Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T09:51:46.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Nothing to Believe In – Lawyers in Contemporary Films About Public Interest Litigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Michael McCann
Affiliation:
Political Science, Law, Societies and Justice, University of Washington
William Haltom
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Puget Sound
Austin Sarat
Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts
Stuart Scheingold
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

“Ya know why everyone thinks that all lawyers are back-stabbing, blood sucking scum bags? Because they are.”

(Julia Roberts, Erin Brockovich)

“If somebody like her came to see me back in New York with this dogshit case … you know what I'd do? I'd take it. Settle quick, pocket the contingency … make more money than her, never see a courtroom.”

(Woody Harrelson, North Country)

A cavalcade of American films over the last fifteen years has addressed legal challenges by lawyers representing ordinary citizens who have been harmed by products or practices of large private corporations. The types of legal actions featured in these films are very much like one familiar form of public interest litigation that we ordinarily associate with cause lawyering. According to some critical observers, these films reflect a strong liberal and pro-lawyer bias. These films, we are told, portray modern mass corporations and other large entities as lawless symbionts driven by the amoral and immoral pursuit of profits and awash in reckless and unaccountable perfidies. At the same time, these films purportedly portray the “trial lawyer as (the) hero” who most successfully challenges the corporation, its unlawful practices, or its owners. In this common reading, contemporary films offer simplistic narratives celebrating left-wing cause lawyering on behalf of victimized American consumers and workers.

Such “good press” for cause lawyers would, if plausible, be a novel development in U.S. cultural history.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×