Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:38:15.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Regulating Terrorism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

By
John Braithwaite
Edited by
Brian Forst ,
Jack R. Greene  and
James P. Lynch
Brian Forst
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Jack R. Greene
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
James P. Lynch
Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

This essay argues that both the war and criminal justice models are too crude, particularly in their theory of deterrence, for responding to the problem of global terrorism. An alternative regulatory model is advanced that overlays the public health concepts of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention with other older ideas of containment of injustice and enlargement of justice. An interconnected web of controls might enable an over-determined prevention of terrorism that, in spite of its redundancy, could be more cost-effective than the war model, because the principle of responsiveness means parsimony in resort to expensive coercion. It is possible to have an evidence-based approach to regulating rare events like 9/11 terrorism by applying the principles of evidence-based regulation to micro-elements that are constitutive of macro-disasters. Viewed through this lens, support for pre-emptive wars on terrorism is not evidence-based, but grounded in other public philosophies, notably retribution.

RECONSIDERING DETERRENCE

An early version of this paper was presented at some conferences and published on the Internet in March 2002. The opening paragraph began: “Both the war model for confronting a transnational problem and the criminal justice model share a central commitment to the deterrence doctrine.” There is surely an important role for deterrence in confronting terrorism, especially if we deploy the more sophisticated models of deterrence of international relations (IR) theory, as opposed to those of criminology or law and economics. IR deterrence is more dynamic than the models that now dominate criminology.

Type
Chapter
Information
Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security , pp. 383 - 408
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Sayyid, M & Musatapha, K (2003) The Other Face of the Islamist Movement, Democracy and Rule of Law Project, Global Policy Program, Number 33. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.
Ayres, I & Braithwaite, J (1992) Responsive Regulation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Barnes, G (1999) “Procedural Justice in Two Contexts: Testing the Fairness of Diversionary Conferencing for Intoxicated Drivers.” Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland.
Blix, H (2004) Disarming Iraq, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J (1993) “Beyond Positivism: Learning from Contextual Integrated Strategies.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency vol 30, pp 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J (2003a) “Meta Risk Management and Responsive Regulation for Tax System Integrity.”Law and Policy vol 25, pp 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J (2003b) “Domination, Quiescence and Crime.” In Nagel, S. (ed) Policymaking and Peace: A Multinational Anthology, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J & Drahos, P (2000) Global Business Regulation, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J & Parker, C (1999) “Restorative Justice is Republican Justice.” In Walgrave, L & Bazemore, G. (eds) Restoring Juvenile Justice: An Exploration of the Restorative Justice Paradigm for Reforming Juvenile Justice, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J & Pettit, P (2000) “Republicanism and Restorative Justice: An Explanatory and Normative Connection.” In Strang, H & Braithwaite, J (eds) Restorative Justice: Philosophy to Practice, Ashgate Dartmouth, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Brehm, SS & Brehm, J W (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N (2001) September 11, Allen and Unwin, Crow's Nest, NSW.
Clarke, RA (2004) Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Collier, P (2000) Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and Their Implications for Policy, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cooley, JK (2000) Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
Cray, , Ed (1990) General of the Army: George C. Marshall Soldier and Statesman, WW Norton, New York.
Dershowitz, AM (2002) Why Terrorism Works, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Fandy, M (1999) Saudi Arabia and the Politics of Dissent, Palgrave, New York.Google Scholar
Ferrell, RH (1966) The American Secretaries of State and their Diplomacy: Volume XV: George C. Marshall, Cooper Square Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Frey, BS (2004a) Dealing with Terrorism: Stick or Carrot? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, BS (2004b) “Calculating Tragedy; Assessing the Costs of Terrorism.” Working Paper No. 25, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
Frum, D & Perle, R (2003) An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Gunaratna, R (2002) Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror, Scribe Publications, Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, B (2002) “Lessons of 9/11.” Testimony to United States Joint September 11, 2001 Inquiry Staff of the House and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence, October 8, 2002.
Studies, International Institute of Strategic (2003). Strategic Survey, 2002–3, International Institute for Strategic Studies, London.Google Scholar
Kennan, GF (1947) “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,”Foreign Affairs vol 25, pp 566–582.Google Scholar
Gilligan, J (2001) Preventing Violence, Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M (2004) The Lesser Evil, Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquard, R (2002) In the Name of Osama Bin Laden, Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
Kaldor, M (1999) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Neustadt, RE & May, EA (1986) Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Health, New South Wales Department of (2004) Checklist Flip Chart for Root Cause Analysis Teams, NSW Department of Health, Sydney.Google Scholar
Pettit, P (1997) Republicanism. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pilger, J (2002) The New Rulers of the World, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Pogue, FC (1966) George C. Marshall: Ordeal and Hope 1939–1942, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pogue, FC (1973) George C. Marshall: Organizer of Victory 1943–1945, Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pogue, FC (1987) George C. Marshall: Statesman 1945–1959, Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
Quandt, WB (2001) Peace Process: American Diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli Conflict Since 1967, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Sherman, LW (1993) “Defiance, Deterrence and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction,”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency vol 30, pp 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, M (2000) The Regulatory Craft, Brookings, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stoller, MA (1989) George C. Marshall: Soldier-Statesman of the American Century, Twayne Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
Touval, S & Zartman, IW (1985) International Mediation in Theory and Practice, Westview Press, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar
Touval, S (1989) “Mediation in International Conflicts.” In Kressel, K & Pruitt DG (eds) Mediation Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Turner, JC with Hogg, MA Oakes, PJ, Reicher, SD & Wetherell, MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
Tutu, D (1999) No Future Without Forgiveness, Rider, London.Google Scholar
Tyler, T (1990) Why People Obey the Law, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Congress, US (2004) Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, US Government Printing Service, Washington, DC.
House, White (2003) “Fact Sheet: Progress in the Global War on Terrorism.” The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, July 1, Washington, DC.
Wilkinson, P (2000) Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response, Frank Cass, London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Regulating Terrorism
  • Edited by Brian Forst, American University, Washington DC, Jack R. Greene, Northeastern University, Boston, James P. Lynch, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Regulating Terrorism
  • Edited by Brian Forst, American University, Washington DC, Jack R. Greene, Northeastern University, Boston, James P. Lynch, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Regulating Terrorism
  • Edited by Brian Forst, American University, Washington DC, Jack R. Greene, Northeastern University, Boston, James P. Lynch, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
  • Book: Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security
  • Online publication: 04 February 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976384.017
Available formats
×