Book contents
- Half title page
- Ideas in Context
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Introduction
- Chapter I The untimely generation
- Chapter II The problem of politics in Arendt’s and Strauss’s early writings
- Chapter III History and political understanding: An ambivalent symbiosis
- Chapter IV Liberalism and modernity: Rethinking the question of the “proud”
- Chapter V Retrieving the problem oftheoriaandpraxis: The antagonisms
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Ideas in Context
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Introduction
- Chapter I The untimely generation
- Chapter II The problem of politics in Arendt’s and Strauss’s early writings
- Chapter III History and political understanding: An ambivalent symbiosis
- Chapter IV Liberalism and modernity: Rethinking the question of the “proud”
- Chapter V Retrieving the problem oftheoriaandpraxis: The antagonisms
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index
- Ideas in Context
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Crisis of German HistoricismThe Early Political Thought of Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss, pp. 196 - 220Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Adorno, Theodor, and Horkheimer, Max (1972)(1947): Dialectic of Enlightenment, New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel (2004): “Who Lost the Chicago School of Political Science?” Perspectives. Forum on the Chicago School of Political Science 2, No. 1, March, 91–92.Google Scholar
Briefs, Goetz (1930–31): “Der klassische Liberalismus,” Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie 24, 90–124.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Scott (1955): “Review of Natural Right and History,” Lawyers Guild Review, April 20, 34.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1981)(1918): Kant’s Life and Thought, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1971): Reason and Hope: Selections from the Jewish Writings of Hermann Cohen, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert (1929): “Soziologie – und ihre Grenzen,” Neue Schweizer Rundschau 22, October.Google Scholar
Dibelius, Martin (1927): “The Structure and Literary Character of the Gospels,” Harvard Theological Review 20, No. 3, July, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibelius, Martin (1931): “Jesus in Contemporary German Theology,” Journal of Religion 11, No. 2. April, 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eger, H. (1930): Review of Arendt’s dissertation, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 49, 257–259.Google Scholar
Samuel, Eldersveld, Heard, Alexander, Huntington, Samuel, Janowitz, Morris, Leiserson, Avery, and Truman, David (1952): “Research in Political Behavior,” American Political Science Review 46, No. 4, December, p. 1003–1045.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle (1963): “For Spaces of Freedom: On Revolution, By Hannah Arendt,” American Scholar 32, No. 2, Spring, 316–318.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich, Gotlein, Fritz, Löwenthal, Leo, Simon, Ernst, and Michaelis, Ernst (1922): “Das prinzipielle Wort der Frankfurter,” Jüdische Rundschau, December 19.Google Scholar
Gogarten, Friedrich (1920): “Zwischen den Zeiten,” Die Christliche Welt 34, No. 24, 374–78.Google Scholar
Gundolf, Friedrich (1924): “Schleiermachers Romantik,” Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 2, No. 2, 418–509.Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf (1908): Das Wesen des Christentums: Sechzehn Vorlesungen vor Studierenden aller Facultäten im Wintersemester an der Universität Berlin, Leipzig: Hinrichs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1985)(1925): History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (2000): “The Idea of Philosophy and the Problem of Worldview” (“Die Idee der Philosophie und das Weltanschauungsproblem” (1919)), “Phenomenology and Transcendendal Philosophy of Value” (“Phänomenologie und transzendentale Wertphilosophie” (1919)), Towards the Definition of Philosophy, London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1997)(1929): Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (2001) (1921–1922): Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hessen, J. (1931): “Review of Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin by Hannah Arendt,” Kantstudien 36, 175.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1930): Anfänge der bürgerlichen Gesichtsphilosophie, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1970) (1934): The Crisis of the European Sciences, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Idzerda, Stanley (1964): “On Revolution by Hannah Arendt,” American Historical Review 69, No. 2, 406–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanbegloo, Ramin (1992): Conversations with Isaiah Berlin: Recollections of an Historian of Ideas, New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl, and Bultmann, Rudolf (2005)(1954): Myth and Christianity: An Inquiry into the Possibility of Religion without Myth, New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Karádi, Eva, and Vezér, Erzsebet (eds.)(1987): “Heidelberger Briefe,” Georg Lukács, Karl Mannheim und der Sonntagskreis, Frankfurt am Main: Sendler.Google Scholar
Krüger, Gerhard (1931): Philosophie und Moral in der kantischen Kritik, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1941): “Towards a Science of Democracy,” Science, Philosophy and Religion, Bryson, and Finkelstein, (eds.), New York: Conference on Science, Philosophy, and Religion, Inc, 85–87.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold, and Atkins, Willard (1924): Labor Attitudes and Problems, New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lippincott, Benjamin (1940): “The Bias of American Political Science,” Journal of Politics 2, No. 2, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwith, Karl (1942): “M. Heidegger and F. Rosenzweig or Temporality and Eternity,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3, No. 1, September, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1924): “Historismus,” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 52, 1–60.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1928–1929): “Das Problem der Generationen,” Kölner Vierteljahrshefte 7, Nos. 2–3, 157–185, 309–330.