Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: April 2014

Chapter 20 - Incubator management

from Section 2 - Culture systems

References

1. Boone WR, Higdon HL III, Skelton WD. How to design and implement an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cleanroom. Clin Embryologist 2007;10:5–17, vi.
2. Johnson JE, Boone WR, Bernard RS. The effects of volatile compounds (VC) on the outcome of in vitro mouse embryo culture. Fertil Steril 1993;60(Suppl 1):S98–9.
3. Boone WR, Johnson JE, Locke A-J, Crane MM IV, Price TM. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 1999;71:150–4.
4. von Wyl S, Bersinger NA. Air quality in the IVF laboratory: results and survey. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:347–8.
5. Cohen J, Gilligan A, Willadsen S. Culture and quality control of embryos. Hum Reprod 1998;13(Suppl 3):137–47.
6. Higdon HL III, Blackhurst DW, Boone WR. Incubator management in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 2008;89:703–10.
7. Merton JS, Vermeulen ZL, Otter T, et al. Carbon-activated gas filtration during in vitro culture increased pregnancy rate following transfer of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2007;67:1233–8.
8. Geisthövel F, Ochsner A, Gilligan AV. Environmental evaluation of assisted reproduction techniques laboratories in Germany and the United States of America. In: Kumar A, Mukhopadhyay AK, eds. Follicular Growth, Ovulation and Fertilization: Molecular and Clinical Basis. New Delhi, India, Narosa Publishing House. 2001;184–98.
9. Worrilow KC, Huynh HT, Gwozdziewicz JB, Schillings WA, Peters AJ. A retrospective analysis: the examination of a potential relationship between particulate (P) and volatile organic compound (VOC) levels in a class 100 IVF laboratory cleanroom (CR) and specific parameters of embryogenesis and rates of implantation (IR). Fertil Steril 2001;76(Suppl 1):S15–16.
10. Battaglia DE, Khabani A, Rainer C, Moore DE. Prospective randomized trial of incubator CODA filtration units revealed no effect on outcome parameters for IVF. Fertil Steril 2001;75(Suppl 1):6S.
11. Ozawa M, Nagai T, Kaneko H, et al. Successful pig embryonic development in vitro outside a CO2 gas-regulated incubator: effects of pH and osmolality. Theriogenology 2006;65:860–9.
12. Johnson JE, Boone WR, Lee ST, Blackhurst DW. Using Fyrite to monitor incubator carbon dioxide levels. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995;12:113–17.
13. Boone WR, Johnson JE, Lee ST, Detry MA, Blackhurst DW. Sources of variation in measurements of carbon dioxide levels inside incubators. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:606–8.
14. Turczynski C, Frilot C, Sartor S, Webster B, Marino A. Electro-magnetic fields: a quality control issue for the IVF laboratory. Embryol Newsletter 1997;2–11, vi.
15. Wamil BD, Holcomb RR, Wamil AW, Rogers BJ, McLean MJ. Effect of static magnetic fields on human sperm penetration. Fertil Steril 1992;58:S166.
16. Zusman I, Yaffe P, Pinus H, Ornoy A. Effects of pulsing electromagnetic fields on the prenatal and postnatal development in mice and rats: in vivo and in vitro studies. Teratology 1990;42:157–70.
17. Zervins A. Chick embryo development in a 26-KHz electromagnetic field. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1973;34:120–7.
18. Maffeo S, Brayman AA, Miller MW, et al. Weak low frequency electromagnetic fields and chick embryogenesis: failure to reproduce positive findings. J Anat 1988;157:101–4.
19. Maffeo S, Miller MW, Carstensen EL. Lack of effect of weak low frequency electromagnetic fields on chick embryogenesis. J Anat 1984;139:613–18.
20. Martin AH. Magnetic fields and time dependent effects on development. Bioelectromagnetics 1988;9:393–6.
21. Mild KH, Wilén J, Mattsson MO, Simko, M. Background ELF magnetic fields in incubators: a factor of importance in cell culture work. Cell Biol Int 2009;33:755–7.
22. Fujiwara M, Takahashi K, Izuno M, et al. Effect of micro-environment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization: comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:5–9.
23. Boone WR, Shapiro SS. Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory. Theriogenology 1990;33:23–50.
24. Avery B, Melsted JK, Greve T. A novel approach for in vitro production of bovine embryos: use of the Oxoid atmosphere generating system. Theriogenology 2000;54:1259–68.
25. McKiernan SH, Bavister BD. Environment variables influence in vitro development of hamster 2-cell embryos to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod 1990;43:404–13.
26. Gardner DK, Lane M. Alleviation of the ‘2-cell block’ and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: role of amino acids, EDTA, and physical parameters. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2703–12.
27. Mortimer D, Henman MJ, Jansen RPS. Development of an Improved Embryo Culture System for Clinical Human IVF. Brisbane, Cook Australia, 2002;1–38.