Li, H., & Han, S. (2015). Challenging emotional prejudice by changing self-concept: Priming independent self-construal reduces racial in-group bias in neural responses to other’s pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv005Google Scholar
Wang, F., Peng, K., Chechlacz, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2017). The neural basis of independence versus interdependence orientations: A voxel-based morphometric analysis of brain volume. Psychological Science, 28(4), 519–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689079Google Scholar
Wong, R. Y.-M., & Hong, Y.-y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16(6), 429–34. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01552.xGoogle Scholar
Zaslansky, R., Sprecher, E., Tenke, C. E., Hemli, J. A., & Yarnitsky, D. (1996). The P300 in pain evoked potentials. Pain, 66(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(96)03020-5Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1310–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047Google Scholar