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1929): “Problems of Sociology in Germany,” Knowledge and Politics. The Sociology of Knowledge Dispute, Meja, Volker and Stehr, Niko (eds.), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1934): “German Sociology (1918–1933),” Politica ed Economia, Vol. 1, February, 12–33.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1924): Die Idee der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte, Munich: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1921): “The Present State of the Study of Politics,” The American Political Science Review 15, No. 2, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1925): Presidential address, American Political Science Association, American Political Science Review 20, No. 1, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Franz (1942): Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reuschlein, Harold Gill (1954): “Review of Natural Right and History,” Harvard Law Review 68, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich (1929): Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung: Eine logische Einleitung in die historische Wissenschaften, Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Riezler, Kurt (1929): “Davoser Hochschulwochen 1929,” Neue Zürcher Zeitung, No. 609, March 30, morning edition.Google Scholar
Robinson, James (ed.) (1968): Beginnings of Dialectical Theology, Vol. 1, Richmond: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (1988): His Life and Thought, Glatzer, N. (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (2000): Philosophical and Theological Writings, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (2005)(1921): The Star of Redemption, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Schelsky, Helmut (1936–1937): “Die Totalität des Staates bei Hobbes,” Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie 31, 176–193.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2005)(1922): Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2007) (1927): The Concept of the Political, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1977): Von Berlin nach Jerusalem: Jugenderinnerungen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, Ernst (1991)(1889): “Historical and Dogmatic Method in Theology,” Religion in History, Minneapolis, MI: Fortress.Google Scholar
Wellek, Rene (1968): “The Literary Criticism of Friedrich Gundolf,” Contemporary Literature 9, No. 3, Summer, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Benno (1982): Ich erzähle mein Leben – Erinnerrungen, Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Zepf, M. (1932): Review of Arendt’s Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin, Gnomon 8, 101–105.Google Scholar
“Die Davoser Hochschulkurse,” Frankfurter Zeitung, morning edition,, 73/206, Monday, March 18, 1929.Google Scholar
Adcock, Robert, Bevir, Mark, and Stimson, Shannon (2007): Modern Political Science. Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Althaus, Claudia (2000): Erfahrung Denken: Hannah Arendts Weg von der Zeitgeschichte zur politischen Theorie, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Altman, William (2007): “Leo Strauss on “German Nihilism”: Learning the Art of Writing,” Journal of the History of Ideas 68, No. 4, 587–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, William (2011): The German Stranger: Leo Strauss and National Socialism, Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Aschheim, Steven E. (2001): In Times of Crisis: Essays on European culture, Germans, and Jews, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Aschheim, Steven E. (2007): Beyond the Border: The German-Jewish Legacy Abroad, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre (1992): “Philosophie und Politik: Die Davoser Disputation zwischen Ernst Cassirer und Martin Heidegger in der Retrospektive,” Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1, No. 2, 290–312.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence (ed.): Political Theory and Praxis: New Perspectives, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bambach, Charles (1995): Heidegger, Dilthey and the Crisis of Historicism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batnitzky, Leora (2006): Leo Strauss and Emmanuel Levinas: Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, Ronald (1990): “Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: The Uncommenced Dialogue,” Political Theory 18, No. 2, 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1988): “Hannah Arendt und die erlösende Kraft des Erzählens,” Zivilizationsbruch: Denken nach Auschwitz, Diner, Dan (ed.), Frankfurt am Main: Ficher, 150–174.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1996): The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Benhegar, Nasser (2003): Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Adcock, Robert (2007): “The Remaking of Political Theory,” Modern Political Science. Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880, Adcock, R., Bevir, M., and Stimson, S., (eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bialas, Wolfgang, and Iggers, Georg (eds.) (1996): Intellektuelle in der Weimarer Republik, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bleek, Wilhelm (2001): Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft in Deutschland, Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Bleek, Wilhelm, and Lietzmann, Hans (eds.) (1999): Schulen in der deutschen Politikwissenschaft, Opladen: Leske and Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluhm, Harald (1999): “Variationen des Höhlengleichnisses: Kritik und Restitution politischer Philosophie bei Hannah Arendt und Leo Strauss,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 47, No. 6, 911–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolz, Norbert (1989): Auszug aus der entzauberten Welt: Philosophischer Extremismus zwischen den Weltkriegen, Munich: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Michael (1996): The Renaissance of Jewish Culture in Weimar Germany, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret (1990): “Socrates or Heidegger? Hannah Arendt’s Reflections on Philosophy and Politics,”Social Research 57, No. 1, 135–165..Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret (1992): Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Peter and Williams, Bernard (1988): “Hobbes en Allemagne,” Archives de Philosophie, Bulletin Hobbes I, 51, 0, 240–253.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard (1959): The American Science of Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diemer, Alwin (ed.) (1978): Konzeption und Begriff der Forschung in den Wissenschaften des 19. Jahrhunderts, Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa Jane (1994): Hannah Arendt and the Limits of Philosophy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Euben, Peter (1996): “Creatures of a Day: Thought and Action in Thucydides,” Political Theory and Praxis. New Perspectives, Ball, Terence (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 28–56.Google Scholar
Foisneau, Luc (ed.) (2005): Leviathan Between the Wars, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frenzel, Ivo, “Utopia and Apocalypse in German Literature,” Social Research 39, No. 2, 306–321.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2000): A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger, Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften in den 20ger Jahren: Heidelberger Impulse, Symposium vom 20 Januar 1995, 1998, Heidelberg: Ulmer Peter.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter Eli (2003): Rosenzweig and Heidegger: Between Judaism and German Philosophy, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter Eli (2004): “Continental Divide: Ernst Cassirer and Martin Heidegger at Davos – An Allegory of Intellectual History,” Modern Intellectual History 1, No. 2, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter Eli (2007): “The Concept of the Apolitical: German Jewish Thought and Weimar Political Theology,” Social Research 74, No. 3, Fall, 862–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Simon (1995): “The Tawney-Strauss Connection: On Historicism and Values in the History of Political Ideas,” Journal of Modern History 67, June, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunenberg, Antonia (2006): Hannah Arendt und Martin Heidegger. Geschichte einer Liebe, Munich, Zurich: Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (1988): “American Political Science, Liberalism, and the Invention of Political Theory,” American Political Science Review 82, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John (1993): The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (1994): “Strauss Before Straussianism: Reason, Revelation and Nature,” Leo Strauss, Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker, Deutsch, K. and Nicgorski, W. (eds.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 107–129.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John (2004): Imagining the American Polity: Political Science and the Discourse of Democracy, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hardtwig, Wolfgang (1990): Geschichtskultur und Wissenschaft, Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Hinchman, Lewis (1984): “In Heidegger’s Shadow: Hannah Arendt’s Phenomenological Humanism,” Review of Politics 46, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, Bonnie (1991): “Declarations of Independence: Arendt and Derrida on the Problem of Founding a Republic,” American Political Science Review 85, No. 1, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iggers, Georg (1968): The German Conception of History. The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Friedrich (1996): “Theorietypen der Krise des Historismus,” Die Historismusdebatte in der Weimarer Republik. Bialas, W. and Raulet, G. (eds.), Frankfurt/Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien: Lang, 52–70.Google Scholar
Jahanbegloo, Ramin (1992): Conversations with Isaiah Berlin: Recollections of an Historian of Ideas, London: Peter Halban.Google Scholar
Janssens, David (2003): “The Problem of Enlightenment: Strauss, Jacobi, and the Pantheism Controversy,” Review of Metaphysics 56, No. 3, March, 605–632.Google Scholar
Janssens, David (2008): Between Athens and Jerusalem: Philosophy, Prophecy and Politics in Leo Strauss’s Early Work, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin (1973): The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923–1950, Boston: Little and Brown.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas (2008): Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielmansegg, Peter Graf, Mewes, Horst, and Glaser-Schmidt, Elisabeth (eds.) (1995): Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Émigrés and American Political Thought after World War II. Washington, D.C.: German Historical Institute (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (2001): Hannah Arendt: Life Is a Narrative, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krois, John Michael (1992): “Aufklärung und Metaphysik: Zur Philosophie Cassirers und der Davoser Debatte mit Heidegger,” Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, Heft 2, 283–289.Google Scholar
Köhnke, Klaus Christian (1986): Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus: Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Laskin, David (2000): Partisans: Marriage, Politics and Betrayal Among the New York Intellectuals, New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
Lazier, Benjamin (2008): God Interrupted: Heresy and the European Imagination Between the World Wars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laube, Reinhard (2004): Karl Mannheim und die Krise des Historismus: Historismus als wissensoziologischer Perspektivismus, Veröffentlichungen Des Max-Planck-Instituts Für Geschichte, 196, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, David (1997): The Practical Imagination. The German Sciences of State in the Nineteenth Century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobkowitz, Nicholas (1996): “On the History of Theory and Praxis,” Political Theory and Praxis. New Perspectives, Ball, Terence (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 13–27.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles (1975): Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany and Italy in the Decade after WW I, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Major, Rafael (2005): “The Cambridge School and Leo Strauss: Texts and Context of American Political Science,” Political Science Quarterly 58, No. 3, September, 477–485.Google Scholar
McCormick, John (1994): “Fear, Technology and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany,” Political Theory 22, No. 4, November, 619–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Henrich (1995): Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Heinrich (1996): Die Denkbewegung von Leo Strauss: Die Geschichte der Philosophie und die Intention des Philosophen, Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Heinrich (2003): Das Theologisch-Politische Problem: Zum Thema von Leo Strauss, Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Heinrich (2005): “How Strauss Became Strauss,” Enlightening Revolutions: Essays in Honor of Ralph Lerner, Minkov, S. and Douard, S. (eds.), Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Meier, Heinrich (2006): Leo Strauss and the Theologico-Political Problem, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meja, Volker, and Stehr, Nico (eds.) (2001): Knowledge and Politics: The Sociology of Knowledge Dispute, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mewes, Horst (1992): “Modern Individualism: Reflections on Oakeshott, Arendt and Strauss,” Political Science Review 21, Spring, 116–147.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Hans (1991): From Weimar to Auschwitz: Essays in German History, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Myers, David (2004): Resisting History: Historicism and Its Discontents in German-Jewish Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Robert (2002): Secret Germany: Stefan George and His Circle, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oexle, Otto G. (1984): “Die Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeichen des Historismus,” Historische Zeitschrift 18, 17–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachter, Henry (1972): “The Intellectuals and the State of Weimar,” Social Research 39, No. 2, Summer, 228–253.Google Scholar
Pascher, Manfred (1997): Einführung in den Neukantianismus: Kontext, Grundpositionen, praktische Philosophie, Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert (2003): “The Unavailability of the Ordinary: Strauss on the Philosophical Fate of Modernity,” Political Theory 31, No. 3, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1992): “The Modern World of Leo Strauss,” Political Theory 20, No. 3, 448–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1973): Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History, New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1987): “The Concept of a Language and the métier d’historien: Some Considerations on Practice,” The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Pagden, A. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1981): “Action, Story and History: On Re-reading The Human Condition,” The Realm of Humanitas: Responses to the Writings of Hannah Arendt, Reuben, G. (ed.), New York: Peter Lang, 149–162.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred (1963): “Der Staatsbegriff der deutschen Geschichtsschreibung des 19. Jahrhunderts in seinem Verhältnis zur klassisch-politischen Philosophie,” Der Staat 2, 41–63.Google Scholar
Rüsen, Jörn (1993): Konfigurationen des Historismus: Studien zur deutschen Wissenschaftskultur, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sauer, Wolfgang (1972): “Weimar Culture: Experiments in Modernism,” Social Research 39, No. 2, Summer, 254–284.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond, and Harpham, Edward (1985): Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis 1884–1984, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan (1994): “Taking Evil Seriously: Schmitt’s ‘Concept of the Political’ and Strauss’s ‘True Politics,’” Leo Strauss, Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker, Deutsch, Kenneth and Nicgorski, Walter (eds.), Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 175–194.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Eugene (2006): Leo Strauss and the Politics of Exile: The Making of Political Philosopher, Waltham, Mass: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002): Visions of Politics, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven (2006): Reading Leo Strauss: Politics, Philosophy, Judaism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontheimer, Kurt (1968): Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik, Munich: Nymphenburger Verlagbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Tanguay, Daniel (2006): Leo Strauss: An Intellectual Biography, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan (1983–84): “Philosophy and History: Tradition and Interpretation in the Work of Leo Strauss,” Polity 16, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan, and Pangle, Thomas (1986): “Epilogue” to the 3rd edition of History of Political Philosophy, Strauss, L. and Cropsey, J. (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press,Google Scholar
Tully, James (ed.) (1988): Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Velkeley, Richard (2011): Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy: On Original Forgetting, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierhaus, Rudolf (1982): “Liberalismus” in the Brunner, Conze, Koselleck, Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, Vol. 3, Stuttgart: Klett- Cotta, 741–785.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana (1996): Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, Dana (2001): Socratic Citizenship, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowinckel, Annette (2001): Geschichtsbegriff und historisches Denken bei Hannah Arendt, Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Wittkau, Anette (1994): Historismus: Zur Geschichte des Begriffs und des Problems, Göttingen: Vandenboeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth (1984): Hannah Arendt. For Love of the World, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zank, Michael (ed.) (2002): Leo Strauss: The Early Writings (1921–1932), Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine, and Michael, Zuckert (2008): The Truth About Leo Strauss: Political Philosophy and American Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar